Semester 2 Lecture Notes
Teleology- the study of order and purpose
Aristotle advocates for an empirical viewpoint
Empiricism- truth and knowledge can be acquired through sense observation
Thinks all human being are born as tabula rasa which means blank slate
We are born with no knowledge and we acquire it through experience
Aristotle and Plato have different ideas about the purpose of philosophy
Aristotle focused on everything in the world such as meteorology, animal/marine life, politics, and metaphysics
The papers of Aristotle have been long gone and currently only have access to lecture notes or notes that students took
Aristotle believed that the universe is a combination of substances
Substance is the matter and form
Primary substance is the primary core of something
Accidents are called secondary substances
Human Nature = rational and political animal
Equality of Substance
Inequality
Form, matter
Someone who has a stronger body is better built for rule
Slaves are still capable of virtue because they are still human
Since humans have rationality we are different from other animals
Genus of something is the classification or general type of something
Animal = rational
genus = species
He believes that substances don’t evolve into something else but they can cease to exist
Extendable means it occupies space
Nutritive/Vegetative Soul
Nutrition
Growth
Reproduction
Sensible/Animal Soul
Sense perception
locomotion
Desires/sensations
nutrition/growth/reproduction
Rational Soul
Thought/rationality
Humor/risibility
Judgement of value/morality
Comes up with the idea of atoms
Originally from Greek
Called “uncuttables”
There is some component of reality where you cannot keep breaking down pieces
There could never be nothing, everything comes from something
Either you’re made of atoms or empty space, no in between
Aristotle did not believe in this
Didn’t think atoms were a real thing
The universe is eternal and boundless
Atoms just are
They were always there
Atoms move continuously forever
Death = cessation of sensation
Ataraxia = tranquility/absence of struggle
Hedonism = the object of all action is pleasure/delight/enjoyment
Pleasure:
Moving: short term
Static: long term
Physical: immediate and present to us
Mental: memory, thought, lofty
Desire:
Natural and Necessary
Natural and Unnecessary
Vain and Empty
Natural Law
Universal reason or Logos
Material Monism
Active principle: Logos
Passive principle: Matter
Living according to how the Logos has ordered us
Not us a sense of command but living according to nature
When you wish for things to be different thats when you become miserable
Leads to people being evil
You must accept the way things actually are
Some Stoics thought that the universe was perfectly ordered
Pantheism: is the belief that the universe and nature are divine and that everything is interconnected. It is the idea that God or a higher power is immanent in all things and that there is no separate, personal deity
Eternal Recurrence: is a concept in philosophy that suggests that the universe and all events within it have occurred and will continue to occur in an infinite cycle
Human being
Material rational soul and material body
Thought that the soul would develop at the age of seven
Not considered a human before than
Natural Law
To want to reproduce to keep species going
Being a good person
Not hurting others
External object is sense perception
sense perception —> impressions —> assent —> cognitive impression —> knowledge
Rene Descartes was born in 1596 and died 1650
He was eleven when he went into university
It was an accelerated program during his time
He got a degree in law but then served in the army
He was originally a Catholic and when he joined the army he became interested in math and geometry
Meditations took him approximately 10 years to write
Deductive Reasoning- necessary reasoning and it is when something follows the other
Example: All men are mortal, Socrates is a man , Socrates is mortal
1. Accept as true only what is known so clearly and distinctly as to be beyond doubt
2. Resolve problems into the simplest parts possible
3. Move from simple to complex
4. Thoroughly review and check one’s work
Descartes tries to find a piece of knowledge we can know for certain
Descartes starts by saying anything known by the sense is subject to doubt since you cannot know for sure
I Doubt
Sensory foundations is doubtful
I cannot clearly differentiate between dreaming and waking experiences
Maybe the idea of God that I have is incorrect
Deceptive God Hypothesis (Descartes doesn’t think God is like that)
He thinks that God made us to have false thoughts
God intervenes so I produce false thoughts
All knowledge that can be moved can be changed
No matter what doubts we have the knowledge will be true
You don’t have to have it proven, you just know it with certainty
First Principle
“I exist” is the knowledge that is known and could never be untrue
Self-consciousness: awareness of one’s self leads us to know that we exist
No matter what we exist because even if God is deceiving us we are still existing and because we doubt we are existence
What am I
Descartes doesn’t know fully what he is
By going through old thoughts about what I am, you can maybe find that knowledge
Rational animal?
Aristotle’s idea that Descartes rejects
He says it is too complex and you can figure that out through the “I Doubt”
Body and soul
He brings in the Stoic version of soul where it fills us
They share properties to work with each other
His idea of body is exclusive from that of the soul
Bodies do not think (goes back to “I Doubt”)
He believes that he is a thinking thing
Another way of saying mind
Distinct reality from the body
We are thinking things if we think about my self
Descartes rejects a lot of Aristotle’s works and ideas
The imagination is not trustworthy because it is caused by sensory
You are unable to figure out you exist through imagination
“I doubt”
Essence: Thought
Moral/Variable Properties:
Understand
Doubt
Affirm
Deny
Will
Retuse
Magine
Sense
Wax Example:
Before-
Sweet
Flowery scent
Yellow, size, shape
Hard, cold, easily handled
Makes a sound
After-
Not sweet
No scent
Clear, different shape
Soft, hot, cannot be handled
Emits no sound
General Truth of Material Essence:
Invariable Property/Essence
Extension/Volume
Variable/Modal:
Size, shape, duration, location
General Truths of Minds:
Invariable Property/Essence
Thought
Variable/Modal:
Understanding, doubting, affirming, denying, willing, refusing, imagining, sensing
Reductionist
Reduced mental properties into a more universal physical property
Mind is a physical property
Sensation Statements
“I am in pain”
When you are feeling an emotion
Idea 1: you can think about an experience
Relates to Brain-Process Statements
Brain-Process Statements
C-fibres are sending signals
Idea 2: have a more scientific idea of your body
Relates to sensation statements
Sensation statements are about something
Are sensation statements about real things?
“I desire a fish taco”
Fish taco is real, but desire is a problematic word
Desire may not be what you are actually feeling at the moment
All of the things we are feeling around us, we have to figure out where they are located
Location problem
We can only find truth of the mind in neuroscience
Premis 1: folk/common sense psychology is a theory of the mind
Premis 2: folk psychology is false
We must eliminate folk psychology in favor of a better theory
Can describe computers as brains
brain is defined by its function to compute
Computation = symbol manipulation
Algorithms
Function describes a brain
Give the machine the right program and it behaves like a brain which is why it can be described as a brain
He is functionalist
Programs are a reflection on our mental activity
He thinks that machines can eventually come up with stuff on their own
Computers imitate humans
He is a biological naturalists
Minds are limited the the brain (the organ)
Chinese Roam Argument
Semantial conent/mental content
Computers are defined by their syntactint content
Where in lies freedom? this is the main question that Augustine is trying to answer
We are determined
Compatibilism
We are free and responsible for our actions
Compatibilism
Incompatibilism
Freedom is not really clear cut and has many variables
Compatibilists have soft determinism and they are inspired by the Stoics
We are determined by external factors
We are free and responsible given that certain conditions are met with our actions
Not face or coercion
I chose the act
Incompatibilists are hard determinists
We are totally determined
We are not free or responsible
We are apart of a long series of cause and effect
Everything is driven by impulse and cause and effect
Libertarianism is a branch of incompatibilism
We are not totally determines
We are free and responsible
No force or coercion
I chose the act
The will is determ
ined by nothing but itself
Contra-Causal Free Will
Very traditional view on freewill
Comobation of Plato, Aristotle, and Stoics
Nobody had virtue since everyone messes up and no one is perfect
Deliberation
Our deliberation is the ranking of our priorities
Highest goods
Intermediate goods
Base goods
We sometimes mess up the rankings of these goods
“We mistake one good out of ignorance and that is how evil is made” - Plato which inspired Augustine
The universe because God made it is good
We will always choose the wrong thing because of original sin and concupiscence and grace
Augustine is a soft determinist
How can we know what is bad if we don’t have knowledge of what is good
The only way to properly execute will is through grace because good can only we done through God and grace comes about through God
St. Paul inspired this teaching
Judgment is intellect and will
Meditation 3 is about resolving deceptive God hypothesis
God exists and is not a deception because he is a supremely perfect being so he cannot decept
Conclusion
We can trust our thoughts and we can have a clear and distinct idea from something
Meditation 4 talks about errors in thoughts
Intellect: faculty of cognition or representation
Finite
Passively perceives ideas
Will: actively affirms or denies what is
Infinite
Represented in the intellect
The will extends beyond the limits of the intellect
When I do not have a clear and distinct idea and affirm it
When I do have a clear and distinct ideal and deny it
The will is totally free
God is not responsible for any problems that occur in the process of intellect and will
The will is the individual and they choose difference between right and wrong
The human is in between nothingness and infinite substance (God)
The will is where we are most like God because it is limitless
It is not the will’s job to understand or to know that belongs to the intellect
He is an empiricist
All knowledge comes from the senses
Knowledge from experience
Sense perception is key
An absurdity is something that can never possibly happen and it it is an obviously false statement
An error is a misjudgement that could possibly be true
Thoughts have to parallel reality
Immaterial Substances are absurdities because they contradict each other
Substances are physical and have material so it cannot be immaterial
He is a materialist
Endeavor is the intention of the animal towards an object or situation
Appetites and desires arise form endeavors
Appetite: the endeavor/movement towards something
The love comes from appetites
Good comes from love
Aversion: the endeavor/movement away from something
Hate comes from aversions
Evil comes from hate
What is good and bad is subjective and depends on the individual
That is his idea on morality
Subjectivism
Desire
Egoism
A deliberation allows us to choose something or avoid it
The act of coming to a conclusion
State of nature
Peaceful and content state
Passions are driving forces behind animal life and us
Based on compassion
amour de soi-mene
love of the self
pleasure/pain principle
Go towards pleasure and away from pain
Perfectibility and self improvement
Frequency
Anarchic freedom
personal freedom
No employer
We are like animals
We have a linear perspective on the world and we have no concept of time or death
All beings are compassionate by nature
Motherhood is an example
Self consciousness
Treat one’s self as an object of thought
language
Selves become symbolized in words
Allows us to analyze
Time consciousness
past, present, and future
amour propre
jealousy basically
Civilization
Personally freedom because dependent on the law
Pessimism
Philosophical view that there is no such thing as progress and no matter what we do there are always fundamental problems
Born 1632 and died 1704
Many of his ideas are implemented in the constitution and declaration
He argues that divine rule is not reliable/real
He says it comes from consent from citizens
Classical Liberalism
Rooted in state of nature
His idea of this is different than Hobbes and Rosseau
Natural Law
Purposes to things and the principles of natures tie to those things
The government to him is a big judiciary body
You hand over your obligations to another body
Freedom
Will to do whatever you want but not license
Certain limitations due to natural law
If you start doing things against your nature you go into a state of war
Equality
Rule by consent is key
Limited government
Separation of powers/checks and balances
Toleration
Because of natural law you don’t have the right over someone else’s life, happiness, property if they have a different opinion
Goes against voice of reason
Right to revolution
Natural Law
Inclination to pressure one’s life
Reproduction
Avoid harm
Search for the truth
Sociability
Benign and reasonable behavior
Emotions, motives, necessity, and liberty
Inductive reasoning = probabilistic reasoning
Logic and it is used very commonly
Common sense
Truth and certainty is not equal
Something may be the case but what is the reasoning behind it
Sun will rise tomorrow, but we cannot be certain that it will
Uniformity of Nature Principle
Events now and in the future replicate those from the past
Things that occur in other places will occur in our present time
Deductive arguments are reliable
Deductive reasoning
What we do in math, geometric proofs, any type of syllogistic problems
Brahman
Used in titles of religious roles and people
Source of one of the principle gods
One called the Brahmin (creator god)
refers to concept of overall god
The Absolute
absolute reality
All of their gods are manifestations of one god
god in hinduism is not a person it refers to all things and beyond all things
their concept of god is pantheistic
Via negativa/negative way
“Brahman is not …..”
Non-physical
Ineffable
Uncircumscribed
We are Brahman, we are divine
Maya
physical, empirical, and illusory world
we are embodied
we find ourselves in a condition of suffering
what it means to be an embodied human is suffering
the individual is driven by desire and aversion and is never satisfied
strive away from the goal of enlightenment
not similar to Hobbes because Hinduism says its bad and not ideal whereas Hobbes says its indifferent
Atman
the divine self
we are the absolute/the brahman
goes under Brahman
this is what they refer to when they talk about the soul
Jiva
empirical/embodied self
goes under maya
refers to everyday consciousness
where desires and aversions take place
our soul is reborn into a new body and a new life
Nation of Reincarnation or Samsara
samsara means reincarnation
cycle of life, death, and rebirth
Moksha
almost like salvation
it is when we break out of samsara and occurs when we stop all desires
when we reach enlightenment
Ananda
ecstatic joy
ways to refer to divine experiences
experiences of ones true self
achieved by detachment
going onto the right path of moksha
Dharma
ethical responsibility
obligations
based upon roles in our lives
i am a swimmer, a daughter, a friend, a student
therefore, i must live up to those expectations that are apart of my condition in life
this relates to the ideas of the stoics
Karma
a cause and effect principle
they have effects cosmically
it will affect what will happen to you in your next life
depends how close or far you are to salvation
affects reincarnation
if you have good karma you are living up to your Dharma
Yoga
paths to salvation
choose which forms of yoga you practice
depends on Dharma
four traditional ones:
Bhakti, Karma, Raja, Ginana
Bhakti: practice of devotion to god, acts of piety and reverence
Karma: prescription of good works, charitable things
Raja: meditation and physic control and about stillness and control over one’s body and mind
Ginana: philosophical inquiry and speculation, studying of texts and scriptures
by practicing the yogas you are trying to reduce the selfish desires and will lead you to anada of the atman
A break away from classical hindu tradition
Shatara Gautama is the founder of buddhism
He lived a life of luxury and Hedonism
Anything he wanted was a desire that was fulfilled
He has 4 sights where he sees people dying, disease, old age, and poverty
He realizes nature is impermanent and indifferent these four things are unavoidable
Ascetism
denying yourself in extreme manners to achieve tranquility
Eightfold Path
Avoid hedonism and ascetism and you find a in between
4 Noble Truths
Life is suffering
Birth is attended with pain, death is painful, everything is painful and pain is the separation of happiness
dukkha is the other word for it
The cause of suffering is desire
5 Aggregates
Material form of the body
Senses
Perceptions
Mental formations (judgements, ideas)
Consciousness
The destruction of suffering
The Eightfold Path
Nirvana
The not-self or at-atman
You want to sacrifice individual desires
Sarte
They think life is meaningless
There is no god or anything guiding us
We exist but we have to gain essence
there is radical freedom
man is freedom
essence is being able to act and take hold of our actions
Denies causality
Camus
absurdity of existence
Cold indifference and silence of the universe
humans are always trying to gain something but nothing will ever be out there because the universe does not care about us
Teleology- the study of order and purpose
Aristotle advocates for an empirical viewpoint
Empiricism- truth and knowledge can be acquired through sense observation
Thinks all human being are born as tabula rasa which means blank slate
We are born with no knowledge and we acquire it through experience
Aristotle and Plato have different ideas about the purpose of philosophy
Aristotle focused on everything in the world such as meteorology, animal/marine life, politics, and metaphysics
The papers of Aristotle have been long gone and currently only have access to lecture notes or notes that students took
Aristotle believed that the universe is a combination of substances
Substance is the matter and form
Primary substance is the primary core of something
Accidents are called secondary substances
Human Nature = rational and political animal
Equality of Substance
Inequality
Form, matter
Someone who has a stronger body is better built for rule
Slaves are still capable of virtue because they are still human
Since humans have rationality we are different from other animals
Genus of something is the classification or general type of something
Animal = rational
genus = species
He believes that substances don’t evolve into something else but they can cease to exist
Extendable means it occupies space
Nutritive/Vegetative Soul
Nutrition
Growth
Reproduction
Sensible/Animal Soul
Sense perception
locomotion
Desires/sensations
nutrition/growth/reproduction
Rational Soul
Thought/rationality
Humor/risibility
Judgement of value/morality
Comes up with the idea of atoms
Originally from Greek
Called “uncuttables”
There is some component of reality where you cannot keep breaking down pieces
There could never be nothing, everything comes from something
Either you’re made of atoms or empty space, no in between
Aristotle did not believe in this
Didn’t think atoms were a real thing
The universe is eternal and boundless
Atoms just are
They were always there
Atoms move continuously forever
Death = cessation of sensation
Ataraxia = tranquility/absence of struggle
Hedonism = the object of all action is pleasure/delight/enjoyment
Pleasure:
Moving: short term
Static: long term
Physical: immediate and present to us
Mental: memory, thought, lofty
Desire:
Natural and Necessary
Natural and Unnecessary
Vain and Empty
Natural Law
Universal reason or Logos
Material Monism
Active principle: Logos
Passive principle: Matter
Living according to how the Logos has ordered us
Not us a sense of command but living according to nature
When you wish for things to be different thats when you become miserable
Leads to people being evil
You must accept the way things actually are
Some Stoics thought that the universe was perfectly ordered
Pantheism: is the belief that the universe and nature are divine and that everything is interconnected. It is the idea that God or a higher power is immanent in all things and that there is no separate, personal deity
Eternal Recurrence: is a concept in philosophy that suggests that the universe and all events within it have occurred and will continue to occur in an infinite cycle
Human being
Material rational soul and material body
Thought that the soul would develop at the age of seven
Not considered a human before than
Natural Law
To want to reproduce to keep species going
Being a good person
Not hurting others
External object is sense perception
sense perception —> impressions —> assent —> cognitive impression —> knowledge
Rene Descartes was born in 1596 and died 1650
He was eleven when he went into university
It was an accelerated program during his time
He got a degree in law but then served in the army
He was originally a Catholic and when he joined the army he became interested in math and geometry
Meditations took him approximately 10 years to write
Deductive Reasoning- necessary reasoning and it is when something follows the other
Example: All men are mortal, Socrates is a man , Socrates is mortal
1. Accept as true only what is known so clearly and distinctly as to be beyond doubt
2. Resolve problems into the simplest parts possible
3. Move from simple to complex
4. Thoroughly review and check one’s work
Descartes tries to find a piece of knowledge we can know for certain
Descartes starts by saying anything known by the sense is subject to doubt since you cannot know for sure
I Doubt
Sensory foundations is doubtful
I cannot clearly differentiate between dreaming and waking experiences
Maybe the idea of God that I have is incorrect
Deceptive God Hypothesis (Descartes doesn’t think God is like that)
He thinks that God made us to have false thoughts
God intervenes so I produce false thoughts
All knowledge that can be moved can be changed
No matter what doubts we have the knowledge will be true
You don’t have to have it proven, you just know it with certainty
First Principle
“I exist” is the knowledge that is known and could never be untrue
Self-consciousness: awareness of one’s self leads us to know that we exist
No matter what we exist because even if God is deceiving us we are still existing and because we doubt we are existence
What am I
Descartes doesn’t know fully what he is
By going through old thoughts about what I am, you can maybe find that knowledge
Rational animal?
Aristotle’s idea that Descartes rejects
He says it is too complex and you can figure that out through the “I Doubt”
Body and soul
He brings in the Stoic version of soul where it fills us
They share properties to work with each other
His idea of body is exclusive from that of the soul
Bodies do not think (goes back to “I Doubt”)
He believes that he is a thinking thing
Another way of saying mind
Distinct reality from the body
We are thinking things if we think about my self
Descartes rejects a lot of Aristotle’s works and ideas
The imagination is not trustworthy because it is caused by sensory
You are unable to figure out you exist through imagination
“I doubt”
Essence: Thought
Moral/Variable Properties:
Understand
Doubt
Affirm
Deny
Will
Retuse
Magine
Sense
Wax Example:
Before-
Sweet
Flowery scent
Yellow, size, shape
Hard, cold, easily handled
Makes a sound
After-
Not sweet
No scent
Clear, different shape
Soft, hot, cannot be handled
Emits no sound
General Truth of Material Essence:
Invariable Property/Essence
Extension/Volume
Variable/Modal:
Size, shape, duration, location
General Truths of Minds:
Invariable Property/Essence
Thought
Variable/Modal:
Understanding, doubting, affirming, denying, willing, refusing, imagining, sensing
Reductionist
Reduced mental properties into a more universal physical property
Mind is a physical property
Sensation Statements
“I am in pain”
When you are feeling an emotion
Idea 1: you can think about an experience
Relates to Brain-Process Statements
Brain-Process Statements
C-fibres are sending signals
Idea 2: have a more scientific idea of your body
Relates to sensation statements
Sensation statements are about something
Are sensation statements about real things?
“I desire a fish taco”
Fish taco is real, but desire is a problematic word
Desire may not be what you are actually feeling at the moment
All of the things we are feeling around us, we have to figure out where they are located
Location problem
We can only find truth of the mind in neuroscience
Premis 1: folk/common sense psychology is a theory of the mind
Premis 2: folk psychology is false
We must eliminate folk psychology in favor of a better theory
Can describe computers as brains
brain is defined by its function to compute
Computation = symbol manipulation
Algorithms
Function describes a brain
Give the machine the right program and it behaves like a brain which is why it can be described as a brain
He is functionalist
Programs are a reflection on our mental activity
He thinks that machines can eventually come up with stuff on their own
Computers imitate humans
He is a biological naturalists
Minds are limited the the brain (the organ)
Chinese Roam Argument
Semantial conent/mental content
Computers are defined by their syntactint content
Where in lies freedom? this is the main question that Augustine is trying to answer
We are determined
Compatibilism
We are free and responsible for our actions
Compatibilism
Incompatibilism
Freedom is not really clear cut and has many variables
Compatibilists have soft determinism and they are inspired by the Stoics
We are determined by external factors
We are free and responsible given that certain conditions are met with our actions
Not face or coercion
I chose the act
Incompatibilists are hard determinists
We are totally determined
We are not free or responsible
We are apart of a long series of cause and effect
Everything is driven by impulse and cause and effect
Libertarianism is a branch of incompatibilism
We are not totally determines
We are free and responsible
No force or coercion
I chose the act
The will is determ
ined by nothing but itself
Contra-Causal Free Will
Very traditional view on freewill
Comobation of Plato, Aristotle, and Stoics
Nobody had virtue since everyone messes up and no one is perfect
Deliberation
Our deliberation is the ranking of our priorities
Highest goods
Intermediate goods
Base goods
We sometimes mess up the rankings of these goods
“We mistake one good out of ignorance and that is how evil is made” - Plato which inspired Augustine
The universe because God made it is good
We will always choose the wrong thing because of original sin and concupiscence and grace
Augustine is a soft determinist
How can we know what is bad if we don’t have knowledge of what is good
The only way to properly execute will is through grace because good can only we done through God and grace comes about through God
St. Paul inspired this teaching
Judgment is intellect and will
Meditation 3 is about resolving deceptive God hypothesis
God exists and is not a deception because he is a supremely perfect being so he cannot decept
Conclusion
We can trust our thoughts and we can have a clear and distinct idea from something
Meditation 4 talks about errors in thoughts
Intellect: faculty of cognition or representation
Finite
Passively perceives ideas
Will: actively affirms or denies what is
Infinite
Represented in the intellect
The will extends beyond the limits of the intellect
When I do not have a clear and distinct idea and affirm it
When I do have a clear and distinct ideal and deny it
The will is totally free
God is not responsible for any problems that occur in the process of intellect and will
The will is the individual and they choose difference between right and wrong
The human is in between nothingness and infinite substance (God)
The will is where we are most like God because it is limitless
It is not the will’s job to understand or to know that belongs to the intellect
He is an empiricist
All knowledge comes from the senses
Knowledge from experience
Sense perception is key
An absurdity is something that can never possibly happen and it it is an obviously false statement
An error is a misjudgement that could possibly be true
Thoughts have to parallel reality
Immaterial Substances are absurdities because they contradict each other
Substances are physical and have material so it cannot be immaterial
He is a materialist
Endeavor is the intention of the animal towards an object or situation
Appetites and desires arise form endeavors
Appetite: the endeavor/movement towards something
The love comes from appetites
Good comes from love
Aversion: the endeavor/movement away from something
Hate comes from aversions
Evil comes from hate
What is good and bad is subjective and depends on the individual
That is his idea on morality
Subjectivism
Desire
Egoism
A deliberation allows us to choose something or avoid it
The act of coming to a conclusion
State of nature
Peaceful and content state
Passions are driving forces behind animal life and us
Based on compassion
amour de soi-mene
love of the self
pleasure/pain principle
Go towards pleasure and away from pain
Perfectibility and self improvement
Frequency
Anarchic freedom
personal freedom
No employer
We are like animals
We have a linear perspective on the world and we have no concept of time or death
All beings are compassionate by nature
Motherhood is an example
Self consciousness
Treat one’s self as an object of thought
language
Selves become symbolized in words
Allows us to analyze
Time consciousness
past, present, and future
amour propre
jealousy basically
Civilization
Personally freedom because dependent on the law
Pessimism
Philosophical view that there is no such thing as progress and no matter what we do there are always fundamental problems
Born 1632 and died 1704
Many of his ideas are implemented in the constitution and declaration
He argues that divine rule is not reliable/real
He says it comes from consent from citizens
Classical Liberalism
Rooted in state of nature
His idea of this is different than Hobbes and Rosseau
Natural Law
Purposes to things and the principles of natures tie to those things
The government to him is a big judiciary body
You hand over your obligations to another body
Freedom
Will to do whatever you want but not license
Certain limitations due to natural law
If you start doing things against your nature you go into a state of war
Equality
Rule by consent is key
Limited government
Separation of powers/checks and balances
Toleration
Because of natural law you don’t have the right over someone else’s life, happiness, property if they have a different opinion
Goes against voice of reason
Right to revolution
Natural Law
Inclination to pressure one’s life
Reproduction
Avoid harm
Search for the truth
Sociability
Benign and reasonable behavior
Emotions, motives, necessity, and liberty
Inductive reasoning = probabilistic reasoning
Logic and it is used very commonly
Common sense
Truth and certainty is not equal
Something may be the case but what is the reasoning behind it
Sun will rise tomorrow, but we cannot be certain that it will
Uniformity of Nature Principle
Events now and in the future replicate those from the past
Things that occur in other places will occur in our present time
Deductive arguments are reliable
Deductive reasoning
What we do in math, geometric proofs, any type of syllogistic problems
Brahman
Used in titles of religious roles and people
Source of one of the principle gods
One called the Brahmin (creator god)
refers to concept of overall god
The Absolute
absolute reality
All of their gods are manifestations of one god
god in hinduism is not a person it refers to all things and beyond all things
their concept of god is pantheistic
Via negativa/negative way
“Brahman is not …..”
Non-physical
Ineffable
Uncircumscribed
We are Brahman, we are divine
Maya
physical, empirical, and illusory world
we are embodied
we find ourselves in a condition of suffering
what it means to be an embodied human is suffering
the individual is driven by desire and aversion and is never satisfied
strive away from the goal of enlightenment
not similar to Hobbes because Hinduism says its bad and not ideal whereas Hobbes says its indifferent
Atman
the divine self
we are the absolute/the brahman
goes under Brahman
this is what they refer to when they talk about the soul
Jiva
empirical/embodied self
goes under maya
refers to everyday consciousness
where desires and aversions take place
our soul is reborn into a new body and a new life
Nation of Reincarnation or Samsara
samsara means reincarnation
cycle of life, death, and rebirth
Moksha
almost like salvation
it is when we break out of samsara and occurs when we stop all desires
when we reach enlightenment
Ananda
ecstatic joy
ways to refer to divine experiences
experiences of ones true self
achieved by detachment
going onto the right path of moksha
Dharma
ethical responsibility
obligations
based upon roles in our lives
i am a swimmer, a daughter, a friend, a student
therefore, i must live up to those expectations that are apart of my condition in life
this relates to the ideas of the stoics
Karma
a cause and effect principle
they have effects cosmically
it will affect what will happen to you in your next life
depends how close or far you are to salvation
affects reincarnation
if you have good karma you are living up to your Dharma
Yoga
paths to salvation
choose which forms of yoga you practice
depends on Dharma
four traditional ones:
Bhakti, Karma, Raja, Ginana
Bhakti: practice of devotion to god, acts of piety and reverence
Karma: prescription of good works, charitable things
Raja: meditation and physic control and about stillness and control over one’s body and mind
Ginana: philosophical inquiry and speculation, studying of texts and scriptures
by practicing the yogas you are trying to reduce the selfish desires and will lead you to anada of the atman
A break away from classical hindu tradition
Shatara Gautama is the founder of buddhism
He lived a life of luxury and Hedonism
Anything he wanted was a desire that was fulfilled
He has 4 sights where he sees people dying, disease, old age, and poverty
He realizes nature is impermanent and indifferent these four things are unavoidable
Ascetism
denying yourself in extreme manners to achieve tranquility
Eightfold Path
Avoid hedonism and ascetism and you find a in between
4 Noble Truths
Life is suffering
Birth is attended with pain, death is painful, everything is painful and pain is the separation of happiness
dukkha is the other word for it
The cause of suffering is desire
5 Aggregates
Material form of the body
Senses
Perceptions
Mental formations (judgements, ideas)
Consciousness
The destruction of suffering
The Eightfold Path
Nirvana
The not-self or at-atman
You want to sacrifice individual desires
Sarte
They think life is meaningless
There is no god or anything guiding us
We exist but we have to gain essence
there is radical freedom
man is freedom
essence is being able to act and take hold of our actions
Denies causality
Camus
absurdity of existence
Cold indifference and silence of the universe
humans are always trying to gain something but nothing will ever be out there because the universe does not care about us