DJ

Motivation & Emotion – Key Vocabulary

Importance & Broad Relevance of Motivation and Emotion

  • Lecturer: Nicola Schrota stresses that motivation and emotion are core to understanding human functioning.

  • Application domains (mentioned explicitly):

    • Personal life decision-making and well-being.

    • Interpersonal relationships.

    • Work/organizational psychology, human resources.

    • Education (children & adults).

    • Therapy & counselling.

    • Sport and performance settings.

  • Take-home idea: Concepts you learn here travel widely across contexts; cultivate transfer thinking.

Course Road-Map (3 sessions)

  • Session 1 (current): Nature of motivation.

  • Session 2: Nature and taxonomy of emotion.

  • Session 3: Dynamic interaction between motivation & emotion and their impact on behaviour.

Visual Kick-Off Example – The Runners Photograph

  • Tasks for students: infer (a) training motives, (b) in-race motives, (c) emotions displayed.

  • Motives surfaced in class discussion:

    • Extrinsic rewards (medals, trophies, public recognition).

    • Early encouragement & positive feedback → developed sense of competence/self-efficacy.

    • Identity motive: “I am a runner” (self-concept as motivational fuel).

  • Emotion cues:

    • Facial/bodily signs of focus & determination (possible “blended” emotions).

    • Anticipatory pride for front runner vs. possible disappointment for rear runner.

  • Immediate illustration of bidirectional links: motivation shapes emotion, felt emotion reshapes moment-to-moment motivation.

Working Definitions of Motivation

  • Internal process that gives direction & energy to behaviour.

  • Alternative wording: process of starting, directing, and maintaining goal-oriented activities.

  • Everyday examples: choosing to attend university, staying engaged in lecture, studying for exams.

Why Do Humans Need Motivation? – Four Perspectives

  1. Survival & growth: guides approach toward beneficial stimuli and avoidance of harm.

  2. Humanistic: fosters unfolding of personal potential.

  3. Social-evolutionary: drives prosocial interactions, cooperation, child-rearing.

  4. Affective: supplies anticipated positive vs. negative emotions that regulate behavioural persistence.

Two Fundamental Directions

Approach Motivation
  • Orients organism toward desired stimuli, opportunities, rewards.

  • Anticipated affect: positive (joy, pride, satisfaction).

  • Neurobiological correlate: Behavioural Activation System (BAS) → sensitive to reward cues and generator of positive affect.

Avoidance Motivation
  • Orients organism away from threats, punishment, loss.

  • Anticipated affect: negative (fear, anxiety, disgust).

  • Neurobiological correlate: Behavioural Inhibition System (BIS) → sensitive to threat cues and negative affect.

Empirical Illustration – Sustainability Behaviour (Schrota & Jatbullah)

  • Two-study design connecting self-efficacy, changeability beliefs, and approach motivation for pro-environmental acts.

  • Key statistical highlights (Study 1):

    • Self-efficacy → Approach motivation: r = .44 (strong).

    • Changeability belief → Approach motivation: weaker but significant.

    • Approach motivation → Reported recycling/energy-saving behaviour (positive path coefficient shown in path model slide).

  • Interventions (Study 2):

    • Program boosting self-efficacy and program boosting malleability beliefs both elevated approach motivation.

    • Self-efficacy-centred intervention produced strongest increase in intention to purchase “green” products.

  • Pedagogical purpose: demonstrates how abstract constructs translate to measurable change in applied arenas.

Approach–Avoidance Conflict Typology

  • Real life often features mixed valence cues → motivational conflicts.

  1. Approach–Avoidance conflict: single option has pros & cons (e.g., better-paid job vs. night shifts).

  2. Approach–Approach conflict: must choose between two attractive options (e.g., two desirable job offers).

  3. Avoidance–Avoidance conflict: choice between two aversive options (e.g., dentist visit vs. ongoing toothache).

  • Affective fallout: worry, stress, cognitive rumination until one tendency outweighs the other.

Sources of Motivation: Internal vs. External Triggers

  • Internal (need-based): physiological deficit (hunger) instigates approach to food.

  • External cues/incentives: sight/smell of pastry can induce hunger & purchase even without prior deficit.

  • Interaction: external cues often amplify or modulate internally generated states.

Needs That Power Motivation

Physiological Needs (survival anchored)
  • Hunger → approach food.

  • Thirst → seek fluids.

  • Sex → species survival & individual bonding.

  • Pain avoidance → rapid withdrawal; note clinical case of congenital analgesia (no pain) underscores adaptive value.

Psychological Needs (Self-Determination Theory core)
  1. Autonomy – desire to self-govern decisions/actions.

    • Example: researcher choosing own topics; employee resisting micromanagement.

  2. Competence – desire to be effective and master environment.

    • Examples: finishing a complex project, learning software, providing for family.

  3. Relatedness – desire to belong, connect, form close bonds.

    • Examples: making friends in new city, family calls, adverse effects of solitary confinement.

  4. Agency/Sense of causality – broader feeling that one’s actions make a difference.

Intrinsic Motivation (IM)
  • Behaviour undertaken for inherent satisfaction rather than separable consequence.

  • SDT claim: fulfilment of autonomy, competence, relatedness naturally elicits IM.

  • Personal examples to reflect on: painting, hiking in nature, deep conversation, solving puzzles.

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (Historical Model)

  • Pyramid (bottom → top):

    1. Physiological (food, water, air).

    2. Safety (body, employment, resources, health).

    3. Love/Belonging (family, friendship, intimacy).

    4. Esteem (self-esteem, recognition, status).

    5. Self-Actualization (creativity, morality, realizing potential).

  • Empirical caveats:

    • General trend: deficits at lower levels dominate attention, but not absolute.

    • Counter-examples: altruistic kidney donation (sacrifices personal safety for relatedness/values).

Goals as Immediate Motivational Drivers

  • Definition: cognitive representations of desired end states.

  • Interaction loop:

    • Needs shape goal selection.

    • Goals channel behaviour and self-regulation.

  • Components of goal motivation:

    • Outcome expectancy: belief goal attainment is possible.

    • Anticipated affect: vision of pride, satisfaction fueling effort.

  • Empirical findings (Goal-Setting Theory):

    • Specific & concrete goals outperform vague intentions.

    • Challenging (yet attainable) goals ↑ performance, albeit with risk of failure disappointment.

The Self as Motivational Engine

  • Real (actual) self: current self-description → guides congruent behaviour.

  • Social self: how we present to others; role-based scripts (therapist, parent, team leader) can prime matching actions.

  • Ideal self: aspirational blueprint → motivates growth and change (e.g., envisioning oneself as healthier, more skilled).

  • Classroom exercise suggested: write ideal-self paragraph and note resulting action impulses.

Self-Efficacy (Bandura)

  • Definition: belief in capability to organize & execute actions for specific outcomes.

  • High self-efficacy → greater task initiation, persistence, resilience.

  • Low self-efficacy → avoidance, quick disengagement.

  • Major sources:

    1. Mastery experience (most powerful).

    2. Vicarious modelling (observing peers succeed).

    3. Verbal persuasion (encouragement from others/self-talk).

    4. Physiological/affective cues (interpreting arousal as readiness vs. fear).

  • General self-efficacy: cross-domain confidence in managing life’s demands; often accumulates from multiple domain-specific successes plus supportive social messaging.

Ethical & Practical Implications Discussed

  • Designing interventions (e.g., sustainability) must respect autonomy while enhancing perceived competence.

  • Workplace policy: balancing approach incentives (bonuses) with avoidance factors (overload) to reduce conflicts.

  • Parenting/teaching: cultivate self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation rather than reliance on extrinsic rewards alone.

  • Solitary confinement example highlights human rights concerns tied to denying relatedness need.

Looking Ahead

  • Next lecture: systematic classification of emotions (basic, secondary, blended) and their regulatory functions.

  • Final session: integrative models where motivation & emotion co-determine attention, cognition, and behaviour across contexts.