Jan 9, 2025
Objectivity, subjectivity & inter-subjectivity
metaphysical question: what counts as reality
Objective phenomenon exist independent of human beliefs, consequently remain stable across time and space (cultural space and historical time), we do not need to be aware of it, it simply exists
i.e homosexual males have more older brothers than heterosexual males.
subjective phenomenon involve the beliefs of a single individual , an individuals subjective perspective cannot be challenged only the individual has access to their subjective reality (subjective experience) it is possible that their experience has no objective bearings but is still important as it can affect ther feelings and actions.
e.g a man who identifies as heterosexual but has no attraction to women sexually or otherwise
inter-subjective phenomenon (social constructs) involve the shared beliefs of a network of individuals. Important in influencing what people believe in and how they behave, in the absence of believing in them social constructs will vanish
e.g. the lgbtq+ this exists because people believe in it, not because its an objective aspect of the natural world
social construncts are important even if th are n harrari’s wods “ a shared myth”
Two perspectives on sexual orientation
sexual orientation is a social construct
sexual orientation has a biological basis
social construct view on sexual orientation
humans are blank slates at birth
individuals acquire their sexual orientation via post-natal socialization
how we conceptualize sexual orientation influences how we socialize it
how sexual orientation is conceptualized varies across-culturally and historically
consequently, how sexual orientation is socialized varies across cross-culturally and historically
this results in the development of fundamentally, different types of sexual orientation that are culturally and historically unique
What is queer theory
a variant of social constructionism, which claims special expertise in relation to sex differences and sexual orientation
it is a political strategy, as opposed to a theory that attempts to explain reality
it seeks to subvert (“queer”, “deconstruct”, destabilize”, “disrupt”, “problematize”) whatever is deemed “normal”, especially in relation to sex differences and sexual orientation
Queer theory : Knowledge claims
rejects the idea that objective knowledge (truth) is attainable so it is anti-empirical and anti0rational
rejects the idea that psychological and behavioural sex differences and sexual orientations have any biological component
it holds that all psychological and behavioural sex differences and sexual orientation are social constructs (intersubjective phenomenon) that arise because of how we talk about them (discourse)
As social constructs, psychological and behavioural sex differences (or lack thereof) and sexual orientations are culturally - and historically- specific
what counts as “knowledge” and “truth” is limited because it is always restricted to culturally- and historically- specific inter-subjectivities
these can only be truly understood in cultural or historical context and therefore your ability to understand anything other than our own contemporary culture is limited (emic vs etic)
Emic refers to an understanding of a culture or historical time period from the perspective of the individuals living in that culture or time period
Etic refers to an understanding of a culture or historical time period from the perspective of the outsider studying that culture or time period
because culturally-and historically- specific inter-subjectivities can only be understood in context, they can not be meaningfully compared
furthermore, because of this, they are equally valid (cultural relativism)
as scial constructs, psychological and behavioural sex differences and sexual orientations are potentially infinite, unstable, and arbitrary
so any universal categories we create to characterize psychological and behavioural sex differences and sexual orientations (e.g., “male-typical”, “female-typical” ”homosexual” “heterosexual”) are illusory
consequently there are no human universals when it comes to psychological and behavioural sex differences and sexual orientations (no norms, no patterns, no meta-narratives)
Queer theory: political claims
those who have socio-political power control discourse and thus they control what counts as knowledge and truth (episteme)
episteme : inter-subjective belief system that is dominant and powerful
this “power-knowledge” permeates al levels of society
this benefits the powerful, but is oppressive for others
categories (e.g., female/male, woman/man, feminine/masculine, heterosexual/homosexual) imply the existence of recurrent patterns, which in turn suggest the existence of norms
norms can be prescriptive and his can foster hierarchies
consequently norms are oppressive (even violent)
given this, categories must be “interrogated” and “deconstructed” by blurring their boundaries (“problematizing”) and thus sowing doubt about their validity
the goal of queer theory is not to elucidate truth but rather push a “queer” political agenda by “disrupting” what counts as (normative) knowledge to foster uncertainty. ambiguity, contradiction instability, and incoherence
obfuscation is intentional (trying to make something obscure is intentional)
categories can be “deconstructed” by changing how we talk about them and thus “destabilizing” how we think about them
hence proponents of queer Theory use words in ways that depart from their everyday meaning
they are also focused on how words are used and censorious when others do not employ their preferred speech patterns
they believe that this “language policing “ will cause us to think and in turn behave differently thus eliminating the oppression caused by categories (social engineering things in the direction they want them to go, which is to eliminate oppression)
The euphemism treadmill
a word is deemed offensive and then another word comes in to replace it that is okay to use then that word becomes offensive due to change in belief systems and another takes its place and the cycle continues
social constructs are unstable but are politically useful
Biological (essentialist) view of sexual orientation
biological processes SHARED by all humans INFLUENCE the development of sexual orientation (and psych-behavioural sex differences)
these processes occur prenatally (and postnatally) hence, individuals are not blank slates at birth
An individuals sexual orientation emerges and devlops, regardless of the historical or cultural context in which they live
sexual orientation categories (e.g., homosexual vs heterosexual) are objectively real (natural kinds)
sexual orientation categories are characterized by objective characteristics (intrinsic properties)
Intrinsic properties distinguish different (natural) kinds of sexual orientation from each other
these intrinsic properties represent the deep structure of sexual orientation, which exist REGARDLESS of cultural or historical context
How can we parse these two perspectives?
can sexual orientation be socialized
does sexual orientation develop fundamentally different ways across cultures and history?
are there intrinsic properties of sexual orientation
Sources of evidence
cross-cultural
historical
developmental
biological
putting it all together
universal biological processes influence the development of sexual orientation
cross-cultural and historical variation in how sexual orientation is inter-subjectively conceptualized influences how sexual orientation is expressed (or not expressed)
Jan 14
What is Biological Sex?
“there is a human imperative to give everything a sex.. but biology doesn’t share that desire”
Sexual Development
sexual development begins with the fusion of two anisogamous (unequal) gamete
gametes are haploid sex-cells they contain a single set of 23 chromosomes
The fusion of two gametes produces a diploid cell (zygote) that develops into a new individual
Diploid cells contain 46 chromosomes (23 pairs; 22 pairs of autosomes + 1 pair of sex chromosomes)
Pairs of sex chromosomes can be XX or XY
An XX pattern of sex chromosomes determines female development
An XY patter determines male development
Developing XX and XY embryos have:
One bipotential embryonic gonad
One bipotential embryonic genital (genital ridge)
Two embryonic reproductive tracts including:
the Mullerian duct system (female reproductive tract in embryonic state)
the Wolffian duct system (male reproductive tract in embryonic state)
Y chromosomes contain an SRY gene
At about six weeks post-conception the SRY gene triggers embryonic gonadal tissue to develop into testes
In the absence of an SRY gene, DAX-1 genes direct the embryonic gonadal tissue to develop into ovaries
The developing embryonic testes produce testosterone (T) and Mullerian inhibiting hormone (MIH)
At about eight weeks post-conception
MIH causes the Mullerian duct system to regress
T promotes the development of the Wolffian duct system develops into the male reproductive tract (epididymis, vas deference, ejaculatory duct, and seminal vesicles)
In the absence of T, the wolffian duct system regresses
In the absence of MIH, the Mullerian duct system develops into the female internal reproductive tract (fallopian tubes, uterus, cervix)
At about ten weeks post-conception
T causes the fetal genital tissue to develop into male external genitalia (penis, scrotum)
In the absence of T the fetal genital tissues develop into female external genitalia (clitoris, labial folds)
5-alpha dihydrotestosterone results in genital differentiation
Gametes
There are two types of gametes produced by the gonads:
Eggs (ova) which are produced by the ovaries
Sperm which is produced by the testes
Egg and sperm cells are anisogamous (unequal), differing in size and function
Eggs are large, nutrient rich and immobile
Sperm are small, nutrient poor and mobile
Defining Biological Sex
In biological terms, sex is defined by the production of one type of gamete or the other
Thus, sex refers to reproductive strategy
These reproductive strategies represent potentials that are not necessarily realized
Females are the sex defined by egg production which occurs in the ovaries
Males are the sex defined by sperm production which occurs in the testes
Determining and Denoting Biological Sex
Sex is determined (not defined) by sex chromosomes
Structures that arise from the organizational effects of sex chromosomes during development are phenotypic markers that denote sex, but do not define sex
These include gonads, internal reproductive organs and genitals
We can usually ascertain whether an individual is male or female by looking at the structures that support the production (gonads), transport (internal reproductive tract) and release (genitals) of either type of gamete
Primary vs Secondary sexual markers
Primary markers that denote sex develop in utero
at 10-18 years, humans undergo secondary sexual development (puberty)
Puberty results in further secondary divergence in the morphologies of males (e.g., facial hair, increases muscle mass) and females (e.g., breast development)
Why Gametes (to define sex)
Biological parameters that determine and denote biological sex vary among sexually reproducing species
Gametes are the only biological parameter that is invariant across all sexually reproducing species
A consilient definition of sex is, therefore, centered on gametes
consilience refers to unifying explanations that invoke universal organizing principles)
“there is a human imperative to give everything a sex.. but biology doesn’t share that desire”
Not all species have sexes
prokaryotes - unicellular organisms lacking nuclei and mitochondria
Not all species have two sexes
Whiptail lizards (cloning)
Some species are simultaneously two sexes
Corpse snail
Some species are sequentially two sexes (individual can at one point be sperm producing and another egg producing)
Clownfish
No species has more than two sexes
Sex assigned at birth
humans may assign sex to individuals for social purposes using among other things, traits that determine or denote sex, but this process of socially constructing a sex does not alter the objective biological reality of gamete production, or lack thereof
Intersexuality
Individuals whose chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive organs and/or genitals exhibit mixed-sex characteristics
Sometimes referred to as disorders of sexual development (DSD)
Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH)
5-alpha reductase deficiency
Some cultures recognize more than two sexes
Inter-subjective beliefs about sex vary cross-culturally
Guevedoce are assigned a third sex for social purposes
In this way, members of the culture construct an “explanation” about individuals who appear female in childhood and then transform into males in adulthood
T is not converted into 5-alphadihydrotestosterone so male genitals do not develop in typical ways
Is sex a social construct?
Some groups of people may inter-subjectively conceptualize “sex” based on sexual morphology (e.g., genitals) because it is socially useful to do so
That said no change in how we choose to define sex is going to change the fact that gamete production is an objective biological/reproductive phenomenon, not a socially constructed one
Does sex exist on a continuum?
Intersex conditions are categorical; relative to each other, they are not expressed as a continuous gradient from male to female in a manner of colour gradient
Gamete production is completely dichotomous; determinates and markers of sex are overwhelmingly dichotomous
So in these regards, sex does not exist on a continuum
99.98% of humans are male or female
2 in 10,000 people is intersex
Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information that confirms or supports one’s beliefs and values
Motivational reasoning is the tendency to make decisions that are desired (emotionally-motivated) rather than those that are evidence-based.
Jan 16
What is gender?
“One is not born, but rather, one becomes a woman” - de Beauvoir (1949)
Beauvoir is trying to say that the state of being a woman is something that is acquired postnatally
Evolving concepts of gender
Traditional view —> Social Role View —> Self-identification View
Biology —> Inter-subjectivity —> Subjectivity
Two individuals aided the shift from a traditional view to social role view which opened up broader opportunities:
Simone de Beauvoir and John Money who is the one who used the term gender in a psychological context, he described gender as socially learned rules, also emphasized that gender is culturally specific.
More recently there is a new view which is the self-identification view this view has been primarily advanced by Judith Butler she says gender is a subjective phenomenon
Gender is about more than socially learned roles and identity
So what is gender?
Gender is a belief system used to construct categories based on the conceots of “masculinity” and “femininity”
Anything can be “gendered” by attributing masculinity or femininity characteristics to it
Inter-subjective ideas about what counts as masculine and feminine vary across historical time and and cultural space
bodies can be sexed, but bodies can also be gendered
when we gender bodies we create gendered categories of personhood
Non-Binary Gendered Categories of Personhood
In many non-Western cultures, gender is conceptualized in a non-binary manner
In such cultures, Transgender, same-sex attracted individuals often identify, and are identified by others, as non-binary
in such cultures, this is also sometimes the case for cisgendered same-sex attracted individuals
Gender role expectations and enactment
Gender role expectations: culturally prescribed rules associated with how individuals that are perceived to occupy a particular gendered category of personhood should behave
Gendered Role enactment/presentation: the constellation of masculine and feminine behaviours that individuals manifest
Gender differences
Average group differences in gender role enactment called “gender differences” for short
These stem from differences in gender role expectations
Are all psychological and behavioural sex differences between the sexes gender differences?
Psycho-behavioural sex differences
There are differences in personality, cognition and behaviour that exist, on average, between males and females independent of any post-natal socialization that relates to gender role expectations
Jennifer Connellan’s study on gazed worked with newborn infants and supports the belief that infants are not blanks slates: are socialized to behave in this sexually dimorphic way
The study found that male infants looked longer at mobile than faces but female infants looked longer at faces than mobile
this is developmentally very early evidence of a sex difference that seems to emerge in many different studies and in many different lifespans
female: people oriented
male: thing oriented
Some psycho-behavioural sec differences do not originate as a result of gender roles expectations, rather they precede such socialization
However, their expression can be subsequently influenced by those expectations
socialization can magnify differences or minimize them however we will not see instances where roles are completely reversed e.g., females who are more thing oriented
beyond this neo-natal stage of life we are generally dealing with a combo of social and biological influences
Sex differences in Children’s Play across cultures
a sex difference in object-orientation versus people orientation is expressed in children’s play across cultures
the assumption is that people share a common biology. Sex differences in children's play across cultures indicate that there are average group differences in play behavior. Boys tend to exhibit more object-oriented behavior while girls often show a preference for person-oriented play. This suggests that, despite cultural influences, biological factors may underpin these differences.
The same sex difference in children’s play emerge across very different non-industrialized cultures
play with weapon is common among boys and not really seen in girls
The same sex difference in children’s play persist over time
Sex differences have been quantitatively documented for almost a century
direction of these differences and magnitude has been stable for 5 decades
The same sex difference in toy preference emerges in monkeys
Study done by Melissa and her student about if this sex difference exists in non human primates, they threw different gendered toys into Vervet monkey enclosure, dolls and trucks/cars and they found that the female monkeys engaged with the dolls significantly more on average where as the males interacted with the cars more.
These sex differences happened despite no prior socialization regarding toys
These study has been replicated three times
A comparable sex difference is expressed by wild chimpanzees
study by Richard and his student found that younger females who had no babies were carrying sticks around as if they were babies (like stick dolls), females were engaging in the stick doll behaviour much more than males once they have their own babies percentage of stick play drops.
Overview
Overall the developmental cross cultural historical and primatological data are consistent with the conclusion that these behaviours originate due to innate biological processes not socialization. socialization cannot account for their origin however in humans gender role expectations can amplify or dismiss these differences
Jan 21, 2025
What is sexual orientation
“It has been suggested that sexual orientation can be characterized as a mechanism, analogous to a compass, that directs one’s sexual attraction, arousal, fantasy and feelings
-J. Michael Bailey
Sexuality refers to courtship and/or genital activity involving arousal, attraction and behaviour which can, in turn, motivate identity formation
Sexual arousal and Sexual attraction
sexual arousal is a state of physical and psychological excitement that is initiated by exposure to a sexual stimulus
Sexual attraction is increased sexual interest in a target
Receptivity refers to a willingness to engage in sexual activity (open but passive)
Proceptivity refers to the active solicitation of sexual activity (open and active)
Courtship
Courtship (or sexual solicitations) are behaviours that communicate sexual interest
non-tactile behaviour (lowering gaze, playing with hair)
verbal
tactile behaviour (touching, hugging)
Terms for sexual orientation in relation to one’s own sex
Heterosexual (attraction to individuals whose sex is opposite to oneself)
Homosexual (attraction to individuals whose sex is the same as oneself)
Bisexual (attraction to both sexes)
two things have to been known and considered ones own sex and the sex of the target
Heterosexual → Heterosexual males, Heterosexual Females
Homosexual → Homosexual males, Homosexual females
Gynephilic (sexual attraction to adult females)
Androphilic (Sexual attraction to adult males)
Ambiphilic (Sexual attraction to adults of both sexes)
Gynephilia → Gynephilic male, Gynephilic female
Androphilia → Androphilic male, Androphilic female
What is sexual orientation?
Relative sexual attraction to adult males, to adult females, or to both when given a choice
Commonly employed indices of sexual orientation
Sexual (orientation) identity
Sexual behaviour
sexual feelings (attractions, fantasies)
Sexual (psychological) arousal
Sexual attention
Assumptions & Implications
The different indices of sexual orientation are not necessarily concordant
so these indices are different phenomenon
sexual orientation is a social construct when conceptualized as something that encompasses all four of these indices
behaviour and identity are impacted by culture and social phenomenon
Sexual feelings as an index of sexual orientation
Kinsey scale
bipolar unidimension 7 point scale for people’s sexual feelings (and behaviours)
Exclusively heterosexual kinsey score of 3 is assigned, exclusively homosexual kinsey score of 6, Bisexual assigned score 3
assigned X to individuals with no sexual feelings
Self report (subjective)
feelings and fantasies, attraction, what is attractive to you
Some pitfalls involved in assessing sexual feeling
People can intentionally misreport their sexual behaviour and feelings (lie)
People can also unintentionally misreport their sexual behaviour and feelings (confabulate)
Confabulation involves producing an explanation, but not one that accounts for the real factors underlying one’s behaviour or psychology
Sexual aversion/disgust
sexual orientation is usually though about in terms of attraction
The flip side of attraction is aversion or disgust
sexual attraction and sexual aversion may operate independently
no god objective way to measure aversion
What’s Love got to do with it?
“…the criterion of falling in love [is] the definitive criterion of homosexual, heterosexual, and bisexual status
A heterosexual person is able to fall in love with, and become pairbonded sexual/erotic partner of only a person of the other morphological sex.
A homosexual person is able to fall in love with, and become the pairbonded sexual/erotic partner of only a person of the same morphological sex.” - John Money (1988)
we need to be conscious in using love as an indicator for sexual orientation, using lust as a criteria makes more sense
Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love
intense desire for proximity
intimacy increases as passion decreases
depending on how you combine intimacy, passion and commitment seven types of love can occur.
Some forms of love are probably closely linked to sexual orientation including:
infatuation (Passion)
Romantic love (passion + intimacy)
Fatuous love(passion + commitment)
Consummate love (passion + intimacy + commitment)
What’s love not got to do with it?
Many types of love do not involve sexual feelings including:
Liking (intimacy)
Empty Love (commitment)
Companionate love (intimacy + commitment)
Other Dimensions of Sexual Orientation
Age:
Teleiophilia - sexual attraction to adults
Hebephilia/ peri-pubescent - sexual attraction to pubescent individuals
Pedophilia - sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children
Orientation (pedophilia/hebephilia) versus behaviour (child molestation)
Species
Anthrophilia - sexual attraction to humans
Zoophilia - sexual attraction to animals
Orientation (zoophilia) versus behaviour (bestiality)
Location
External - focusing on allosexual targets (locating preferred sexual target out in the environment)
Internal - focusing on oneself (Interest in target becomes inverted back onto self) Autosexual, what you find sexually attractive you invert it back into your own body. Want to temporarily or permanently transform yourself into what you find attractive.
Activity
Masochism - sexual arousal to being subjected to pain, suffering and humiliation
Sadism - sexual arousal to inflicting pain, suffering and humiliation
Biastophilia - sexual arousal to sexual activity with non-consenting partners
Jan 23
Sexual Attraction and Arousal in Males
Monosexual- sexually attracted to one sex or the other but not both (Gynephilic or Androphilic)
“A man’s pattern of genital arousal is his sexual orientation” - J. Michael Bailey
whatever the penis is doing thats what a mans sexual orientation is
Heterosexual Erotic Stimuli
sexual interactions between a male and female is sometimes used but is often not used as it is not considered optimal as its difficult to tell what part of the stimuli is arousing the participant
Homosexual (“Pure”) Erotic Stimuli
Much more common to use homosexual stimuli as there is only one sex depicted so the object of arousal is more clear
Measurement of Male Genital Arousal
penile plethysmograph: rubber strain gage filled with mercury, electrical current is ran through the mercury
The pattern of heterosexual men’s genital arousal
Stimuli depicting men
Stimuli depicting women :
The pattern of heterosexual men's subjective arousal
Describing heterosexual men’s pattern of genital arousal and subjective attraction
Heterosexual men’s pattern of genital arousal and subjective sexual attraction in response to human stimuli is sex specific
Sex specificity refers to sexual arousal that is dependent on the sex of the human stimulus
Comparing heterosexual men’s genital arousal & subjective sexual attraction
The relationship between heterosexual men’s genital arousal & subjective sexual attraction
Heterosexual men’s genital arousal and subjective sexual attraction are sexually concordant
Sexual concordance refers to a pattern whereby genital arousal and subjective sexual attraction match each other
Male sexual orientation differences and similarities in genital arousal
Unlike heterosexual men, homosexual men’s direction of genital arousal is toward men and thus, sex-atypical
Like heteropsexual men, homosexual men exhibit a pattern of genital arousal that is sex specific and, in this regard, sex-typical
Male sex orientation similarities in sexual concordance
Like heterosexual men, homosexual men’s pattern of genital arousal and subjective sexual attraction are sexually concordant and thus, they are sex-typical in this regard
Viewing time data from Samoa
Study of samoan men: Petterson et al. (2018)
Sexual attraction rating: How would you feel about having sex with this person?
1 = Very unpleasant 5 = very pleasant
Viewing time: time between stimuli presentation and response to text prompt
Samoan males exhibit sex-specific attractiveness ratings
studied different types of males fa’afafine who had sex with men, men who had sex with men and men who had sex with women
Samoan males exhibit sex-specific viewing time patterns
discrepancy between ratings allowed us to haze zero as no preference between the two below zero indicates more attraction to women above zero indicates more attraction to men
What is sexual orientation in men?
the maximum value along an erotic stimulus generalization gradient
erotic stimulus generalization gradient can be thought of as a continuum of erotic stimuli that differ from each other
Morphological distances (Mi) : Adult female←→ peri pubescent female,←→ pre pubescent female, ←—→ pre pubescent male,←→ peri pubescent male,←→ adult male
one unit of morphological distance between an adult female and peri pubescent female whereas there is 1.5 units of MD between pubescent female and pubescent male
Largest unit of distance is found between adult male and adult female (5.5), this stems from having different genitalia as well as being at the end of their development (sexual differentiation)
the extra .5 distance between pubescent males and females is to take into account the different genitalia
gender preference study: Blanchard (2010, 2017)
data pertains to male penile response to different stimuli
peri pubescent males and female
pubescent males and females
adult males and females
green lines represent data, red lines represent data generated from mathematical model of theoretical data expected, both lines of data fit each other closely
one column is heterosexual males, the other is homosexual and the data is split up into teleiophilic, hebephilic and pedophilic
Heterosexual male teleiophiles have greatest response to adult women and the lowest to adult males (AW most preferred, AM least preferred) however they are much more aroused to PPG than AM
this is because lesser preferred erotic stimuli has relation to their most preferred erotic stimuli, the more different morphologically the bigger the distance of arousal
Homosexual Teleiophiles have the greatest response to Adult males, with some arousal to the lesser preferred stimuli AW, they were more aroused by PPB than AW
“Can you imagine being a young man on campus today? The way society policed the sexuality of gay people in the past, it’s now open season the sexuality of heterosexual males. they’re monitored, policed, demonized, under constant criticism, and their taught that their normal sexuality is a pathology that needs to be punished, corrected, and cured.”
- Christina Hoff Sommer (2016)
Heterosexual men are subjectively and genitally aroused to consexual, non-violent sex
study by suschinsky & lalumiere (2011)
presented participants with audio stimuli
neutral
no sex, violence, no consent
no sex, violence, consent
sex,violence, no consent,
sex, violence, consent,
sex, no violence, no consent,
sex, no violence, consent
they found that sex was most arousing and they liked consensual non-violent sex
their genitals reached maximum arousal to non-violent consensual sex
Jan 28
Sexual Arousal and Attention in Females
“Before asking what sexual orientation orients, we should first ask whether anything sexually orients women” - J.Michael Bailey (2008)
Measurement of Sexual Arousal
most of the studies are doing so with vaginal arousal or vaginal blood flow
measured with Vaginal photoplethysmograph, more light detected is indicative of more arousal
Heterosexual women’s vaginal arousal is not sex-specific, not contingent on the sex of individual being depicted in the stimuli, might be a little more response to the lesbian stimuli vs the MM stimuli, despite attraction to men.
Sex differences in the sex specificity of genital arousal
women have a different pattern of arousal to stimuli than men do, sex specificity is male typical, lack of sex specificity is female typical
Heterosexual women’s subjective sexual attraction is not sex specific
study showed that hetero women found lesbian stimuli more arousing than gay stimuli
Sex differences in the sex specificity of subjective sexual attraction
Heterosexual women’s vaginal arousal and subjective sexual attraction are not sexually concordant
False Comparisons?
Do sex differences in genital arousal result because we are comparing blood flow in non-homologous structures (vaginas versus penises)
The clitoris is homologous to the penis
Clitoral blood flow is not sex specific in response to sexual stimuli
Clitoral Anatomy: Glans, Shaft, Crura Vestibular bulbs
Heterosexual women are vaginally aroused to non-preferred sexual activities
sex with, no violence and consent was rated highly
how ever rating of sex did not influence genital blood flow, occurred to highly aversive stimuli
The Preparation Hypothesis
Preparation Hypothesis holds that vaginal arousal to any cues of sexual activity via lubrication and, in doing so, protect it from damage should forced copulation occur
Female sexual orientation differences in subjective sexual arousal
Lesbians are more sex-specific than heterosexual women in terms of subjective sexual attraction
Female sexual orientation similarities in vaginal arousal
Like heterosexual women, lesbian vaginal arousal is not sex specific when shown high intensity sexual stimuli
Female sexual orientation differences in vaginal arousal
Lesbians are more sex specific than heterosexual women in terms of vaginal arousal when shown low intensity sexual stimuli
Even so, lesbians exhibit less sex specific genital arousal than monosexual men
Female sexual orientation differences in sexual concordance
Lesbians are more sexually concordant than heterosexual women when shown low intensity sexual stimuli, but they are still less sexually concordant than monosexual men
Lesbians and heterosexual women are both sexually non-concordant when shown higher sexual intensity stimuli
Lesbians genital arousal is shifted in male-typical direction
What do eye-tracking experiments tell us about female sexual orientation?
Forced attention paradigm: two stimuli presented unable to look at both
Two important measures
Latency to first fixation (LFF) (automatic) (where you look first)
Controlled attention (where you choose to look)
Total fixation duration (TFD)
Total fixation count (TFC)
Latency to first fixation
LFF is not sex-specific in exclusively androphilic and mostly androphilic/Kinsey 1 women
LFF is sex-specific in ambiphilic women and exclusively gynephilic women
Controlled attention (TFD)
In monosexual women, controlled attention is sex-specific
In ambiphilic women, controlled attention is not sex-specific, but we would not expect it to be
Controlled attention (TFD)
In all females, controlled attention is concordant with self-reported sexual orientation
Implications for female sexual orientation
female sexual orienting toward sexual stimuli appears to be less coupled to automatic physiological processes compared to male sexual orientation
Female sexual orienting toward sexual stimuli has a relatively greater cognitive component compared to male sexual orientation
Greater cognitive control in the sexual/reproductive realm may be adaptive for heterosexual women because they risk incurring relatively greater costs if they make poor sexual/reproductive decisions
Jan 30
Masculinity - Femininity & Sexual Orientation
“It’s highly probable that a small group of homosexual people exist in all societies and produce the same kind of continuu. There are the “macho” and “regular guy” hoosexuals as well as highly cross-gendered homosexuals, [including] female impersonators and transsexuals. Lesbians also exist in all societies. They range from the ultramasculine to the very feminine.
Frederick L. Whitam (1994)
A spectrum of male androphilia
Very masculine(keegan hirst) → Very feminine (Laverene cox)
Gynandromorph: males who feminize their bodies but retain their penises
Gynandromorphophiles: males who are attracted to gynandromorphs as much as they are attracted to women
A spectrum of female gynephlia
Very feminine(portia de rossi) → Very masculine (chaz bono)
Categorization of same-sex attracted individuals
Across cultures and history, individuals who are attracted to same-sex adults are commonly categorized into two groups
These two groups are distinguished by their presentation and behaviour and include: cisgender and transgender individuals
Cisgender refers to a person whose presentation and identity is relatively typical for their sex and corresponds to the gender they were assigned at birth
Transgender refers to a person whose presentation and identity is atypical for their sex and does not correspond to the gender that they were assigned at birth
Many cultures categorize androphilic males into transgender and cisgender types
cutures way of saying feminine males
in ivory coast feminine males are woubi and cis gendered males are yossi
Binary categorization of gynephilic females occurs outside the West
Thai dee (feminine) and tom (masculine)
Binary categorization of androphilic males occurred in the ancient past
Two types of androphilic males (klibas) were recognized in ancient India : masculine and feminine
Binary categorization of gynephilic females has occurred at least since the 19th century
In critical arrows (1879), Ulrich described how gynephilic females could be very masculine (Mannlingin) or very feminine (Weiblingin)
Objective reality: A spectrum of masculine-feminine presentations
Intersubjectivity: Binary categorization/ social construction
we think of these types as categorically different (gay guy vs trans woman)
Binary bias involves treating gradients of information as binary
this binary bias might be adaptive, might be impossible to process infinite graditiences of information.
Same natural kind, different expressions
the way in which they express the trait of androphilia varies depending on cultural context
How would we know? that two different presenting individuals are part of the same category
do they share intrinsic properties
Whitam (1987) contends that male homosexual and heterosexual transvestites (cross-dressers) and transsexuals are
“two separate spectra, not one”
arguing that they are different natural kinds
Two types of MtF trans individuals
Homosexual/Androphilic MtF trans individuals
Heterosexual/Gynephilic MtF trans individuals
Whats the evidence?
Homosexual/Androphilic MtF trans individuals
Extremely feminine in childhood including non-fetishistic cross-dressing
Extremely feminine in adulthood
Exclusively sexually attracted to men (homosexual/androphilic)
If they transition, they often do so early in life
Heterosexual/Gynephilic MtF trans individuals
Not feminine in childhood
Sexually attracted to women, but will sometimes engage in sex with men
Not particularly feminine in adulthood
Often marry and father children
Sexually aroused to the thought of themselves as women (autogynephilia)
Autogynephilia expressed in adolescence via fetishistic cross-dressing
If they transition, they often do so later in life
Two separate types of MtF trans individuals
Homosexual/Androphilic
MtF trans individuals
has normophilic pattern of attraction
femininity is present since childhood
Heterosexual/Gynephilic
MtF trans individuals
has paraphilic pattern of attraction
often attraction becomes inverted back into their own bodies : want to become what they desire
Erotic target location error
femininity starts to manifest at adolescence
Cisgender androphilic “gay” man & Androphilic transwomen
Same natural kind
Same biological potential, but its channeled in different directions depending on the culture you find yourself in.
Different expressions of the same thing
Androphilic transwoman & Gynephilic transwomen
different natural kinds
Two types of FtM trans individuals?
What’s the evidence
Childhood onset
Masculine in childhood including cross-dressing
Masculine in adulthood
Most are sexually attracted to women, although some report bisexual attraction
Adolescent Onset
Prior to mid-2000s it was rare to non-existent
Not masculine in childhood
Sexually attracted to women, men or both
Trans identification occurs “out of the blue” typically in adolescence and often in the context of others in their peer group making similar declarations (peer-to-peer social contagion)
Some cross-dressing is apotropaic
The Nandi of Kenya , has nothing to do with having sex atypical identities
trying to avoid evil influences
power to avert evil eye
Some cross dressing is propitiatory
refers to signaling reverence, and sacrifice
to appease gods or other supernatural beings
Yase, Japan fesitval
Chavara, India festival