QUT recognises the Turrbal and Yugara peoples as the First Nations custodians of the lands on which the university now stands.
Respect is paid to Elders, lores, customs, creation spirits and the enduring role Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people play in QUT’s teaching, research and learning community.
Lecture Overview (Week 2 – “Digital Audit (1)”)
Administrative updates.
Reflections on the live client brief + student presentation expectations.
Rapid review of foundational marketing/digital concepts.
Activity: Personal reflection on a familiar brand—enumerate experienced touchpoints.
Assessment 1 – Digital Audit (Key Instructions)
Audit ANY three active digital offerings (MUST include website).
Use provided template; rate each audit criterion 1\rightarrow10 (justify with theory + evidence).
Focus on ANALYSIS, not description.
Visuals (screens, graphs) → Appendix (not graded; reference in report).
Provide live links + academic/industry citations.
Marking Rubric (HO2.1 excerpt)
High Distinction ((>8.49/10)) = perceptive discussion, critical & discerning analysis, seamless integration of accurate research + original insights.
Lower bands progressively show less depth, integration, relevance or evidence.
Criterion 1 – Analysis of Platforms
Identify three channels; assess “channel–content alignment”.
1) Audience composition: Are users the brand’s targets?
2) Platform requirements: format, character limits, algorithmic preferences, posting cadence—did the brand comply?
3) Feature utilisation: Lives, Reels, Stories, Groups, hashtags, SEO tags, etc.
Blog vs traditional page → blogs rated higher on conversational voice.
Organisational blogs must:
1) Be authored officially/semiofficially.
2) Carry explicit/implicit organisational endorsement.
3) Feature an identifiable organisational representative.
Brand Personality (Aaker 1997)
Five dimensions & sample traits:
Sincerity (down-to-earth, honest).
Excitement (daring, cool, imaginative).
Competence (reliable, intelligent, successful).
Sophistication (upper-class, charming).
Ruggedness (outdoorsy, tough).
Nation-branding example (Mexico vs Brazil Facebook pages) uses same framework.
User Engagement & Dialogic Communication
Dialogic definition (Kent & Taylor 1998): “negotiated exchange of ideas & opinions.”
Goal: open, honest, ethical relationships; adapt to stakeholder needs.
Parasocial relationships (Horton & Wohl 1956): one-sided bonds with media personas; dimensions = Proximity, Similarity, Attraction (Yuan et al. 2016 measurement scales; model fit \chi^2=186.125,\;p<0.001).
Application: spokespersons on Facebook ads can strengthen equity via parasocial pathways.
Example Posts for Analysis (Illustrative)
Qantas Facebook feed: heritage storytelling (Dash-8 “Winton”), solidarity message (incident in DC), destination spotlight (Vancouver approach) – demonstrates organisational voice of national pride & empathy; mixed paid/shared.
Australia.com Reels: wildlife encounters, scenic sunsets → excitement & sincerity; heavy use of short-form video to match algorithm.
UQ HASS: community success stories, research highlights; encourages comments & shares (dialogic tactic: question prompts).
Queensland Health mould-advice post: informational, crisis-relevant, clear CTAs & protective advice; simultaneously posted as TikTok short (cross-platform repurposing).
Assessment Criterion 4 – Analysis of User Engagement
Evaluate dialogic tactics: surveys, polls, open questions, rapid replies, live streams, acknowledgements.
Examine whether advanced platform tools (e.g., Instagram Q&A stickers, Facebook Group Rooms) are deployed.