Chapter Two: Doing Social Psychology Research
Developing Ideas: Beginning the Research Process
Coming Up with Ideas
- Social psych studies begin with questions
- Ideas can come from reading about research that has already been done
- Hypothesis: An explicit, testable prediction about the conditions under which an event will occur
- Theory: An organized set of principles used to explain observed phenomena
- Goal is to explain findings, articulate connections between the variables, and predict our social worlds
- Basic Research: Seeks to increase our understanding of human behavior. often designed to test a specific hypothesis from a specific theory
- Applied Research: Focuses on making applications to the world and contributing to the solution of social problems
Refining Ideas
- Operational Definition: The specific procedures for manipulating / measuring a conceptual variable
- Construct Validity: The extent to which
- The manipulations in an experiment manipulate the variables they’re supposed to
- The measures used in a study measure the variables they’re supposed to
- Measuring Variables using self-reports, observations, and tech
- Self-Reports: Participants disclose their thoughts, feelings, desires, and actions
- The desire to look good to ourselves and others can influence how we respond
- Bogus Pipeline Technique: Participants are led to believe that their responses will be verified by an infallible lie detector
- Affected by the way questions are asked (wording, context)
- Interrater Reliability: Level of agreement among multiple observers of the same behavior
- Technology
- Measure cognitive and physiological responses (reaction time, heart rate, levels of hormones, sexual arousal, eye-tracking)
- Brain imaging tech
Testing Ideas
- Descriptive Research: Record how frequently or how typically people think, feel, or behave in particular ways
- Observational studies
- Archival Studies: Examining existing records of past events and behaviors
- Surveys
- Correlational Research: Measures the relationship between variables
- Correlation Coefficient: A statistical measure of the strength and direction of the association between two variables
- Correlation is not causation
- Experiment: Form of research that can demonstrate causal relationships
- Random Assignment: Participants are not assigned to a group based on their characteristics
- Random Sampling: Selecting participants for a study in a way that everyone in a population has an equal chance
- Lab Research: Environment is controlled and participants are carefully studied
- Field Research: Conducted in real-world settings outside the lab
- Independent Variable: A variable whose variation doesn’t depend on that of another. The manipulated variable in an experiment
- Dependent Variable: A variable whose variation depends on that of another. In an experiment, it is measured to see if it’s affected
- Subject Variables: Characterize preexisting differences among the participants in a study
- Internal Validity: When an experiment is properly conducted
- Confound: A factor other than the independent variable that has an effect on the dependent variable
- Experimenter Expectancy Effects: The effects produced when an experimenter’s expectations about the results of an experiment affect his or her behavior toward a participant and thereby influence the participant’s responses.
- External Validity: The extent to which the results obtained under one set of circumstances would also occur in a different set of circumstances
- Mundane Realism: Extent to which the research setting resembles the real-world setting
- Experimental Realism: Degree to which the experimental setting and procedures are real and involving to the participant
- Deception: Providing participants with false info
- Confederates: People working for the experimenter who pretend they’re part of the experiment
Interpreting the Meaning of the Results Obtained
- Meta-Analysis: Combining results across studies
- Informed Consent: An individual’s deliberate, voluntary decision to participate in research
- Debriefing: Researchers fully inform their participants about the nature of the research at the end of the experiment