This week marks the final lectures for the course on law and legal theory.
Focus on linking themes and ideas from Semester One to Semester Two.
Aim is to unify content and build a foundational basis for critical analysis.
Core questions from Semester One:
What is the law?
Who is it for?
Who makes it?
What do we want the law to be?
These questions serve as foundational assumptions for critical analysis.
Shift from abstract questions in Semester One to concrete examples in Semester Two.
Important outcomes for this week:
Understand course connections and themes.
Preparation guidance for ILLT assessment and formative assessment.
Advice on approaching essay questions and coursework format.
Coursework will require an eight-page essay, understanding of assessment criteria is vital for marking.
Resources are available for assessment preparation and student well-being.
Need for support during exams is acknowledged particularly for students with specific learning differences.
Importance of knowing available support options before assessments are due.
Discussion on class descriptors (e.g. 2:2, 2:1, First, Fail) and their meaning in terms of marking criteria.
Emphasis on academic misconduct and importance of understanding what is considered acceptable and unacceptable in coursework.
Formative assessment to be released on March 28.
Formative submissions due by April 14 with feedback to follow.
Summative coursework titles will be released in March, with a submission deadline in early May.
Continual exploration of the relationship between law and morality.
Discussions on validity and questions of justice and fairness within legal frameworks.
Referencing key theorists (e.g., Hart, Radbruch, Dworkin) to frame arguments.
Examination of the role of state power in the formation of law.
Individual rights versus state enforcement highlighted through case studies (e.g. Splintin Explorers).
Questions of equity and justice explored in light of state power versus individual rights.
Distinction between law in principle versus law in practice.
Recognition that legal writing does not always align with practical outcomes.
Examining the intersection of legal sources, morality, and societal implications.
Emphasis on critical reflection linking to various themes covered throughout semesters.
Use of seminar readings to structure the majority of arguments in the essay.
Suggested format for the essays:
Introduction: Outline the key points and stance on the topic.
Body: Critical discussion of readings, providing examples.
Conclusion: Summarize key arguments without introducing new points.
Task requires a two-page annotated bibliography covering selected sources.
Aim is to ground critical voice with specific literature in the annotated bibliography.
Importance of clarity and critical engagement with sources emphasized.
Expectation to analyze arguments critically, presenting balanced views while reaffirming one's own perspective.
Avoid last-minute submissions and ensure compliance with formatting guidelines (size, spacing, margins).
The use of OSCOLA referencing for citations is mandatory.
Advice on structuring essays and presenting arguments clearly, emphasizing critical analysis and structured debate.
Conclusion should reflect the main arguments presented, avoiding the introduction of new information.