Attribution Theory and Motivation
Attribution Theory: Key Concepts
Attribution = a causal explanation for an event or behavior.
Attribution-Emotion-Behavior process: attributions influence emotions, which influence motivation and behavior.
Key dimensions for classifying attributions:
Locus of causality: internal vs external.
Stability: stable vs unstable.
(Optional) Controllability/intentionality (not the focus here).
Four attribution combinations to remember:
(\text{internal}, \text{stable})
(\text{external}, \text{stable})
(\text{internal}, \text{unstable})
(\text{external}, \text{unstable})
Attribution Styles
Optimistic attribution style (self-serving):
Positive outcomes attributed to internal factors; negative outcomes attributed to external factors.
May involve internal attributions for successes and external for failures; can foster empowerment but risk inaccuracy.
Pessimistic attribution style:
Negative outcomes attributed to internal, stable factors; positive outcomes attributed to external, unstable factors.
Often links to low confidence and learned helplessness.
Hostile attribution style:
Negative outcomes attributed to external factors that are stable; positive outcomes attributed to external factors that are unstable.
Linked to anger and potential aggressive responses toward others.
Important note: Attribution styles are tendencies (biases) and not always accurate reflections of causes.
Motivational States and Attributions
Learned Helplessness:
Repeated punishment/failure leads to passive, unmotivated behavior even when success is possible.
External barriers promote internal, stable attributions for failures and external attributions for successes, decreasing motivation.
Organizational norms can induce helplessness (e.g., crediting self for successes while blaming employees for failures).
Aggression:
Undesirable motivational state; two forms:
Instrumental aggression: pursue a goal not provided by the organization.
Hostile aggression: aimed at harming others.
External and stable attributions for negative events can fuel aggression; perceived intent of the responsible party influences whether aggression occurs.
Empowerment:
Heightened motivation from optimistic effort-reward expectations; linked to higher innovation and effectiveness.
Emerges when negative events are attributed to factors that are internally controllable or external factors that are unstable/uncontrollable.
Optimistic attributions can promote empowerment, but accuracy remains crucial.
Resilience:
Ability to accept reality and adapt to change; promotes accurate attributions.
Low resilience = more extreme internal/external attributions; high resilience = closer to reality and less biased.
Resilience can be developed via environment and experiences; supports empowerment by maintaining accurate perceptions.
Promoting Motivational Attribution Processes
Five techniques to foster accurate and motivational attributions:
Screening for resilience
Identify individuals with high baseline resilience during selection; helps match job stressors with attributional styles.
Attributional Training
Use assessment tools to identify biases; discuss causes of successes and failures to broaden causal search.
Immunization
Provide early, manageable successes to build confidence and prevent early internal-stable attributions for failure.
Increasing Psychological Closeness
Ensure managers have experience with subordinates’ work to reduce dispositional biases; promotes accurate feedback.
Multiple Raters of Performance
Use 360° feedback to offset individual attribution biases; builds a more accurate picture of causes of performance.
Conclusion
Internal and stable attributions for successes and external and unstable attributions for negative events are generally linked to higher empowerment.
Accuracy is key: empower employees by helping them understand the real causes of performance, not just by fostering optimism.
Case Studies & Quick Takeaways
Case Study 8-1 (Managing Attributions): managerial explanations can communicate different internal/external and stable/unstable attributions; choose explanations that minimize demotivation.
Case Study 8-2 (Deviant Behavior and Attribution): external, stable attributions for errors can increase likelihood of deviant acts; internal controllable attributions can reduce such behavior if managed properly.
Quick Reference: Attribution Styles and Motivational States
Learned helplessness: internal & stable attributions for failures; external attributions for successes → passivity.
Aggression: external, stable attributions for negative outcomes → anger and possible aggression; external, unstable for positive outcomes.
Empowerment: internal controllable or external unstable/uncontrollable attributions for negative events → higher motivation and empowerment.
Resilience: bias toward accurate attributions; reduces detrimental biases; supports long-term motivation.