Net Present Value (NPV) Approach:
Cash flows estimated in the real world.
Discounted at a risk-adjusted discount rate.
Suitable for traditional capital budgeting.
Risk-Neutral Valuation Approach:
Cash flows estimated in a risk-neutral world.
Discounted at the risk-free interest rate.
More appropriate for valuing real options due to the difficulty in determining appropriate risk-adjusted rates.
Advantages of Risk-Neutral Valuation:
Simplification of valuation by using the risk-free rate.
Focus on the potential upside of options rather than downside risk impact.
Increased Uncertainty (Higher Standard Deviation):
Effect: Increases the value of the expansion option unless higher discount rates on cash flows apply.
More Optimistic Forecast (Higher Expected Value):
Effect: Increases the value of the expansion option due to higher expected cash flows.
Increase in the Required Investment:
Effect: Reduces the value of the expansion option as expected cash flows decrease.
Decision: Renting vs. Buying
Reason for Renting:
Flexibility in operations; can abandon furniture if start-up fails.
Abandonment value of used furniture is low.
Issue: Economic life of 10 years may not be fixed.
More Complete Analysis:
Consider options to abandon or extend plant life.
Assess performance implications on the abandonment option.
Advantage of Waiting:
Opportunity to learn more about market values and land use (call option).
Reason to Develop Immediately:
Immediate capture of rental income to offset property costs.
Efficiency: Gas turbines are less efficient.
Reason for Existence:
Flexibility in production, can ramp up quickly based on market demand.
Valuable Option: Decision to run or not run turbines based on economic conditions.
Complexity: Many problems are not well-structured.
Roadmaps for Future Events: Difficult to outline decisions and events.
Competitive Interactions: Increase the complexity of assessment.
a. True: Negative-NPV may secure growth options.
b. True: Greater uncertainty makes options valuable, postponing cash flows.
c. True: Binomial trees can evaluate options accurately.
d. True: Risk-neutral methods allow for valuation as if traded.
e. True: Investing in a large plant can be better than multiple smaller projects.
Ways to Create Real Options:
Plan initial projects to allow later expansion.
Invest in modular facilities instead of large scale projects.
Utilize standardized equipment with good salvage values.
Delay investments to gather information (timing option).
Situation: Negative-NPV development with a break-even price of C$90.
Option: A five-year American call option on oil with an exercise price rising at 5% per year.
Situation: Annual cash flow of $700,000.
Option: American put option to abandon the restaurant with an exercise price of $5 million.
Fixed Costs: Known costs resulting in net cash flow of $700,000.
Exercise Price Calculation: $5 million real estate value plus avoided future fixed costs, totaling $8 million.
Situation: Ability to shut down and restart in response to demand changes.
Complex Option: American put and call options allowing for temporary abandonment and restarting.
Situation: Developer uses land as a parking lot instead of immediate construction.
Option: In-the-money American option to choose either a hotel or apartment building later.
Situation: Air France negotiates a purchase option with confirmation needed by 2014.
Option: Call option fixing delivery date and pricing.
Investment Required Change: From $900 million to $800 million increases option value.
Present Value Change: From $467 million to $500 million increases option value.
Standard Deviation Change: From 35% to 20% decreases option value.
Situation: One-year call option on land with exercise price of $2 million.
Value Calculation: Using standard model methods, it’s worth approximately $71,100.
Situation: Warehouse generates rents affecting land value.
Value Calculation: Approximately $28,600 after rent payouts considered.
Current PV: Estimated at $2.7 billion with cash flows included.
Comparison of Options: Should model ability to exercise now versus future.
a: One discount rate cannot apply without accounting for changes in risk.
b: Options on risky assets are often more valuable due to their potential upside.
c: DCF valuation remains essential for determining the underlying asset value.
Assessment: Will not yield the right answer due to failure to adjust discount rates based on changing risks.