The Uses of History
Enables us to better understand the present (even if it does not provide solutions)
We can derive a sense of our identity
Helps us understand human nature and society
Helps develop an open mind and tolerance for views different from our own
Important to other disciplines
Can equip one with critical thinking and writing skills
History can be entertaining
Misuses of History
Tampering with history
To make the past look better
To make the present look better by changing the circumstances that led to it
To legitimize the present
How history could be abused
Danger of prejudice
Subordination to theory or ideology
Subjugation to politics or private interests
Historical revisionism
Valid if used to rectify the past
Usually done to suit present interests, usually of those in power
What is History?
Arthur Marwick (1936-2006)
“The bodies of knowledge about the past produced by historians, together with everything that is involved in the production, communication of, and teaching about that knowledge.”
“The past as we know it… Based on the interpretations of historians based on their critical study of the widest possible range of relevant sources, every effort having been made to challenge and avoid the perpetuation of myth.”
Two meanings of History (Furay & Salevouris 2009)
As event/past
What actually happened in the past; a change in a given state of affairs at a particular time and place
Events take place in a historical field:
Actors (the doer of action; the source of change) / human agency - explains the past in linear cause and effect chains
Context - takes into account the role of social, economic and political processes and structures in which events take place
Historical events are events that are worth recording
Sources
Primary Sources
Created during the period being studied by an eyewitness or participant in an avent
Could also be written years after the event
Examples:
Letters, memoirs
Official reports, public/government records, newspaper articles
Photographs, videos, art, architecture, artifacts (archeological sources)
Oral histories
Issues:
Not necessarily reliable or accurate
Never intended to be made public
Secondary Sources
A study of a period in the past (or a particular event / events from that period) written long after the period
Based on primary and / or secondary sources
Examples:
Books
Journal articles
Essays / newspaper editorials
Conference paper
Social media posts
KAS 1 lectures
Some secondary sources may contain primary sources
Based on medium:
Written (text)
Non-written (image)
Oral
As narrative
A study of the past; makes use of a methodology (history as a social science)
A historian’s interpretation; a constuct
Historiography:
What the historian does
Events —> Sources —> Evidence —> Facts —> Synthesis —> Interpretation —> Narrative
Can historians be objective?
The impossibility of objectivity and arriving at a single truth
The writing of history is dependent upon the availability of sources
The historian’s interpretation of the past, his selection of the significant and the relevant, evolves with the progressive emergence of new goals (Carr 1970). Interpretations are therefore tentative in quality.
Events can have multiple causes and cannot be reduced to generalities
One event could have many narratives
Example:
GOMBURZA execution —> Propaganda Movement (Rizal, Marcelo H. del Pilar created a new social awareness about our colonial experience—> Andres Bonifacio and Philippine Evolution
But the Philippine revolution didn’t happen just because of gomburza, rather it happened due to many factors/causes
Monuments as Public History
Why Marcos Should Not Be Buries at the Libingan ng mga Bayani?
Marcos did not command any guerilla unit which fought against the Japanese occupation just as he had claimed because that has been the justification for burying him in LMB, that he was a war hero
But in reality, he could have been labeled as a war criminal because he was arrested for collecting money under false pretense and was pretending to be the leader of a guerilla organization that actually did not exist
Facts gathered from past events which have to be interpreted to suit the present generation and they are affected by individual or institutional influences such as the preference of the sitting president or this political establishment or a particular huge corporation. This is also affected by the forces of society. What do the Filipino people want to hear? Who are the vested interests in power? What is the type of educational system is presenting these historical narratives?
Historiography: The historian’s interpretation
Analysis will be based on the historian’s perspective (way of looking at the past). It is based on the historian’s point of view, which is influenced by the historian’s background (bias, religion, social class, education, language, nationality, ethnicity, gender, judgement of what is relevant or important, political affiliation interpretation)
The historian excerpts and incorporates it, and recasts into that he considers a suitable style
Even if there can be differing narratives about the past…
“A version of the past cannot be supprted by evidence is worthless.
The narrative needs an evidence, hindi sa ‘tingin’
Packaging the historical narrative
History could be written based on periodization, or its different branches (e.g. political, economic, cultural, diplomatic, environmental, etc)
Commissioned histories - e.g., corporate history, biographies
Identity history - an insider’s representation of a particular group (e.g., local history, women in history)
Public History
Intended for education / appeal to a large audience
Usually determined by the government
Could potentially be used for propaganda
Presented in textbooks, popular media, public displays (e.g. museums and monuments)
Reconstructing the Past / Challenges of Arriving at the Truth
The past can’t be recreated in its entirety
There is no one true account
Historians are not infallible; they are influenced by their personal bias, political beliefs, economic status, religion, etc.
History is constantly open to revision.