3.11 vid 2

Introduction to FRQ on SCOTUS Cases

• Focus on applying knowledge of Supreme Court cases in free response questions (FRQ).

• Utilize foundational documents to make connections with historical context.

Understanding SCOTUS FRQ Structure

• FRQs are worth four points, with four tasks involved.

  • One task relies on personal knowledge of court cases.

  • Emphasize using active voice in responses.

    • Example: Use specific names and titles (e.g., Congress instead of legislature).

Practice Example with Constitutional Concepts

Task Example

• Compare Brown v. Board and Milligan v. Bradley relating to the Fourteenth Amendment.

• Prompt: Identify the constitutional concept.

  • Answer Example:

    • Both cases apply the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to school segregation.

    • Importance of understanding the three concepts within the Fourteenth Amendment.

    • Reinforcement of terms to vividly answer the question (e.g., repeat prompt language).

Analyzing Differences in Court Cases

Task B

• Understanding claims regarding education violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.

• Importance of Differentiation:

  • Clearly explain differences between cases.

  • Include specific holdings and conclusions drawn to illustrate differences.

  • Use clear language to describe how changes affect understanding of the cases.

Comparing Cases to Foundational Documents

Task C

• Describe principles in both the case and foundational document.

• Explain commonalities and their implications.

Graphic Organizer Approach

• Utilize a visual layout to connect facts of the cases to the concepts from the documents.

  • Case Facts (e.g., Milligan Case): Laws must pass strict scrutiny regarding state action in education.

  • Constitutional Context: Analysis through Tenth Amendment - state powers regarding education not explicitly given to the federal government.

Integrating Amendment Concepts

• Emphasis on how the Tenth Amendment allows states to maintain control over education unless federal conflict arises.

• Recognition that the failure to demonstrate malicious intent can allow state powers over education to prevail under the Tenth Amendment.

Conclusion

• Continuous practice with FRQs relating to historical SCOTUS cases is essential.

• Importance of making connections between cases and foundational documents for comprehensive understanding.

• Encouragement for students to make informed choices and continue studying.