Cognitive Control: the intentional selection of actions, thoughts and emotions in accordance with current goals, context and task demands, as well as the concomitant suppression of those which are inappropriate
Necessarily requires voluntary, goal-directed behaviour, but this is not the whole story
Simultaneous, competing goals
Interference from involuntary behaviours
Not limited to physical action
Sophisticated representation of environmental ‘rules of engagement’
Comprises a range of processes we collectively refer to as executive functions
Working memory
Choice and decision-making
Planning
Behavioural inhibition
Resolving response conflict
Task-switching
Examples
Being patient and responding calmly when you’re frustrated
Staying focused on your study while resisting the urge to check social media
Keeping in mind you need to stop by supermarket on the way home
Preparing multiple elements of a complicated dish at once
Negotiating a good deal with the used car salesperson
Pulling attention away from your crocheting project in time to rescue your child about to leap from the dining table
Many tasks have been developed to assess cognitive control, they share the same common features:
‘Rules’ dictate which instrumental contingencies hold in the presence of particular cues
Hold ‘rule’ in mind to disambiguate target cues that are associated with multiple outcomes
Apply these complex contingencies to determine the correct response
Exert control to make the correct action while inhibiting correct actions
Examples of cognitive control tasks:
Stroop task
Continuous Performance Task (CPT)
Wisconsin Card Sorting Task
N-Back task
Rule: Name the colour or read the word
Ambiguous cues: Colour words written in coloured ink
Apply rule: Produce the appropriate colour name or word
Conflict: for the ‘name the colour’ rule you must inhibit prepotent tendency to read words (fluent readers)
Applied to Green in Red Font - Parallel Distributed Processing
Presentation of this stimulus activates red colour pathway and the green word input activate pathway leading to response green
This is parallel activation
Word pathways should dominate - they are naturally stronger (hence why in bold)
From patients with frontal lobe damage and fMRI studies, PFC is involved in:
Inhibiting inappropriate (but previously relevant) responses
Directing attention towards relevant over irrelevant stimuli (especially in unstable environments)
Flexibly adapting the ‘rules’ by which behavioural responding is governed
Manipulating information in working memory
Overcoming conflicting choices
Neurons in the PFC are selectively activated to apply a ‘rule’ for responding
Animals were trained on two tasks that were very similar
Difference was whether a rule was required to discriminate responding
Visual cue told them the rule for a future task they would have to respond
‘Cue’ units: represent information about sensory inputs, motivational state, etc
‘Response’ units: represent possible behavioural response output
‘Hidden’ units: represent intervening stages of processing between input and output
PFC can act via hidden units tot bias particular input-output pathways according to task demands
Dorsolateral PFC:
Important for holding in mind the ‘rule’
Anterior Cingulate:
Important for executing response
fMRI data is correlational data, so need to directly manipulate activity in PFC in cognitive-control tasks
Rats are capable of selective attention, behavioural inhibition, and task-switching
Impaired by lesions to the PFC
Rats receive training with conditional cues, which are then combined at test to create congruent and incongruent compound cues
Correct responding can only determined by using contextual cues from the environment in which the compound occurs
They are trained with auditory cue where they learn that they have to press left/right lever depending on context
The conflict is introduced at test; they are presented with audio-visual compounds of the stimulus they received at training
The animal has to use contextual cues to figure out which lever to click
These elements activate pathways to opposing responses
To bias processing in one of the opposing pathways - it needs to activate the relevant contextual units
Rats acquire both biconditional discrimination tasks to an equivalent degree
Performance at test reveals contextual control of responding to incongruent cues
Pretraining lesions to the mPFC:
Do not impact learning of independent biconditional discriminations
Do not impact correct responding on congruent trials at test
Do impair correct responding on incongruent trials at test
Rat mPFC is critical for resolving response conflict in a cognitive control task
ACC implicated in task performance (as opposed to preparation) from fMRI
Pretraining lesions to the ACC:
Do not impact learning of independent biconditional discriminations
Do not impact correct responding on congruent trials at test
Do impair correct responding on incongruent trials at test - but only early in the stimulus presentation
Rat ACC is critical for detection of response conflict
DLPFC (PL): Implicated in the application of a ‘rule’ for responding
Inactivation of PL:
Does not impact correct responding on congruent trials at test
Does impair correct responding on incongruent trials at test
Inactivation of IL:
Does not impair correct responding on congruent or incongruent trials at test
Rat PL cortex critical for being able to apply ‘rule’ information to resolve response conflict
Verifies the correlational studies results
Laid groundwork for theoretical ideas of how the sub-regions of PFC may coordinate to create cognitive control
Impairments in cognitive control can look like:
Issues with selective attention
Impulsivity/poor decision-making
Inability to maintain focus on a task
Lacking ability to flexibly adjust behaviour in accordance with task demands
Some psychological disorders that feature impairments in cognitive control (’executive dysfunction’) include:
Dementia
ADHD
Schizophrenia
Addiction
Disorder that causes significant impairment in the way reality is perceived
Characterised by:
Positive symptoms: delusions, hallucinations (psychosis)
Negative symptoms: apathy, anhedonia, blunted affect
Cognitive symptoms: speed of processing, verbal fluency, memory, concentration, working memory, cognitive flexibility, behavioural inhibition
Animal model:
Acute or chronic administration of drugs known to induce psychotic symptoms (e.g., ketamine; PCP) also produce many of the cognitive impairments seen in schizophrenia
Acute ketamine administration impairs ability to use contextual cues to disambiguate responding in situations of response conflict
Chronic PCP administration produces lasting changes in ability to use contextual cues to disambiguate responding in situations of response conflict
Addiction or substance abuse disorder, involves a pattern of drug use that causes significant distress or impairment and often includes:
The taking of escalating doses
Unsuccessful efforts to cut down/stop
Experience of craving, tolerance, and/or withdrawal
Continued use despite adverse consequences
Chronic methamphetamine use is associated with:
Psychotic-like symptoms (delusions, hallucinations)
Impairments in problem-solving, inhibitory control, and decision making
Animal model: Chronic methamphetamine exposure produces cognitive control deficits that persist after the drug has been discontinued
The methamphetamine impaired performance in incongruent in trials
Cognitive impairments in chronic methamphetamine use thought to be related to oxidative stress
Administration of antioxidants may ameliorate these deficits
Not a properly controlled experiments (it was not counter-balanced) - but still a promising indicator
Cognitive control describes the intentional selection of actions, thoughts, and emotions in accordance with current goals, context and task demands, as well as the suppression of those which are inappropriate
Can be measured using tasks that require individuals to hold a ‘rule’ in mind in order to disambiguate target cues associated with multiple outcomes or responses (e.g., Stroop)
We can understand how this might work using the framework of a parallel distributed process model
Human case studies, fMRI, and neural recording investigations have identified the PFC as critical for cognitive control processes
Using a rodent model of cognitive control we have been able to:
Provide experimental evidence that the PFC is causally involve in cognitive control processes
Aid in identifying functional disassociations between subregions of the PFC
Infralimbic/ventromedial PFC = promotes responding based on ‘weight of evidence’ from simple associative structures
Prelimbic/dorsolateral PFC = facilitates use of contextual/’rule’ information to provide flexible top-down modulation of behaviour
Anterior cingulate cortex = important for detecting response conflict