the legislative process
summary:
bill introduced
referred to appropriate committee
subcommittee review n mark up (from here, the bill can fail)
committee review, mark up and vote on bill
chamber debates and votes on bill
other chamber considers bill
conference committee
both chambers vote on final bill
president signature
bill becomes law
must pass both houses during Congress (has 2 years to pass)
same in both houses, merely a formality
no debate
no vote
speaker assigns legislature to appropriate committee
committee stage
broken into sub-committees
many bills don’t get out » pigeon-holed
bills w lots of support get heard
house, congress, interest groups, etc
committee members are specialists
witnesses called n questioned
power of amendment
can pass, amend or reject
reported out ie goes to floor if vote in favour
bill can be thrown out at this stage
slow coz of witness
find time for consideration whole chamber
house rules committee » 2:1 in favour of majority
can set time limits n rules for level of debate
therefore controls what passes vs powerful
considered by whole chamber
further amendments made
in senate-tradition, everyone who wants to speak can
potential filibuster (someone talking so much that a vote can’t happen within the time)
60 senators must vote for cloture-motion to stop debate allowing determine minorities to end a bill
simple majority pass
final debate
if big amendments made after 2nd reading » substantial debate
if minor amendments n large vote in favour, 3rd reading brief, further vote taken
optional
if big difference between bill agrees by house n senate due to amendments a conference committee (reps) from both chambers repped
if bill not approved by end of congressional terms - 2 years - process must start all over again
4 options
10 days to act
signed into law
can veto bill
veto can be overridden by 2/3 majority
pocket veto » president could ‘forget’ to sign the bill or otherwise take no action at the end of Congress = dead bill » cannot be overturned
pres could leave the bill on desk = becomes law after 10 working days
due to the separation of powers n federalism, parties tend to be weak w many factions
party leaders also have limited power over their own party, with ineffective patronage n whipping
result: parties don’t act as a single unit in passing legislation = difficult to pass laws
the rise in partisanship can help the passage of legislation through Congress, but this is of little use if the presidency is controlled by a different party or the House n Senate have split control eg 2010-14
partisanship here can cause high levels of gridlock, where President, House n Senate fail to agree n legislation cannot be passed
the Repub party was criticised for excessive partisanship during the Obama presidency w some politicians seeming to oppose any policy supported by Obama
eg: the then-House budget committee Chair Tom Price refused to begin committee consideration of Obama’s final $4-trillion-budget proposal
voting between parties has become more divergent than at any other period since WW2
moreover: political middle has disappeared » declines in moderate Conservatives n Blue Dog Democrats
certain degree of negativity that is part of the obstructionist’s platform
republicans n some moderates of both parties » not progressive
wish for things to remain the same, even when outdated
look @ new ideas with preconceived ideas of failure
controversial bills require negotiation
often won’t pass unless sponsored by majority party
even then, weak links can be found to vote against the bill
weak party discipline in congressional system often means party members have little to gain from voting along party lines » would rather follow personal/constituent ops
legislative process bestows power on the committee system, allowing a committee to simply ‘table’ a bill
tabling a bill/piece of legislation means that it’s set aside for later consideration
whether or not it’s ‘dead’ depends upon how many in the legislature want it considered later, how much other legislation is under consideration - and how much pressure they can bring to bear on the committee chair(s) to bring tabled item up for active consideration
allows president to return legislation to Congress unsigned
Congress can only override this veto with a 2/3 majority in both Congress Houses
difficult to achieve, esp if the bill is considered to be partisan or controversial
allows the minority in the Senate to delay/defeat any piece of legislation
sometimes filibuster threat cant force small majrity to negotiate further w minority
filibuster: in the Senate (unlike the House), bill-related speeches have no time limits
against rules in the Senate for majority member to end a debate in order to vote
eg: Strom Thurmond talked non-stop for over 24h in 1957 » Congress record
to end a filibuster, Senators can invoke what’s known as a cloture (call for a vote) » 3/5 (60) must vote or sometimes, 2/3 of those present
can only happen 2 days after cloture has been proposed n signed by 16 senators
even after cloture: still 30 more hours allowed, where Senators can speak for no more than an hour
during gw bush’s presidency, the Dems used filibusters so effectively that Repubs considered changing the rules to make the process more difficult to achieve
Dems lost their ‘supermajority’ of 60, shortly before 2010 midterms, made their position far more difficult
if a party has a majority in both Congressional houses, theoretically, they’ll be able to pass most of their party platform legislation (providing there’s nothing too controversial)
ease of passing legislation is usually proportional to the size of the majority
strength of legislative process | weaknesses of legislative process |
checks n balances prevent tyranny, forcing compromise between different interests. in this sense, the USA creates a pluralist democracy in which power is shared | inefficiency/low output results from excessive need to compromise. Congress can’t act quickly, often failing to agree on legislation to address key needs |
quality policy comes from detailed consideration of bills n filters to remove undesirable aspects. this limits the danger of a bill being poorly though-through | high partisanship levels = unwillingness to compromise = gridlock. Constitution requires compromise for laws to be passed |
individual n state rights are protected, as Senators can insert amendments or filibuster on the basis of their equal state power n interests | poor-quality legislation can come from too much compromise. a bill may lack coherence due to many amendments n interests. prevalent pork-barrelling can create financially wasteful policy not based on rational decisions |
evaluate the view that congress is effective in its legislative role
summary:
bill introduced
referred to appropriate committee
subcommittee review n mark up (from here, the bill can fail)
committee review, mark up and vote on bill
chamber debates and votes on bill
other chamber considers bill
conference committee
both chambers vote on final bill
president signature
bill becomes law
must pass both houses during Congress (has 2 years to pass)
same in both houses, merely a formality
no debate
no vote
speaker assigns legislature to appropriate committee
committee stage
broken into sub-committees
many bills don’t get out » pigeon-holed
bills w lots of support get heard
house, congress, interest groups, etc
committee members are specialists
witnesses called n questioned
power of amendment
can pass, amend or reject
reported out ie goes to floor if vote in favour
bill can be thrown out at this stage
slow coz of witness
find time for consideration whole chamber
house rules committee » 2:1 in favour of majority
can set time limits n rules for level of debate
therefore controls what passes vs powerful
considered by whole chamber
further amendments made
in senate-tradition, everyone who wants to speak can
potential filibuster (someone talking so much that a vote can’t happen within the time)
60 senators must vote for cloture-motion to stop debate allowing determine minorities to end a bill
simple majority pass
final debate
if big amendments made after 2nd reading » substantial debate
if minor amendments n large vote in favour, 3rd reading brief, further vote taken
optional
if big difference between bill agrees by house n senate due to amendments a conference committee (reps) from both chambers repped
if bill not approved by end of congressional terms - 2 years - process must start all over again
4 options
10 days to act
signed into law
can veto bill
veto can be overridden by 2/3 majority
pocket veto » president could ‘forget’ to sign the bill or otherwise take no action at the end of Congress = dead bill » cannot be overturned
pres could leave the bill on desk = becomes law after 10 working days
due to the separation of powers n federalism, parties tend to be weak w many factions
party leaders also have limited power over their own party, with ineffective patronage n whipping
result: parties don’t act as a single unit in passing legislation = difficult to pass laws
the rise in partisanship can help the passage of legislation through Congress, but this is of little use if the presidency is controlled by a different party or the House n Senate have split control eg 2010-14
partisanship here can cause high levels of gridlock, where President, House n Senate fail to agree n legislation cannot be passed
the Repub party was criticised for excessive partisanship during the Obama presidency w some politicians seeming to oppose any policy supported by Obama
eg: the then-House budget committee Chair Tom Price refused to begin committee consideration of Obama’s final $4-trillion-budget proposal
voting between parties has become more divergent than at any other period since WW2
moreover: political middle has disappeared » declines in moderate Conservatives n Blue Dog Democrats
certain degree of negativity that is part of the obstructionist’s platform
republicans n some moderates of both parties » not progressive
wish for things to remain the same, even when outdated
look @ new ideas with preconceived ideas of failure
controversial bills require negotiation
often won’t pass unless sponsored by majority party
even then, weak links can be found to vote against the bill
weak party discipline in congressional system often means party members have little to gain from voting along party lines » would rather follow personal/constituent ops
legislative process bestows power on the committee system, allowing a committee to simply ‘table’ a bill
tabling a bill/piece of legislation means that it’s set aside for later consideration
whether or not it’s ‘dead’ depends upon how many in the legislature want it considered later, how much other legislation is under consideration - and how much pressure they can bring to bear on the committee chair(s) to bring tabled item up for active consideration
allows president to return legislation to Congress unsigned
Congress can only override this veto with a 2/3 majority in both Congress Houses
difficult to achieve, esp if the bill is considered to be partisan or controversial
allows the minority in the Senate to delay/defeat any piece of legislation
sometimes filibuster threat cant force small majrity to negotiate further w minority
filibuster: in the Senate (unlike the House), bill-related speeches have no time limits
against rules in the Senate for majority member to end a debate in order to vote
eg: Strom Thurmond talked non-stop for over 24h in 1957 » Congress record
to end a filibuster, Senators can invoke what’s known as a cloture (call for a vote) » 3/5 (60) must vote or sometimes, 2/3 of those present
can only happen 2 days after cloture has been proposed n signed by 16 senators
even after cloture: still 30 more hours allowed, where Senators can speak for no more than an hour
during gw bush’s presidency, the Dems used filibusters so effectively that Repubs considered changing the rules to make the process more difficult to achieve
Dems lost their ‘supermajority’ of 60, shortly before 2010 midterms, made their position far more difficult
if a party has a majority in both Congressional houses, theoretically, they’ll be able to pass most of their party platform legislation (providing there’s nothing too controversial)
ease of passing legislation is usually proportional to the size of the majority
strength of legislative process | weaknesses of legislative process |
checks n balances prevent tyranny, forcing compromise between different interests. in this sense, the USA creates a pluralist democracy in which power is shared | inefficiency/low output results from excessive need to compromise. Congress can’t act quickly, often failing to agree on legislation to address key needs |
quality policy comes from detailed consideration of bills n filters to remove undesirable aspects. this limits the danger of a bill being poorly though-through | high partisanship levels = unwillingness to compromise = gridlock. Constitution requires compromise for laws to be passed |
individual n state rights are protected, as Senators can insert amendments or filibuster on the basis of their equal state power n interests | poor-quality legislation can come from too much compromise. a bill may lack coherence due to many amendments n interests. prevalent pork-barrelling can create financially wasteful policy not based on rational decisions |
evaluate the view that congress is effective in its legislative role