WEEK 1
Aristotle+Plato’s opinions on comms
Aristotle’s 3 proofs
Ethos- a person’s character
logos- arguments/logic
pathos- appeal to emotions
mythos
aristotle’s model of comms
Need examples and enthymemes to express an argument acc to Aristotle
Enthymemes-syllogism w a suppressed premise (only one premise+conclusion)
Syllogisms- part of deductive reasoning
Major premise
Minor premise
Logical conwitt
^3 step process to prove cases
Forefather of comms
Harold Lasswell (1902-1978)
Research in prop. During WW1
Invented content analysis rm to measure comms
Paul Lazarsfeld (1901-1976)
pioneered market research
initiated media effects tradition >dominant paradigm in mass comm research
Kurt Lewin (1890-1947)
field theory still referred to widely in comms research
interpersonal and grp comms influencer
Carl Hovland (1912-1961)
Sleeper effect (you agree more with someone than you disagree with them)
You will remember more about what you agree with than what you disagreed w
dyadic communication
Wilbur Schramm (1907-1987)
Father of mass communication
schramm spoke w a stutter and sought to understand why
named head of journalism in 1943
started the first mass comm doctoral program in a J-school, created a gen model for comms study in unis
WEEK 2
communication: the process by which info is exchanged among 2 or more systems that exist within a common environment- Brian Reynolds
interpersonal comm: comm btwn individuals focusing on relational processes
intrapersonal comm: comm with oneself
nonverbal communication: communication without the use of words
mass comm: comm using tech as a medium to communicate to a large audience
international comm: comm among nations, regional entities, and international orgs
intercultural communication: communication that occurs in interactions between people who are culturally different, understanding how different ppl communicate and act differently
group communication: comm which occurs in groups, looking at characteristics such as collaboration, cohesion, structure, identity, and decisions making in small scale and large scale contexts
organizational communication: comm in and by an organization. an org is a structured collection of interdependent members with a common interest, working together to achieve goals
model: abstract representation of a general set of elements of a phenomenon, showing the relationship of those elements and clarifying their details in context
uses of a model
explain: explain the relationship btwn the elements
predict: understand directionality of changes w/in and btwn elements
control: one can potentially control the elements
Linear Model of Communication
Sender: person who communicates the message
message: set of info or symbols produced by sender to which meaning can be attributed
channel: the means via which we send a message (eg- video call, cell phones, TV)
receiver: the recipient of the message
Interactive Model of communication
Encoding: process of creating meaning into a specific form of a message
decoding: process of extracting meaning from a message
feedback: response to a message
noise: interrupters in the environment of the message
physical/external- literally physical noise
psychological/internal- might affect one of the senses which will impact ability of message to be sent and received
semantic/social- using words known by fewer ppl
Transactional model of communication
mutual influence: ongoing and active contribution/influence of all parties in the communication process
transactional: simultaneous and mutually influential process of encoding and decoding messages
communicator: the sender/encoder and receiver/decoder in the communication process
Lasswell’s model
Context: productive process of communication effects
who → says what→ in which channel→ to whom→ w what effect
Shannon-Weaver model
Mediated Communication
Context: communication w others via a device or tech
info source: communicator originating the message
message: the info sent directly by the source
transmitter: the device sending the message
signal: the form in which the message is sent via the device
noise source: interference w message transmission
received signal: the device receiving the message
received message: what is actually produced by the receiving device after receiving the signal
destination: indivi who is the target of the mediated message
Gerbner’s Model
Context: journalism- describes the process of observation and communication of observed events: perception and representation
Perceptual dimension
E- event that is perceived by a person
M- person
E1- perception of the event through objective and subjective interpretation
Means and control dimension
S- form: availability of channels of the source; particular characteristics of chosen channel(s); skill of message source using chosen channel (s)
E- content: info abt the event
SE- statement construct by source abt the event
lower horizontal arm
M2- destination: a decoder (audience) interprets the info received via the channel used by the source (M)
SE1- perceptual filtering in the decoding process generated an interpretation of event
Berlo’s SMCR model
Context: complexity to achieve fidelity (accuracy) in comm
interdependent components w/in basic linear elements
Source
communication skills: skill of the invid to communicate
attitudes: attitude towards audience, subject and oneself
knowledge: communicator needs to be knowledgeable in the subject
social systems: values, beliefs, culture, and a gen understanding of society
culture: also comes under social systems
message
content: body of the message
elements: non verbal cues
treatment: the accuracy of the message being conveyed
structure: how the message is arranged
code: the form and means in which it was conveyed (eg- body language, gestures etc)
Westley-Maclean model
Context: journalism
A- reporter (observer)
C- editor (gatekeeper)
B- audience (receiver)
f- feedback
X^1- message
X^11-modified message
X1- info
the convergence model
Lawrence Kincaid (1979)
Context: Processual communication- change in communicators’ relationships, the understanding of each other, and continuing communication together over time. focuses on global tendencies in comm exchanges
“and then…”- any comm interaction is based upon what has come before and is part of a larger system and is part of a layer system of communication
A+B: communicators who interact in cyclical patterns of information sharing (I1)
each interaction represents a transaction in which participants express and interpret information
Week 3
Perception- the process by which we make sense of the world around us
Using senses to acquire info abt the surrounding environment to situation
Active perception- your mind selects, organizes, and interprets that which you sense
Physiological process-receiving info through our senses of sight, hearing, touch, taste, smell
Cognitive- the sorting, organizing, and interpreting of our senses
Subjective perception- uniquely constructed meaning attributed to sensed stimuli
Psychological influence-own mental outlook shapes our own thought processes, character, and experience
Social influence- communication interaction of and with others
Our communication should exist before any perceived reality
our perception creates the world which requires comm
comms is based on perception not on reality
Perception process
Selection
How we choose which sensory info to process
Organization
How we arrange or order that info
Interpretation
How we attach meaning to that perception
Selection process
frequency: things that occur repeatedly
contrast: things that stand out in some manner
intensity: things are particularly strong or extreme versions of a phenomenon
novel: things that are new to us
Other influences
Own individual characteristics- past experiences, socialization, knowledge and social roles
Social factors- social media, mass media
Consciously focusing on stimuli- narrow focus on an item
errors in selection
omission: inaccurate perception of events due to not selecting an important piece of information for processing
distortion: the incorrect prioritizing of what info is essential or imp
oversimplification: selection of unnecessarily significant info for a superficial or oversimplified understanding of something
Organization process
cognitive schemata: mental framework that are applied when organizing information about a situation, event, person etc
established through experience, socialization, familiarity, and biological ‘hard wiring’
types of schema
personal constructs
physical constructs: how ppl are organized according to their physical attributes
role constructs: ppl are organized based on their social role and position
interactional constructs: ppl are organized based on their social and interactional qualities
psychological constructs: ppl are organized based on their disposition or personality traits
prototype: idealized representation that is most representative of a category and its qualities
scripts: a cognitive framework for an event or action
chronological or sequential to anticipate future/ongoing events or actions
series of events and linked responses
govern our behaviour is familiar occurrences
figure and ground
figure- the focal point
ground- the bg against which your focused attention occurs
closure
tendency to fill in missing info to complete your perceptive understanding
proximity
the principle that items physically close to each other will be perceived as a unit or whole
similarity
elements grouped together bc they share attributes like size, colour, or shape
Interpretation
subjective interpretation of associations of meaning we have learned for numerous stimuli as part of our culture, socialization, and past experiences
attributions and context-
context- perceived rules, norms, and principles that govern our behaviour in the short and long term, in familiar and unfamiliar settings
attributions- assigning cause to behaviour
internal- external locus of control; cause of behaviours is w/in the person or beyond their control- eg. failed an exam due to bad study habits or exam is too difficult
stability- short or long-term behaviour- eg. failed an exam due to tiredness or dyslexia
control- ability to exercise control over his/her actions- eg. failed an exam bc went to an all-night party the night before
tendencies in perception
self-serving bias- judge ourselves more tolerantly than we judge other by overemphasizing situational explanations for our own actions
fundamental attribution error- tendency to assume the cause of the behaviour is with the person
out-group homogeneity- tendency to view out-grp member as more alike than in-grp members
persistence of first impressions- we tend to send out, infer, or assume evidence that confirms our initial reads