aronson-laughter-2016-the-theory-and-practice-of-culturally-relevant-education-a-synthesis-of-research-across-content (1)

Overview of Culturally Relevant Education (CRE)

Culturally Relevant Education (CRE) seeks to connect educational practices with the diverse cultural backgrounds of students, providing an inclusive environment that reflects their identities. Despite many educators asserting their practice of CRE, standardized curricula frequently overlook these culturally responsive approaches, often marginalizing students’ experiences. There is a pressing need for evidence-based research to demonstrate how CRE positively impacts student outcomes in terms of engagement, motivation, and academic success.

Historical Context

CRE emerged in response to the challenges of school desegregation during the 1960s and 1970s, evolving over time to focus on effectively teaching a diverse student body. Its development has been informed by the need to address historical injustices within educational systems. Key concepts associated with CRE include culturally appropriate, congruent, responsive, and compatible education, as outlined by researchers like Au & Jordan (1981), Mohatt & Erickson (1981), and Cazden & Leggett (1981).

Research Strand Distinctions

In discussing CRE, two prominent research strands are identified:

• Teacher Practice: Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT), notably represented by Geneva Gay, emphasizes teaching strategies that leverage students' cultural knowledge and experiences to enhance learning.

• Teacher Posture: Culturally Relevant Pedagogy (CRP), as illustrated by Gloria Ladson-Billings, focuses on the teacher's perspective and aims to empower students through culturally relevant practices.

Both CRT and CRP share a commitment to social justice and view the classroom as a site for social change, ultimately advocating for educational transformations that benefit all students.

Defining Culturally Relevant Education (CRE)

CRE synthesizes both CRT and CRP to support a diverse range of students, providing an opposition to neoliberal educational reforms that typically promote standardized curricula and individualism. CRE is conceptualized as a pedagogy of opposition and a tool for collective empowerment, emphasizing the importance of recognizing and valuing students’ cultural identities in the learning process.

Contributions to CRE Framework

Geneva Gay’s Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT)

CRT leverages cultural knowledge, experiences, and students' frames of reference to enhance the learning experience. It consists of six dimensions:

• Academic Empowerment: Supporting students in achieving their highest academic potential.

• Multidimensionality: Recognizing the complex identity of each student.

• Cultural Validation: Affirming and integrating students' cultures into the curriculum.

• Whole-Child Education: Addressing the comprehensive needs of students.

• Social Transformation: Encouraging students to engage with and transform their communities.

• Liberation from Oppressive Practices: Challenging systemic inequities in education. Developing CRT practice requires educators to understand student backgrounds and dismantle deficit perspectives, adopting a strengths-based view of students.

Gloria Ladson-Billings’s Culturally Relevant Pedagogy (CRP)

CRP emphasizes empowering students through the integration of cultural references in their education. It is built on three main components:

• Long-term Academic Achievement: Valuing sustained academic success beyond mere testing metrics.

• Cultural Competence: Equipping students with the skills needed to navigate and appreciate cultural differences in various contexts.

• Sociopolitical Consciousness: Encouraging students to critically examine societal inequalities and their own roles within them.

Practical Applications of CRE

Educators should engage in teaching practices that both acknowledge and honor students' cultural backgrounds, while fostering critical thinking, engagement, and relevance in the curriculum. CRE engages students in curriculum design that reflects their lived experiences and cultural backgrounds, thus promoting a meaningful and inclusive learning environment.

Key Components of CRE

• Construction of Knowledge: Utilizing students' cultural references to create meaningful academic connections.

• Critical Reflection: Encouraging students to analyze their own lives and the broader societal context critically.

• Cultural Competence: Developing the ability to understand and respect one's culture as well as others'.

• Critique of Power Systems: Providing students with tools to challenge and analyze societal inequalities through a critical lens.

Evidence-Based Outcomes of CRE

Research indicates that CRE practices yield positive correlations with student engagement, motivation, and academic achievement across various subjects, including Mathematics, Science, Social Studies, English Language Arts, and English as a Second Language (ESL).

CRE in Mathematics

Implementation of CRE in Mathematics demonstrates increased student interest and engagement by connecting lessons to relevant community issues and students' lives. Notable research by Tate (1995), Civil & Khan (2001), and Ensign (2003) highlights improved understanding of mathematical concepts through culturally relevant approaches.

CRE in Science

Integration of CRE principles in Science education enhances cultural competence in scientific inquiry, leading to greater engagement and critical discussions surrounding societal issues (Milner, 2011).

CRE in History/Social Studies

The incorporation of diverse perspectives in History and Social Studies education encourages students to critically reflect on historical narratives, fostering a sense of agency and challenging Eurocentric viewpoints (Epstein et al., 2011).

CRE in English Language Arts

Utilizing culturally relevant texts and integrating hip-hop pedagogy has been shown to empower students and enhance literacy outcomes, especially through connections to societal issues highlighted in lyrics (Morrell & Duncan-Andrade, 2002).

CRE in ESL Instruction

Studies reveal significant improvements in writing and literacy outcomes among English Language Learners (ELL) and immigrant populations when culturally relevant practices are implemented (Irizarry & Antrop-González, 2007).

Conclusion

Culturally Relevant Education is an essential pedagogical approach that prioritizes inclusivity, affirms diverse identities, and seeks to empower students. By fostering educational environments that reflect and respect students’ identities and experiences, CRE contributes to improved academic outcomes and cultivates critical engagement with social issues in an ever-diversifying global landscape.