LX

Emotion, Affective Processes, Attitudes and Consistency – Quick Reference (Ch.6-7)

What is emotion?

  • Emotion: conscious, unified state tied to an event; mood: diffuse feeling not clearly linked to an event; affect: automatic evaluation of a stimulus as good or bad (liking vs disliking).

  • Positive affect vs negative affect are typically treated as distinct dimensions.

  • Emotions bridge mental and physical processes (feelings, arousal, bodily responses).

Conscious emotion versus automatic affect

  • Conscious emotion: felt as a strong, unified feeling state (e.g., anger, joy).

  • Automatic affect: quick, nonconscious liking/disliking toward something; can occur without awareness.

  • Both dimensions are important; one cannot determine which is more influential.

Emotions and arousal

  • Arousal: physiological activation (e.g., heart rate, breathing); linked to many emotions but not necessarily to automatic affect.

  • Arousal can be similar across different emotions, challenging simple one-to-one mappings between arousal and specific emotions.

James-Lange theory of emotion

  • Proposes bodily changes follow perceived exciting facts; feeling of changes creates emotion (bodily response → emotion).

  • Empirical support weak for distinct bodily patterns across emotions.

  • Led to facial feedback hypothesis: facial expressions can evoke or magnify emotions due to facial muscle activity influencing brain input.

  • Botox reducing facial feedback can impair recognizing others’ emotions.

Facial feedback hypothesis

  • SMILE vs FROWN manipulation can influence how much one enjoys stimuli.

  • Facial feedback may help in recognizing others’ emotions.

Schachter-Singer theory of emotion

  • Emotion has two components: physiological arousal and cognitive label.

  • Arousal is relatively nonspecific; cognitive label determines the emotion experienced.

  • The arousal channel can be mislabelled; context helps assign the correct emotional meaning.

Misattribution of arousal

  • Arousal from one source can be misattributed to another situational cause (excitation transfer).

  • Classic experiments show arousal from one event can intensify reactions to a subsequent event depending on label.

  • Real-world example: fear arousal on a bridge leading to increased attraction to an approaching person can be misattributed as love or attraction.

  • Two basic arousal states observed: pleasant and unpleasant; arousal from genuine events tends to be clearly good or bad.

Some important emotions

  • Happiness: linked to belongingness; influenced by comparisons and expectations; hedonic treadmill describes adaptation to life events.

  • Anger: signals approach/defensive action; can be adaptive for asserting rights or defusing conflict, but is heavily regulated across cultures.

  • Guilt vs. shame: guilt is about a specific action and can repair relationships; shame is about the self and is often destructive.

  • Disgust: avoidance of potential infection or moral violations; motivates health-protective behaviors; linked to moral judgments and purity norms.

Why do we have emotions?

  • Emotions promote belongingness and social bonds.

  • They communicate social information and guide behavior, thinking, and learning.

  • Anticipated emotions guide decisions, sometimes more than actual emotions.

  • Positive emotions counteract negative ones and build resources (broaden-and-build theory).

  • Emotions affect memory, learning, and decision making; they help prioritize information.

Emotions promote belongingness and social information

  • Emotions facilitate forming and maintaining relationships (e.g., weddings, acceptance into institutions).

  • Emotions signal when relationships are threatened (e.g., fear, sadness, anger).

  • Emotions can be contagious; people’s moods spread via social channels and social media.

Emotions guide thinking and learning; anticipation in decisions

  • Emotions shape how people process information and learn from mistakes.

  • Anticipated emotions can influence choices by forecasting future feelings (anticipatory regret, etc.).

  • Affective forecasting is often inaccurate; people overestimate duration and intensity of future emotions.

Affective forecasting and decision making

  • Anticipated regret can bias decisions toward the status quo to avoid possible future bad feelings.

  • Emotions can bias risk judgments (risk-as-feelings hypothesis).

  • Positive emotions broaden attention; negative emotions narrow attention.

Positive emotions counteract negative emotions; emodiversity

  • Broadening-and-building: positive emotions expand thought-action repertoires and build resources (intellectual, physical, social, psychological).

  • Positive moods improve flexibility, creativity, persistence; reduced risk taking in some contexts.

  • Emodiversity: variety of emotions experienced; higher emodiversity linked to better mental/physical health.

Group differences in emotion

  • Six basic facial emotions recognized cross-culturally: anger, surprise, disgust, happiness, fear, sadness (Ekman et al.).

  • Cross-cultural consensus in recognizing basic expressions; some cultural differences in display rules.

  • Gender differences: mixed evidence; large-scale daily-life studies often show little difference in emotional experience between men and women; some lab studies show stronger lab-reported emotions in women, but physiological measures often reveal little difference; men may show stronger arousal in some contexts.

  • Love: men often report loving earlier; women may report love differently; breakup distress can differ by gender.

Arousal, attention and performance

  • Yerkes-Dodson law: some arousal improves performance, but too much impairs it (inverted U-shape).

  • Curve is steeper for complex tasks; moderate arousal yields best performance.

  • Easterbrook's hypothesis: arousal narrows attention; under high arousal, performance can suffer due to missing relevant information.

Emotional intelligence (EI or EQ)

  • Definition: ability to perceive, generate, understand, and regulate emotions to foster thinking and growth.

  • Four components: perceiving, facilitating, understanding, managing emotions.

  • Higher EI linked to better affect forecasting, job performance, leadership, relationships, health; some evidence of a dark side (association with narcissism, psychopathy, Machiavellianism in some contexts).

Affect regulation

  • Regulation helps manage emotional responses to maintain functioning.

  • Strategies include: doing things that produce positive affect (eating, exercise, listening to music); distraction; arousal control (caffeine, sleep, relaxation); seeking social support; problem-focused strategies (reframing, humor, perspective-taking); prayer.

  • Exercise often rated as highly effective; some strategies (like venting) can backfire.

  • Goals of affect regulation: enter/exit/prolong good or bad moods depending on context.

  • Prior to social interactions, people may regulate mood to optimize performance; context matters.

  • Gender differences in mood regulation: women may ruminate; men may distract themselves or use humor; differences in coping styles exist but averages show substantial similarity.

Is affect regulation safe?

  • Emotions are valuable for guidance; over-regulation can hamper social functioning.

  • Overly suppressing emotion can be detrimental; some emotional experience is necessary for adaptation.

The social side of sex and related constructs

  • Arousal can be physiological or sexual; brain-genital link may differ by gender; sexual arousal can be misinterpreted under certain conditions.

  • Mood and sexual decision making: sexual arousal can bias risk judgments and learning about contraceptive information.

  • Mood effects on eating (mood-congruent eating patterns): negative moods associated with unhealthy food choices; positive moods can increase flexibility and task engagement.

Money matters

  • Emotions influence financial decisions; disgust and sadness can alter willingness to buy/sell; disgust lowers selling price and willingness to pay; sadness tends to lower selling price but can increase willingness to acquire.

  • Background socioeconomic status affects risk-taking and impulsivity in spending.

What makes us human? Putting the cultural animal in perspective

  • Human emotion is tied to meaning and ideas; cognitive labeling (as in Schachter-Singer) allows emotions to be refined and differentiated.

  • Humans have vast emotional vocabularies; self-concept and culture shape emotion regulation and expression.

  • Emotion regulation is sophisticated in humans, facilitating social acceptance, culture, science, and philosophy.

Chapter 6 Summary (key points)

  • Emotions involve conscious experience and automatic affect; both are essential.

  • Arousal is a core component; theories differ on how arousal translates to emotion (James-Lange vs Schachter-Singer).

  • Positive emotions broaden attention and build resources; negative emotions focus attention and may aid learning.

  • Happiness is influenced by outlook and social connections; objective predictors have weak relationships with happiness; social bonds are the strongest predictor.

  • Guilt vs. shame: guilt tends to be constructive for relationships; shame often destructive.

  • Disgust motivates health-protective behaviors and can influence moral judgments.

  • Emotions guide thinking and learning, but they do not uniformly determine behavior; automatic affect can prompt quick reactions, while conscious emotion informs longer-term decisions.

  • Affective forecasting is often inaccurate in predicting future emotions.

  • Emotion and decision making interact with risk, memory, and learning; positive emotions can improve flexibility, problem solving, and resilience.

  • Emotional intelligence supports regulation and social functioning; the “dark triad” traits can co-occur with high EI in some contexts.

  • Affect regulation strategies and goals are context-dependent and can have varying effectiveness.

  • Humans uniquely integrate meaning, culture, and cognition into emotion.

Attitudes, beliefs and consistency (Chapter 7)

What are attitudes and why do people have them?

  • Attitudes: global evaluations toward objects or issues (like/dislike, approve/disapprove).

  • Beliefs: pieces of information about objects/issues (facts or opinions).

  • Automatic attitudes: fast, non-conscious evaluations; deliberate attitudes: reflective, controlled evaluations.

  • Dual attitudes: automatic vs deliberate attitudes toward the same object; can conflict.

Why people have attitudes

  • Humans live in complex environments requiring many attitudes to navigate choices and social interactions; attitudes ease decision making and action selection.

How attitudes are formed

  • Mere exposure effect: familiarity increases liking; exposure to stimuli (words, faces, etc.) increases favorable attitudes unless initial attitude is negative.

  • Embodied attitudes: bodily states can influence attitudes (e.g., head or body movements can influence agreement with messages).

  • Classical conditioning: attitudes can form via pairing neutral stimuli with positive/negative unconditioned stimuli.

  • Operant conditioning: attitudes shift with rewards/punishments for behaviours.

  • Social learning: people imitate attitudes and behaviours observed in others, especially when those others are rewarded.

Consistency of attitudes

  • Cognitive dissonance: inconsistencies between cognitions and behaviours create discomfort; people modify attitudes or behaviours to restore consistency.

  • Effort justification: hard-won outcomes lead to attributing greater value to the outcome.

  • Suffering for a group increases liking for the group (effort and social belonging).

  • Post-decision dissonance: after making a choice, people justify the chosen option to reduce dissonance.

  • Dissonance can be reduced by changing attitudes, rationalizing, or changing perception of alternatives.

  • Dissonance is often accompanied by arousal and social pressures (self-presentation and audience effects).

Do attitudes really predict behaviours?

  • The A-B problem: attitudes do not always predict behaviours well; better predictions occur when attitudes are specific, measured across time, consciously salient, and highly accessible.

  • Attitude–behaviour link is stronger for explicit, context-relevant attitudes and behaviours, and weaker for broad, general attitudes.

Beliefs and believing

  • Belief vs understanding: automatic belief often accompanies understanding; deliberate doubt can override automatic belief.

  • Belief perseverance: once beliefs form, they are resistant to change even when evidence contradicts them.

  • Coping and beliefs: beliefs help people cope with trauma by downward comparison, restoring self-esteem and control, and finding meaning or purpose (including religious beliefs).

  • Assumptive worlds: people hold beliefs about how the world should be; misfortune can threaten these beliefs, and coping involves restoring or reframing them.

What makes us human? Putting the cultural animal in perspective

  • Humans rely heavily on attitudes and beliefs; we use language and culture to navigate consistency, doubt, and social meaning.

  • Dual attitudes and the ability to doubt are uniquely human features that support science, philosophy, and culture.

Beliefs and believing (testable takeaways)

  • Automatic belief often accompanies understanding; deliberate doubt is a separate step.

  • Belief perseverance can be mitigated by presenting opposite theories and encouraging critical thinking.

Chapter 7 Summary (key points)

  • Attitudes: global evaluations; beliefs: informational assertions.

  • Automatic vs deliberate attitudes; dual attitudes may conflict.

  • Mere exposure, embodied attitudes, classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and social learning shape attitudes.

  • Attitude polarisation: reflecting on attitudes can make them more extreme.

  • Consistency theories (notably cognitive dissonance) explain how people reduce inconsistency between thoughts and actions.

  • A-B problem: attitudes do not always predict behaviour; specificity, aggregation, accessibility, and conscious prominence improve predictions.

  • Behavioural intentions (theory of planned behaviour) link attitudes to behaviour via subjective norms and perceived behavioural control.

  • Selective exposure and filter bubbles: people tend to seek information that confirms their attitudes; media and algorithms can reinforce beliefs.

  • Coping and assumptive worlds: beliefs and coping strategies help people manage trauma and stress; religion often supports coping.

  • Irrational beliefs can undermine well-being but sometimes serve as coping mechanisms in the short term.

  • What makes us human: emotion, cognition, meaning, culture, and language enable complex social behavior and self-regulation.

Key terms (selected)

  • affect, affect-as-information hypothesis, affect balance, affective forecasting, arousal, automatic affect, brute vs deliberate processing, disgust, emodiversity, emotional intelligence, facial feedback hypothesis, helplessness, hedonic treadmill, life satisfaction, mood, optimism, resilience, risk-as-feelings hypothesis, shaming vs guilt, social learning, mere exposure effect, operant conditioning, precision in attitudes, cognitive dissonance, post-decision dissonance, selective exposure, theory of planned behaviour

End of notes