Chapter 9: Human Development
Developmental psychology: study of how behavior changes over the lifespan
Nature: our genetics
Nurture: environment
Clarifying the nature-nurture debate
Gene-environment interaction: The impact of genes on behavior depends on the environment in which the behavior develops
Bidirectional relationship of genes and environment
Example: Individuals with gene causing low production of monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) are more likely to become violent criminals
This genetic risk factor depends on exposure to environmental factors
Low MAO gene + maltreatment → violence
Low MAO gene without maltreatment → no effect
Nature via nurture: genetic predispositions drive us to select and create particular environments that influence our behavior
Leads to mistaken appearance of nature being the causal factor, but in reality, genetics are involved in the environment we select
Ex. fearful children seek environments rid of their anxieties → makes it appear as though safe environments creates fearfulness, even though this is controlled by their genetic predispositions
Gene expression: some genes “turn on” only in response to specific environmental triggers
Epigenetics: whether genes are active is regulated by day-by-day and moment-by-moment environmental conditions
Ex. children with genes that predispose them to anxiety may never become anxious unless a highly stressful life event occurs (ex. family death)
The Mystique of Early Experience
External stimuli have a significant impact on brain development and behavior
Mistake of overestimating the unique impact of experiences during infancy on long-term development
Children are highly resilient
Can withstand stress and trauma in surprisingly good shape
Later experiences play a large role in development, not just early experiences
Positive experiences can often counteract the negative effects of early deprivation in children from diverse cultures
Brain changes throughout childhood and adulthood
Attending to Cohort Effects
Systematic differences between generations can impact behavior
Ex. the spending habits of millennials vs. those raised during the Great Depression differ due to systematic differences in the environments they were raised in
Cross-sectional design: research design that examines people of different ages at a single point in time
Cohort effects: the risk of cross-sectional design is that it doesn’t control for cohort effects: effect observed in a sample of participants that results from individuals in the sample growing up during a certain time period
Longitudinal design: research design that examines development in the same group of people on multiple occasions over time
The only way to control for cohort effects
Can be costly, time consuming, or nearly impossible to conduct
Attrition: participants drop out of study before it is completed
Problem in longitudinal design because participants who drop out may differ in important ways from the participants that stay in
Commonly observational designs instead of experimental → cannot infer cause and effect relationship
Post-hoc fallacy: false assumption that because one event occurs before another event, it must have caused that event
Ex. 100% of serial killers drank milk as children → doesn’t mean milk CAUSES murder
Bidirectional influences
Children’s experiences influence their development, and their development also influences what they experience
Conception and Prenatal Development: From Zygote to Baby
Prenatal period: human body acquires basic form and structure
Zygote: fertilized egg
Blastocyst (conception to 1.5 weeks, germinal stage)
Zygote divides to form blastocyst: ball of identical cells without specialized function
Embryo (2-8 weeks, embryonic stage)
Cells differentiate
Development of limbs, facial features, major organs (heart, lungs, brain)
Spontaneous miscarriages occur when embryo doesn’t form properly
Fetus (9 weeks to birth, fetal stage)
Major organs are established, heart begins to beat
Physical maturation until birth (“bulking up”)
Brain Development: 18 Days and Beyond
Brain begins to develop 18 days after fertilization
Continues to develop well into adulthood and adolescence (until other organs which only grow in size after birth)
Proliferation: prenatal stage from 18 days to 6 months when neurons develop at astronomical rate
Up to 250,000 brain cells per minute
Migration: beginning in the 4th month, neurons migrate and move to their final positions in specific structures of the brain, such as the hippocampus and cerebellum
Obstacles to Normal Fetal Development
Premature birth
Full term = 40 weeks
Premature birth = born at less than 36 weeks gestation
Viability point: point in pregnancy at which infants can typically survive on their own (25 weeks but varies)
Preemies (premature birth babies) have underdeveloped lungs and brains, often cannot breath/maintain healthy body temperature → delays in cognitive and physical development
With each week of pregnancy, odds of fetal survival increase and odds of development disorders decrease
Some preemies can “catch up” and do not suffer long-term consequences, especially if born after 32 weeks gestation and have healthy birth weight for their gestational age
Low birth weight
Less than 5.5 pounds at full term
Average is 7.5 pounds
Linked to high risk of death, infection, developmental delays, psychological disorders such as depression and anxiety (may be confounding variables)
Exposure to hazardous environment influences
Teratogens: environmental factors that can affect prenatal development negatively
Drugs, alcohol, chicken pox, X-rays
Fetal alcohol syndrome → learning disabilities, delays in physical growth, facial malformations, behavioral disorders
Smoking → low birth weight
Chronic stress, anxiety, and depression in gestational parent → alters fetus’s chemical and physiological environment
Genetic disorders/errors in cell division
Infant Motor Development: How Babies Get Going
Infant reflexes (survival instinct)
Infants born with automatic motor reflexes that are triggered by survival needs
Sucking reflex: automatic response to oral stimulation
Rooting reflex: infants look for feeding source in response to stimulation of their face
Acquisition of purposeful motor behaviors
Motor behaviors: bodily motions that occur as a result of self-initiated force that moves the bones and muscles
Major motor milestones
Sitting without support: 6 months
Crawling: 9 months
Standing: 11 months
Cruising: 12 months
Walking without assistance: 13 months
Running: 18-24 months
Factors that influence motor development
Physical maturation/body weight → strength and coordination
Heavier babies take longer to develop enough strength to hold themselves up
Cultural and parenting practices
Swaddling in Peru, China, Tajikistan → prevents free movement of limbs, slows down motor development
Stretching, massaging, and strength building exercises in Africa and West Indies → speeds up infants motor development
Cloth and disposable diapers in industrialized societies → slow down walking
Growth and Physical Development Throughout Childhood
Head to body ratio decreases as we age
Hormonal changes
Growth hormone (pituitary gland) → growth spurts
Reproductive system releases sex hormones estrogen and androgen → growth and physical changes
Puberty: maturation of reproductive systems
Primary sex characteristics: reproductive organs and genitals
Secondary sex characteristics: sex-differentiating characteristics that don’t directly relate to reproduction
development of breast tissue, deeper voices in men, and pubic hair
Menarche: onset of menstruation, begins once girls have achieved full physical maturity (?)
Spermarche: first ejaculation, 13 years old
Boys take much longer to fully mature
Can ejaculate before they are physically mature
Genetic component of puberty onset
Noticeable difference in strength and endurance
Physical changes in adulthood
Physical peak in early 20s
As we age…
Change in muscle mass/body fat ratio
Decline in senses
Decline in fertility (females) in 30s and 40s
Menopause: end of menstruation, women can no longer reproduce
Triggered by reduction in estrogen → “hot flashes”
Men can reproduce well into old age, but there is a decline in sperm production and testosterone levels
Changes in agility and physical coordination with age
Simple motor tasks → no decline in ability
Learning new motor skills → decline in ability
Strength training minimizes the decline in motor capability
Cognitive development: study of how children acquire the ability to learn, think, reason, communicate, and remember
Core differences in different theories on cognitive development
Stage-like development vs. continuous development
Mental growth spurts (sudden spurts in knowledge followed by periods of stability)
Continuous (gradual and incremental) changes in understanding
Domain-general vs. domain-specific
Domain-general: changes in cognitive skills that affect all areas of cognition together
Domain-specific: children’s cognitive skills in different domains develop at different times
Main source of learning
Physical experience: moving around in the world
Social interaction: how parents and peers engage with them
Biological maturation: innate programming of certain mental capacities
Jean Piaget’s theories
Showed that children are not miniature adults → their understanding of the world differs fundamentally
Children are NOT passive learners, they are active learners who seek information and observe the consequences of their actions
Piaget’s 4 Stages of Development
Sensorimotor stage (birth to 2 years)
Main source of knowledge and thinking is through physical interaction with the world
Observing consequences of their actions
Object permanence and separation anxiety
No thought beyond immediate physical experiences
Preoperational stage (2 to 6 years)
Able to think beyond the here and now, but egocentric and unable to perform mental transformations
Symbols such as language and drawings
Egocentric: the world revolves around their personal experiences
Concrete operational stage (7 to 12 years)
Able to perform mental transformations but only on concrete physical objects
Ex. can sort coins by size → need a physical experience as an anchor for mental operations
Can’t perform mental operations in abstract or hypothetical situations
Formal operational stage (12+ years)
Can perform most sophisticated type of thinking: hypothetical reasoning beyond the here and now
Can understand logical concepts and abstract questions
Equilibration: Piaget proposed that cognitive change occurs in children to achieve equilibration: the balance between their experience of the world and their understanding of it
Children match their thinking about the world around their observations
Assimilation: absorbing new experience into our current understanding/schema, there is no change in cognition or worldview
Accommodation: Beliefs/schemas are altered to become more compatible with new experiences
Stage changes are a result of accommodation → forces children to accept a new way of thinking about the world
Pros and cons of Piaget’s theory
Evidence that development is more continuous than stagelike
Development is less domain-general than Piaget proposed
Depended on children’s ability to report their experiences, which doesn’t match their ACTUAL level of understanding
Culturally biased
3 important contributions of Piaget
Viewing children as entirely different from adults
Characterizing learning as an active rather than passive process
Exploring general cognitive processes that apply to many domains → more straightforward underlying factors in development
Vygotsky’s Theory: Social and Cultural Influences on Learning
Social and cultural factors influence learning
Scaffolding: parents provide initial assistance in children’s learning but gradually remove structure as children become more competent
“Taking training wheels off of the bicycle”
Zone of proximal development: phase when children are receptive to learning a new skill but aren’t yet successful at it
At this stage, children benefit from instruction
There are NO domain-general stages → different children acquire skills and master tasks at different rates
Cognitive Landmarks of Early Development
Physical reasoning
Piaget’s object permanence: understanding that objects continue to exist when they’re out of view (developed around 5 months of age)
Conceptual categorizations
Learning to categorize objects by kind
Things that look different can take a conceptual relationship
Formulation of self-concept
Developing a sense of self distinct from others
Theory of mind: children’s ability to understand that others’ perspectives can differ from theirs
Ability to reason about what other people know or believe
Language acquisition
Begins in the womb
5th month of pregnancy: fetuses can make out the gestational parent’s voice, recognize parts of their nature language and specific songs/stories
Shown through operant conditioning (high-amplitude sucking procedure) → showed that babies were more responsive to mother’s native language than foreign language
1st year of life
Phonemes: native language sounds
Babbling: intentional vocalization that lacks specific meaning
Learning words
Comprehension precedes production: children can recognize and interpret words well before they can produce words
Children begin to speak at around 1 year old
1 year to 1.5 years: vocabulary between 20 and 100 words
Mistakes in children’s speaking
Over-extension: applying words in a broader sense
Under-extension: applying words in a narrower sense
One-word stage: children begin speaking with individual words to convey entire thoughts
By age 2, they progress to 2-word phrases → more and more words over time
Critical period for language learning: narrow window of time in development when organism must learn skill in order to be successful at it
Fluency in language is influenced by age of exposure
Homesign: system of signs invented by children who are deaf with hearing parents → children develop language without parental input
Variability in language development
Different children reach language milestones at different points → doesn’t necessarily correlate with language proficiency later on
Parents talking to their kids more greatly improves vocabulary
Poorer parents tend to talk to their children less → language defecits
Theoretical accounts of language acquisition
Is language developed through imitation?
This is partially true because babies learn the language they hear
However, this doesn’t explain everything because language is generative
Generativity: language isn’t a set of predefined sentences, we produce new thoughts and ideas through unique combinations of words
Nativist account
States that children come into the world with some basic knowledge of how language works
Children are born with expectations of syntactic rules
Language acquisition device: Noam Chomsky hypothesized that humans possess a language “organ” preprogrammed in the brain that houses syntactic rules
Weakness of nativist account: claims are difficult to falsify
Challenges to these theoretical accounts
Children are better than adults at acquiring language
Specific areas of the brain are more active during language processing than in other contexts
Numbers and mathematics
First counting systems developed only a few thousand years ago → counting/mathematical skills do not inevitably develop
Mathematical concepts that children learn:
Numbers are about amount
Numbers refer to specific quantities
Numbers ordered from small to large
Size is not relevant to quantity (large object and small object are both 1 item)
These concepts are very difficult to learn, develop in different rates across countries
Cognitive changes in adolescence
Frontal lobe is not done maturing until late adolescence or early adulthood
Largely responsible for planning, decision making, and impulse control
Explains impulsive behaviors in teenagers
Teens have potential to engage in harmful behaviors (sex, vandalism, drunk driving) → make worse decisions because brain is not done developing
Peer influence
Limbic structures of the brain involved in social rewards become more active → teens more susceptible to peer influence and risk-taking
Cognitive function in adulthood
Many aspects of cognitive function decline with age
Ability to recall information decreases after age 30
Processing speed also declines, likely due to decrease in brain matter in certain areas
Aging brains become less efficient at removing waste proteins → cognitive decline
Some aspects of cognitive function improve with age
Free recall declines, but cued recall and recognition remain intact
Aging adults show relatively little decline when asked to remember material pertinent to their everyday lives
In contrast, their ability to remember random lists of words declines
Older adults perform better on vocabulary and knowledge tests that younger adults because crystallized intelligence stays the same or increases with age
Social Development in Infancy and Childhood
Infants prefer looking at faces over other objects
At 4 days of age, infants prefer looking at their gestational parent’s face over others
Stranger anxiety: develops around 8-9 months, infants will scream around strangers
Before this develops, infants are friendly with strangers
Stranger anxiety increases until 12-15 months, then declines steadily
Temperament: individual differences in children’s social and emotional styles that appears early in development and is largely genetic
3 major temperamental styles
Easy infants (40%): adaptable and relaxed
Difficult infants (10%): fussy and easily frustrated
Slow to warm up infants (15%): disturbed by new stimuli at first but gradually adjust
35% of infants do not fall into any of these categories
Behavioral inhibition (10%): another temperamental style identified by Jerome Kaga, infants become frightened due to new/unexpected stimuli → hearts pound, bodies tense, and amygdalae become active
High behavioral inhibition increases risk for shyness and anxiety disorders later in life
Very low behavioral inhibition increases risk for impulsive behaviors later in life
Temperament is stable across infancy
Influences how parents and caregivers interact w/ infants
Cultural differences in newborns
Attachment: strong emotional connection we share with those to whom we feel closest
Evolutionary purpose: ensures that infants and children don’t stray too far from caretakers
Imprinting: animals such as geese imprint on the first large moving object they see after hatching and become very fixated on it and are unlikely to follow or bond with anything else
Critical period: imprinting only occurs during a specific time period (36 hours)
Humans and more advanced mammals do not imprint, but still form attachment
Sensitive period: developmental windows in more complex creatures such as cats, dogs, and humans
Contact comfort: positive emotions afforded by touch
Different Attachment Styles
“The Strange Situation” lab procedure: measures how comfortable infant is alone in a room, how the infant responses when a stranger enters the room, how infant responds when mother leaves infant alone with stranger, infants behavior when mother returns
Revealed 4 attachment styles: (percentages apply to U.S. infants)
Secure attachment (60%): infant explores room but makes sure caregiver is watching, returns to caregiver when stranger enters, becomes upset when caregiver leaves, and then is happy when caregiver returns
Caregiver is secure base: rock-solid source of support
Insecure-avoidant attachment (15-20%): infant explores without acknowledging caregiver, doesn’t care about entry of stranger, doesn’t care when caregiver leaves or re-enters
Insecure-anxious attachment (15-20%): infant doesn’t explore toys without caregiver’s assistance, is distressed when stranger enters, panics when caregiver leaves, and shows mixed reaction when caregiver returns (reaches for caregiver but refuses to be picked up)
Also called anxious-ambivalent attachment
Disorganized attachment (5-10%): inconsistent and confused set of responses
These attachment styles predict children’s later behavior
Secure attachment style → tend to be more well-adjusted, helpful, and empathetic compared to infants with other attachment styles
Anxious attachment style → more likely to be disliked and mistreated by peers later in childhood
Infants can have different attachment styles with different family members
Display strong preference for primary caregiver until 18 months old
Influence of Parenting on Development
Parenting styles (Baumrind #1-3 Maccoby and Martin #4)
Permissive: Lenient with children, little to no discipline, lots of affection
Authoritarian: strict with children, little freedom, use punishment, little outward affection
Authoritative: supportive and affectionate but set/enforce clear and firm rules
Uninvolved: ignore their children, pay little attention to their positive or negative behaviors
Authoritative parenting style leads to children having the best social and emotional adjustment and lowest levels of behavior problems
Uninvolved parenting style leads to worst outcomes
Authoritarian/Permissive parenting styles are in-between
These findings may only apply to middle-class White American families
Average expectable environment: environment that provides children with basic needs for affection and discipline
As long as parents provide this, children will turn out fine
Self control: ability to inhibit our impulses
Identity: our sense of who we are + life goals and priorities
Erik Erikson’s 8 Stages of Human Development
Believed that personality/identity growth is continuous
Each of the stages has a distinct psychosocial crisis: dilemma concerning an individual’s relations to other people
Identity crisis: confusing that most adolescents experience regarding their sense of self
Difficulty resolving earlier crises heightens risk for later identity confusion and difficulty with intimacy/meaningful relationships
Infancy (trust vs. mistrust): developing general security, optimism, and trust in others
Toddlerhood (autonomy vs. shame/doubt): developing a sense of independence and confident self-reliance, taking setbacks in stride, or they doubt their abilities
Early childhood (initiative vs. guilt): developing initiative in exploring and manipulating the environment, or they feel guilty about efforts to be independent
Middle childhood (industry vs. inferiority): enjoyment and mastery of applying themselves to tasks, in and out of school, of they feel inferior
Adolescence (identity vs. role confusion): establishment of a stable and satisfying sense of role and direction, or they become confused about who they are
Young adulthood (intimacy vs. isolation): young adults struggle to form close relationships and to gain the capacity for intimate love, or they feel socially isolated
Adulthood (generativity vs. stagnation): satisfaction of familial needs and contributing to the world through work/helping others, or they feel a lack of purpose
Aging (ego integrity vs. despair): adjusting to the process of aging with satisfaction (or failure)
Emerging adulthood: period of life between the ages of 18 and 25 when many aspects of emotional development, identity, and personality become solidified
Role experimentation: occurs during emerging adulthood, trying on different identities
Moral development: knowing right from wrong
Moral development begins in childhood
Based on fear
Right → reward
Wrong → punishment (we learn not to do bad things to avoid punishment)
Moral dilemmas: situations in which there are no clear right or wrong answers
Piaget believed that children’s moral development is constrained by their cognitive development
Can understand intentions better as they progress through the stages of development
Kohlberg’s Moral Dilemmas
Scored participants based on reasoning processes
Concluded that morality develops in 3 major stages:
Preconventional morality: focus on punishment/reward
Conventional morality: focus on societal values
Postconventional morality: focus on internal moral principles
Chapter 10
Emotions: mental states or feeling associated with out evaluation of our experiences
Theories of emotions
Discrete emotions theory: humans have a small number of distinct emotions that are rooted in biology and combine in complex ways
Emotions have biological roots
Each emotion has an evolutionary function
The cortex (thinking) evolved after the limbic system (emotion), therefore our emotional reaction comes before our thoughts
Emotions are innate and essentially universal
Support for the evolutionary basis of emotions:
Emotional expressions don’t require direct reinforcement
Infants smile when alone
Blind infants have facial expressions
Behavioral immune system: set of cognitive, emotional, and behavioral mechanisms that alert us to threat of disease and motivate us to take steps to avoid infection
Certain emotions are evolutionarily adaptive
Ex. disgust: we wrinkle our nose, close eyes slightly, etc. to prevent disgusting stimuli with harmful bacteria from entering our bodies
Emotions prepare us for biologically important actions → physiological changes
Ex. clenching teeth and fists when angry → ready to fight
Ex. opening eyes wide when scared → looking for predators
Similarities between humans and nonhuman animals
Most mammals have similarities in communication → may have the same evolutionary origins
Cultural universality of emotional expressions
Similarities between expressions across cultures
Ekman and Friesan study: isolated New Guinea tribe could recognize emotions on Americans
Primary emotions: small number (7?) of emotions that are supposedly cross-cultural (happiness, sadness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, contempt)
Can be combined to form secondary emotions
Cultural differences in emotional expression
People from different cultures don’t always agree on emotional expressions
But on average, there is still some universality of emotions
Cultures differ in display rules: social guidelines or norms for how and when to express emotions
Friesen’s study on Japanese and American students’ reactions to gory film showed that Japanese participants changed their reaction to become more positive/neutral in the presence of authority figure, while Americans did not change their reactions
Cognitive theories of emotion: emotions are a product of our thinking
Disagrees with discrete emotion theory that claims that emotions are largely innate motor programs triggered by certain stimuli
Thinking → emotions
The way we interpret a situation influences what we feel in response
No discrete emotions because boundaries across emotions are blurry
Emotions are as diverse as our thoughts
3 Cognitive theories of emotion
James-Lange theory: emotions result from our interpretations of our bodily reactions to stimuli
Observations of our physiological state determine emotion
Ex. our body reacts to stimulus of a bear with sweating, feet running, heart pounding → fear
Somatic marker theory (Damasio): unconsciously and instantaneously use our autonomic responses to determine course of action
Physiological markers (ex. palms sweating) help us make decisions
Cannon-Bard theory: our bodily reactions and emotional responses occur simultaneously in response to stimulus
Ex. when we see bear hiking in forest, we feel fear and start running at the same time
Proposes that the thalamus triggers emotion and bodily reactions
Later researchers determined that thalamus AND hypothalamus and amygdala contribute to emotions
Two-factor theory: emotions are produced by 2 psychological events
In response to stimuli, we experience undifferentiated physiological arousal (alertness)
Undifferentiated means that this arousal is the same across all emotions
Seek to explain source of autonomic arousal by labeling it with an emotion
Emotions are the explanations we attach to state of arousal
Two-factor theory is supported by the Schachter and Singer experiment
Emotion requires physiological arousal AND attribution of that arousal to emotion-inducing event (in this case, it was the emotion of the confederate/undercover research assistant)
However, emotions don’t always require arousal
Cons of cognitive emotional theories
Discrete emotions → underestimates cultural differences, diversity of emotions, and how thinking influences emotions
Two-factor theory → partially true, but not all emotions require arousal
Unconscious influences on emotion: variables outside our awareness that can affect our feelings
Mere exposure effect: phenomenon in which repeated exposure to a stimulus enhances favorability
Evidence
Exposure to meaningless syllables/stimuli causes greater liking toward those stimuli
Subliminal exposure: exposure below the threshold of awareness causes greater liking
Facial feedback hypothesis: facial blood vessels send feedback to the brain that alters our experience of emotions
Much of our emotional expression is nonverbal
Nonverbal leakage: unconscious spillover of emotions into nonverbal behavior
Acts as a powerful cue when trying to conceal behavior
Body language and gestures
Posture and body language can convey our mood
Types of gestures
Illustrators: highlight or accentuate speech
Ex. moving our hands while talking
Manipulators: one part of the body strokes/presses/bites/touches another body part
Occurs when we are stressed (ex. nail biting)
Emblems: convey conventional meanings recognized by members of a culture
Ex. thumbs up in America means good
Personal space
Proxemics: study of personal space
Anthropologist Edward Hall observed that person distance is correlated with emotional distance
According to Hall, there are 4 levels of personal space
Public distance (12 feet or more): typically used for public speaking, such as lecturing
Social distance (4-12 ft): typically use for conversations among strangers and casual acquaintances
Personal distance (1.5-4 ft): typically used for conversations among close friends or romantic partners
Intimate distance (0-1.5 ft): typically used or kissing, hugging, whispering “sweet nothings,” and affectionate touching
These rules may differ by culture
When these implicit rules are violated, we feel uncomfortable
Lying and Lie Detection
Common misconception that nonverbal cues give away dishonesty (ex. shifty eyes, nervous body language)
This is not true!
Over-reliance on nonverbal cues leads to poor lie detection accuracy
Best way to figure out if someone is lying is to listen to what they’re saying rather than how they say it
Interviews that ask unexpected questions and look for lack of plausibility, inconsistency, sparse and uncheckable details
We are only 55% accurate at detecting lies on average (including police officers, customs officials, psychiatrists, and polygraph administrators)
Polygraph tests ask 3 kinds of yes or no questions
Relevant questions
Irrelevant questions
Control questions (probable lies)
Results: does better than chance at detecting lies, but has VERY high rate of false-positives → this test is biased against the innocent
Confuses physiological arousal with evidence of guilt
Purpose of happiness
Happiness may serve evolutionary adaptive functions
“Broaden and build theory” by Frederickson’s: happiness predisposes us to think more openly, allowing us to see a big picture we may have overlooked
We find novel solutions to problems, see more of the world, seek out more opportunities → better social lives
People with positive attitudes live longer
What Makes Us Happy: Myths and Reality
Life events don’t determine happiness
Positive life events were not correlated with higher overall happiness
Does money cause happiness?
Below annual salary of $75,000, there is a modest association between wealth and happiness
Above $75,000 a year, additional money doesn’t make us much happier
Killingsworth study found that number to be a bit higher
Larger incomes give people more control over their lives, greater opportunities for spending money to increase enjoyment and reduce suffering, and greater financial security
There is some amount at which happiness probably levels out
Old age?
Yes, happiness tends to increase with age
Positivity effect: tendency for individuals to remember more positive than negative information with age
Diminished activity of amygdala (which processes negative emotions) → older people are less affected by unpleasant information
Geographic location?
No, living in a beautiful geographic location does not increase happiness
Factors correlated with happiness: strong social relationships, satisfying marriages, fewer health problems, less smoking, less physical pain and stress, more exercise
Factors correlated with unhappiness: lack of income, social support, and health
College increases happiness
Higher income, more meaningful work, better health outcomes, more stable marriages
Religion increases happiness
Feel connected to a larger community and higher power
Gratitude
Writing down/expressing gratitude increases happiness
Experiences
Life experiences tend to make us happier than material possessions
Flow state
Being in flow state makes us happy (completely immersed in what we’re doing)
Forecasting Happiness
We are very bad at affective forecasting: predicting our own and others’ happiness
Durability bias: we overestimate the long-term impacts of events on our moods, expecting that good and bad moods will last longer than they actually do
Ex. winning the lottery doesn’t actually increase long-term happiness as much as we think
Ex. paraplegic’s return to baseline happiness after a few months
This return to baseline is due to the hedonic treadmill: the tendency for our moods to adapt to external circumstances
Our levels of happiness adjust quickly to our ongoing life situations
Hedonic treadmill hypothesis proposes that we begin life with happiness “set point”
Set point is mostly stable, but can shift over time
Downward shift: divorce, widowed, laid off of work
Upward shift: engaging intentionally in rewarding activities consistent with our goals and values
Myths and Realities About Self Esteem
Self-esteem: evaluation of our worth
Self-esteem is positively correlated with happiness, taking initiative, and bouncing back from failure
NOT correlated with academic success, good social skills, better relationships, or abstaining from alcohol/drug abuse
Single-variable explanation: self esteem is the single cause for happiness, without self esteem, people are aggressive/depressed
NOT TRUE! There is no evidence that self-esteem is the root of all unhappiness
High self esteem is related to positive illusions: tendencies to perceive ourselves more favorably than others do
Can lead to healthy self confidence → allows them to take healthy risks in interpersonal situations, such as asking someone out or applying for a job
Excessive positive biases may lead to narcissism: extreme self-centeredness
Types of narcissism
Grandiose narcissism: flamboyant, charming, domineering, brag about their accomplishments
Vulnerable narcissism: introverted, preoccupied with themselves, oversensitive to perceived minor slights, always playing the victim
Positive psychology: emerging discipline in the 21st century that emphasizes human strengths such as coping, life satisfaction, love, kindness, and happiness
Intervention such as expressing gratitude about others regularly and writing about positive experiences tends to enhance moods, combat depression, and improve well-being
Defensive pessimism: anticipating failures → over preparing for negative outcomes
Encourages people to work harder + improves performance
Can decrease life satisfaction and irritate others
Motivation: psychological drives (wants and needs) that propel us in specific directions
Theories of motivation
Drive reduction theory: certain drives, like hunger, thirst, and sexual frustration, motivate us to act in ways that minimize aversive states
Drives are unpleasant → satisfying drives minimizes negative feelings and creates pleasure
Strength of drives serves evolutionary function (survival and reproduction)
Ex. thirst drive is stronger than hunger because it is more essential to life
Goals of drives: maintaining homeostasis
Strength of drives and task performance are affected by physiological arousal
Yerkes-Dodson Law: inverted U-shaped relation between physiological arousal and mood and performance
There is an optimal “peak” of arousal for best performance
Below optimal point: low motivation, don’t perform well
Above optimal point: we are too anxious/stimulated, don’t perform well
Yerkes-Dodson Law popular among sport psychologists → correct arousal is important for peak performance
Underarousal can heighten our curiosity (ex. sensory deprivation)
Conflicting drives
Approach: predisposition towards certain stimuli (ex. food)
Avoidance: disposition away from certain stimuli (ex. scary things)
Avoidance gradient is steeper than approach gradient → avoidance gets higher and higher compared to approach as goals become closer
Incentive theories: propose that we are motivated by positive goals
Explains why we engage in behaviors even after our drives are satisfied
Intrinsic motivation: motivated by internal goals, such as liking the activity
Extrinsic motivation: motivated by external goals (rewards)
Contrast effect: certain rewards may undermine intrinsic motivation → makes us feel like we are controlled/forced to engage in the behavior → intrinsic motivation decreases once reward is removed
Types of needs
Primary needs: biological necessities like hunger and thirst
Secondary needs: psychological desires
Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
We must satisfy our primary needs before we can progress to more complex secondary needs
Bottom of the triangle: needs produced by drives
Top of the triangle: needs produced by incentives
Maslow’s Hierarchy is not based on biological reality → omits important evolutionary needs like sexual and parenting drives
Hunger and Eating
Hunger: complex interplay between brain and digestive organs
Full stomach activates neurons in hypothalamus → fullness
Hormones produced by stomach
Ghrelin: hormone that makes us hungry by communicating with the hypothalamus
CCK (Cholecystokinin) counteracts effects of ghrelin, decreases hunger
Glucostatic theory: when blood glucose drops, hunger creates a drive to restore the proper level of glucose → homeostasis
Weight Gain and Obesity: Biological and Psychological Influences
41.9% of American adults are obese
Biological contributors to obesity
Leptin: hormone that increases due to more stored energy in fat cells → signals hypothalamus to reduce appetite and increase energy expenditure
Leptin resistance contributes to obesity → appetite doesn’t decrease despite increased fat/energy stores
Sensitivity to serotonin: sight/taste/smell of food can release neurotransmitters that activate pleasure in the brain
Some people find these stimuli especially rewarding → contributes to obesity
Biological set point: value that established a range of body fat and muscle mass we tend to maintain
Obese people may have a higher set point: born with more fat cells, lower metabolic rate, leptin resistance → makes it hard to lose weight
Melanocortin-4 receptor gene: in 6% of obesity cases, mutation in melanocortin-4 gene makes it impossible for people to feel full
Psychological contributors to obesity
Negative emotions: overeating can also provide comfort to distract from negative emotions
Portion distortion: American portions are much larger than portions in other countries
Portions at restaurants have drastically increased over time
Internal-external theory: people with obesity are motivated to eat more by external cues like portion size, taste, smell, and appearance of food rather than internal cues like a growling stomach
Bariatric surgery: surgeries that assist with weight loss
Gastric bypass surgery: decreases size of stomach (food bypasses the rest of the stomach) → activates hormones that suppress hunger because stomach becomes full on much less food
Eating Disorders: Bulimia and Anorexia
Bulimia nervosa: characterized by pattern of bingeing and purging
Bingeing: eating large amounts of highly caloric foods in brief periods of time
Binge eating disorder: bingeing with no purging
Purging: vomiting or other means of drastic weight loss, like frantic exercising or taking laxatives
Purging disorder: people purge on recurrent basis but do not binge
Binge-purge pattern
Eating disorders influenced by genetics and sociocultural expectations about body image
Anorexia nervosa: eating disorder characterized by excessive weight loss achieved by caloric restriction and irrational perception that one is overweight
Sometimes fueled by sociocultural influences
“Fear of fatness,” distorted body perception
May lose upwards of 25%-50% of body weight
Very high mortality rate (5-10%) → one of the most threatening psychological conditions
Sexual Motivation
Libido = sexual desire, wish/craving for sexual activity and sexual pleasure
Rooted in genes, biology, and sociocultural factors
Males have higher sex drive than women on average
Biological and cultural influences on sex drive
Testosterone increases sexual interest
High levels of serotonin decrease sexual interest
DRD4 gene: protein related to dopamine transmission is correlated with sexual desire and promiscuity
Cultural norms
Sex drive and sexual orientation are a continuum
Women have greater variability in sex drive
Women w/ high sex drive more likely to be bisexual
Sexual Orientation
Genetic contribution to sexuality
Homosexuality in men associated with thicker corpus callosum
Environmental contribution to sexuality
Fetal exposure to testosterone
Girls exposed to excess testosterone in womb → more likely to be lesbian
Boys exposed to too little testosterone → more likely to be gay
Maternal immune response/fraternal birth order
Having older brothers increases odds of male homosexuality by 33% for each older brother because male fetuses trigger mother’s immune system to develop anti-male antibodies that affect sexual differentiation of fetus
Have older sisters and being an only child also increase odds of homosexuality → due to different types of maternal immune responses
Cultural acknowledgement and acceptance
Leads to higher rates of homosexuality and openness
Social influences on interpersonal attraction
Proximity: nearness increases attraction
Nearness an be physical or virtual, people we interact with every day
Exposure effect increases attraction
Frequency and duration of conversations are strong markers of attraction
Similarity: like attracts like
Extent to which we have things in common with others is a predictor of attraction
When interests and attitudes overlap, it paves the foundation for mutual understanding
Sharing common goals enhances attraction
People who agree with us validates our views
Reciprocity: give and take
Reciprocity strengthens relationships, makes people feel like they can be vulnerable in return
Physical attraction
Physically attractive people perceived as more competent, intelligent, trustworthy, and productive
Facial symmetry is universally attractive
Men generally attracted to women with hip-waist ratio of 0.7
There are some cultural differences in attractiveness (some cultures find thinner or heavier bodies more ideal)
Evolutionary models
Men attracted to women with cues of potential health and fertility such as youth and physical attractiveness
Women attracted to men who can provide for offspring (well off monetarily, physically strong, experienced in life)
Social role theory: biological variables + social roles play a role in attraction
Women tend to have lower social status → prioritize finding a partner who is financial stable
Over time, social roles are diminishing and females and males have become more similar in mate preferences
Average faces tend to be more attractive → absence of any abnormalities
Types of love (Hatfield and Rapson)
Passionate love: powerful, overwhelming, longing for one’s partner
“Romeo and Juliet”
Long-term passionate love is possible
Companionate love: sense of deep friendship and fondness for one’s partner
Romantic relationships tend to progress over time from passionate to companionate, but most healthy relationships still have some passion
Older couples have stronger companionate love
Robert Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love
3 major elements of love:
Intimacy: I feel really close to this person
Passion: I’m crazy about this person
Commitment: I really want to stay with this person
Consummate love is the combination of all 3 of these
Sternberg’s Theory of Hate
Negation of intimacy: “I would never want to get close to these people”
Passion: “I absolutely and positively despise these people”
Commitment: “I am determined to stop or harm these people”
Burning hate is the combination of all 3
Can contribute to groupthink, confirmation bias, and other logical fallacies
Propaganda fuels hate
Hate can be unlearned by teaching people to overcome confirmation bias and having compassion for others
Chapter 11
For Friday's class (and Quiz 3 and the final exam), we will not cover 11.4: Promoting Good Health and Less Stress. Feel free to check out this section of the book for a discussion on healthy lifestyle habits and the science behind complementary/alternative medicine, but it will not be tested.
Stress: tension, discomfort, or physical symptoms that arise in response to a stressor
3 approaches to studying stress
Stress as stimulus
Identifying different types of stressful events (job loss, combat, natural disasters) and identifies the people more susceptible to stress afterwards
Stress as a response
Assessing people’s psychological and physical reactions to stressful circumstances
Measures multiple outcome variables:
Stress related feelings: depression, hopelessness, hostility
Physiological changes: increases in heart rate, release of stress hormones (corticosteroids)
Post-traumatic growth: highly stressful life events can lead us to perceive beneficial changes or personal transformations in the face of adversity
People reinterpret their lives more positively and find meaning in adversity as a coping strategy
Stressful circumstances that impact a whole community can increase social awareness, solidify interpersonal bonds
Stress as a transaction (between people and their environments)
Examines interaction between potentially stressful life events and how people interpret and cope with them
Primary appraisal: deciding whether an event is harmful
Secondary appraisal: deciding how well we can cope with an event
Problem-focused coping: tackling life’s problems by taking action
Emotion-focused coping: placing a positive spin on it
Meaning-focused coping: finding meaning in highly aversive and uncontrollable circumstances
Finding meaning and purpose in everyday life, embracing human interconnectedness
Measuring stress
SRRS (Social Readjustment Rating Scale) by Holmes: measures number of stressful life events and reported physical/psychological diagnoses
Positive association between # of stressful life events and diagnoses
Doesn’t include interpretation of events, coping behaviors and resources, and chronic stressors in marginalized communities
Hassles Scale
Hassles: minor annoyance or nuisance that strains our ability to cope
Both major life events AND hassles are associated with poor general health
Daily hassles can add up and negatively impact health → better predictors of physical health, depression, and anxiety than are major life events
Interview-based methods of measuring stress
More in-depth picture of life stress than self-report measures
Distinguishes ongoing/chronic stressors from one-shot stressors
Considers the interaction between events that produces physical and psychological problems
Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)
Uses smartphone prompts to gauge what people are thinking, feeling, and doing at random/predetermined time intervals
Efficient, cost-effective, eliminates human recording errors, and immediacy of responses minimizes inaccurate responses when people have to recall previous events
Hans Selye General Adaptation Syndrome
Recognized connection between stress responses and physical illness
Hypothesized that we respond to stress by moving into “high gear” → too much stress leads to breakdown
General adaptation syndrome: all prolonged stressors take us through 3 stages of adaptation
Alarm
Excitation of autonomic nervous system → hormone release, physical symptoms of anxiety
Stress hormones: adrenaline, noradrenaline, cortisol
Emotional brain/limbic system = site of anxiety (amygdala, hypothalamus, hippocampus)
Hypothalamus receives signals of fear → sympathetic nervous system activates adrenal gland → secretes epinephrine and noradrenaline → spike in blood pressure, pupils dilate, heart rate increases (FIGHT OR FLIGHT RESPONSE)
Resistance
Adapting to stressor and finding ways to cope with it
Engages the “thinking brain” (cerebral cortex) → using reasoning/rationalization and coping mechanisms to decrease our stress response
Exhaustion
Prolonged, uncontrollable stressor leads to exhaustion
Levels of activation bottom out → damage to organ systems, depression/anxiety, immune system breakdown
Selye’s Eustress and Distress
Short-term stress (eustress)
Situations that are challenging, but not overwhelming
Lasts minutes to hours, can trigger a healthy immune response and enhance mental and physical performance
Long-term stress (distress)
PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder)
Vivid flashbacks (memories, feelings, and images)
Feelings of detachment/estrangement from others
Increased arousal (difficulty sleeping, easily startled)
Managing stress: What works
Social support: relationships with people, groups, and the larger community that can provide us with emotional comfort and personal and financial resources
Strong inverse relationship between number of social connections and probability of dying
Breakup of close relationships through separation, divorce, widowing, and social isolation is strong risk factor for health problems and mortality
Gaining control of the situation
Behavioral control: doing something about it
Parallels problem-focused coping, which is more effective at relieving stress than avoidance-focused coping
Cognitive control: ability to think differently about negative emotions that arise in response to stress
Parallels emotion-focused coping
Decisional control: ability to choose among alternative courses of action
Informational control: acquiring information about a stressful event
Proactive coping: anticipating stressful situations and taking steps to prevent or minimize the difficulties before they arise
Emotional control: controlling emotions in a flexible way to meet the demands of a situation
“There’s a time and place for everything”
Acceptance-based coping: accepting circumstances and feelings and thoughts we can’t change and finding positive ways of thinking about our problems
Ways of Managing Stress: What Doesn’t Work
Rumination: focusing on how badly we feel and endlessly “spinning our mental wheels,” analyzing the causes and consequences of our problems
Negative repetitive thoughts linked to PTSD, anxiety, and other psychological conditions
Catharsis: disclosing painful feelings
When it involves problem solving and constructive efforts to minimize harm, catharsis can be beneficial
When catharsis reinforces a sense of helplessness → can be harmful
Physical catharsis (yelling, throwing, punching) can increase anger and anxiety in the long run
Crisis debriefing: people discuss their reactions to traumatic events in a group setting (ex. firefighters, emergency responders)
May make matters worse and increase risk of PTSD because it gets in the way of people’s natural coping strategies
Talking about our problems when we are upset may not be helpful → better to talk about problems in a constructive light
Individual differences in coping
Hardiness: set of attitudes marked by sense of control over events, commitment to life and work, courage and motivation to confront stressful life events
Buffer against stress-induced illness
Optimism: having a positive outlook, expecting that good things will happen
Increased likelihood of active coping, finding solutions to problems, and tend to be less anxious and depressed, more productive, focused, persistent, and better at handling frustration
Lower mortality rate, better immune response
Spirituality: search for the sacred, which may or may not extend to belief in God
Higher perceived well-being, improved health, more adaptive reactions to loss
May be due to increased self-control, social support, sense of meaning and purpose, control over life
Gender
Tend and befriend: reaction that mobilizes people to nurture (tend) or seek social support (befriend) under stress
More common among women, helps them deal with stress and has evolutionary benefit
Nocebo effect: beliefs can create reality
Immune system: body’s defense system against invading bacteria, viruses, and other potentially illness-producing organisms and substances
AIDS: acquired immune deficiency syndrome: life-threatening treatable condition when HIV attacks and damages the immune system
Psychoneuroimmunology: study of relationship between immune system and central nervous system
Chronic stress related to increased risk of colds
Immune system function impacted by sleep and stress
Chronic stress disrupts immune system
Alzheimer’s caretakers have 24% longer wound healing time
Biopsychosocial view of stress-related illnesses
Common myth: mental states are the root cause of physical ailments
Psychosomatic illnesses: due to deep-seated emotional conflicts
In reality, medical conditions result from biological, psychological, AND social factors
Stress can play an indirect role in contributing to illnesses
Psychophysiological illnesses: category of illness in which emotions and stress can aggravate/maintain the illness
Includes asthma, ulcers, headaches, coronary heart disease
Biopsychosocial perspective: conditions are neither all physical nor all psychological → depend on complex interplay of genes, lifestyle, immunity, social support, everyday stressors, and self-perceptions
Coronary Heart Disease (CHD): complete/partial blockage of arteries, #1 cause of death and disability in the U.S.
Atherosclerosis: cholesterol collects in walls of arteries → narrows arteries
High levels of stress hormones contribute to CHD
Irregular heart rhythm
Atherosclerosis
Increase in body-wide inflammation
Stress correlated behavioral risk factors (poor diet, inadequate exercise)
Chapter 12
Social Psychology: study of how people influence others’ behavior, beliefs, and attitudes (for better or for worse)
We tend to believe that others are vulnerable to social influence, but we are not
Human gravitate to small groups and form “in-group members” and “out-group members”
Gravitating to each other
Dunbar’s magic number 150 = approximate size of most human social groups
Social media may be changing this
Why we form groups
Need-to-belong theory (Leary): Humans have a biologically based need for interpersonal connections
Schachter pilot study on social isolation with sample size of 5 showed that people hate isolation
One participant failed in 20 minutes, longest participant made it to 8 days
Prison inmates experience severe stress and more psychological symptoms, especially mood and anxiety problems, more likely to die after being released and more prone to suicidal behavior
Mere threat of social isolation causes stress/dysregulated function
Jean Twenge study gave college students a questionnaire and randomly told them them that based on their results, they were more likely to end up alone in life → led to unhealthy eating behaviors, procrastination, IQ test impairment
Loneliness: not just about being alone, also about feeling socially or emotionally isolated from others and experiencing distress about this isolation
Long term loneliness is damaging to our health
Cognitive decline
26% elevated risk of premature mortality
Increased depression
Why People Affect Us
Social influence is powerful and often unconscious
Social influence can impact behaviors, attitudes, or beliefs without us knowing
Social influences are adaptive and naturally selected/culturally important
These processes have served us well over the course of evolution
Conformity, obedience, and many other forms of social influence become maladaptive only when they’re blind or unquestioning
Cultural norms
Prosocial behavior: behaviors that clearly benefit others
Antisocial behaviors: harm others
Social comparison theory: we evaluate our abilities and beliefs by comparing them with those of others
Upward social comparison: comparing ourselves to someone superior
Downward social comparison: comparing ourselves to someone inferior
Both upward and downward social comparison can boost self-concepts
Upward social comparison → if they can do it, so can I!
Downward social comparison → we feel better than others
If someone is better than us, we may make an excuse that the other person is “an exception to the rule,” or “they’re just a genius” to buffer our self concepts
We look to others in ambiguous situations when we are unsure of what to do
Social behavior is contagious
Mass hysteria: contagious outbreak of irrational behavior that spreads much like a flu epidemic
Fueled by anxiety, can have disastrous consequences
Can lead to collective delusions: many people simultaneously become convinced of bizarre things with no evidence (conspiracy theories, misinformation)
Urban legends: false stories repeated so many times that people believe them to be true
Surprising yet plausible, tug on our negative emotions, provoke interest or concern
Social facilitation: enhancement of performance brought about by the presence of others
Occurs only on tasks we find easy
Social disruption: worsening of performance in the presence of others
Occurs on tasks we find difficult
More likely to “choke” on difficult task when distracted by being watched → limits our working memory we can use on performing the task
Attributions: assigning causes to behavior
Dispositional influences: enduring characteristics such as personality traits, attitudes, and intelligence
Situational influences: what's going on around the person/externally
Fundamental attribution error: tendency to attribute too much of people’s behavior to disposition influences (rather than the situation they are in)
Aka underestimating impact of situational influences on other’s behavior
However, when it comes to OURSELVES, we believe that situational influences are stronger than dispositional
Less likely to commit fundamental attribution error if we’ve been in the same situation ourselves (empathy)
Certain collectivist cultures are less likely to commit FAE (Japan, China) because they view behaviors in context
Conformity: tendency of people to alter their behavior because of group pressure
Causes of conformity:
Belongingness and being accepted
Avoiding rejection
Aligning with group norms
Asch Line Studies on Conformity (1950s)
1 participant, the rest are confederates pretending to be participants
Participants are asked which of the “comparison lines” is the same length as the “standard line”
3 influences on conformity
Uniformity of agreement: if all confederates gave the wrong answer, participant was more likely to conform
Difference in the wrong answer: if someone else in the group disagreed with the majority, the participant was less likely to conform
Size: size of majority only made a difference up to 5-6 confederates. People were no more likely to conform in a group of 10 than a group of 5
Participants actually knew the correct answer, so norms affect people’s expressed behavior, not their perceptions of reality
Deindividuation: tendency of people to engage in atypical behavior when stripped of their usual identities as unique individuals
Due to feeling on anonymity + lack of personal responsibility
Online disinhibition effect: people post nasty online comments when anonymous (internet “trolling”)
Crowds can become more or less aggressive depending on prevailing social norms
Mob storming the capital → more aggressive than they would act individually
People on public transport/crowds → people limit social interactions to minimize conflict
Stanford Prison Experiment (Philip Zimbardo)
Zimbardo wondered whether dehumanizing prison conditions stemmed from people’s personalities or roles they were in
To explore this question, participants were randomly assigned to role of prisoner or guard
Abuse started after day 1
Groupthink: emphasis on group consensus at the expense of critical thinking and objective decision making
Lack of independence in group member’s judgements
Ex. 1986 Challenger shuttle explosion
Antidotes to groupthink
Supporting viewpoint diversity: valuing a range of different perspectives
Encouraging dissent
Inoculation: convincing people to change their minds about something by introducing reasons why the perspective might be correct and then debunking these reasons
Including a devil’s advocate in groups
Symptoms of groupthink:
Illusion of group’s invulnerability, unanimity, unquestioned belief in the group’s moral correctness, conformity pressure, stereotyping of the out-group
Can lead to cults: groups of individuals who exhibit intense and unquestioning devotion to a single individual or cause
Group polarization: tendency of group discussion to strengthen the dominant positions held by individual group members
Polarization happens at the individual level
Obedience: adherence to instructions from those of higher authority
Influence is vertical (we are influenced by leaders who are above us) rather than horizontal (influenced by peers)
In conformity, social influence is implicit
In obedience, social influence is EXPLICIT (authority figure tells us what to do, and we obey)
Migram experiment on obedience
Evaluated effects of punishment on learning
Participants deliver shock of increasing voltage to learners (confederates) if they answer a question incorrectly
Milgram wanted to see how high they would put the shock
66% of participants obeyed until the highest voltage level
Prosocial behavior: behavior that helps others
Bystander effect: why do bystanders tend to not intervene or help in situations?
Pluralistic ignorance: error of assuming that no one in the group perceives things as we do
If nobody else is responding, the situation must not be an emergency
Diffusion of responsibility: the more people present for an emergency, the less each person feels responsible to help
“Plenty of other people could have helped, so it's not my fault for not intervening”
Studies on bystander nonintervention
Latane and Nida performed analysis of 50 studies with 6,000 participants → found that people were more likely to help when alone than in groups 90% of the time
Things that make people MORE likely to intervene/help:
If victim is in immediate danger, bystanders are more likely to intervene
If there are cameras or recording devices present, bystanders are more likely to intervene
Enlightenment effect: learning about psychological research can change real-world behavior for the better → more likely to intervene
Social loafing: people tend to slack off when working in groups
Variant of bystander nonintervention
Occurs due to diffusion of responsibility: people working in groups feel less responsible for the outcome of the project than they do when working alone, so they invest less effort
Social loafing is more likely in individualist cultures (U.S.) than collectivist cultures (China)
Prosocial behavior and altruism
Altruism: helping others for unselfish reasons
Fueled by empathy
Situational influences on helping others:
More motivated to help when we are held accountable for actions
More motivated to help when we can’t escape the situation
Characteristics of the victim (more likely to help a person with a cane than a drunk person)
Being in a good mood makes us more likely to help
Exposure to role models who help others
Aggression: behavior intended to harm others (verbally, physically, or both)
Contributors to aggression:
Interpersonal provocation
Frustration
Media influences: violent media may increase odds of violence due to observational learning
Aggressive cues being present, such as guns or knives → serves as discriminative stimuli which make us more likely to respond violently to provocation
Physiological arousal (alertness)
Alcohol and other drugs
Outside temperature: warmer temperatures increase irritability and aggression
Cultural differences in aggression
Personality traits: people with high levels of negative emotions, impulsivity, and lack of closeness to others are especially prone to violence
Sex differences: men are more aggressive than women on average
Cultural differences: physical aggression and violent crime are less prevalent in east Asian countries than in western countries
U.S. has a “culture of honor” → more likely to use violence to defend what they believe in (why southern states are more violent)
Attitudes and behavior
Belief: conclusion regarding factual evidence
Attitude: belief that includes an emotional component
Misconception: attitudes are good predictors of behavior
In reality, attitudes are only moderate predictors of behavior (correlation coefficient r = 0.38)
Sometimes, attitudes CAN predict behavior well:
If attitudes are highly accessible (come to mind easily)
If attitudes are firmly held and stable over time
In people who are low in self-monitoring: extent to which people’s behavior reflects their true attitudes/feelings
Aka people who don’t conceal their attitudes
Key influences on our attitudes:
Recognition heuristic: we are more likely to believe something we have heard many times
Attitudes and personality → influence religious beliefs and political affiliations
Cognitive Dissonance Theory
Cognitive dissonance: unpleasant state of tension between 2 or more conflicting thoughts (Thought A and Thought B)
We can reduce this anxiety in 3 major ways:
Change cognition A
Change cognition B
Introduce new cognition, C, that reconciles the inconsistency between A and B
Persuasion
Two pathways to persuading others (“dual-access model” of persuasion)
Central route
Careful and thoughtful consideration of arguments merits
Focuses of informational content of the argument
Produces strongly held, enduring attitudes
Peripheral route
Relies on “snap judgements” that we make very quickly based on heuristics
Focuses on surface elements of the argument
Persuasion is weaker and unstable, but can still affect short-term choices
Persuasion techniques
Foot in the door: small request → big request
Door in the face: large request → small request
Both foot-in-door and door-in-face are equally effective at achieving agreement
Low-balling: agree to price → add-ons until cost is much higher than original agreement
Telling someone “but you are free to choose”: giving people the sense that they are free to choose doubles the odds of compliance
Stereotypes
Broad application of belief about characteristics of group
Can be positive, neutral, or negative
Ultimate attribution error
Attributing negative behavior of an entire group to disposition
Attributing positive behaviors of an entire group to luck or rare exceptions
Disregard for situational influences in both cases
Prejudice
Negative conclusion about a group not based on experience
Tendency towards prejudice is influenced by:
In-group bias: favoritism towards individuals inside our group
Out-group homogeneity: tendency to view all individuals outside our group as highly similar
Makes it easy to dismiss members of other groups
Implicit vs. explicit prejudice
Implicit Association Test (IAT) flashes images of people to uncover implicit biases
Prejudices may arise due to:
Scapegoat hypothesis
Belief in a “just” world
Conformity to social norms
Prejudice often, but not always, accompanies discrimination: negative behavior towards members of out-groups
Combating prejudice
Superordinate goals: working together towards a higher purpose
Raising awareness through educational or workplace trainings
Chapter 13
Overview of personality
Personality: typical ways of thinking, feeling, and behaving
Consists of traits: relatively enduring predispositions that influence behavior
2 ways to study personality
Nomothetic: identify general laws that govern behavior of all individuals
Allows for generalization
Idiographic: identify unique characteristics and life experiences of individual (e.g. case studies)
Causes of personality
Identical twins have much higher correlation in personality than fraternal twins → personality is genetic
Identical twins raised together and apart have similar correlation in personality → environment does not have much influence?
Correlation in personality between biological parents and child is much higher than adoptive parents and child → personality is genetic
Behavior-Genetic Studies: A Note of Caution
Personality being heritable does NOT indicate the existence of a “genetic code” for personality traits
Genes code for proteins, not behaviors
Environment shapes when/whether genes are expressed
Theories of personality
Freud’s Psychoanalytic Theory of Personality
3 core assumptions
Psychic determinism: all psychological events have a cause (usually stemming from childhood)
Freud believes that powerful inner forces drive us
There is a hidden and symbolic meaning to all actions: no action is meaningless
Unconscious motivation: we are largely unaware of why we do what we do
3 parts of personality
Id: primitive impulses
Operates on pleasure principle
Unconscious
Ego: decision maker
Operates on reality principle
Superego: sense of morality
The “judgemental parent”
Conflict between these different parts of personality causes distress, which increases risk of psychological disorder
Major Freudian DEFENSE mechanisms
Repression: motivated forgetting
Projection: attribution of own negative qualities to others
Sublimation: transforming unacceptable impulse into a valued goal
Rationalization: reasonable explanation for unreasonable behavior or failure
Displacement: redirecting unacceptable impulse onto acceptable target
Reaction-formation: transforming anxiety-producing experience into its opposite
Regression: psychological return to younger/safer life stage
Identification: adopting psychological characteristics of threat
Intellectualization: focusing on abstract and impersonal thoughts
Freud’s Model of psychosexual/personality development
Controversial, largely dismissed as pseudoscientific
Premise:
Sexuality begins in infancy
Inability to resolve each stage results in fixation (getting “stuck”) → can occur from deprivation of sexual gratification or excessive gratification\
Stage | Approximate Age | Primary source of sexual pleasure |
Oral | Birth to 12-18 months | Sucking and drinking |
Anal | 18 months to 3 years | Using the bathroom |
Phallic | 3 years to 6 years | Genitals |
Latency | 6 years to 12 years | Dormant sexual stage |
Genital | 12+ years | Renewed sexual impulses + mature romantic relationships |
1.Oral stage (birth to 12-18 mos.) ~ Nursing
Fixation: intense dependence; excessive eating/drinking; smoking
2.Anal stage (18 mos. – 3 years) ~ Potty training
Fixation: excessive neatness; stingy; stubborn
3.Phallic stage (3 – 6 years) ~ Oedipus/Electra complex
Fixation: life-long feelings of inferiority; heightened risk of later problems
4.Latency stage (6-12 years) ~ Sexual impulses disappear into unconscious
5.Genital stage (12 years +) ~ Creation/maintenance of love attachments
Neo-Freudianism
Alfred Adler, Carl Jung, Karen Horney
Similarities to Freud: emphasis on unconscious influences + importance of early experience in shaping personality
Differences from Freud: social drives rather than sexual drives, more optimistic than Freud about personality change over life course
Humanistic Models of Personality
Carl Rogers (1947): Personalities consist of…
Organism: innate blueprint that makes organisms inherently good
Self: beliefs about who we are (self-concept)
Conditions of worth: expectation imposed on us for inappropriate and appropriate behavior
Personality differences stem from conditions of worth imposed by others
Behavioral Models of Personality
Personality stems from habits acquired through conditioning
Personality consists of behavior
Overt (observable) and covert (unobservable)
Personality = genetics + environmental contingencies (reinforcements and punishments)
Behavioral determinism → free will is an illusion, we unconsciously process external influences which determine our behavior
Social Learning Models of Personality
Emphasize thinking as cause of personality
Reciprocal determinism: mutual influence of personality, cognition, behavior, and environment
Acquire habits from parents and caregivers via observational learning
“Locus of control” shapes personality
Belief in control over reinforcers and punishers
Internal vs. external locus of control
What causes personality? 5 different theories:
Psychoanalytic theory
Neo-Freudian theory
Humanistic theory
Behavioral theory
Social learning theory
The Big 5 Model of Personality
Trait models seek to find the STRUCTURE of personality, not its cause
These traits are assessed on a SPECTRUM
O: openness to experience
C: conscientiousness
E: extroversion
A: agreeableness
N: neuroticism
Trait Models: Basic Tendencies vs. Characteristic Adaptations
Basic tendencies: underlying personality traits
Characteristic adaptations: behavioral manifestation of underlying traits
Traits can be expressed in dramatically different ways, can be constructive or destructive
Sensation-seeking: tendency to seek out new and exciting stimuli
Firefighters and prisoners have nearly identical scores of sensation seeking
Can personality traits change?
Change can happen prior to age 30, can sometimes be substantial
Beyond age 30, some reliable change observed across the lifespan
Decline in extraversion
Decline in neuroticism
Increase in agreeableness
Increase in conscientiousness
Stability in personality is largely the norm
Structured personality tests: questions that respondents answer in one of a few fixed ways
True/false or Likert scale (1-7), etc
MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory)
MMPI-2: 567 true or false questions
10 basic scales: detection of major mental health conditions
3 validity scales: tests for response sets and malingering
Developed via empirical observation → low face validity
Largely supported by extensive research
CPI (California Psychological Inventory)
The “common person’s MMPI”
Assessment of personality traits in the typical range
Common for industry, college counseling centers, etc.
NEO-PI-R
Tests the BIG 5 traits (OCEAN)
Rational/theoretical method
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Based largely on work of Carl Jung/neo-Freudian thinking
Rational/theoretical method
What are projective tests
Influenced by psychoanalytic views of personality
Projective hypothesis: people project their personality onto ambiguous stimuli, interpreters work in reverse by examining people’s answers for clues about their personality
Projective tests are highly controversial (disputed reliability and validity)
Types of projective tests
Rorschach Inkblot Test
Asks participants “What does inkblot resemble?”
Answers are scored for characteristics associated w/ personality traits
For example, focusing on tiny details of the inkblot could indicate OCD
Not reliable or valid
Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
Asks participants to construct a story about ambiguous images
Interpreted on “impressionistic” basis
Draw-A-Person (DAP)
Examine features of free-drawing (ex. eyes)
Confounded with drawing ability
Graphology
Interpretation of handwriting
Influenced by representativeness heuristic
Pitfalls in personality assessment
P.T. Barnum effect: acceptance of broad description as specific to oneself
Personal validity does NOT equal test validity
Astrological horoscopes
Palmistry
Crystal ball/tea leaf/tarot card readings
Criminal profiling: is it legit?
Criminal profiling conclusions are often based on Barnum-effect-esque statements
“Trained professionals” may be no more accurate in generating profiles than college students
More of an urban legend
Chapter 14
Recipe of a psychological disorder
No clear-cut definition
Host of criteria, not exhaustive
Family resemblance view: family members share a loose set of features but aren’t always identical
Statistical rarity
Subjective distress
Impairment
Societal disapproval
Biological dysfunction
Need for treatment
Irrationality
Loss of control over one’s behavior
Historical conceptions of psychological disorders
Explanations of abnormal behavior and treatments are influenced in cultural conceptions
Middle ages: demonic model
Evil spirits infesting the body, treated via exorcisms
Renaissance “enlightenment”: medical model
Placed the mentally ill into asylums
Treatment: bloodletting, frightening the illness out of patients
Moral treatment (late 1700s-1800s)
Emphasis on dignity, kindness, and respect
Marked improvement in asylum conditions
Modern day
Early 1950s → introduction of chlorpromazine (Thorazine), an antipsychotic drug
1960s/1970s → deinstitutionalization
Positive and negative consequences
Psychiatric diagnosis today
DSM-V (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, APA, 2013)
Includes diagnostic criteria and rules for how many criteria must be met for diagnosis
Information on “organic” causes for symptoms → What other factors might cause these symptoms?
Ex. stressful life event, lack of exercise, lack of sleep, poor diet, etc
Prevalence of disorders (what % of population that has disorder)
Biopsychosocial considerations
Interview guide to determine cultural identity
ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, Worth Health Organization, 2010)
Overview of anxiety-related disorders
Anxiety is not always bad, it is an adaptive mechanism
Anxiety is only a problem when it gets out of hand
Anxiety disorders are among the most common of all psychological disorders
Roots of Anxiety Disorders
Learning models: idea that fears are learned through…
Classical and/or operant conditioning
Observational learning
Misinformation or information learned from others
Tendency to catastrophize and high anxiety sensitivity
Genetic influence
High in neuroticism
Frontal lobe abnormalities and overactivity
Types of anxiety disorders
Generalized anxiety disorder
Characterized by spending 60% of the day worrying
Tendency to “sweat the small stuff”
Often accompanies other anxiety disorders
Panic disorder
Repeated, unexpected experiences of panic attacks and behavioral change in attempt to avoid attacks
Attacks: sweating, dizziness, racing heart, shortness of breath, light-headedness
Phobias: disproportionate, intense fear of an object or situation
MOST COMMON anxiety disorder
PTSD and OCD
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
Marked by flashbacks (intrusive memories)
Attempts to avoid anything related to the event
Difficulty sleeping and startling easily
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)
Obsession → repetitive thought about unacceptable topic
Compulsion → repetitive behavior or mental act
Relieves anxiety or stress associated with obsession
Mood disorders and suicide
Major depressive disorder
The “common cold” of psychological disorders
Symptoms: depressed mood, diminished interest in pleasurable activities
May be accompanied by weight loss, sleep difficulty
Recurrent: people with major depressive disorder usually have around 5-6 episodes over the life course
Roots of major depressive disorder = complex interplay of many factors
Life events
Social media use (direction of association is unknown)
Interpersonal problems
Lack of reinforcement
Negative schemas
Attributions for success vs. failure
Tend to blame failures on themselves (dispositional) while attributing luck to luck or other situational factors
Low norepinephrine, dopamine
Dysfunctional reward and stress-response systems
Bipolar disorder
Characterized by manic episodes
Only takes 1 episode to qualify for diagnosis
Symptoms of manic episode: elevated mood, decreased sleep, inflated self-esteem, irresponsible, impulsive behavior
Causes problems with social and occupational functioning
May be triggered by stressful OR positive life event
Bipolar disorder is highly heritable (up to 85% heritability)
Suicide
There is the highest risk increase for suicide with major depression and bipolar disorder
Also increased risk for people with panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, and substance abuse disorder
Predicting suicide is difficult but very critical
Single best predictor: a previous suicide attempt
Overview of personality disorders:
DSM-V diagnosis requires:
Onset by adolescence
Traits are inflexible, stable, and displayed in various situations
Results in distress or impairment
Borderline personality disorder
“Stable instability” → long term pattern of emotional instability regarding mood, sense of self, interests, life goals, and relationships
Highly sensitive to feelings of abandonment
Causes them to be reactive in scenarios where they fear abandonment
Leaving at the first sign of abandonment, jumping from one relationship to another
Impulsive and self-destructive behaviors
Manipulativeness: may threaten of attempt suicide to control others
Can harm ability to form long term relationships and jobs, but not always
Psychopathic personality (psychopath/sociopath)
NOT formally classified as a disorder in the DSM-V
Guiltless, dishonest, manipulative, callous, self-centered
Display of callous-unemotional traits in childhood
Can also be superficially charming, engaging, and personable → allows them to sometimes occupy positions of power
Overlaps with antisocial personality disorder from DSM-V
Antisocial personality disorder: violent/criminal activity
Dissociative Disorders: disruptions in integration of consciousness, memory, identity, or perspective
Depersonalization/derealization disorder
Depersonalization: dream or movie-like state, feeling of seeing self from 3rd person perspective
Derealization: external world seems strange or unreal
Must be multiple episodes of this to be diagnosed
May be influenced by sleep deprivation (quality of sleep and disruptions to sleep)
Dissociative amnesia
Inability to recall important personal information, usually following a stressful experience
Loss of job, loved one, etc.
Not the result of “ordinary forgetting” and cannot be explained by other factors such as brain injury
Sometimes includes dissociative fugue (physical relocation) → “woke up one day in a new location with no memories of their past”
Dissociative identity disorder
Presence of 2+ distinct personality states (alters)
These alters are different from the “host” personality
Can be different name, age, gender, race, species, and number of alters can differ
Explanations:
Response to trauma (physical of sexual abuse at a younger age) so that only one of the personalities is a victim to abuse
Product of social/cultural factors such as hypnosis or guided imagery
Roots of schizophrenia
Diathesis-stress model
Diathesis (vulnerability) + stress (triggers)
Possible diathesis:
Family history/genetics
Schizotypal personality disorder: motor limitations, unusual beliefs and fears, issues with social relationships → often a predecessor of schizophrenia
Factors that impact development:
Maternal illness during 2nd trimester
Lack of gestational nutrition
Viral infection in-utero
Complications during birth
Symptoms of schizophrenia
Disturbances in attention, thinking, language, emotion, and interpersonal relationships
Delusions and hallucinations
Delusion: strongly held belief with no basis in reality, commonly involving persecution
Hallucination: sensory perceptions in the absence of external stimulus (primarily auditory in nature)
Can be command hallucinations or violent hallucinations, but this is rare
Most of the time, voices are narrating and neutral
Disorganized speech (“word salad”): can produce words, but the syntax of words is incorrect
Deficits in thinking + fundamental impairment in ability to shift and maintain attention
Catatonia: bizarre or rigid body positions (“waxy flexibility”) → if you move the person, they are moldable
Accompanied by echolalia: parrot-like verbal repetition
Disorganized behavior: lack of self-care and personal hygiene
Autism Spectrum Disorders (DSM-V category including both Autism and Asperger’s)
Symptoms of severity are on a continuum
Difficulties with communication, social bonding, and imagination
Repetitive or restrictive behaviors (motor movements, words)
Very resistant to changes in environment or daily schedule
Can have behavioral outbursts in response to change
657% increase in rates of autism across the U.S. from 1993-2003
People questioned why autism rates were increasing so much
Vaccines are NOT the cause of autism
Exact causes for this are unknown
Most likely, this uptick was due to changes in diagnostic criteria
ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder)
Infancy: incessant crying, fussiness, emotional outbursts, constant need for movement
Middle childhood: disruptive classroom behavior, academic struggles
Adolescence: impulsiveness, restlessness, inattention, delinquency
Debate in over-vs-under-diagnosis
Boys are 2-4x more likely to receive a diagnosis than girls
Early-Onset Bipolar Disorder
Sometimes challenging to distinguish manic episodes from ADHD in children
May share ADHD diagnosis → makes us question whether they have severe ADHD or early onset bipolar?
Symptoms: rapid mood change, reckless behavior, irritability, aggression
Chapter 15
What is psychotherapy?
Hard to define, many variations of psychotherapy (over 600 approaches)
Psychotherapy: psychological intervention intended to help people resolve emotional, behavioral, and/or interpersonal difficulties
Variety of individual reasons for seeking therapy: behavioral, emotional, social difficulties
Goal: improve quality of life
Who practices psychotherapy?
“Therapist” is not a legally-protected term, does not mean a lot
Licensed therapists: undergo formal, structured training protocol, take a standardized exam to become licensed
Includes clinical psychological, psychiatrists, mental health counselors, and clinical social workers
Unlicensed therapists: religious/vocational/rehabilitation counselors, art/music therapists, and paraprofessionals → do not have to take standardized exam, but still usually undergo some sort of training
Professional training may not make a big difference in effectiveness
What makes psychotherapy effective?
Therapist having certain characteristics makes them more effective:
Warm, direct, caring, empathetic, flexible
Avoid contradicting clients (don’t disagree or shut them down) → creates safe space to voice concerns
Match treatments to client needs
Insight Therapies (Freudian)
Psychoanalytic/psychodynamic therapies: based on 3 core facets
Abnormal behavior stems from childhood trauma
During therapy sessions, therapists analysis focuses on:
Avoided thoughts/feelings
Wishes/fantasies
Recurring themes and life patterns
Significant past events
Therapeutic relationship
Achieving insight into previously unconscious material will resolve symptoms
Key ingredients in psychoanalysis
Free association: self-expression without censorship, clients encouraged to say whatever is on their mind
Interpretation: analyst-formed explanations for client’s dreams, emotion, and behavior
Dream analysis: relating client’s dreams to waking life
Resistance: client’s attempts to avoid confronting feared aspects of self
Transference: projecting feelings from past onto therapist
Working through: problem processing
Neo-Freudian Therapy
Greater concern for conscious aspects of functioning
Consideration of past experiences and future goals
Goal of therapy is individuation: integrating opposite aspects of personality
Emphasis on cultural and interpersonal influences
Interpersonal therapy: form of neo-Freudian therapy which aims to strengthen social skills and clients ability to cope with interpersonal projects
In neo-Freudian therapy, working through problems is more important than insight into problems (working through > insight)
Humanistic Therapies
Help clients overcome sense of alienation + develop sensory and emotional awareness
Emphasizes love, responsibility for our path in life, authenticity, and staying present in the moment
Relates to theories of Maslow, Rogers, tunes into the humanistic idea that people are inherently good
Carl Rogers: person-centered therapy
Therapist authenticity: don’t say things you don’t really mean
Unconditional positive regard towards client: nonjudgemental towards client
Empathic understanding for client: repeat back/paraphrase what the client is saying to show active listening
Existential therapy: pioneered by holocaust survivor Victor Frankl
Psychological disorder stems from failure to find meaning in life
Logotherapy (feelings towards existence)
Stresses responsibility for our actions and rising to meet life’s challenges
Gestalt therapy
Integration of different/opposing aspects of personality into unified self
Accepting responsibility for our feelings and maintaining contact in the present
Two-chair technique → talking to other aspect of personality in a different chair
Group therapies
Treat more than one person at a time
Groups may range from 3 to 20 people
Pros of group therapy: efficient, time-saving, cost-effective, and equal effectiveness to individual therapy
Alcoholics Anonymous
Considered a self-help group → usually no mental health professional is present during meetings
“12 step” program predicated on alcoholism as a physical disease
Key factor in effectiveness may be social network participation
Focuses on relapse prevention: aims to help people avoid “abstinence violation effect”
1 slip up → binge
Family therapy
Focuses on interaction between family members (the “unit”)
Strategic family therapy: strategically removes barriers to effective communication through directives
Directives: list of tasks they need to complete on their own time
May involve “reverse psychology:” for example, for a family with fighting parents, the directive may be to argue more
Structural family therapy: therapist is actively immersed in daily activities
Comparable effectiveness to individual therapies
Behavioral approaches
Systematic desensitization: slow, stepwise process that progresses through an anxiety hierarchy
Based on “reciprocal inhibition”: can’t be related and anxious as the same time
Can be done as a mental exercise or in vivo (live)
Common treatment for phobias
Flooding therapy: clients are exposed to most-feared stimulus for long periods of time
Based on idea that avoidance perpetuates fears
Paired with response (ritual) prevention
Can be done virtually, with images, or in vivo (live)
Commonly used to address anxiety disorders
Modeling therapy: therapist models positive behaviors for the client → client learns observationally
Assertion training: socially appropriate expression of thoughts/feelings
Behavioral rehearsal: client/therapist role-play as practice for real world interactions
Operant and Classical Conditioning Procedures
Operant conditioning: behavior is modified by consequences
Token economy
Positive behaviors rewarded with exchangeable tokens, stickers, etc.
Negative behaviors ignored or punished
Classical conditioning: undesirable behaviors are paired with unpleasant stimulus
Aversion therapy → mixed support for effectiveness
Cognitive-Behavioral Approaches
Rational-Emotive Behavior Therapy: maladaptive thoughts and behaviors can be identified, measured, and modified
ABC = client
A: Activating Event
B: Belief system
C: consequences
DEF = therapist
D: Dispute irrational beliefs
E: Effective (adaptive) beliefs
F: Feelings that are desirable
Beck’s Cognitive Therapy
Cognitive distortions and behavioral manifestations
Slightly more emphasis on behavioral procedures than rational emotive behavioral therapy (REBT)
Third-Wave Therapies
Centered around acceptance
Acceptance and commitment therapy: our thoughts are NOT facts
Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT): addresses contradiction between changing behavior and accepting it
Frequently used in cases of borderline personality disorder to accept emotions while making life changes to cope
Is Psychotherapy effective?
The “Dodo bird” verdict: “Everybody has won, and all must have prizes” → all therapies appear equivalent in outcome
Conclusion is NOT unanimous… effectiveness may depend on:
What is being treated
Existing problems can become worse after treatment (for example, if people are being “scared straight”)
Common characteristics shared by different forms of therapy → essential for fostering client motivation
Listening with empathy
Instilling hope
Establishing emotional bond
Providing clear treatment rationale
Using techniques that create new ways of thinking/feeling/behaving
May help explain improvement across diverse treatment types
Psychopharmacotherapy: prescribing medication
Anxiety disorders → anxiolytics or antianxiety drugs
Depression → antidepressants
Bipolar disorders → mood stabilizers
Psychotic conditions → Neuroleptics/antipsychotics or major tranquilizers
Attention difficulties → psychostimulants
Dosage and side effects are important considerations
Not everyone reacts the same
Caution against over-prescribing or prescribing for young children
Electrical Stimulation:
Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)
Muscle relaxant and anesthetic + electrical pulses → seizures
Serious depression, bipolar, schizophrenia, or catatonia
“Bad rap” from depiction in the media
91% of ECT clients report feeling grateful for receiving treatment
80-90% improvement rate in cases of severe depression
Transcranial stimulation
Stimulation of the vagus nerve: stimulates serotonin release and increases blood flow to brain
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): magnetic impulses delivered at skull surface
Deep brain stimulation: electrodes implanted deep into patient’s brain
Psychosurgery
Historically common, but now seen as a last resort due to controversial effects
Frontal lobotomy: blunted affect causes “zombie-like” personality