Legitimacy of Coercion
Government should not dictate beliefs or restrict doctrines.
Coercive power is illegitimate, regardless of public support.
Silencing dissent harms society as a whole, depriving it of truth.
Each individual's opinion contributes to the greater good.
False Supposition
Presuming any opinion is false without discussion is an assumption of infallibility.
Silence prevents the opportunity to assess both true and false opinions.
Collective Certainty
Individuals often rely on the prevailing views of their social group rather than their own judgments.
Historical perspectives show that no age is infallible; beliefs change over time.
Human Errors
Dissent can lead to corrections and advancements in thought.
Engaging in open discussions is necessary for the correction of errors.
Open Criticism
Critical examination and diverse opinions are essential for sound reasoning.
Rational Assurance
Confidence in opinions comes from their exposure to scrutiny.
Public Beliefs
Established beliefs should remain subject to challenge to protect their validity.
The Case of the Devil’s Advocate
Even the most sacred beliefs require examination to confirm their worth.
Some beliefs may be deemed indispensable, leading to government intervention based on necessity rather than truth.
Assumption of Infallibility
Authorities assuming certain beliefs should not be questioned assert their infallibility. to discard dissenting opinions limits the breadth of public discourse.
The discussion surrounding an opinion's utility assumes its truthfulness.
False Doctrines' Implications
A claim of utility cannot be separated from its truth, as false beliefs cannot genuinely be beneficial.
Conclusion
Restrictions on beliefs based on perceived utility lack justification without fair debate.
Mill argues that free expression and the ability to question prevailing opinions are essential for societal growth and human understanding.