The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness
The Color of Justice
Emma Faye Stewart's story
Single African American mother arrested in Hearne, Texas during a drug sweep.
Pressured by a court-appointed attorney to plead guilty to drug distribution, despite her innocence.
After nearly a month in jail, she accepts a guilty plea to return to her children.
Faces consequences: ten years probation, financial penalties, loss of government assistance, eviction threats.
Eventually, others arrested during the sweep were released, with charges dropped after the informant's deceit was revealed.
Clifford Runoalds' situation
Arrested while attending his daughter’s funeral, forced to testify against someone he did not know.
Charged with felonies, job loss, and missed opportunities to say goodbye to his daughter.
Represents the broader impact of the War on Drugs on African American communities.
The War on Drugs and Racial Disparities
Arrest Statistics
Mass incarceration primarily affects African Americans and Latinos: 80-90% of drug offenders in some states are Black.
Drug-related convictions among men of color are disproportionately high, even though drug usage rates across races show minimal differences.
Impact of Drug War
Illegal drug users and dealers predominantly white, yet over-representation of Black individuals in incarceration statistics.
As of 2006, 1 in 14 Black men incarcerated vs. 1 in 106 white men. Young Black men hit hardest.
Discriminatory policies exacerbate existing biases in the justice system: difficult to challenge race discrimination in court.
Legal Framework and Discrimination
Court Decisions
The Supreme Court’s rulings (e.g., Whren v. United States) allow racially biased policing practices to continue.
McCleskey v. Kemp (1987) ruling underscores barriers to proving racial bias in sentencing, favoring discretion over accountability.
Armstrong v. United States emphasizes hurdles faced in proving selective prosecution and discrimination.
The Effects of a Criminal Record
Continuing Punishment
Individuals labeled as felons face lifelong exclusion from jobs, housing, political rights, and public benefits.
The stigma of a criminal record effectively creates a second-class status for millions, undermining social reintegration.
Impacts on Families and Children
High rates of parental incarceration negatively affect family stability, leading to broken relationships and diminished economic support.
Children in these situations at higher risk for emotional and behavioral problems, increased delinquency rates, and poor academic performance.
Economic Consequences
Employment Barriers
Discouraging background checks for ex-offenders on job applications manifest systemic discrimination.
Consequence of prison sentences includes reduced long-term earnings potential and increased competition for low-wage work.
Housing Gaps and Homelessness
Legislation prohibits ex-offenders from accessing public housing assistance, pushing many into homelessness.
Housing instability leads to loss of children to foster care systems.
Community Effects
Social Disorganization Theory
Areas with high incarceration rates demonstrate weakened informal social controls, affecting community cohesion and increasing crime rates.
Lack of positive male role models reduces stability in families, compounding issues of youth delinquency and antisocial behavior.
Coercive Mobility Hypothesis
Definition
Suggests that high incarceration rates redefine neighborhoods, leading to increased crime due to social disintegration.
Empirical studies generally support the claim that greater incarceration correlates with rising crime rates, undermining existing social networks.
Evidence shows a curvilinear relationship: initial imprisonment can decrease crime rates, but high levels of incarceration lead to increased crime.
Moving Forward
Call to Action
Incarceration should be viewed as a structural problem with significant social implications; community engagement and policy changes are needed to address the cycle of poverty and crime linked to incarceration.
Communities must seek solutions to bolster social networks and enhance economic opportunities for marginalized groups, thus challenging systemic inequalities perpetuated by mass incarceration.