knowt ap exam guide logo

logical fallacies & satire quiz prep

LOGICAL FALLACIES

  • Hasty Generalization: Making a conclusion based on too little evidence.

  • Missing the Point: When the argument made doesn't address the actual issue being discussed.

  • Post Hoc: Assuming that because one thing happened after another, the first caused the second.

  • Slippery Slope: Arguing that a small action will lead to a chain of negative events without showing how.

  • Weak/Faulty Analogy: Comparing two things that aren't really similar enough to make a valid comparison.

  • Appeal to Authority: Believing something is true just because an authority or expert says so, without proper evidence.

  • Appeal to Pity: Trying to win an argument by making the audience feel sorry for someone instead of presenting logical evidence.

  • Appeal to Ignorance: Claiming something is true just because it hasn’t been proven false, or vice versa.

  • Straw Man: Misrepresenting someone’s argument to make it easier to attack or criticize.

  • Red Herring: Distracting from the main issue by introducing an unrelated topic.

  • False Dichotomy: Presenting only two options when more exist.

  • Begging the Question: Assuming the conclusion in the argument’s premise, so it doesn’t really prove anything.

  • Equivocation: Using a word in different ways to confuse or mislead.

  • Circular Reasoning: Using the conclusion as part of the argument, so it just goes in circles.

  • Non Sequitur: When the conclusion doesn’t logically follow from the premises.

  • Ad Misericordiam: Appealing to sympathy to get support, instead of using facts or logic.

  • Poisoning the Well: Discrediting someone before they even present their argument, so it’s easier to dismiss them.

  • Appeal to Tradition: Arguing something is true or right simply because it’s been done that way for a long time.

  • Stacking the Deck: Presenting only evidence that supports your argument while ignoring contradictory evidence.

  • Hypothesis Contrary to the Fact: Making a guess about what could have happened if things were different, without proper evidence.

  • Moving the Goalposts: Changing the criteria for success or proof once it’s met, so it’s always out of reach.

SATIRICAL TERMS

  • Formal/Direct Satire: Directly criticizing something in a serious or formal way to highlight flaws.

  • Indirect Satire: Criticizing something subtly or through storytelling, without being obvious.

  • Horatian: A light, humorous way of making fun of people or things, aiming to entertain rather than hurt.

  • Juvenalian: A serious and harsh form of satire meant to criticize society or people in a bitter way.

  • Optimist: Believes people are basically good but might be naive; uses humor to point out flaws and improve things.

  • Pessimist: Critical of society but still cares about individuals; uses satire to show what’s wrong in the world.

  • Diatribe/Invective: A strong, angry verbal attack against something or someone.

  • Farce: An exaggerated, ridiculous story or event meant to entertain with its absurdity.

  • Caricature: An exaggerated, humorous version of someone or something to make them look silly.

  • Grotesque: Depictions of something strange, ugly, or horrifying to show what’s wrong with it.

  • Juxtaposition: Placing two things next to each other to highlight their differences or contrasts.

  • Exaggeration: Making something seem bigger or more extreme than it is to make a point or for humor.

  • Hyperbole: An extreme exaggeration used for emphasis or effect.

  • Absurdum: Taking an argument or idea to an extreme to show that it’s unreasonable or ridiculous.

  • Understatement: Saying less than what is true, often to make something seem less serious than it really is.

  • Incongruity: When two things don’t make sense together, creating humor or highlighting their oddness.

  • Reversal: Presenting the opposite of what’s expected to show a contrast or create surprise.

  • Irony: When the outcome is different from what you expect, or when you say one thing but mean the opposite.

  • Sarcasm: Saying something in a mocking or ironic way to show contempt or make fun of something.

  • Judgement: Making an opinion or critique, often to expose flaws or contradictions.

  • Play/Wit: Clever, quick, and often funny remarks that show sharp thinking.

  • Misunderstanding: Creating humor from confusion or mix-ups between people or situations.

  • Parody: Imitating something in a humorous way to mock or make fun of it.

    • Burlesque: A humorous imitation of something serious or grand, often exaggerated to show its silliness.

    • Mock Heroic: Treating a trivial subject like it’s heroic or important, usually in an exaggerated and funny way.

M<

logical fallacies & satire quiz prep

LOGICAL FALLACIES

  • Hasty Generalization: Making a conclusion based on too little evidence.

  • Missing the Point: When the argument made doesn't address the actual issue being discussed.

  • Post Hoc: Assuming that because one thing happened after another, the first caused the second.

  • Slippery Slope: Arguing that a small action will lead to a chain of negative events without showing how.

  • Weak/Faulty Analogy: Comparing two things that aren't really similar enough to make a valid comparison.

  • Appeal to Authority: Believing something is true just because an authority or expert says so, without proper evidence.

  • Appeal to Pity: Trying to win an argument by making the audience feel sorry for someone instead of presenting logical evidence.

  • Appeal to Ignorance: Claiming something is true just because it hasn’t been proven false, or vice versa.

  • Straw Man: Misrepresenting someone’s argument to make it easier to attack or criticize.

  • Red Herring: Distracting from the main issue by introducing an unrelated topic.

  • False Dichotomy: Presenting only two options when more exist.

  • Begging the Question: Assuming the conclusion in the argument’s premise, so it doesn’t really prove anything.

  • Equivocation: Using a word in different ways to confuse or mislead.

  • Circular Reasoning: Using the conclusion as part of the argument, so it just goes in circles.

  • Non Sequitur: When the conclusion doesn’t logically follow from the premises.

  • Ad Misericordiam: Appealing to sympathy to get support, instead of using facts or logic.

  • Poisoning the Well: Discrediting someone before they even present their argument, so it’s easier to dismiss them.

  • Appeal to Tradition: Arguing something is true or right simply because it’s been done that way for a long time.

  • Stacking the Deck: Presenting only evidence that supports your argument while ignoring contradictory evidence.

  • Hypothesis Contrary to the Fact: Making a guess about what could have happened if things were different, without proper evidence.

  • Moving the Goalposts: Changing the criteria for success or proof once it’s met, so it’s always out of reach.

SATIRICAL TERMS

  • Formal/Direct Satire: Directly criticizing something in a serious or formal way to highlight flaws.

  • Indirect Satire: Criticizing something subtly or through storytelling, without being obvious.

  • Horatian: A light, humorous way of making fun of people or things, aiming to entertain rather than hurt.

  • Juvenalian: A serious and harsh form of satire meant to criticize society or people in a bitter way.

  • Optimist: Believes people are basically good but might be naive; uses humor to point out flaws and improve things.

  • Pessimist: Critical of society but still cares about individuals; uses satire to show what’s wrong in the world.

  • Diatribe/Invective: A strong, angry verbal attack against something or someone.

  • Farce: An exaggerated, ridiculous story or event meant to entertain with its absurdity.

  • Caricature: An exaggerated, humorous version of someone or something to make them look silly.

  • Grotesque: Depictions of something strange, ugly, or horrifying to show what’s wrong with it.

  • Juxtaposition: Placing two things next to each other to highlight their differences or contrasts.

  • Exaggeration: Making something seem bigger or more extreme than it is to make a point or for humor.

  • Hyperbole: An extreme exaggeration used for emphasis or effect.

  • Absurdum: Taking an argument or idea to an extreme to show that it’s unreasonable or ridiculous.

  • Understatement: Saying less than what is true, often to make something seem less serious than it really is.

  • Incongruity: When two things don’t make sense together, creating humor or highlighting their oddness.

  • Reversal: Presenting the opposite of what’s expected to show a contrast or create surprise.

  • Irony: When the outcome is different from what you expect, or when you say one thing but mean the opposite.

  • Sarcasm: Saying something in a mocking or ironic way to show contempt or make fun of something.

  • Judgement: Making an opinion or critique, often to expose flaws or contradictions.

  • Play/Wit: Clever, quick, and often funny remarks that show sharp thinking.

  • Misunderstanding: Creating humor from confusion or mix-ups between people or situations.

  • Parody: Imitating something in a humorous way to mock or make fun of it.

    • Burlesque: A humorous imitation of something serious or grand, often exaggerated to show its silliness.

    • Mock Heroic: Treating a trivial subject like it’s heroic or important, usually in an exaggerated and funny way.

robot