Reflections on lecture and seminar content will be posted.
The instructor will be at the National Suicide Prevention Conference in Perth next week and will post reflections on the unit site.
Intelligence
Today's topic is intelligence.
The lecture is taking place on the lands of the Wurundjeri people.
This is the last week of PASS sessions; this week's topic focuses on intelligence, a case study on IQ testing, and exam revision.
Exam timetable is available on Student Connect.
Intelligence is a large concept that means different things to different people in different contexts.
Examples include intelligent behavior in animals and variations across cultures.
Some consider "book smarts" as intelligence, while others value "street smarts," or the ability to adapt to different environments.
Intelligence as a psychological concept has been around since around the 20th century, but the definition has changed over time.
Terms like emotional intelligence and social intelligence are relatively new.
Definition of intelligence for this lecture: the capacity to learn from experiences, use metacognitive processes to enhance learning, and adapt to the environment within different social and cultural contexts.
Key Terms in the Definition of Intelligence
Learning from experience: applying what is learned in one situation to other similar situations (generalization from classical conditioning).
Example: Applying knowledge from one assignment to other assessments of a similar type.
Ravens and crows are examples of intelligent birds that can learn from experience - using tools to get treats out of bottles.
Adapting to the environment: behaving appropriately and usefully in different environments.
Examples of different environments: educational, home, peer group, work.
Adapting behavior to be respectful when visiting another culture.
"Adaptive" generally means positive change, while "maladaptive" means not so positive change.
Metacognition: thinking about one's own thinking and problem-solving skills.
Reflecting on learning processes.
Biological Basis of Intelligence
Intelligence has around a 50% genetic component.
Simplified explanation: intelligent parents are likely to have intelligent children, but it's not deterministic.
Correlative studies are generally used to determine this; causal research is not possible.
A bigger brain may correlate with higher intelligence.
Intelligent brains are more efficient and use less energy to solve complex tasks; energy usage can be measured using brain imaging techniques.
Brain size, energy usage, and genetics are factors, but they don't fully explain intelligence; the environment also plays a role.
Bigger brains don't always mean greater intelligence.
Men generally have bigger brains than women, but there are no differences in overall intelligence.
Encephalization quotient: brain size relative to body size.
Environmental Factors Affecting Intelligence
Family environment: Aside from genetics, factors like better nutrition, more time, and financial resources may influence intelligence.
School culture: Schools focused on academic ability may produce more academically inclined individuals.
Wider cultural expectations and norms: Cultural expectations around academic achievement and societal norms can impact intelligence.
Treatment of children: the way children are treated impacts how intelligent they perceive themselves to be
If treated as capable, they may perceive themselves as more intelligent.
Theories of Intelligence
CHC Theory (Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory)
Most widely accepted and used theory of intelligence.
Evidence-based theory synthesizing results from standardized intelligence tests.
Involves factor analysis to identify different factors of intelligence.
Three strata of intelligence:
Stratum 1: Narrow abilities (specific).
Stratum 2: Broad abilities (umbrella for narrow abilities; includes fluid and crystallized intelligence).
Stratum 3: General ability (umbrella for all abilities).
Key Abilities within Stratum 2
Fluid intelligence (GF): Ability to cope with novelty, think rapidly and flexibly.
Involves problem-solving, adapting to changing environments, and flexible thinking.
Crystallized intelligence (GC): General knowledge.
Knowledge about language, school learning, and general world knowledge.
Detailed Breakdown of CHC Theory
General intelligence at the top, branching into broad abilities (stratum two, e.g., fluid and crystallized intelligence).
Fluid intelligence: ability to be flexible and think about things in a different way.
Crystallized intelligence: book learnings, knowledge.
Short-term memory: ability to retain things impacts overall intelligence.
Visual processing: ability to look at things and mentally manipulate them.
Auditory processing: ability to take information auditorily and manipulate it.
Long-term storage and retrieval: ability to remember things for a long time and retrieve them when needed.
Cognitive processing speed: how quickly we are able to do certain tasks.
Decision and reaction speed: how quickly we react to things, how quickly we can make a decision about things.
Reading and writing and quantitative knowledge.
Each of these broad abilities is made up of various narrow abilities that can be tested using cognitive tests.
Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence: Further Breakdown
Fluid intelligence: induction, general sequential reasoning, and quantitative reasoning.
Problem-solving, pattern recognition, ability to think about new information.
Induction: observing the world and making suggestions about what we observe as being broader; going from specific to broad.
General sequential reasoning: recognizing sequence of shapes or patterns.
Mathematical reasoning: can we predict what the answer's going to be?
Crystallized intelligence: knowledge of general information, language development, and lexical knowledge.
General information: pub trivia knowledge.
Language development: lexical knowledge, the amount number of words that we know, our ability to listen, our ability to communicate, grammar, and our oral production and fluency
Fluid is more of that doing new things, and crystallized is more of that saying what you know, knowing things and saying them.
Pros and Cons of CHC Theory
Pros:
Easy to measure abilities.
Quantifiable.
Evidence for these as factors and as separate abilities.
Cons:
Focuses on cognitive abilities.
Relies on learned knowledge.
Can we actually measure those latent cognitive processes?
Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences
Eight different types of constructs:
Linguistic: language production, language understanding.
Logical-mathematical: reasoning and maths.
Spatial: how objects move in space and relate to each other in space.
Bodily-kinesthetic: physically anchored intelligence in the body.
Musical: musicians are gonna be higher in this.
Naturalistic: our understanding of the natural world.
Interpersonal: social and emotional intelligence.
Intrapersonal: understanding the self.
Each of these functions are separate to each other, but where I would suggest that they can and must interact.
Pros and Cons of Gardner's Theory
Pros:
Recognizes different types of skills and intelligence.
More cross-culturally relevant.
Allows for more variability between people; less standardized and more individualized.
Cons:
Hard to measure any of these constructs.
Less evidence for these.
Doesn't tackle our working memory or problem-solving.
Models of Intelligence: Innate vs. Developed
Neither model explains whether intelligence is something we have or something we develop.
Biological models suggest we either have it or we don't, while sociological models suggest it can be developed over time.
Some cultures (e.g., First Nations people) believe elders with more knowledge are more intelligent.
In Western culture, there's an impression that elders know less.
Is having greater knowledge the same as intelligence?
Is age the thing that leads to wisdom?
Is wisdom part of intelligence that we haven't assessed?
Assessment of Intelligence
Assessing intelligence helps to rule out intellectual disability as the cause of an ongoing issue; identifying people who might need additional support.
To see if there are other underlying causes of ongoing problems.
Identify any particular cognitive domains that might be impaired.
Helps to identify individuals needing additional support (e.g., in schools, for NDIS support).
Methods of Measuring Intelligence
Stanford Binet Intelligence Test
Traditional IQ test.
Calculation of a mental age which was divided by the individual's chronological age and that gave us an IQ score
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)
More commonly used IQ test.
Utilizes a comparative comparison to a normative sample to calculate IQ
Different domains:
Verbal comprehension.
Perceptual reasoning.
Working memory.
Processing speed.
Distribution of Intelligence
Normal distribution with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.
Average intelligence: 85 to 115.
Lower level intelligence: below 85.
Higher intelligence: above 115.
Gifted: above 145.
Extreme intellectual disability: below 55.
Difficulties with Current Assessments
*Everyone gets the same test regardless of their background and access to resources.
Expensive process.
*IQ tests that we use a lot don't assess cognitive strengths and weaknesses of non-Western people.
May not be fair for people who have never been exposed to those things before; not an accurate depiction of where they're at in this normative distribution.
Those norms that we talked about before, maybe they only apply to the group they're developed in.
Culturally based differences in IQ have been used to suggest white supremacy inappropriately.
Intelligence in Pop Culture and Media
Intelligence tests are often advertised on social media and related to celebrities and politicians.
Questions to consider:
Where does this information come from?
Who is telling us this and why?
What is the purpose of publicizing this?
What does it help us to know?
Psychological and Sociological Impacts of Intelligence Perception
How does perceiving oneself or being perceived by others as having high or low intelligence affect:
Psychology?
Social interactions?
Key Takeaways
Is there a necessity of intelligence testing?
Why do we still use these tests?
How can we better incorporate cultural differences into theory and assessment?