Sensory Analysis: Taste, Chemesthesis & Industry Applications
Week 9 – Administrative & Housekeeping
- Second-to-last week of the course
• Session recorded on Tuesday 5 Aug (lecturer repeatedly corrected the date).
• Next week: VIP guest speaker + in-class quiz → lecturer urged full attendance and asked students to spread the word to fill the lecture hall. - 52-slide lecture; 10-min break in the middle; extra quiz segment run by Apeksha at the end.
Why the Food Industry Cares About Human Senses
- Three core consumer purchase drivers:
- Price / Cost / Affordability
- Convenience
- Taste / Pleasure (focus of this week)
- Long-standing industrial goal: create a third shelf of foods that “taste good and are good for you.”
- Sequencing of the human genome (~2001) allowed the field to move from empirical formulation to molecular design of taste & aroma → several Nobel Prizes (Linda Buck, Richard Axel, David Julius, Ardem Patapoutian).
Basic Vocabulary & Concepts
- Taste (Gustation) – detection of dissolved chemicals by receptors on the tongue.
- Smell (Olfaction) – detection of volatile chemicals via the nasal cavity (orthonasal & retronasal).
- Flavor – holistic perception produced by the combination of taste + smell (and chemesthesis, texture, sight, sound, context…).
- Chemesthesis / Chemosensory Irritation – tingling, burning, cooling, etc., mediated primarily by trigeminal nerve endings (e.g., capsaicin, menthol).
- Stimulation vs. Perception
• Stimulation: physical/chemical activation of peripheral receptors.
• Perception: subjective brain representation (depends on context, mood, physiology). - Five classical senses: sight, smell, taste, hearing, touch (but course continually emphasises cross-modal interaction).
Context Dependence: The “Gustatory” Illusion Analogy
- Checkerboard example (Adelson illusion): physical luminance of squares A & B identical, yet perceived as black vs white because of contextual processing → similar contextual effects occur with tastes (sweetness, saltiness, temperature, plating, mood, etc.).
Sensory Science Methodology
Human Testing Infrastructure
- Purpose-built sensory booths with cloches for blinded sample delivery (example: six-station lab in Science-Engineering Building).
- Panel types:
• Trained (can detect $\,\approx\,$3 % salt difference, recognise off-flavours, etc.)
• Untrained (consumer liking, JAR: Just About Right scales).
Core Test Designs
- 2-AFC / 3-AFC (Alternate Forced Choice)
• “Find the odd one” among 3 samples → used to determine detection thresholds & difference thresholds. - GLMS (General Labelled Magnitude Scale)
• Anchors: barely detectable → strongest imaginable; accommodates individual differences. - Multidimensional profiling
• Spider/Radar diagrams – axes for sweetness, creaminess, bitterness, etc.
• PCA (Principal Component Analysis) – reduces large attribute matrices to PC1/PC2 plots for product mapping.
Animal Behaviour Assays
- Two-bottle preference test (mice): measures consumption of test vs control solution to infer hedonic valence; can incorporate genetic knock-outs to map receptor specificity.
Neuro-Anatomical Pathways
- Taste nerves
• Chorda tympani (CN VII branch) – anterior tongue
• Glossopharyngeal (CN IX) – posterior tongue
• Vagus (CN X) – epiglottis/larynx
• 1st synapse: Nucleus of the Solitary Tract (NST) → thalamus → Gustatory cortex (insula). - Trigeminal nerve (CN V) – three roots innervating face, oral & nasal mucosa; responsible for chemesthetic sensations.
Tongue Microanatomy
- What you see: Papillae (fungiform, foliate, circumvallate).
- What actually senses taste: Taste buds embedded in papilla walls.
• ≈100 polar neuro-epithelial cells per bud.
• Labelled-line coding: distinct cell subtypes dedicated to single modalities (not cross-fibre).
Molecular Biology of Each Taste Modality
1. Sweet
- Biological role – Signals caloric carbohydrates; innate preference (energy, “happiness”).
- Industrial relevance – Consumer pull; sweeteners, sugar reduction, satiety manipulators.
- Receptor – Heterodimer T1R2 + T1R3 (Class C GPCR).
• Discoveries published simultaneously by six labs in Feb 2001; Charles Zuker’s group secured key patents.
• Knock-out mice lacking both subunits show abolished chorda tympani responses to sucrose, saccharin, etc. - Ligand diversity – Sugars, polyols, high-potency sweeteners (saccharin, aspartame, cyclamate), sweet proteins (thaumatin, monellin), some D-amino acids.
2. Umami
- Biological role – Indicates protein (L-glutamate) & nucleotide richness → “meaty/savoury.”
- Industrial relevance – MSG, nucleotides (IMP, GMP) as flavour enhancers (Ajinomoto, stock cubes).
• Synergy: \text{EC}{50}\,(\text{MSG}) \approx \text{mM};\ \ +\ 10^{-6}\,\text{M}\,\text{IMP}\ \Rightarrow\ \text{EC}{50}\,(\text{MSG})\rightarrow\mu\text{M}. - Receptor – Heterodimer T1R1 + T1R3 (shared T1R3 subunit).
• Double knock-out eliminates responses to MSG ± IMP.
3. Bitter
- Biological role – Avoidance of toxins (alkaloids, metals, spoilage indicators).
- Industrial interest – Masking coffee/beer bitterness; producing “healthy bitter” vegetables.
- Receptors – ~30 T2R GPCRs → broad chemical coverage but convergent “bitter” percept.
• Species differences (human, mouse, rat, bonobo) documented. - Cross-activation caveat – High conc. saccharin activates some T2Rs → explains off-notes of artificial sweeteners.
4. Salty
- Biological role – Detects \text{Na}^+, essential for nerve & muscle function; drives salt appetite after depletion.
- Primary detector – ENaC (epithelial sodium channel).
• Mouse taste: \alpha\beta\gamma subunits; amiloride-sensitive.
• Human taste: \alpha\beta\gamma\delta tetramer (δ-subunit explains earlier pharmacological anomalies). - Mechanism – Ion permeation depolarises taste cell directly (channel, not GPCR).
5. Sour
- Biological role – Warns of unripe or spoiled (acidic) foods; helps maintain acid–base balance.
- Candidate sensors – PKD2L1/Pkd1l3 channels (“PiCaDilly” cells), OTOP1 proton channel, etc.
- Industry angle – Managing acidity in yogurt, beverages; acid masking.
6. Fat / “Oleogustus” (emerging modality)
- Nutritional role – Highly caloric, carrier of fat-soluble vitamins, essential FAs.
- Consumer psychology – “The fatter, the better” (ice-cream, potato chips; peak pleasure when finger-licking).
- Candidate detectors – CD36, GPR120, GPR40, K+ channels (texture), yet multi-modal (taste + mouthfeel).
- Case study – Olestra (non-digestible fat mimic) tasted fatty but caused gastrointestinal leakage → market failure.
7. Chemesthesis / Spiciness
- Key TRP channels
• TRPV1 – heat & capsaicin (red chili) → Nobel 2021 (Patapoutian & Julius).
• TRPM8 – cold & menthol → gives “cooling” of mints.
• TRPA1, TRPV3, TRPV4 – mustard oil, gingerol, wasabi, etc. - Cultural/Health Aspects
• Spices historically used for antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, thermogenic, or metabolic effects.
• Synergistic perception: sub-threshold chili elevates overall taste intensity of foods.
- PCR screens revealed sweet, umami, bitter receptors in gut entero-endocrine cells.
• Influence GLP-1, CCK, ghrelin → link to satiety & glycaemic control (basis for modern weight-loss drugs). - Demonstrates nature’s “re-use” of sensory GPCRs for internal nutrient sensing and metabolic regulation.
Practical Demonstrations Suggested by Lecturer
- Clip nose + blindfold → grated onion vs apple become indistinguishable (proves dominance of smell in flavour).
- Drink coffee while occluding nose, then release → experience olfactory contribution.
- Rub capsaicin vs sugar in eye (NOT recommended) → only chemesthetic stimuli activate trigeminal endings in cornea.
Key Take-Away Matrix (Zuker 2009)
Modality | Primary Sensor | Molecular Type | Typical Ligands |
---|
Sweet | T1R2+T1R3 | GPCR heterodimer | Sugars, polyols, HPS, peptides |
Umami | T1R1+T1R3 | GPCR heterodimer | \text{L-Glu} + IMP/GMP |
Bitter | ~30 T2Rs | GPCR family | Alkaloids, metals, hops, etc. |
Salty | ENaC \alpha\beta\gamma(\delta) | Ion channel | \text{Na}^+ |
Sour | PKD2L1/OTOP1 | Proton channels | \text{H}^+ (acids) |
Chemesthesis | TRP family | Mixed ion channels | Capsaicin, menthol, mustard oil, etc. |
- Feb 2001: Six labs simultaneously cloned sweet receptor genes.
• Charles Zuker published in Cell and filed broad patents → led to successful start-up, later acquisition by Swiss firm; example of aligning academic discovery with commercial IP.
Wrap-Up & What’s Next
- Today covered: sensory methodology → peripheral anatomy → molecular identity of taste, chemesthesis, fat sensing.
- Remaining topic (deferred to next lecture): Olfaction (smell receptors, flavour synergy, food design).
- Reminder: VIP speaker + quiz next Tuesday. Bring classmates, arrive on time.