conceptualizing deviance: statistical, legalistic, normative
normative approach to conceptualizing deviance: considering what would evoke a disapproving response from others
relativist perspective: deviance is not an inherent characteristic of an act, but is the result of social construction, it is defined by society
absolutist perspective: some behaviors are inherently deviant, deviance is part of its nature
ethnocentrism: evaluation of cultures based on standards of your own culture
conflict perspective: subtype of relativist approach, says that “deviant” is used as weapon against vulnerable people, used to preserve social dominance of powerful groups
“nuts, sluts, and perverts” : Liazos
Liazos: nuts,sluts, perverts, felt sociologists had stigmatized deviants to social norms, wanted to discontinue use of word deviant
Liazos wanted to switch word deviant with: victimization, persecution, or oppression
Wolf and Zuckerman: deviance is requirement for social change
Cesare Lombroso: believed people were born criminals
Durkheim: organization of society inhibits suicide, characteristics of society (such as its ability to regulate behavior and foster solidarity)
anomie: society’s norms fail to regulate behavior, bond between individual and the community breaks
Erikson: punishing deviants-→ members of society affirm moral boundaries
Durkheim’s functionalist view: deviance increases, bar for what is considered deviant rises
Merton’s view of anomie: societal emphasis on success and underemphasis on means to achieve it, deviance is result of culture
control perspectives: social disorganization: some neighborhoods have more crime bc their conditions make it difficult for the community to achieve collective efficacy and social control: conform to norms due to threat of formal or informal sanctions
self-control theory: risk seeking, self cntered, search for simple tasks, lead to acts of force or fraud (children will fail to find self control without help of caregivers)
learning theories: deviance is no diff from other social behaviors, they have a normative transmission, learned behavior
strain theories: Agnew, failure to achieve positively valued goals, removal of positively valued stimuli, presentation of negatively valued stimuli
corrective action: coping that seeks to address strain (violent retaliation)
moral entrepreenurship: seek to change norms to align w their views
medicalization of deviance
labeling:
primary deviance: no deviant label associated
secondary deviance: occurs as result of deviant lable
becker’s typology of deviance
neutralization techniques used by violators: denial of responsibility, denial of injury, denial of victim, condemning the condemners, appeal to higher loyalties
compensatory strategies: offset deviance
gabrication: presentation of false identity
concealment
signaling
private property source of problems, provides motivation
conflict perspective: control = key to wealth
social stratification: distribution of goods
estate: social standing determined distribution
intra- change during life
conceptualizing deviance: statistical, legalistic, normative
normative approach to conceptualizing deviance: considering what would evoke a disapproving response from others
relativist perspective: deviance is not an inherent characteristic of an act, but is the result of social construction, it is defined by society
absolutist perspective: some behaviors are inherently deviant, deviance is part of its nature
ethnocentrism: evaluation of cultures based on standards of your own culture
conflict perspective: subtype of relativist approach, says that “deviant” is used as weapon against vulnerable people, used to preserve social dominance of powerful groups
“nuts, sluts, and perverts” : Liazos
Liazos: nuts,sluts, perverts, felt sociologists had stigmatized deviants to social norms, wanted to discontinue use of word deviant
Liazos wanted to switch word deviant with: victimization, persecution, or oppression
Wolf and Zuckerman: deviance is requirement for social change
Cesare Lombroso: believed people were born criminals
Durkheim: organization of society inhibits suicide, characteristics of society (such as its ability to regulate behavior and foster solidarity)
anomie: society’s norms fail to regulate behavior, bond between individual and the community breaks
Erikson: punishing deviants-→ members of society affirm moral boundaries
Durkheim’s functionalist view: deviance increases, bar for what is considered deviant rises
Merton’s view of anomie: societal emphasis on success and underemphasis on means to achieve it, deviance is result of culture
control perspectives: social disorganization: some neighborhoods have more crime bc their conditions make it difficult for the community to achieve collective efficacy and social control: conform to norms due to threat of formal or informal sanctions
self-control theory: risk seeking, self cntered, search for simple tasks, lead to acts of force or fraud (children will fail to find self control without help of caregivers)
learning theories: deviance is no diff from other social behaviors, they have a normative transmission, learned behavior
strain theories: Agnew, failure to achieve positively valued goals, removal of positively valued stimuli, presentation of negatively valued stimuli
corrective action: coping that seeks to address strain (violent retaliation)
moral entrepreenurship: seek to change norms to align w their views
medicalization of deviance
labeling:
primary deviance: no deviant label associated
secondary deviance: occurs as result of deviant lable
becker’s typology of deviance
neutralization techniques used by violators: denial of responsibility, denial of injury, denial of victim, condemning the condemners, appeal to higher loyalties
compensatory strategies: offset deviance
gabrication: presentation of false identity
concealment
signaling
private property source of problems, provides motivation
conflict perspective: control = key to wealth
social stratification: distribution of goods
estate: social standing determined distribution
intra- change during life