Forensic psychology in the judicial system
Overview and scope
Forensic psychology is the application of psychological expertise within the judicial system.
It became an APA-approved specialization in 2001.
Forensic psychologists provide services for both criminal and civil courts, including:
Mental health evaluations
Risk assessments (e.g., potential for violence)
Child custody determinations and other family-law issues
Personal injury and related civil matters
Other issues requiring psychological expertise to inform legal decisions
The field aims to help courts and juries make more educated decisions about criminal offenders and civil litigants.
Growth of the field has been influenced by popular media (e.g., television shows like CSI and Law & Order) which:
Attract more students to the field
Increase attorneys’ awareness of psychologists’ contributions to cases
A notable benefit of forensic psychology is its fee-for-service nature, offering an alternative to managed-care constraints and their stressors.
Quote: a forensic psychologist in private practice highlights the ability to “make a living outside of the managed-care parameters and stressors.”
What forensic psychologists do
Many are in private practice and are hired by:
Attorneys
The court system
They provide expert opinions on:
Whether a defendant has a mental disorder that affects trial participation
A defendant’s mental state at the time of an offense
Regardless of hiring source, the client is not the examinee; the client is the attorney or the court.
This has important implications for confidentiality and other professional obligations.
Civil cases include:
Evaluations of plaintiffs in workers’ compensation cases
Child custody cases (including parental relocation considerations)
Forensic neuropsychologists contribute by:
Assessing amnesia claims and other cognitive defenses
Evaluating competence restoration to stand trial, especially in cases with conditions like dementia
Assessing cognitive deficits’ impact on job performance and daily functioning
Settings in which forensic psychologists work include:
Private practice
State forensic hospitals
Court clinics
Mental health centers
Jails and prisons
Juvenile treatment centers
Services in these settings often blend evaluation with therapeutic interventions tailored to legal proceedings, e.g.:
Treating a psychotic defendant not competent to stand trial using antipsychotic medications
Providing competence restoration education about how the criminal justice system operates
The work can be emotionally demanding, including exposure to violent offenses described by inmates (e.g., violent crimes against others or against children).
The goal remains to balance scientific understanding with practical, ethical courtroom application.
Client identity, confidentiality, and obligations
The client for a forensic psychologist is the attorney or the court, not the person being evaluated.
This changes confidentiality considerations and other professional obligations, requiring careful navigation of who information can be shared with and under what conditions.
Ethical practice calls for transparency about who the client is and the scope of the evaluation.
Civil and family-law applications
Civil-forensic work includes:
Workers’ compensation assessments
Child custody evaluations conducted as court-appointed evaluators
Providing guidance to attorneys on trial preparation, including development of direct and cross-examination questions
Educating clients about current research on child development and parenting plans (including relocation)
Finished adding these to notes^ continue adding to goodnotes
Forensic neuropsychology and related evaluations
Neuropsychologists (e.g., Tussey) are often asked to:
Validate amnesia claims related to alleged offenses
Assess whether a defendant can be restored to competence to stand trial, especially when dementia or other cognitive issues are present
Conduct personal injury evaluations and fitness-for-duty assessments
The scope of practice can include:
Evaluating how traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) impact functioning and job performance
Distinguishing cognitive deficits from other factors in legal contexts
Settings and roles in institutions
Forensic psychologists work in a range of settings, including:
State forensic hospitals
Court clinics
Mental health centers
Jails and prisons
Juvenile treatment centers
In addition to evaluations, they may provide therapeutic services tied to the legal process, such as:
Competence restoration programs
Educational components about the legal system for defendants
Competence, restoration, and clinical challenges
A key area is assessing competence to stand trial and determining if restoration efforts are feasible.
Restorative strategies can involve education about legal procedures, rights, and how the system operates.
Clinicians may encounter cases where mental health conditions (e.g., psychosis, dementia) complicate both the evaluation and treatment processes.
Providing accurate testimony requires strong scientific grounding and familiarity with jurisdictional mental health laws.
Training: foundation and pathways
Forensic psychology is a specialized field with limited formal training opportunities:
Only a handful of doctoral programs specifically offer forensic psychology as a specialty.
Many practitioners enter the field with a clinical psychology degree and supplement with continuing education to build expertise.
Cautions raised by leading figures:
A few individuals with minimal training have begun offering forensic services to supplement income, which is discouraged.
The field requires substantial specialized knowledge and experience to practice competently.
Core educational considerations include knowledge of jurisdictional requirements and relevant mental health laws, which are not readily learned in short workshops.
Recommended steps to build expertise:
Seek mentorship and supervision from experienced professionals
Engage with professional organizations and pursue leadership roles to gain practical insight and networking opportunities
Participate in ongoing education and specialized training beyond one-day workshops
Professional development and mentorship
Networking and mentorship are emphasized as essential for preparing for courtroom testimony and building credibility.
Strategies include:
Joining organizations focused on psychology and law
Taking on leadership roles to deepen understanding of the field
Building a sponsor/mentorship network to guide career advancement
Important organizations and resources
Organizations to contact for foundational education and training:
American Psychology-Law Society (APA’s Div. 41)
American Academy of Forensic Psychology (education and training arm of the American Board of Forensic Psychology)
Certification pathways often involve credentialing beyond doctoral training and may include supervised practice and examinations.
For more information and continued reading, refer to the Monitor series and related APA resources (e.g., search for related pieces such as “No Insurance Required”).
Practical implications and takeaways
Interdisciplinary collaboration is central: psychology, law, and policy intersect in evaluations and testimony.
The courtroom environment demands preparation, credibility, and the ability to withstand cross-examination while maintaining scientific integrity.
Ethical practice requires clarity about who the client is, what information can be shared, and how confidentiality applies in civil versus criminal contexts.
The field offers diverse opportunities across private practice, public institutions, and civil litigation, with ongoing demand for qualified professionals despite limited formal training pipelines.
Summary connections to broader concepts
Forensic psychology exemplifies how empirical science informs legal decision-making and policy.
It highlights the importance of evidence-based assessments in high-stakes settings, including risk assessment, competency evaluations, and child custody decisions.
The profession underscores the need for robust ethical standards and rigorous training to prevent misapplication or harm in legal outcomes.
References and resources cited in the article
Source article: American Psychological Association Monitor (Sept. 2017), “Helping courts and juries make educated decisions” by Amy Novotney, Vol 48, No. 8.
Key organizations:
American Psychology-Law Society (APA’s Div. 41)
American Academy of Forensic Psychology (education and training arm of the American Board of Forensic Psychology)
Additional notes:
The article discusses the role of funding models (fee-for-service vs. managed care) and the impact on practice.
It also mentions a Monitor series titled "No Insurance Required" exploring practice niches with no insurance reimbursement.
URL for further reading (as mentioned in the article): https://www-apa-org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/monitor/2017/09/courts-decisions