Contested Hominin Species
Contested Species
Many named species are debated, with specimens potentially belonging to variable Au. afarensis or Au. anamensis species.
- Specimens are sometimes dated to times or found in places with gaps in the palaeoanthropological record.
- These may represent chronospecies or Au. afarensis variants.
- More discoveries may validate distinct species types.
Australopithecus bahrelghazali
- Dated to within the time period of Au. afarensis (3.6 mya; Brunet et al. 1995).
- First Australopithecine discovered in Chad, central Africa.
- Holotype "Abel" may fall within the variation range of Au. afarensis (Lebatard et al. 2008).
- If "Abel" is Au. afarensis, the geographic range of the species would be greatly extended.
Australopithecus deyiremada
- Dated to 3.5 mya to 3.3 mya.
- Based on fossil mandible bones discovered in 2011 in Woranso-Mille, Afar region of Ethiopia, by Yohannes Haile-Selassie (Haile-Selassie et al. 2019).
- Au. deyiremada means “close relative” in the Afar language.
- Smaller teeth with thicker enamel (potentially suggesting a harder diet).
- Larger mandible and more projecting cheekbones, in contrast to Au. afarensis.
- Evidence suggests more than one closely related hominin species occupied the same region at the same time (Haile-Selassie et al. 2015; Spoor 2015).
- Alternative view: This species has been prematurely identified, more evidence is needed.
- Variation may be due to slightly different niche occupations between populations over time.
Australopithecus garhi
- Found in the Middle Awash region of Ethiopia.
- Dated to 2.5 mya (younger than Au. afarensis).
- Fills in a temporal gap between hominin finds in the region.
- Anatomical differences: relatively large cranial capacity (450 cc), larger hind dentition than other gracile Australopithecines.
- 450 \text{ cc}
- Longer hind limbs than Au. afarensis, but still able to move arboreally (Asfaw et al. 1999).
- Not well documented or understood, based on only several fossil specimens.
- Crude stone tools resembling Oldowan found in association with Au. garhi.
- This is one of the earliest technologies found in direct association with a hominin.
Kenyanthopus platyops
- Highly contested genus/species designation, "platyops" refers to its flatter-faced appearance.
- Specimen KNM-WT 40000 from Lake Turkana in Kenya, discovered by Maeve Leakey in 1999.
- Dated to between 3.5 mya and 3.2 mya.
- Some suggest it is an Australopithecus, perhaps even Au. afarensis (small brain size).
- Others place it in Homo (small dentition and flat-orthognathic face).
- Discoverers argue it is ancestral to Homo, in particular to Homo ruldolfensis (Leakey et al. 2001).
- Earliest tool finds from Lomekwi, Kenya, are temporally (3.3 mya) and geographically close to this specimen.