Religion Part Two

RELIGION AND THE MEANING OF LIFE

Page 1

• Title: Religion and the Meaning of Life Part Two

Page 2

• Readings for These Slides:

  • Reading 11 (optional): Daniel Hill, "The Meaning of Life", Philosophy Now, Issue 35, Sept/Oct 2014.

  • Reading 13: Robert Nozick, "Philosophy and the Meaning of Life", available online.

  • Reading 14: Kurt Baier, "The Meaning of Life", available online.

Page 3

• Basic Reasoning Behind the Religious View:

  • There is no observable evidence in the empirical, natural world to confer meaning or purpose to life.

  • Existence may not inherently possess value or importance.

Page 4

• Main Thesis of the Religious Approach:

  • The meaning and purpose of human life depend on the existence of a transcendent reality (God and afterlife).

  • A supernatural realm is proposed to avoid nihilism regarding our existence.

Page 5

• Literal Interpretation of Life's Purpose:

  • The religious perspective interprets life's purpose as fulfilling God's intended role for humanity, similar to tools fulfilling their functions.

  • Examples include proving love for God and sharing in His glory.

Page 6

• Daniel Hill’s View from Reading 11:

  • The question “What is the meaning of life?” suggests looking for purpose or function given by an intelligent creator.

Page 7

• Hill's Blunt Claim:

  • Atheists must deny life's meaning since no non-divine purpose exists to explain living things.

  • Hill insists that meaning requires an intelligent creator.

Page 8

• The Role of Faith:

  • Faith provides meaning and purpose even if knowledge of God’s role is inaccessible.

  • Tolstoy posits that faith helps the masses sense meaning in life.

Page 9

• Transition to Critique of the Religious View.

Page 10

• Religious Approach Problems:

  • While plausible, it raises complex issues about meaning if God exists, highlighting ambiguity.

Page 11

• Problems for Religious View:

  • Knowledge Problem: Lack of convincing evidence for God's existence challenges life's meaning.

  • Other accounts of meaning do not face this problem.

  • Many feel their lives have meaning regardless of God's existence.

Page 12

• Nietzsche's Reminder:

  • Suggests that losing theism leads directly to nihilism; this doesn’t align with people's lived experience.

Page 14

• Does the Religious View Clash with Modern Values?

Page 15

• Outdated Values Objection:

  • Religion may not align with modern values such as autonomy, freedom, and self-determination.

Page 16

• Historical Context of Religious Values:

  • Developed in authoritarian contexts with rigid roles emphasizing obedience and conformity.

Page 17

• Projection of Social Structures onto Religion:

  • Historical power dynamics influence religious views, with God as authoritarian figure, reflecting societal structures.

Page 18

• Value Shift:

  • Current values emphasize independence, contrasting religious views focused on fulfilling roles within a divine plan.

Page 19

• Existentialism Comparison:

  • Existentialism advocates personal creation of meaning, lacking a universal blueprint.

Page 20

• General Respect for Existentialism:

  • Emphasizes better fit with modern individualistic values than religious conception of meaning.

Page 22

• Ambiguity of 'Purpose' (Kurt Baier):

  • Misunderstanding different senses of 'purpose' promotes confusion in discussions of life's meaning.

Page 23

• Baier’s Focus:

  • Challenges the notion that scientific views imply life has no purpose—distinguishing between individual and object-oriented purpose.

Page 24

• Two Meanings of 'Purpose':

  • Sense 1: Attributed to people’s goals or reasons for actions.

  • Sense 2: Attributed to the function of an object, emphasizing creation by another.

Page 25

• Application of Purposes to Life:

  • Purpose in Sense 1 involves personal goals; in Sense 2, involves functions defined by an external creator.

Page 26

• Value of 'Purpose':

  • Importance lies more in Sense 1, while Sense 2 may reduce existence to an object-like status.

Page 27

• Validity of Scientific View on Purpose:

  • The scientific worldview can support purposeful lives in Sense 1 while lacking a divine essence.

Page 28

• Conclusion to Baier’s Argument:

  • The scientific worldview's lack of Sense 2 purpose doesn’t invalidate the quest for personal meaning.

Page 29

• Transition to Robert Nozick’s objections to the religious view.

Page 30

• Robert Nozick:

  • Influential philosopher known for contributions to political philosophy and theories of knowledge.

Page 31

• Explanation Problem:

  • Questions how fulfilling a role in God's plan imparts meaning, especially if the roles feel trivial.

Page 32

• Nozick's Critique of Role Meaning:

  • God’s plan must be meaningful in itself to convey meaning to our lives—not just about obedience to power.

Page 33

• Leading to Further Explanation Problems:

  • Questions arise about the specifics of God's plan and how we fit into it; ambiguity undermines justification of divine meaning.

Page 34

• Unclear Religious Answers:

  • Religion often lacks clarity about the nature and significance of God's plan, affecting its plausibility.

Page 35

• Eternal Afterlife as a Solution?

  • Questions the intrinsic value of eternal happiness compared to earthly life satisfaction; challenges the narrative of afterlife meaning.

Page 36

• Circularity Objection:

  • Nozick argues that for God's purpose to give meaning, that purpose must itself hold significance—raising foundational questions.

Page 37

• God's Meaningfulness Questioned:

  • Just as we seek meaning in life, God’s nature must also be scrutinized; lack of clear meaning for God limits understanding of divine purpose.

Page 38

• Existentialism and God's Meaning:

  • Questions if human existence gives meaning to God's being, suggesting a reciprocal relationship.

Page 39

• Existentialistic Framework:

  • We might characterize God’s meaning through the lens of human creativity and existence—-conflating divine with human experiences.

Page 40

• Conclusion to Nozick's Objection:

  • The call for clarity in how God's existence relates to life's meaning remains unaddressed within religious frameworks.

Page 42

• Transition to support for religious approaches from thinkers like Tolstoy and Kierkegaard.

Page 43

• Leo Tolstoy:

  • Russian author and philosopher advocating the belief that God alone provides life’s meaning.

Page 44

• Response to Nozick (Reply 1):

  • The religious view emphasizes free will over being treated as objects; choice and responsibility are central.

Page 45

• Scientific Argument (Reply 2):

  • Science remains incomplete, leaving room for transcendent explanations related to purpose.

Page 46

• Invoking Faith:

  • Faith may not scientifically prove God but can serve as a foundation for life choices and meaning.

Page 47

• Tolstoy on Faith:

  • Knowledge of God’s role in imparting life with meaning relies on faith, allowing individuals to perceive inherent meaning.

Page 48

• Tolstoy’s Reflection on Existence:

  • Contemplates mortality, suggesting that awareness of life's transience leads to existential questioning.

Page 49

• Meaning of Life Inquiry:

  • Asks about the meaning of life within temporal bounds, concluding an absence of inherent meaning.

Page 50

• Rational Knowledge Limitations:

  • Determines that external, finite experiences must engage with the infinite to yield meaning.

Page 51

• Role of Faith in Life’s Meaning:

  • Argues faith in God endows human life with a sense of the infinite, transcending suffering and despair.

Page 52

• Deflecting Critiques:

  • Argues that existing critiques lack appreciation for the incomplete understanding of transcendent realities.

Page 53

• Kierkegaard's Support for Faith:

  • Emphasizes the subjective decision-making process involved in faith as a personal and unique leap.

Page 54

• Søren Kierkegaard:

  • Noted existentialist philosopher advocating for subjective experience as key to understanding existence.

Page 55

• Kierkegaard’s Core Belief:

  • Fundamental inquiries surrounding faith and God surpass rational comprehension and necessitate belief.

Page 56

• Existentialism vs. Rationalism:

  • Prioritizes living out personal truth over abstract knowledge about existence.

Page 57

• Need for Immediate Decisions:

  • Advocates urgency in determining beliefs as a necessity in shaping one’s life.

Page 58

• Religion as Life Attitude:

  • Defines religion not merely as beliefs but as a comprehensive approach to living beyond empirical refutation.

Page 59

• Transition to Existentialism and Meaningfulness.

Page 60

• Readings for Existentialism:

  • Reading 14: Jean-Paul Sartre's "The Humanism of Existentialism";

  • Reading 15: Stephen Crowell's overview of existentialism.

Page 61

• Further Existentialism Readings:

  • Viktor Frankl's "Man's Search for Meaning" and related works on purpose and values.

Page 62

• Prominent Existentialists Highlighted.

Page 63

• Visual Representation of Existentialist Thinkers.

Page 64

• Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980):

  • French philosopher known for his contributions to existentialism.

Page 65

• Sartre Café Joke:

  • A humorous anecdote illustrating existential concepts with light-hearted comedy.

Page 66

• Main Reading - "The Humanism of Existentialism":

  • Key interpretation of the existentialist movement, emphasizing humanistic values.

Page 67

• Definition of Humanism:

  • Stresses the human perspective, rejecting authority and religion in determining values.

Page 68

• Existentialism as Humanism:

  • Focus on human capacity to determine meaning without divine guidance; aligns existentialist and humanist values.

Page 69

• Defining existentialism:

  • Philosophy concerned with understanding human existence and individual experience.

Page 70

• Theme of Existence:

  • Existentialism arises from Western human conflict and aims to reconcile self-understanding through existential issues.

Page 71

• Existentialist Themes Identified:

  • Ranges from freedom to responsibility, emotional states, and the nature of existence.

Page 72

• Integrated Nature of Existentialism:

  • Understanding one theme requires comprehension of them all, emphasizing their interconnectedness.

Page 73

• Existence Precedes Essence:

  • Asserts that human existence isn’t predetermined; individual creation of meaning is central.

Page 74

• Essence in Artifacts vs. Human Existence:

  • For objects, purpose is defined before creation; for humans, existence comes first, allowing for self-definition.

Page 75

• Essence in Artefacts:

  • Discusses how craftspeople conceive items prior to creation—contrasting with Sartre's view of evolving human essence.

Page 76

• Sartre's Stance:

  • Lacking a divine creator, humans must create their essence post-existence; existence is inherently undefined until shaped by choices.

Page 77

• Core of Human Existence:

  • Emphasizes individual freedom and the absence of a predefined nature, urging self-creation.

Page 78

• Essence and Free Will:

  • Freedom underlines human existence, promoting self-directed life shaping.

Page 79

• Existential Independence:

  • Humans must create their identity, underscoring awareness of choice in defining oneself.

Page 80

• Sartre's View on Meaning Creation:

  • Asserts there’s no predetermined societal meaning—individuals must instantiate meaning through action.

Page 81

• Defining Authenticity:

  • Authenticity embodies the commitment to true beliefs and actions, contrasting with self-deception.

Page 82

• Continual Self-creation:

  • Life is characterized by constant transformation and self-definition, based on life choices.

Page 83

• Dynamic Personal Choices:

  • Young individuals’ choices serve as defining moments in identity formation.

Page 84

• Sartrean View on Life’s Meaning:

  • Meaning arises through active self-creation rather than being discovered—an individual's responsibility.

Page 85

• Human Actions Define Identity:

  • Underscores how personal endeavors shape an individual’s legacy, asserting that one's life is a culmination of choices.

Page 86

• Beyond Actions:

  • Sartre recognizes the broader identity that exists beyond mere actions, emphasizing the notion of potential.

Page 87

• Freedom and Responsibility Interlinked:

  • Personal freedom demands accountability for choices, amplifying the weight of each action.

Page 88

• Illustrating Freedom with Smoking Habit:

  • Uses the analogy of a smoker to demonstrate personal responsibility for decisions, emphasizing active choice over inertia.

Page 89

• "Condemned to be Free":

  • Acknowledges freedom as a double-edged sword, both liberating and burdensome.

Page 90

• Freedom Implies Responsibility:

  • Each choice resonates beyond the individual, creating a collective image of what humanity should represent.

Page 91

• Responsibility for Collective Image:

  • Emphasizes how each action reflects broader choices regarding humanity and individual identity.

Page 92

• Choosing for Humanity:

  • Each decision inherently invokes responsibility not only for self but for broader human implications.

Page 93

• Collective Responsibility Exposition:

  • Choosing one's path creates a model of values that others may follow, enhancing moral weight of individual choice.

Page 94

• Alienation Concept:

  • Defines alienation as estrangement from oneself and others, resulting in a disconnected sense of reality.

Page 95

• Forlornness Indicated:

  • Expresses existential solitude, emphasizing the essence of individual experience and its loneliness.

Page 96

• Individual Spiritual Journey:

  • Emphasizes that personal self-creation is an isolating experience, underscoring personal accountability.

Page 97

• Illustrating Forlornness through Decision-making:

  • Provides an example of a student’s choice between loyalty and service, highlighting the personal burden of decision-making.

Page 98

• Choice Consequences:

  • Reinforces how every decision profoundly influences the future, amplifying the existential weight of choice.

Page 99

• Existential Anguish:

  • Reflects on the degree of responsibility each person bears in defining their existence, generating anxiety about choices.

Page 100

• Bad Faith Defined:

  • Self-deception emerges as an evasion of responsibility, illustrating the struggle to acknowledge freedom in choices made.

Page 101

• Modern Rationalization:

  • Exposes the tendency to rationalize actions, maintaining a facade that diverts from true responsibility.

Page 102

• Self-deception Complexity:

  • Discusses the inherent contradictions within self-deception and the challenges it poses to personal awareness.

Page 103

• Freudian Perspective:

  • Presents a divided self concept through Freudian discourse to make sense of self-deception dynamics.

Page 104

• Authenticity Vs. Bad Faith:

  • Calls for integrity by acting on true beliefs, criticizing the tendency to rationalize away personal convictions.

Page 105

• Authenticity:

  • Illustrates authenticity as integral to true living, ensuring genuineness in beliefs and actions.

Page 106

• Existentialism and Divine Existence:

  • Suggests that the existence of God does not alter the need for individual meaning crafting; faith doesn’t substitute for action.

Page 107

• Simultaneously Creating Morality:

  • Highlights the existentialist conviction that morality must be developed through individual choices rather than originating from divine edicts.

Page 108

• Aspects of Truth within Existentialism:

  • Proposes universal reflections: choices shape identity, multiple valid life paths exist, and fluctuations of authenticity are common.

Page 109

• Finalization of Sartrean Thoughts:

  • Concludes with an affirmation of the existentialist stance on freedom, responsibility, and the individual's role in creating life meaning.