Why study family?
view of family is distorted- we see what we want to and overlook what we don’t
gaining info helps us to be subjective
Who is included in family?
parents
children
grandparents
siblings
aunts, uncles, cousins
pets
friends
deceased
those not yet born
defining family
census definitions
family- a group of 2 or more persons related by birth, marriage, or adoption residing together in a household
household- one or more people—everyone living in a housing unit makes up a household
inclusive definitions
2 or more people related by birth, marriage, adoption, or choice, includes affiliative or fictive kin
Functions of the family
provides for a source of intimate relationships
acts as a formation of a cooperative economic unit
produces/socializes children
establishes social roles and status
types of family
family of orientation/origin
family in which we grow up
family of procreation
family formed thru marriage/childbearing
family of cohabitation
family formed through living or cohabiting with others
extended family
cohabiting couple, children, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, in laws
can be formed through marriage or birth
kinship system
kin can be affiliated, a nonrelated person would be considered “kin”
a relative may fill a different kin role, e.g. grandma taking the role of mother
what is marriage?
a marriage is a legally recognized union between 2 people
united sexually/economically
may give birth to, adopt, or rear children
assumed to be permanent but can be dissolved thru separation or divorce
the definition evolves/is not the same in all cultures
forms of marriage
monogamy
only legal form of marriage in the US
serial monogamy- a person who moves between relationships quickly, spends very little time single
polygamy
preferred marital arrangement worldwide
polygyny- 2 or more wives
polyandry- 2 or more husbands
Who can marry?
2 people- polygamy outlawed in 1879
same sex- became legal in US in 2015
different races- legalized in 1967
age/relationship restrictions vary by state- with/without parental consent and degree of cousins
societal features of marriage
establishment of rights/obligations connected to gender, sexuality, kin relationships, and legitimacy of children
specified rights/duties or partners and responsibilities within wider community
orderly transfer of wealth from one generation to the next
assignment of responsibility for caring for and socializing children to the spouses of their relatives
rights and benefits of marriage
Right to enter into a premarital agreement
Income tax deductions, credits, and rates
Legal status with partner’s children
Partner medical decisions
Right to support from spouse
Right to inherit property
Payment to worker’s compensation benefits after death
Public assistance from the Department of Human Service
Right to a divorce
Award of child custody in divorce proceedings
Control and disposition of community property
Division of property after dissolution of marriage
Right to support after divorce
varied perspectives on family depend on what we conceive of as families
influenced by personal experiences, religious backgrounds, personal values
ideological positions on family/change
conservative-pessimistic about changes in family life/the families of today
less self sacrifice, more self fulfillment
results in higher divorce, higher cohabitation, more births outside of marriage
families are weaker than before
policy should promote marriage and inhibit divorce (no more no-fault divorces)
liberal- optimistic about family change
change does not mean decline
economic conditions influence family structure
policy should promote economic well-being for families
centrist
wider social changes are responsible for family change
cultural values are important- many give up on marital/familial roles to pursue individual interests
common ways of knowing
experiential reality- based on our histories
agreement reality- based on what others tell us, media, and cultural ideas
fallacies- errors in reasoning
egocentric- everyone is the same as us and must think the same as us
ethnocentric- ethnicity is superior to others
influences of beliefs
media influence- tendency to sensationalize, highlights extreme cases, simplifies, appeals to most noticeable viewpoint
errors in choosing our sources
selection bias- only asking people that are available
confirmation bias- looking for evidence that fits our views
researching the family
objectivity- suspend our own beliefs about a subject until we understand what’s being said
objective vs value statements- value includes words that mean should/imply that our way is the correct/best way
research
re-search
ongoing investigation
based on prior evidence
looks for evidence you’re wrong/shared to allow for criticism and follow up
SCIENTIFIC METHOD!!!!!!!!
theories and concepts
theories-general concepts/principles to explain phenomena, provide a framework to understand research
concepts- abstract ideas used to represent reality in which we are interested
quantitative and qualitative research vs secondary data analysis
quantitative research- numbers, info, statistics
qualitative- detailed understanding of entire narrative, less to do with numbers
secondary data analysis- reorganizing data collected for a different purpose
types of research!!
exploratory research
used when little is known about a subject
what is it like?
what’s happening?
how do ppl feel about it?
descriptive
exactly what it sounds like- surface level
explanatory
attempts to answer why questions
evaluative/applied research
designed to find effectiveness of policy/programs
findings not always put into practice due to opposition
macro-level family theories
ecological perspective
micro, meso, exo, macro, chronosystems
structural functionalism
societies are stable/orderly systems
relationships are a result of agreement by members of society
social institutions work together to help society survive
ex: functions of the family- produce and stabilize members of society, fill roles that ensure stability- expressive role and instrumental role
criticism- number of families that actually filled these roles was greater in the 1950s
women may work and be responsible for the expressive role as well (second shift)
conflict theory
focus on inequality in the family esp around power and control
personal conflict- bad management can cause extensive damage
sources of power- legitimacy, money, physical coercion, love
criticism- underestimates cooperation, stability in families
micro level theories- focus on small groups
symbolic interaction
smiles, gestures, colors, language
how do relationships differ in different groups
criticism- underestimates role of large institutions and economic structures in interactions
Social exchange theory
“accounting” in relationships
assumes motivation=self interest
maximize benefits/minimize cost
reciprocity and balance are crucial
assets/liabilities as a mate, deciding on divorce
criticism- doesn’t address resource distribution
family systems theory
families are systems- change by one person affects others
boundaries, rules, roles
difficult to change- equilibrium
criticism- focused on treatment of families in a clinical setting
developmental theory
focus of family changes over time
dating, engagement, marriage, children, work/schooling, launching, retirement, death/grief
criticism- not applicable to contemporary families
methods
surveys, observations, secondary analysis, experimental design
Native americans
574 tribes in 7 groups named for natural environment
hunting/gathering or horticultural economies
most patrilineal except Hopi, Zuni, and Iroquois
arranged marriages within clan
girls marry at 12-15, boys at 20
rites of passage- hunts/puberty
parenting- lead by example, no harsh discipline
4-5 families living in 1 house
respect for natural world- men hunt, women gather fruit or berries
cedar fishing and small game
1800-1900s
relocation to camps
starvation
forced assimilation
European colonists
love came after marriage
patriarchal, christian
couples were business partners primarily
inequality
wife as helpmate/property
fertility- 8 children
high infant mortality
Puritans
children have souls and original sin
father was primary parent
3 Rs- repression, religion, respect
apprenticeship- males 7-12
African American
having children as a slave was illegal til importing was banned in 1807
extended kin and monogamy
til death or distance do you part
industrialization
mechanized production
urbanization
gender polarization
child labor
fertility decline
crowding, alcoholism, crime
orphan trains
1900s-1920s
men go to WWI
child labor laws
flappers in office
mandatory education laws
divorce rate rises
pessimism about the future
Companionate family
middle class emergence
being in love
sharing household decisions
wives not required to be sexually restrained
children given more freedom, democratic families
1930s
great depression
unemployment jump
family income way down
more traditional roles- divorce decreases
1940s
WWII
victory gardens, rationing
half of women in factory work
childcare assistance
marriage and divorce rise
after war, women move out of work
1950s
good post war economy
traditional roles and younger marriage
TV and kid culture
divorce rates decline
fertility increases
gov subsidizes education and white housing
poverty rate for 2 earner black families was 50%
teen birth rate inreased
rate of babies given up for adoption- up 80%
1/3 marriages end in divorce
middle class stay at home mom drug/alcohol use
1970s and middle class slide
economic downturn
2 earners needed
divorce increse
latch-key children- before and after school programs
longer work/greater debt
family life today
individualism
credentialism
less retirement
gig economy
more cohabitation/singlehood
boomerang kids
family consumerism/debt.
social classes
economic position
life chances
social mobility
intergenerational- extent to which children move up the ladder compared to parents
intragenerational- movement within a generation
class and family pattern
upper class
subordinate wives
pressure on children to maintain appearances
mental health, drugs
middle class
2 career marriages
egalitarian
pressure on children to be the “best”
mental health problems from guilt, self discipline, initiative
least connected with extended kin
working class
traditional
2 earner households
“second shift” for women
emphasis on obedience, less psychological and more physical punishment
pool resources w extended family, family events as a source of leisure
poor/working poor
stress of bills, poor nutrition, unsafe neighborhoods, poor healthcare, stigma
less stabilization
“feminization of poverty”
mental health and drug use in children
changes in spectrum
ideas of trans varies historically/culturally
US and other cultures increasingly accepting
US and Germany have third gender option
stereotypes of masculinity and femininity are used to justify unequal treatment
expectations for males and females are different as they enter/exit specific social situations
Gender wage gap
women almost always make less than men
2021- 82 cents to the dollar
gendered family experiences
less middle class emphasis on traditional role of wife and mother
AA women’s roles instrumental- no conflict between work and motherhood
Latino women deference to men out of respect, elders respected regardless of gender
male as breadwinner still emphasized regardless of race/ethnicity
much more flexibility today but gender roles still limit our potential
need for love and intimacy
love hasn’t always been important psychologically
Harlow’s research- what is love?
cloth mother and wire mother to monkeys
Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development
identity vs role confusion (adolescent)
intimacy vs isolation (early adulthood)
implications for intimacy today
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs
physiological, safety, love/belonging, esteem, self actualization, self transcendence
I am between love/belonging and esteem
friends through the lifespan
friends provide intimacy, but also benefit us as people
toddlers- intrinsic friendships and relationships
friends become a means to an end- it’s cool to be seen with them or you can get something out of them
when people get older they don’t need friends for the same purpose as they did earlier, gets back to intrinsic relationships
being love vs deficiency love
being love- based on regard for the other person- seeing and appreciating others for who they are rather than who you want them to be
deficiency love- based on trying to fill a void- involves distortion of the other to fit your needs
transformation of intimacy
romantic love- seeing others as a means to an end, future focused
confluent love- based on equality and reflexivity, present
due to greater gender equality/independence
what is intimacy?
defined: closeness and sharing between 2 or more people, might be expressed sexually but not always
expressed: talking, spending time, listening, being open/honest, trust
importance: more important to relationship satisfaction than independence, agreement, or sexuality
friends
friendship and love-important to wellbeing, grief is super stressful life event
friends are intrinsic mostly
romantic partners can be more extrinsic, sexual, formal
i like you or i love you like a friend
romantic partners
standard for romantic partners is higher
appearance, social status, level of commitment, reproductive success, interdependence- life trajectory
Culture of love
parental involvement in mate selection gone in late 1800s
love as basis for marriage in 1900s (companionate marriage)
best friend, confidant, romantic partner
romantic love is functional in industrial societies
validates importance of individual autonomy
establishes relative independence of conjugal from extended family
fits wider social freedoms of teens and young adults
economy wise?
mobility, nuclear households, changing economy
consequences of love based marriage
more idealizing partners
more emphasis on sex
impacts divorce/remarriage
love does not equal good long term partner
Gender/intimacy
Feminization of love (straight)
devalues love shown by men
caregiving/words of affirmation over gift giving
“lets talk” or “lets not”
gender and friendship
female- disclosure, gossip, more fragile
male- self disclosure, less co-rumination, fewer displays of affection
cross sex- straight men are more open in cross sex relations, overall higher expectations for cross sex relationships
Friends with Benefits (situationships)
FWB adds sex to friendship
less likely to have this in monogamy assumed relationships
FWB more common on college campuses
Hendrick’s love attitudes scale
eros: romantic/passionate love
ludus: playful or game playing love
storge: love between companions
mania: obsessive love
agape: altruistic love
pragma: practical love
Hatfield and Sprecher
passionate- intense longing for a union
companionate- warm and tender affection we feel for close others
Sternberg’s triangular approach to love
3 elements of love:
intimacy- emotional component
passion- motivational piece- arousal and attraction
commitment- cognitive dimension
types of love:
liking, infatuation, empty love, romantic love, companionate love, fatuous love, consummate love
Love and attachment
attachment- affection, fondness, or sympathy for someone or something.
attachment styles in children- secure, anxious, and avoidant
Attachment in adulthood
secure attachments
relatively easy to get close to others, comfort depending on others and them depending on me
not worried about abandonment
not worried about losing self
more texting
anxious attachment
reluctant to get close
worry that they don’t really love me/won’t want to stay
want to get very close
afraid to let them out of sight
more sexting/cyber stalking
avoidant attachments
somewhat uncomfortable being close with others
difficult to trust, hard to depend on others
others want me to be more intimate than i feel comfortable with
sex while texting
finding a partner
are looks everything?
halo effect- assumption that good looking people possess more desirable characteristics/make us look better, looks matter most in the beginning of a relationship
roles of tech in relationships
dating apps- 30% have used and many had overall positive experiences
12% of Americans say they have married/been in a committed relationship with someone met on an app
however 45% were left feeling more frustrated after using dating apps, lots of harassing especially for women under 35
57% received unwanted sexually explicit message or images
gender differences- women found it harder to find attractive people, men found it harder to find someone that shared interests
men more likely to complain that they don’t get enough messages
online vs f2f honesty- are people more honest online or in person?
social media makes perception of relationship different, posting about relationships is also very different
Jealousy
occurs bc of involvement with a third person
insecure attachment styles more likely to notice
fear of loss + insecurity= higher likelihood of jealousy
suspicious vs reactive jealousy
breakups
usually initiated by one side
bring improvements to subsequent relationships
similar regardless of orientation
lasting relationships
time affects relationships
rapid growth of intimacy tends to level off
commitment tends to increase as long as the relationship is judged to be rewarding
verbal and non verbal communication
verbal
less of the message, one channel, more conscious
non verbal
many channels
eye contact/facial expression
touch
proximity
object language
posture
paralanguage
more of the message
less conscious
problems- imprecise, mixed messages
functions
conveying attitudes
expressing emotions
handling ongoing interaction
supportive: benefits health- eye contact, interest, etc
negative: threatens stability of relationship- lack of interest, disrespect
verbal expresses basic content of the message
nonverbal reflects relationship part of the message
communication
goal of communication- have intended message be accurately received
problem is misunderstanding
Heider’s attribution theory
attribution- explanation for someone’s behavior
internal disposition vs external situation
when love is new, we give benefit of the doubt
when a mistake is made by…
others- it’s the way they are (disposition)
us- its the circumstance (situational)
if we’re mad and they do something nice, it’s situational
Areas of conflict
lack of time together or disagreement about togetherness vs separation
money
sex
parenting
division of labor
Gottman
couples physiological response to conversation and disagreement- 94% accurate in predicting divorce
compatibility isn’t required in relationships
conflicts are a result of not tending to the bigger picture
5 horsemen of the apocalypse
criticism
contempt
defensiveness
stonewalling
belligerence/aggression
masters
love map
create meaning in life
admiration and fondness
turn toward each other
accept influence
dialogue about problems
self soothing
disasters
don’t take notes
don’t ask about things that matter
have contempt
turn away or against
compete, do not accept influence
live parallel lives
partner as enemy/adversary
negative perspective
distress- maintaining thoughts
How to correct this?
repair
apologies, humor- not snark
attack the problem, not each other
soft start ups- be kind, not right
very important when partner stonewalls
turn toward
how a partner responds to bids for time/engagement
accept influence
consider partners viewpoint and ideas
positive sentiment overrides emotional climate
look for what is right/self soothing self talk
American society
foundation for american families
50% of adults 18 and older are married
overall decline in marriage, increase in cohabitation
marriage/cohabitation views
higher levels of trust and satisfaction for married couples
Black Protestants and white evangelical Protestants less likely to support cohabitation
Many cohabiting couples stay unwed due to financial issues
long term couples are seen as better off married
younger adults see living together as a way to improve marital success
endogamy- marriage inside of your groups because of shared understanding and assumptions
exogamy- marry outside of certain groups, especially family
Marriage squeeze
gender imbalance reflected in the ratio of available unmarried men vs women
members of one gender tend to get squeezed out of the marriage market
mating gradient
tendency for women to marry above their status
tendency for men to marry below them
homogamy and age
straight marriages- typically he is older
more marriages have similar ages nowadays
as men get older they marry younger
as women get older they stay with a similar age
homogamy and religion
same faith means higher happiness and lower divorce rates
highly religious and family support
religious homogamy- strong effect on marital quality
interfaith marriage- concern for kids
homogamy and social class
most same social class w marriage gradient
greater equity with same sex marriages
Theories of choosing a spouse
complementary needs theory
parental image theory
stimulus role value theory
why marry?
economic well being- higher income, greater productivity, mobility at work)
physical and mental health
personal happiness
selection vs protection
predicting marital success
rocky+turbulent
unhappy and lasting
sweet and undramatic
satisfying and enduring
passionate
vulnerable to divorce
problem solving skills are important but emotional climate is more so
engagement, cohabitation, marriage
engagement- culmination of premarital dating process
cohabitation- premarital cohabitation common
wedding- ancient ritual to show commitment to each other
early marriage- establish marital and family roles, provide emotional support, and adjust personal habits
middle aged marriage- some couples happy, some troubled by children leaving, boomerang children, pandemic lead to more children returning/staying home
aging and later life marriages- usually less conflict
widowhood variety of deep and painful emotion, harder for men due to less social support, death of wife less expected, women typically have broader networks to turn to for support
marital commitments
3 major types of commitment
personal- desire to stay with spouse, love
moral commitment- moral obligation, attitude about marriage contract
structural commitment- irretrievable investment, difficulty getting out
presence of children appears to lower marital satisfaction and increase marital conflict
single households
1960: 13% of households
2021: 29% of households
37 mil 1 person households
Partnered peers are generally better off than unpartnered peers
increase in singles?
delayed marriages
more options for women
rates of divorce are up
more liberal sexual/social standards
less men than women
types of never married singles
voluntary + temporary
involuntary and temporary
voluntary and permanent
involuntary permanent
living solo only became an option in the last 50 years because of inability to afford it
cohabitation- living together in an intimate relationship without marriage
trial marriage
precursor to marriage
substitute for marriage
coresidential dating
indistinguishable from marriage- indifference to marriage
cohabitation and remarriage
half of those who remarry after divorce cohabit before remarrying
postdivorce cohabitation is now more common than premarital cohabitation
marital quality and happiness appear to be lower among post divorce cohabitors
cohabitation has less effect on premarital couples
higher risk of divorce for serial cohabitation
cohabitation vs marriage
married couples tend to do more household chores than cohabitating couples
children- births don’t seem to affect the relationship as much, positively or negatively
married people have better health, but cohabiting have better health than divorced, widowed, and never married
civil unions- grant same protection as marriage to couples
domestic partnerships- grant some protections of marriage to cohabiting couples
fertility rates- births per 1000 women, 15-44
most birthing mothers are 20-34 years old
40% of births are to unmarried mothers, and half of those are to cohabiting couples
childfree women
high status occupation
less religion
more likely to be employed/work full time
more likely to be first born or only child
less traditional ideas about gender/family
childfree couples- higher satisfaction but higher divorce as well
infertility
20% of heterosexual women are unable to conceive within a year
increased risk of infertility in men
age (over 40)
obesity
excessive drug/alcohol use
testosterone
high testes temp
smoking
exposure to radiation
increased risk in women
obesity or underweight
extreme weight loss/gain
maternal age (over 30)
smoking
excessive alcohol use
excessive physical or emotional stress that results in amenorrhea
chlamydia, endo, PCOS
ideal age to have a child
teen mothers
high risk of hypertension
low birth weight babies
reduced educational opportunities
fewer supportive resources
over 35
higher risk of birth defects, but more resources
Raising a child is approx. $233,610 not counting college!!
pregnancy’s effects on relationships
physical and psych adjustment- first trimester- estrogen and morning sickness, socialization
second trimester- excitement builds, nausea and fatigue disappear mostly, baby reaches age of viability
third trimester- physical discomfort, fatigue, preparing for baby
childbirth- medicalized in 1940s, expensive and impersonal, so there are other options like birthing center and doulas/midwives
foster care kids
foster care goal: provide permanent homes and reconnection with bio families when appropriate
1/3 of foster kids are with relatives esp grandparents
children of color, LGBTQ, and disabled kids spend more time in foster
Supporting Foster Youth and Families thru the Pandemic act- helps youth aging out with school, job training, rent, bills
adoption laws vary widely from state to state
trend is towards open adoption- contact between adoptive and birth families
inter racial/ethnic adoption
Becoming parents
areas of change that comes with children
identity and inner life changes
shifts between marital roles and relationships
shifts in intergenerational relationships
changes in roles and relationships outside of family
new parenting roles and relationships
less stress if:
they have a strong relationship
open communication
agreed on family planning
had a strong desire for the child
Fathers more likely to engage in activities than custodial care
styles of child rearing
authoritarian- requires absolute obedience
permissive/indulgent- lenient, show more responsive and less demanding behavior
authoritative- parents rely on positive reinforcement and infrequent use of punishment
uninvolved- parents are not responsive or demanding- may suffer consequences
another parenting model- LeMasters and DeFrain
martyr
pal
police officer/drill sergeant
teacher/counselor
athletic coach
What do children need?
prenatal nutrition/care
stimulation and care of newborns
at least one close attachment during first 5 years
childcare when parents are at work
protection from illness
freedom from physical/sexual abuse
respect for individuality
safe, nurturing and challenging schooling
free of pressure to grow up too fast
protection from premature parenthood
Parenting and caregiving in later life
children are growing up later in life
most parents with adult children still feel like parents
children still feel like children til parents are gone
some parents provide continuously for children that are limited physically or mentally
grandparent styles
grandparent contribution expanding
take on greater importance with single parent, foster, and stepparent families
types
companionate
remote
involved
how many parents work?
all marriages
1 person employed- 78.7%
1 spouse employed- 25.2%
both spouses- 46.8%
none employed- 21.3%
opposite sex couples
1 person employed- 78.7%
husband only- 18.2%
wife only- 7.2%
both- 46.6%
none employed- 21.3%
holidays and vacations- US has no guaranteed paid vacation or hoidays, no guaranteed maternal or paternal leave
Family leave and medical act (1993)
covers those working for
private sector employers w at least 50 employees
public agencies
schools
conditions of employment
must have been employed minimum of 12 months before leave
must work at least 24 hrs a week
what is covered?
job is held up to 12 months
insurance is continued but no pay
conditions of family leave
care for newborn
care for receiving foster/newly adopted child
care for seriously ill child, parent, or spouse
serious medical condition of employee
Military Caregiver leave- 26 weeks to care for seriously ill or injured child, spouse, or parents of active military personnel
work/family considerations
1980s-90s upscaling in American Dream
comfort to luxury
McMansions
faster, quicker (fashion, food)- more waste
Pandemic calls into question assumptions about
time
location
wages
productivity
importance of social wealth and time wealth
overworked employees=more anger, resentment, mistakes at work, stress, poorer health
underworked employees
gig economy
less stable
more difficulty in coordinating hours
less/no paid time off for healthcare
cash jobs and lower Social Security
greater difficulty meeting demands of work, family, school
emotional distress comes with unemployment, esp for men because their identity is so closely tied with the role of provider
increased risk of emotional withdrawal, spousal abuse, marital distress, and alcohol abuse
work and family spillover
work spillover
work demands and climate have effect on family
negative spillover is more common for employed women
family spillover
emotional climate at home have effect on workplace (positive and negative)
Role issues
role conflict
positions we occupy contain competing, contradictory, or simultaneous role expectations
role strain
occurs when the demands attached to a particular status are contradictory or incompatible
role overload
occurs when our roles require more than we can give and we’re drowning in responsibility
familial division of labor
traditional pattern
male breadwinner, female housewife
18% of households are like this
may or may not be reflection of ideologies, may simply be what works for that family
women’s employment patterns and second shift
women’s employment typically cuts back to have children
women tend to have a second shift when they get home from work
women are much more likely to cut back on hours to meet family demands
dual earner/career families
dual earner- 2 incomes to maintain a decent standard of living
dual career- focus on achievement and gender equality
often difficult for both partners to achieve goals, usually one has to be sacrificed for the other
housework
women tend to do more work regardless of employment
cohabiting couples tend to have a more equal division of labor than married couples
marriage, rather than living with a man, turns women into homemakers
men do more than before but still less than women
do more if wife earns more and has higher education
younger men and men of color do more
shift couples
couples who structure their lives and work into turn taking, alternating system of paid and family work
lower marital satisfaction, more distress, increased rate of divorce
save money by having one parent home at all times
peer marriages
focus on fairness rather than gender tradition when deciding
career needs/work schedule
childcare
household division of labor
at home fathers and breadwinning mothers
seem to be a role reversal, but it could actually be disability, unemployment, retirement, school
Family issues in the workplace
need for adequate childcare
finding reliable, safe, affordable childcare sucks
employment affects educational opportunities
lack of adequate childcare may limit mothers and their job opportunities
child care crisis
violence- an act with the intention or perceived intention of causing physical pain or injury to another person
intimate partner violence- all violence among intimate partners
types of intimate violence
situational violence
usually erupts during an argument and doesn’t result in serious injury
intimate terrorism
one partner tries to dominate and control the other
violent resistance
self defense violence, usually by women
mutual violent control
both partners are trying to violently control each other
common couple violence represents gender symmetry- similarity in estimates of male-female and female-male intimate violence
prevalence of intimate violence
impossible to know exact statistics on prevalence of intimate violence- largely underreported and hidden
intimate partner violence ranges between 17-39% any given year
why families are violent
individualistic explanations
violence is related to personality disorder, mental illness, substance abuse
allows abuser to attribute violence to things outside of their control
ecological model
used to explore child abuse
cultural approval of physical punishment and lack of community support for families can increase risk of violence
feminist model
stresses gender inequality and role of male dominance over women
social stress and learning model
social stress aspect- structural stress (income, illness) and cultural norms (spare the rod, spoil the child) contribute to family violence
resource model
violence used to offset lack of income, power, education, interpersonal skills
exchange-social control model
weigh cost-benefit, private nature of family, occurs if person thinks they can get away with it
gender, power, stress and intimacy
gender- male violence tends to be more common and extreme
power- central motive in partner violence
stress- may raise likelihood of violence, but is not the cause
intimacy- we see love/family as private, which can legitimize violence
socioeconomic status and race
SES- household income has greatest influence on violence
race- Native and multiracial people have highest rates of victimization
Women and men as victims/survivors and perpetrators
battering- slapping, punching, knocking down, choking, kicking, hitting with objects, threatening with weapons, stabbing, shooting
women are just as likely to batter men as men are to batter women
women’s violence tends to be situational and doesn’t cause great injury, while men’s tends to be more extreme
female survivors
higher rates of violence among low income women, younger women (20-24), and Native/African American women
more affluent groups’ victimization likely underreported
characteristics of male perpetrators
traditional role stereotypes and moral rightness of violence
low self esteem/entitlement
sadistic, passive aggressive use of sex, pathologically jealous
socially isolated
unemployed
not generational- most men raised by violent parents don’t become violent themselves
intimate partner and sexual violence among men
sexual violence- sex without freely obtained consent
1/3 men experience sexual or physical violence or stalking by an intimate partner
56% experience this before age 25
1/4 men experience some form of contact sexual violence in their lifetime
1/17 men are victims of stalking in their lifetime
female perpetrators
assaulting a spouse is an “intrinsic moral wrong”
avoid sending message that some violence is acceptable
danger of escalation
assault is a model for violent behavior in children
marital and intimate partner rape
unwanted sexual penetration, perpetrated by force, threat of harm, or when victim is intoxicated
can be perpetrated by males or females and can be oral vaginal or anal penetration
marital rape- not illegal til 1993
wives are offered full protection from husbands in less than half of states
violence in gay and lesbian relationships
occurs in comparable rates to heterosexual couples
can be very difficult due to lack of support services for LGBT people
adolescent relationships
physical violence- 13%
verbal violence- 26%
62% of tweens either have experienced or know someone who has experienced intimate partner violence
college- violence in 1/3 to 1/2 of relationships
only half tell someone else, often stay in the relationship
date rape and coercive violence
date rape- acquaintance rape
sex with a dating partner that occurs against their will with force or threat of force
alcohol/drugs are often involved
hookup culture described as rape culture by Lisa Wade- focused on meaningless sex
4 types of child abuse/neglect
physical abuse- intentional physical force that can result in physical injury
sexual abuse- pressuring or forcing a child to engage in sexual acts
emotional abuse- harm to self worth or emotional well-being
neglect- failure to meet child’s basic physical and emotional needs
forms of emotional child abuse
spurning: ridiculing or belittling
terrorizing: threatening a child or placing them in a dangerous position
isolating: denying child the opportunity to interact, confining a child, imposing unreasonable limitations on a child’s freedom
exploiting: use of drugs, alcohol, exposure to prostitution or other criminal activity
denying emotional responsiveness: failing/refusing to express affection
neglect of mental or medical health or educational needs
prevalence of child maltreatment
estimated 1/7 children (underestimated)
in 2020, 1750 children died of abuse and neglect
children living in poverty 5 times more likely to suffer abuse or neglect
consequences:
injury
chronic abuse and toxic stress
lower education
higher risk of continued victimization
how to prevent child abuse/neglect
strengthen economic support- fund daycare and promote family friendly work policies.
change social norms towards more positive parenting
quality care and education- preschool and early childhood care
improve parenting skills- parenting and family relationship education
intervene to lessen harm and prevent future harm
hidden victims of family violence
sibling violence
most common form of family violence
annually, 2/3 teens commit an act of violence against a sibling
parent violence
more boys act violently, mothers are more often the recipients of violence
increases with adolescence
elder abuse
common- 1/10 people 60 and older experience elder who live at home
underestimated- only based on non-fatal injuries from ER
victims fearful or unable to tell others
may be dependent on perp for care
rates of nonfatal assault and homicide higher in men
types of abuse- physical, sexual, psychological/emotional, neglect, financial
abandonment
granny dumping
abandoned in public location, ER, nursing home
100000 per year in the US
occurs in other countries as well
senior citizen postbox
how to help
listen to older adults and caregivers to understand
check in on older adults
report abuse or suspected abuse to local adult protective services, long term care, or police
provide overburdened caregivers with support
encourage and assist people with substance abuse issues
responding to intimate and family violence
intervention and prevention
protecting victims
rehabilitating offenders
assisting families
eliminating social stress and strengthening families
the law
mandatory arrest
no-drop prosecution
most common response is jail combined with a mandated group intervention program
shown to lower repeat offenses
Duluth Model
emphasizes helping batterers develop critical thinking skills around themes like nonviolence, respect, partnership, and negotiation
measuring divorce
ratio measure of divorce
calculating ratio of marriages to divorces in a given year
crude divorce rate
number of divorces in a given year per 1000 people
refined divorce rate
number of divorces in a given year per 1000 marriages
predictive divorce rate
an estimate of how many new marriages will end in divorce
both marriage and divorce rate have declined since 1979
legal meaning of divorce
fault based divorce
grounds of adultery, cruel and inhuman treatment, mental cruelty, habitual drunkenness and desertion
“winner” takes all
no fault divorce (1970)
irreconcilable differences make it impossible for them to continue to be married
1974: first year that more marriages ended due to divorce than due to death of a spouse
community property states
divorce risk
depends on many factors
about 2/3 of marriages stay together
demographic factors affecting divorce
employment status
low status occupations have higher divorce rates than high status occupations
income
higher income=lower divorce rate
educational level
higher education=lower divorce rates
ethnicity
asian men and women have lower rates of divorce
religion
a high frequency of religious attendance lowers risk of divorce (unless only one partner attends regularly
societal factors affecting divorce
changed nature of family
work has moved from home to the factory, making the family non essential unit
social integration
degree of interaction between individuals and larger community can affect rates of divorce
individualistic cultural values
society values individual happiness over that of the family
life course factors affecting divorce
age at time of marriage
under 25 or over 35- higher risk of divorce
becoming pregnant or giving birth prior to marriage increases likelihood of divorce
remarriage
the divorce rate for remarriages is higher than for first marriages
intergeneration transmission
having divorced parents gives you higher odds of divorcing
family processes
early marital happiness
low levels of happiness in the early years of marriage increase the risk of divorce
children
children decrease risk of divorce
marital problems
infidelity, substance abuse, growing apart, in laws, communication troubles
proximal causes of later divorce- daily complaints raise probability
distal causes- things that each person brings to the relationship (income, education, religion, personality, etc.)
weighing decision to divorce
Levinger’s model
attraction: factors that draw one to a relationship
alternatives: other options a person has
barriers: factors that keep one from leaving (religion, stigma, few resources)
Process of disaffection
beginning phase- psychological breakup
notice issues/flaws
still hopeful for change
middle phase- disappointment
expects relationship to fail
only notices what’s wrong
end phase- hopelessness
plans breakup
may go for therapy
stations of divorce
emotional divorce
when one or both spouses disengages from the marriage
legal divorce
the court-ordered termination of a marriage
economic divorce
dividing of property, money and resources
co-parental divorce
dealing with issues of child custody, visitation and support (most painful)
community divorce
ex in laws, coworkers, neighbors, and friends
psychic divorce (takes the longest, if ever)
feeling complete as a single person; more realistic about circumstances of divorce
70% experience distress in first
75% say divorce was a good thing by year 6
psychic divorce (may take up to 10 years
peace with ex
realistic about self and role in divorce
individuation from ex
readiness to move on
sense of self esteem
completeness as an individual
future/present orientation
co-parental divorce
half of all divorces involve children
binuclear family
two households created when parents divorce
childrens reaction to news of a divorce depends on
how the news is disclosed
degree of conflict prior to divorce
amount of financial hardship
actions of divorcing couple
adjustment of custodial
economic consequences of divorce
no fault divorce laws
systematically impoverish women and children
women have custody of children responsibility for their economic stability
alimony
a monetary payment a former spouse makes to the other to meet their economic needs
child support
a monetary payment made by the non-custodial parent to assist in child rearing expenses
employment opportunities
childcare, family needs
post-divorce income
income for single mother homes decrease 27%
income for men increase 10%
child support covers less than half of the cost of raising a child
medial annual amount- $3328
19.5 mil parents are single
5.4 mil have some child support
3.7 mil receive regular payments
1.7 mil receive varying amounts inconsistently
children’s adjustment
how and when parents tell children
parents on a mission
younger children guilt
adolescents-anger blame
degree of conflict prior to divorce
amount of financial hardship
actions of divorcing couple
adjustment of custodial parent
short term consequences (first year)
grieving over loss
reduced standard of living
adjusting to transitions
relief from conflict
long term negative consequences
greater marriage anxiety
unrealistically high expectations for a partner
difficulty in school
economic/occupational impact (tied to financial hardship rather than divorce)
positive consequences
80% lead happy, well adjusted lives
better relationship with custodial parent
more communication with mothers
more democratic parenting
children’s responses to divorce
acknowledging parental separation
disengaging from parental conflicts
resolving loss, anger, blame
accepting the finality of divorce
achieving realistic expectations for later relationship success
how to help children adjust
open discussions about separation and divorce
healthy involvement with non-custodial parent
lack of hostility between divorced parents
child custody
custody is awarded to mothers in most cases
sole custody
the child lives with one parent who has sole responsibility for making all decisions regarding upbringing
split custody
children are divided between parents
joint custody
joint legal custody- child lives with one parent but both parents share decision making
joint physical custody- child lives with both parents, splitting time between households
visitation or coparenting
noncustodial parent involvement ranges from highly involved to completely removed
mandatory visitation- treat visitation as an obligation of parents and an expectation to be enforced by authorities
divorce mediation
assist divorcing couples in resolving issues in a cooperative manner
promotes shared parenting
characteristics of single parent families
creation by divorce or births to unmarried women
single parent families created by births to unwed mothers are more common than those created by divorce
these families receive little social support
headed mostly by mothers
over 85% of single parent families are headed by women
given gender discrimination, single mothers are much more likely to be in poverty than single fathers
moms get more judgement, dads get more praise
characteristics of single parent families
diversity of living arrangements
single parent families can include outside romantic partners or live in partners
social father- male relative family associate or mothers partner who demonstrates father behavior
private safety nets- support from social networks that the family can fall back on in times of need
characteristics of single parent families
transitional form
single parent families tend to be a transitional family form that can precede marriage or occur after divorce
intentional single parent families
some women haven’t found a suitable partner or do not want a partner- intentionally become single parents
children in single parent families
negative outcomes: behavioral problems, academic performance, and mental and physical health
cope with parents loneliness, depression, and increased stress (parentification)
positive outcomes- child learning more responsibility, more time with custodial parent, and feeling less pressure to conform to gender roles
successful single parenting
accept responsibilities and challenges for single parenthood
parenting as first priority
consistent, non-punitive parenting
emphasis on open communication
fostering individuality supported by the family
recognition of the need for self-nurturing
dedication to rituals and traditions
single parent family strengths
parenting skills
successful single parents have ability to take on new roles
personal growth
developing a positive attitude helps
communication
through good communication, a single parent can develop trust
family management
coordinate activities
financial support
repartnering
impact of repartnering on children
more difficult than divorce
dating concerns
cohabitation and severed ties
does living together=more money
impact on parental involvement
greatest involvement when both parents are single
least involvement when father has remarried and mother has not
maternal roles more in conflict than paternal roles
courtship in repartnering
courtship differs between first marriages and remarriages
may trigger old wounds but likely goes into it with more realistic expectations for this relationship
many divorced persons choose to cohabit before remarriage or in place of it
single parents usually keep children as central figures in their life
remarriage rates
most are second marriages
men have higher rates than women
foreign born hispanic men rate highest (58%)
black men lowest (16%)
white people most likely to have 3rd + marriages
factors influencing remarriage
children lower probability of remarriage for men and women but moreso for women
women’s rate of remarriage decreases with age
those who are employed and socialize with coworkers are more likely to remarry
initiators are more likely to remarry
characteristics of remarriage
marital satisfaction
people seem to be as satisfied in second marriages as they are in first
remarriage lacks societal norms, laws, and behavioral prescriptions
remarriages are subject to different stresses
children from previous relationships complicate remarriage
stations of remarriage
emotional, community, parental, legal, economic, psychic
blended families
stepfamilies
as common today as in the 17-1800s
from divorce rather than death
incomplete institution
pressure to remarry based on deficit model
characteristics of stepfamilies
more complex
born of loss
love not assumed
unclear roles
sexual attractions
step parents have few legal rights
stepfamily development- 7 years?
later stages
contact- relationships become genuine
resolution- family becomes solid
can successfully fill traditional family functions
benefits
additional role models
greater flexibility
gain extra support
gain extended kin network
improved economic situation
happily married parents