Presented by Amber Comer, JD, PhD
Affiliation: Indiana University, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences
Defined as "the state of being awake and aware of one's surroundings."
Vegetative State:
Characterized by absence of responsiveness and awareness.
Overwhelming dysfunction of the cerebral hemispheres.
Retains functions in the diencephalon and brain stem, allowing autonomic functions and sleep-wake cycles.
May exhibit complex reflexes (e.g., eye movements, yawning) but lack awareness of self and environment.
Minimally Conscious State:
Some evidence of awareness of self/environment.
Patients may show improvement.
Requires a clinical diagnosis.
Treatment is mainly supportive with typically bleak prognoses for persistent deficits.
Defined as irreversible vegetative condition with very small chances of regaining consciousness.
A permanent vegetative state diagnosis requires a high degree of clinical certainty regarding irreversibility (Multi-Society Task Force on PVS, NEJM 1994).
Persistent Vegetative State:
No conscious awareness; life support decisions may need to be made.
Minimally Conscious State:
Marked by minimal but definite behavioral evidence of self/environment awareness.
Rare neurological disorder with complete voluntary muscle paralysis, except for eye movements.
Coma:
No eye-opening, unable to follow instructions, no communication, no purposeful movement.
Vegetative State:
Return of sleep-wake cycles, may produce sounds or facial expressions without cause, unable to follow instructions or communicate.
Minimally Conscious State:
Sometimes follows instructions, may communicate with gestures or speech, demonstrates emotional responses, and focuses on people or objects.
Questions arise regarding the significance of fMRI results indicating a minimally conscious state.
Ethical considerations on defining personhood and care decisions if consciousness is lost.
Substituted Judgement vs. Best Interest
Ethical frameworks used to guide decision making for incapacitated patients.
Overview of historical cases that have influenced legal and ethical standards in life support decisions.
Landmark ruling regarding life-support disconnection due to persistent vegetative state, emphasizing patient's right to privacy over state interests.
Established paternal authority to decide in the absence of recovery prospects.
First Supreme Court case on right to die, recognizing such a right but requiring clear evidence of the patient's wishes before food and water could be withheld.
Controversy over withdrawing feeding tubes, raising ethical and legal dilemmas.
Key considerations include:
Allocation of healthcare resources.
Quality vs. quantity of life assessments.
Pain and suffering evaluations.
Prognosis attached to patients' conditions.