The study investigates the effects of chronic exposure to electronic cigarette (e-cig) vapor and traditional cigarette smoke on cardiovascular function.
Increasing e-cig usage, especially among youths, necessitates understanding its long-term health implications despite being marketed as safer than traditional smoking.
The study conducted by Charles River Laboratories and the National Institute of Aging.
Rats of two age groups (young and old) were exposed to:
Purified air (control)
E-cigarette vapor with nicotine
E-cigarette vapor without nicotine
Traditional cigarette smoke
Duration of exposure was 12 weeks using a nose-only inhalation system.
Echocardiography: To observe and measure heart function, including:
Left ventricular (LV) diastolic internal diameter
Systolic internal diameter
LV wall thickness (systolic and diastolic)
LV fractional shortening (cardiac pumping efficiency)
Miller Catheter: Used to directly assess heart pressure, measuring:
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Heart rate
Maximum slope of LV systolic pressure increment/decrement
Tau (LV diastolic function)
Thermodilation: To determine cardiac output via thermal dilution curves from cold saline injections.
After experiments, rats were euthanized to measure:
Body weight
Heart weight
Left and right ventricle weight
Tibial length
Postmortem LV volume
Graph A: Blood pressure significantly increased in young rats exposed to traditional cigarettes compared to air; e-cig exposure (both types) did not significantly increase blood pressure.
Graph B: No significant difference in blood pressure between air and e-cigarette exposure.
Graph A: Young rats showed no significant differences among all exposure types.
Graph B: Old rats exposed to nicotine-containing e-cigs had a higher heart weight to body weight ratio compared to those exposed to air.
Limited significant differences noted in:
LV dimensions
Wall thickness
Cardiac output in both young and old rats across groups.
E-cigarette without nicotine showed lower LV diastolic internal diameter compared to the cigarette smoke group.
Young rats showed resilience against e-cig exposure, with no significant changes in cardiac metrics.
Older rats displayed heart enlargement after exposure to nicotine-containing e-cig vapor, indicating potential long-term damage despite stable heart function.
Youth may not show immediate adverse effects from vaping, suggesting resilience but not guaranteeing safety.
Older individuals might exhibit higher vulnerability to vaping-related damage, indicating that age factors into health risk assessments.
Vaping, regarded as safer, can still contribute to cardiovascular risks, advocating for revision of health guidelines especially concerning nicotine exposure.
Relevant research on e-cig usage impacts, particularly on cardiovascular health.
Comprehensive assessment including control and varied exposure groups.
Investigation of aging effects on cardiovascular response.
Use of different rat strains raises potential genetic confounding variables.
Limited twelve-week study duration potentially underestimated long-term effects.
Lacked gender diversity in subjects, restricting generalizability of findings.
Utilize uniform rat strains across age groups to minimize genetic variability.
Extend study duration (6 months to 1 year) to observe chronic effects/diseases.
Include both male and female subjects to assess hormonal impacts on cardiovascular function.