TJ

Mediation Intake Meeting Notes

Intake Meeting

  • Intake meetings are held separately with each party and are confidential.
  • The meeting's purpose is to ensure mediation is appropriate and to discuss family issues out of court.
  • Mediation can be joint (both parties on the same screen) or in separate breakout rooms, moving from one room to the other.
  • All discussions during mediation are confidential.
  • None of the participants can disclose to the judge what was said, offered, or commented during the mediation.
  • The goal is to resolve family law issues privately.

Agreement and Report

  • If an agreement is reached during caucus mediation, the mediator drafts a non-binding report.
  • The report is sent to both parties and their lawyers, if applicable.
  • Parties are advised to seek legal advice on the report.
  • Once both parties sign the report, it can be turned into a court order.
  • If no agreement is reached, a one-page summary is sent, stating that mediation occurred, listing the issues discussed, and noting the absence of an agreement.

Exceptions to Confidentiality

  • There are exceptions where confidentiality cannot be maintained:
    • If there is a risk of harm to a child.
    • If there is an imminent risk of harm or immediate danger to someone.
    • The judge has discretion to subpoena the mediator's notes in very rare circumstances, such as criminal or child protection proceedings.

Mediator's Role

  • The mediator is a neutral and impartial party, not taking sides or interested in the outcome.
  • The mediator facilitates discussion but does not provide legal advice.
  • Mediation is voluntary and can be withdrawn from at any time.

Session Protocol

  • Confirm the participant is alone in the room and not recording the session.
  • Verification of ID required.

Background Information

  • Relationship Background:

    • The parties were in an on-and-off romantic relationship for about 10 years.
    • The daughter was planned, with the participant undergoing fertility treatments.
    • A domestic violence incident occurred just before the participant discovered she was pregnant, leading to separate counseling.
    • The participant experienced prenatal depression following her father's death.
    • A comprehensive parenting plan drafted by the participant was ignored by the other party.
    • The parties separated when the daughter was two months old but continued to see each other casually.
  • Co-Parenting History:

    • The participant had primary care of the daughter for the first six months while exclusively breastfeeding.
    • A 50/50 schedule was attempted, but the participant still handled daytime caregiving.
    • In 2021, the participant started working Uber Eats due to financial constraints.
    • Conflicts arose when the participant requested full parenting time, leading to the paternal grandmother assisting with childcare.
    • Child support payments ceased in early 2022, exacerbating financial stress.
  • Mental Health Crisis:

    • The participant experienced a mental health breakdown and suicidal ideation around May 2022 due to financial strain and burnout.
    • The daughter started full-time daycare in June 2022 after the participant became eligible for a subsidy.
  • Parenting Time Adjustments:

    • The participant asked the other party to take the daughter overnight while she stabilized, but she still had to handle daycare pickups and caregiving.
    • Medication and meditation helped stabilize the participant's mental health.
  • Financial and Business Ventures:

    • The participant managed her father's estate, including renovating properties and handling finances.
    • She used funds from selling inherited properties to start her own business.
    • An accident while working Uber temporarily halted income.
  • Relationship with Extended Family:

    • The other party started leaving their daughter with his mother every weekend.
    • The participant developed a bond with the other party's niece and nephew, who eventually came to live with her.
    • The other party pressured the children to babysit and tried to limit their contact with the participant.
  • Concerns for Daughter's Well-being:

    • The daughter exhibited potty training regression and selective mutism.
    • The other party initially denied any changes in their environment but later admitted his girlfriend had moved in.
    • The participant requested counseling for their daughter, but the other party refused.
    • Pediatrician and counselor assessments suggested environmental factors were contributing to the daughter's issues.

Legal Application

  • The participant sought sole decision-making authority due to concerns about the daughter's well-being and the other party's refusal to attend counseling.
  • The daughter underwent assessments, all of which indicated environmental factors were affecting her.

Current Mental Health Status

  • The participant reports improved mental health with medication and meditation.
  • She maintains regular check-ups to prioritize her mental health for her daughter.

Domestic Violence Incident

  • The participant described a one-time incident of domestic violence where the other party hit and choked her while in a drunken state.
  • She did not call the police but discussed the incident in counseling.
  • The counselor assessed the other party as being at high risk of developing a drinking problem.

Concerns About The Other Party's Behavior

  • The other party's behavior has been irrational, particularly towards extended family.
  • He has been volatile towards his mother, threatening to disown her if she continues to support the participant.

Safety Measures

  • The participant requested limited direct contact with the other party and uses a co-parenting app for communication.
  • Child exchanges occur at school or through the paternal grandmother's house.

Opinion of The Other Party as a parent

  • Despite the issues, the participant thinks the other party is a great and involved dad.
    • The participant doesn't feel fear for her own safety.
    • The participant’s main concern is the well-being of her daughter.
      • The participant suspects the behaviour to due to a power stuggle.