Market Structure & Power
Market Problems & Policy Regulation
Refer to S & W, Ch 14 for additional information
Focus: Microeconomics: Market Structure & Market Power
University of Michigan material acquired
Types of Market Structures:
Monopoly
Oligopoly
Monopolistic Competition
Setting Prices with Market Power
Issues & Problems of Market Power
Public Policy to Restrain Market Power
Market Structure influences market power.
Market Power: The ability to charge higher prices without losing sales.
Types of Market Structure:
Perfect Competition
Monopoly
Oligopoly
Monopolistic Competition
Characteristics of Perfect Competition:
Identical products across businesses
Many sellers and buyers, each small relative to the market
Market Power: Sellers have none.
Characteristics of Monopoly:
Single seller in the market
Market demand curve equates to the firm's demand curve
Market Power: Seller has significant power.
Characteristics of Oligopoly:
Few large sellers in the market
Sellers are attentive to consumers and each other
Market Power: Sellers have some power.
Characteristics:
Many small businesses selling differentiated products
Efforts to differentiate software from competitors
Market Power: Sellers possess some power.
Visual representation of market power:
Perfect Competition -> Imperfect Competition (Oligopoly & Monopolistic Competition) -> Monopoly
Sources of Market Power depend on:
Number of competitors
Type of product (Identical vs Differentiated)
Unique products with monopolies.
Least power: Perfect Competition
Most power: Monopoly
Most firms are in imperfectly competitive markets.
Key Insights:
Market power enables independent pricing strategies
More competitors reduce market power
Effective differentiation increases market power
Imperfect competition offers bargaining power to buyers
Choices depend on competitor actions.
Pricing involves a trade-off:
Selling high quantities vs making more profit per item
Firm Demand Curve: Quantity demanded changes with price
Evaluate using marginal revenue curve.
Market types show how demand and price change:
Perfect Competition: No market power
Monopolistic Competition/Oligopoly: Some market power
Monopoly: Significant market power.
Experimenting with prices helps identify firm demand curve
Strategies may involve varied pricing for different customer groups.
Focus on Marginal Revenue (MR) for good decision-making
MR represents the additional revenue from selling one more unit.
Example: Price of cars at different quantities to assess demand and revenue
Experimenting leads to insights on demand and marginal revenue.
MR reflects:
Output Effect: Revenue from selling one additional unit
Discount Effect: Revenue loss from reduced price across all sold units
Formula: MR = P - ∆P × Q.
The firm's demand curve slopes downwards
Marginal revenue lies below the demand curve due to discounts.
Steps to Determine Pricing:
Continue selling until MR = MC
Set price according to the demand curve.
Use graphs to determine optimal price and quantity based on marginal cost and revenue.
Profit calculated as total revenue minus total cost, highlighting key figures for quantity, price, and profit conditions.
Market power can lead to poor market outcomes, such as high prices for essential goods like drugs
Situations where sellers can exploit market power are problematic.
Monopoly Maximizes Profit:
Determine optimal output (Qm) where MR = MC
Use demand curve to set price (Pm)
Calculate profits as (P - ATC) x Q.
Monopoly incentivizes profit maximization through constrained output and unique pricing strategies.
Dominant market prices lead monopolies to operate with substantial mark-ups, generating higher profits.
Competitive pricing equals marginal costs (P=MC) unlike monopolistic conditions (Pm > MR = MC).
Comparison highlights inefficiencies and consumer impact due to monopolistic pricing strategies.
Consumer surplus: Difference between willingness to pay and market price
Producer surplus: Difference between market price and costs.
Competitive outcomes maximize total surplus.
Competitive markets efficiently maximize total surplus compared to monopolistic settings.
Monopolistic practices create unrealized consumer gains due to reduction in output relative to competitive levels.
Inefficient monopolistic pricing strategies lead to significant deadweight loss in markets.
Four conclusions drawn from market analysis:
Higher prices due to market power
Inefficiently smaller quantities produced
Larger economic profits observed
Market power leads to survival in suboptimal conditions.
Raising competition enhances societal outcomes through lower prices and quantity increases.
Regulatory Approaches: Ensure competition through laws against collusion and mergers that threaten market power.
Legislation aimed to foster competition and prevent anti-competitive practices from hindering market balance.
Competitive mergers may benefit consumers while anti-competitive mergers harm overall market dynamics.
Analyzing share prices and competitive impacts helps assess merger implications.
Government can implement price ceilings to counter excessive market power, mitigating inefficiencies.
Instances where a single entity best serves market demands, requiring potential government intervention to regulate prices.
Market structures range broadly affecting levels of market power and pricing strategies utilized by sellers.
Understanding marginal revenues allows insights into pricing strategies reflective of market power impacts on seller behavior.