Accounting Policies, Estimates, Errors & Events After Reporting Period – Lecture & Assessment Guidance
Administrative & Assessment Briefings
Session Logistics
Non-standard meeting time; session recorded for absent classmates.
Lecturer invites real-time questions, especially on Assessment 2 (A2).
Assessment 2 Overview
Prerequisite Gen-AI Quiz
Must be attempted before the A2 submission link (and your individual data file) becomes visible.
Allocated workload: 2\ \text{hours}; contains 4 questions with recommended time allocations.
Permitted AI Tools
Choice between ChatGPT and Copilot.
Copilot preferred (institutional licence ⇒ privacy “shield”; ability to delete entire chat).
All other tools prohibited to keep cohort outputs comparable.
Key Due-Date Warnings
Do not confuse return date with due date.
Individual task; final upload is one Word file.
Question-by-Question Snapshot
Q1 (Events after reporting date; 5 marks): no AI allowed. Require paragraph citations—not copy-pasted extracts.
Q2 (Presentation & disclosure; 20 marks): AI compulsory.
• Ignore your own Q1 decision when preparing statements.
• Decide your own prompt strategy; must embed AI in workflow.
• Submit up to 5 screenshots (first & last show date/time). No truncation—overlap a few lines for continuity.
• Provide “Notes” column that cross-references specific \text{AASB}\,101 paragraphs (e.g., para 54\,\text{(i)} for PPE line item).Q3 (Reflection; 20 marks): 500-word guide, three sub-parts specified. Write from personal reflection on the submitted prompts only.
Presentation & Documentation
Follow detailed Presentation tab instructions.
Cover sheet with declaration, financial statements plus explanatory workings, screenshots, reflection, reference list.
Explanatory workings ≠ statutory “Notes to Accounts”; they simply justify every figure you altered, added, split or aggregated.
For format model, review Topic 3, Exercise 5 template.
AI as a Study Partner
Treat AI as a *hyper-intelligent friend* ("100 PhDs, never sleeps").
Always verify AI output, especially standards paragraphs.
Practise prompt engineering before the real attempt.
Topic 4 – Accounting Policies & Events After Reporting Period
Continuation of financial-statement preparation with emphasis on disclosure, materiality and professional judgement.
Standards in scope:
\text{AASB}\,101 Presentation of Financial Statements
\text{AASB}\,1054 Australian-specific disclosures
\text{AASB}\,108 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates & Errors
\text{AASB}\,110 Events After the Reporting Period
Professional judgement & materiality concepts re-emerge every week.
Accounting Policies
Definition
Principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices an entity adopts for preparing and presenting its financial statements (AASB 108 para 5).
Four Elements a Complete Policy Addresses
Definition – What the item is.
Recognition – Criteria for recording it.
Measurement – How to quantify at initial & subsequent dates.
Disclosure – Minimum information to communicate.
Example – \text{AASB}\,116 Property, Plant & Equipment covers all four: defines PPE, states recognition criteria, prescribes cost/revaluation models and lists disclosure requirements (carrying amount, disposals, depreciation method, etc.).
Some standards (e.g.
\text{AASB}\,8 Operating Segments) only address disclosure.
Policy‐Related Disclosures Inside AASB 101
Para 25: Must disclose if the going-concern assumption is not met.
Para 122: Disclose key judgements/estimates that affect amounts.
Additional Australian Requirements (AASB 1054)
Declare compliance with both Australian Accounting Standards and IFRS.
State whether entity is for-profit or not-for-profit.
Identify statements as general-purpose or special-purpose.
Westfarmers illustration: first note confirms general-purpose report, Corporations Act & IFRS compliance; key estimates collated and cross-referenced by page.
Changes in Accounting Policies, Estimates & Errors (AASB 108)
Accounting Estimates
Concern the measurement element of a policy.
Inevitable because of uncertainty (e.g., depreciation, warranty provisions).
Changing estimates is common.
Allowable Change in Policy
Required by another standard, or
Results in more relevant & reliable information (para 14).
Treatment: Retrospective application (paras 19-22) – restate comparatives & opening equity unless impracticable.
Change in Estimate
Permitted whenever new information or developments arise (para 36).
Treatment: Prospective – affect current and future periods only.
Errors
Only material errors must be corrected (para 41).
Correct via retrospective restatement of comparatives; if error predates earliest period presented, adjust opening balances.
Classification Example (Exercise)
Case | Nature | Policy or Estimate? | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
A. Determine useful life = 5 yrs | Estimate (measurement) | Para 32 | |
B. Decision to depreciate PPE | Policy | AASB 116 requirement | |
C. Change from straight-line to reducing-balance | Estimate | Para 34(a) | |
D. Provide warranty based on past experience | Policy (measurement basis) | Para 14 | |
E. Adjust % of sales for warranty from 3\% to 5-7\% | Estimate | Para 36 |
Events After the Reporting Period (AASB 110)
Key Definitions
Event after reporting period: Event occurring between the end of the reporting period & the date the financial statements are authorised for issue.
Adjusting event (para 3(a)): Provides evidence of conditions that existed at the reporting date ⇒ adjust amounts.
Non-adjusting event (para 3(b)): Indicative of conditions arising after the reporting date ⇒ disclose if material.
Timeline illustration (FY 2025 example):
\text{01 Jul 25} \;\longrightarrow\; \text{…} \;\longrightarrow\; \text{03 Sep 25 (authorisation)}
Any event inside this window is assessed under AASB 110.
Practical Scenarios
Customer liquidation on 28 July ⇒ Receivable existed 30\,Jun; evidence of impairment ⇒ adjust.
Board announces closure on 15 July ⇒ No obligation existed 30\,Jun; treat as non-adjusting; disclose nature & estimated effect.
Disclosure Requirements for Non-Adjusting Events (para 21)
Nature of the event.
Estimate of financial effect, or statement that such estimate cannot be made and why.
Exercise – Macau Ltd (30 Jun 2026 / authorise 15 Sep 2026)
Event | Adjust? | Rationale & Paragraph |
---|---|---|
a) Trawlers lost in freak storm after YE | Non-adjust; natural disaster after YE ⇒ para 22(d); disclose if material. | |
b) Defective nets ordered pre-YE, fault found 28 Jul | Adjust; condition (purchase obligation) existed at YE ⇒ para 9(b). | |
c) Lawsuit filed post-YE for 17 Jul deaths | Non-adjust; condition (legal claim) arose after YE; disclose (material). | |
d) Directors resolve to issue 8\,000 debentures at \$10, 5\% int. on 1 Sep | Non-adjust; no present obligation at YE; disclose plan only. |
Materiality drives whether non-adjusting events warrant disclosure.
Professional Judgement & Materiality
Essential in borderline cases (policy vs estimate; adjust vs disclose).
Judgement applies when assessing:
• Availability/quality of evidence.
• Magnitude & nature of amounts (qualitative + quantitative).
• Impracticability of retrospective restatement.
Study & Submission Tips
Distinguish between explanatory workings (A2) and statutory Notes to Accounts (topic content).
Use AASB paragraph numbers rigorously in answers.
When capturing screenshots: include bottom-right clock for 1st and last; overlap lines to prove continuity; limit to 5 prompts.
Expect large Word files (~30 pages) if many screenshots—plan compression.
Before prompting AI for graded work, rehearse on “dummy” questions to gauge quality and refine prompts.
Quick Numerical Reference Recap
Gen-AI quiz: 2 hours, 4 questions.
A2 marking: Q1 5, Q2 20, Q3 20 (total 45).
Reflection word guide: 500 words.
Debenture example: 8\,000 × \$10, interest 5\%; application \$5 + allotment \$5.
End of comprehensive notes – aligned to transcript, standards, and assessment guidance.