L12_Urban N (1)
Pollution Sources
Point Source Pollution
Defined as any single identifiable source from which pollutants are discharged.
Examples include:
Pipe
Ditch
Ship
Factory smokestack (EPA)
Non-point Source Pollution
Results from land runoff, precipitation, atmospheric deposition, drainage, seepage, or hydrologic modification (EPA).
Changes in Runoff
Key Factors
Timing: Changes over seasonal cycles.
Quantity: Total amount of runoff generated.
Location: Geographic distribution of runoff sources.
Quality: Contaminant levels in runoff water.(Adapted from Tague and Costello, 2008)
Runoff Differences
Urban vs. Non-Urban Systems
Urban systems typically exhibit significant differences in:
Timing
Amount
Location
Quality of runoff.
Potential pollutants in runoff can lead to environmental degradation.
Nitrogen Pollution
Significance in Aquatic Systems
Nitrogen is a critical pollutant that affects aquatic ecosystems, particularly in the Chesapeake Bay.
Nitrogen Sources in Chesapeake Bay
Fertilizer: 15%
Air Emissions: 6% (including agricultural emissions)
Manure: 17%
Stormwater: 38%
Sewage/Industry: 19%
Septic systems: 4%
Air pollution contributes to approximately 40% of total stormwater nitrogen. (Source: Chesapeake Bay Program)
Eutrophication
Excess nitrogen promotes algal blooms, depleting oxygen and leading to dead zones.
Impacts human health through contamination of drinking water and increased air pollutants affecting lung function.
Anthropogenic Changes to the Nitrogen Cycle
Human activities now fix more nitrogen than natural sources (lightning and bacteria).
Fossil fuel combustion returns stored nitrogen to the atmosphere.
Sources of Nitrogen in Urban Landscapes
Fertilizer Use
Pet Waste
Atmospheric Deposition
Wet Deposition: 50%
Dry Deposition: 50%
Sewage
Chesapeake Bay
Declared impaired waters by USEPA.
Requirement to reduce nitrate loadings by 40%.
Need for strategies to decrease non-point source pollution.
Water Budget at Hubbard Brook
Precipitation breakdown:
100% Precipitation = 60% Streamflow + 40% Evapotranspiration
Research Methodology
Stream Flow Gaging Sites
Varied landscapes:
Agricultural
Suburban
Urban
Forested reference sites.
Water Quality Variation
Nitrate concentrations differ across landscapes.
Highest: Agricultural areas
Lower but significant in Suburban and Urban areas.
Forest areas showed the lowest levels of nitrate.
Predicting Nitrogen Sources
Understanding the nitrogen cycle can help identify pollution sources for management.
Land Cover and Ecosystem Function
Different land covers impact:
Water quality
Nutrient retention
Heat dissipation.
Monitoring Stations
Represent landscapes impacts on nitrogen levels,
Monitoring includes fine analysis of landscape structure.
Effects of Herbaceous Vegetation
Positive correlation with stream nitrate levels suggests vegetation may amplify nitrogen issues.
Urbanization Impacts
Riparian zones affected differently across urban environments;
Changes include:
Water table levels
Species diversity
Plant health (Q. lobata) under varying incision conditions.
Denitrification Processes
Soil Conditions
Increased moisture and organic matter favor denitrification, especially in flowing streams with low levels of incision.
Non-Nitrogen Concerns
Other elements in runoff (pesticides, personal care products) also pose significant risks to water quality.
Final Review Questions
Compare urban vs. non-urban water cycle differences.
Explain point vs. non-point source pollution and implications for management.
Describe nitrogen cycle pools and fluxes and anthropogenic impacts.
Discuss watershed management and the riparian zone's role in mitigating nitrogen pollution.
Analyze the differences in climatic impacts on nitrogen export in temperate vs. Mediterranean regions.