Political theory: what makes policy makers create the decisions that they pursue
How do you justify things that force people to do stuff they don't want to doè
John Rawls Veil of Ignorance and original position “Main idea of theory of justice”
When making political system, the people making it don't know what position they will have in system (rich or poor), so they make just system
Pros:
Might work for new countries
Cons:
Not realistic = can not be used in real society d to our real positions
“Principles of of Morals and legislation.”
Utilitarianism: seeks to see morality or action or system based on overall happiness that it marks
Jeremy Benthalam’s Principle of utility: something is good if it maximised happiness for greatness number
If pleasure of overall majority exceeds pain of minority = it is just
However, if 90% only slightly happy, but 10% very unhappy then this is wrong
Hedonic calculus = math he used to decide this
Cons:
Individual rights are not respected due to good of the many = tyranny of majority
Behind veil of ignorance certain things might be bad
Immaneul Kant, categorical imperative:
If you do one thing you should generalise it to whole world
Move beyond particular situation and then generalise to whole world
Ex. if someone is hungry and they steal food from a store, have to ask themselves if this is okay in wider society
Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan:
State of nature: state where no government, no society = people naturally bad, so agree to have government to control them
Ex. no art, industry, war all the time, no rights at all
No right to physical safety, or property
Leviathan = the state that can enforce set of rules or regulations
Even most tyrannical state better than state of nature
Cons:
Can turn into a dictatorship and make unfair rules, randomly take away right
Worse government worse than worst state of nature
Assumption that people are bad
What is law is not what is moral
Did not consent to this “contract”
Nash equilibrium, game theory:
Optimal outcomes can be achieved when people work together, rather than competing
Prisoner’s dilemma: either confess or stay silent, nash equilibrium is to both remain silent due to 5 years in jail for both but not for life for either
Nash equilibrium: both should go and coordinate actions
Patriot act: violated individual rights but better for collective good in theory
John Locke:
Tacit consent: By choosing to use government services, and remain there = you consent to governments rule
Ex. Walking on the street = streets maintained by state so tacit consent
David Hume, issue of consent:
Tacit consent does not exist, people don't have a choice
Don't have money to leave, have connections there, their job is there
Consent in order to be valid it has to be given voluntarily and have had other options
Right wing politics:
Support for view that certain social orders and hierarchy are inevitable, natural or desirable
Low taxes, few welfare, little social security and state focus on essentials
Left wing politics:
Hierarchies are bad, state should get rid of hierarchies
Does with higher taxes, welfare and social security
Ex. economic status, the right thinks that hierarchies are natural (less intervention in welfare) and left wing something has to be done (more redistribution of wealth and taxes)
Communism vs facism:
Facism:
Extreme right wing
Idea of hierarchy to extreme through coercion
Nationalism to justify, military is important, racial hierarchies, gender roles
Communism:
Extreme left wing
Takes idea of eliminating hierarchies to extreme
All people should have same outcome, elimination of class hierarchy
Persecutes those that are elitist such as rich peasants in Russia
Caused poverty and death
In common:
Individual subordinated to the group
Extreme persecution due to government control
Liberal then vs now:
Modern: Liberal is left wing (lots of taxes)
Classical liberalism: used to be conservative = due to association with freedom, wanted more economic and social freedoms
People developed a hierarchy over time but it is good because it is free at least
Ex. American Bill of rights
Neoliberalism for this reason is most free
Neustadt “Presidential Power”: describes that the US president is a clerk, not a dictator and can't pass things quickly. Like a clerk as he is weak and needs congress to make laws
No proactive power = can not really make policies and decrees
Have a lot of reactive power = can veto things
Foreign policy they have a lot of power
Formally = do not have a lot of written power
Informal power = power to persuade people
Persuade people because they get a lot of media coverage
i.e can go on TV and ask people to lobby congress for their medicare plan
Can talk to congress people in Oval office with good aura or facilities to offer
Prestidge of his position
Founding father Jean Monet: thought economic integration would end conflicts in Europe
States in EU lose:
Open borders can’t regulate
Lose sovereignty due to EU commission, parliament and court of justice
Contribute to common EU budget
States in EU gain:
Free movement of goods (no tariffs)
Common tariff rate for imported goods
Free movement of people and work
Schengen zone
Countries don't need to use a passport and no border guards
Common visa policy = if from a country that isn't from Schengen get one that lets you go to it
Most are part of it unlike Bulgaria, and Ireland
Not in EU but in Schengen = Norway and Switzerland
Eurozone
Countries that use the euro
Countries that don’t = Denmark and Switzerland
To join = deficit has to be under control, debt to GDP ratio has to be low
Fiscal vs monetary policy vs political union
Political union: states give up some sovereignty to a supranational entity with legislation that includes aspects of both foreign and domestic policy
Ex US federal government controls the individual states
EU is not one because it doesn't have much power and influence compared to US federal government
Fiscal union: common budget and states make decisions together with taxation and spending
Ex together Canadian province make collective decisions on taxation
EU is not one since there is no EU tax and budget is small
Monetary union: states that have the same currency and central bank determines supply of it
Ex Eurozone is one since they have Euro
Eastern European growths WWII vs Western European growth today
First trend:
After WWII = fast and exponential growth Western Europe
Slowed down now Eastern Europe faster = will probably slow down since less growth to do
Second trend:
Nationalist leaders
2016 Referendum = David Cameron wants to prove people want to stay and get special status, stop eurosceptic party vote syphoning
Most voted to leave the EU and so they left in January 31st 2020
Nationalism caused by economic issues
Ex People who voted for Brexit suffered from losses in manufacturing
Third trend:
Russia is a “rogue state” as it does not conform to international law or conduct
Europe dependent on Russia for gas
If NATO went to war Russia cut off gas, so can’t
Ex Germany has a lot of its gas from Russia
2005 Constitution referendum: EU worked well until this, France and netherlands rejected so showed issues in EU
2008 Financial Crisis = hurt members of EU hard, especially Eurozone
PIIGS = Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain affected
Contagion effect = if Greece went bankrupt then investors devalue currency of Eurozone
Why
Greece had fake stats to join Eurozone (i.e deficit 5 times over max)
The Troika = the EU commission, central bank and IMF bailed out Greece
IMF told Greece to cut spending = Greece didn't like
Greece didn't leave though = because if one country left then permanent currency image shatter as others could leave
Assad family: ruled since 1971, president is Bashar al-Assad
Syrian state vs radical rebels vs moderate rebels
Arab spring 2011: Assad used chemical weapons on people, conflict went from street fighting to a civil war with three actors
The government, the moderate rebels (US supported), radical rebels (ISIS, Al-Mousra front)
Leading up to protests there were a lot of droughts and food prices went up
Provinces hardest hit had most protests
Arab spring: Affected Middle Eastern nations, most common form of regime before was authoritarian dictatorships financed by oil
Succeeded
Started in Tunisia
Why:
Self-immolation of street vendor in Tunisia since couldn't sell without permit
Ben Ali = was dictator of Tunisia
Went to democratic consolidation
It spread because of social media
Failed
Egypt
Mubarak = Persons were protesting against in Tahrir square
Morsi = person who replaced, controlled too much power and fuel shortages
El-Sisi = current president, came to power with coup d’etat
Libya
Gadafi = dictator, killed during Arab Spring in 2011 August and then civil war
Revolutionary groups turned on each other no common enemy and ISIS had foothold
Bellin “Reconsidering Robustness of Authoritarianism”
Patriomal vs industrialised militaries
Institutionalised: choose generals how qualified they are, not vested in survival of dictator
Will not fire on protesters
Patriomal: loyalty in choosing generals, don’t care for qualifications, vested in survival of dictator
Will fire on protestors to support government
Bellin Argument: most militaries in Middle East are patrimonial
Weak states
Inefficient, corrupted, governments can not control territories
It is the most unequal region in the world (8 of most unequal countries in Latin America)
Violence
Inflation (too much money in circulation, money made valueless, hurts poor)
Political instability
Hyper Presidentialism (Delegative democracy)
Checks-and-balances: institutions or rules that prevent rulers from doing as they please, but in Latin America are weak
Ex Congress for presidents
Guillermo O’Donell
Delegative democracy: one that doesn't have checks and balances, can pass laws as they please
To pass laws:
Executive orders used to pass laws
Rubber stamp congress, congress passes all laws due to supermajority
Monroe doctrine and American intervention
Cold war much intervention in Cuba, Guatemala to Chile
Monroe doctrine: US views Latin America as their sphere of influence, so can intervene
Especially if turning Communist
Suzane Stokes Clientelism
Voting people because they give you material material benefits with no policies
Ex Buying votes = money to vote for
Ex Bribing people = provide them with goods or services
Bad for democracy:
Perverse accountability: Keep people poor to pay them again next election
No incentive to make you better off but make you poor
Juan Peron and Eva Peron
Juan Peron
Working class angry at oligopoly government for mismanagement and inequality
Came to power in coup, pro-working class used their language
What he did:
Made paid vacation
Labour laws
Unionsation
Public transports
Subsides expanded
Society security coverage
Eva Person:
Wife, in charge of labour ministry, held informal power, gave women right to vote and liked her due to being good speaker, died of cancer
What happened to them:
Personism: controversial, made lots of debt, printed money economy collapsed
Military kicked out of office 1955
Salvador Allende
Marxist, won presidential election
What he did:
Price controls
Social spending
Nationalised banks
Causes economy to collapse due to printing money
1973 Military Coup
1973 September 11th, military surrounded palace, bombed building and killed himself
Pinochet came to power after
FARC
Marxist guerrilla groups wanted to take power by force
Cocaine
Illegal resource extraction
Landowners had to fight against them due to state incompetence and corruption
3 way civil war
Three groups
United Self Defence Forces of Colombia (landowning paramilitary group)
Government
FARC
Alvaro Uribe
Determined to get rid of FARC
Wanted to professional the armed forces = grew strong so could fight
FARC reduced in first year, less homicides and kidnappings
What happened:
Won reelection in 2006
Porfirio Diaz
Autocratic dictator of Mexico between 1889 - 1911
Good:
Created army and opened up for trade and made railroads
Bad:
Jailed people and closed news, oligarchy and inequality increased
Mexican Revolution 1910
Toppled him but changed balance of power with progressive constitution and equal pay and let land reform
PRI:
Hegemonic party made by centrist Lazaro Cardenas, support from working people
Owned police and judges, wouldn't give money to governors who didn't like
1980s and 1988 elections burned ballots due used military to unpopularity = caused economic failure
By 1990s PRIs hegemony ended and 2000s non PRI president won
Shining Path
1990 Peru, doing bad with sharp economic crisis and Shining Path
Was a terrorist Marxist guerrilla group that terrorised people
Wanted to overrun state
Alberto Fujimori
Dictator, came to power in 1990s, did not like congress, did not like judges, preferred to govern by decree
What he did:
Got rid of Shining Path and fixed economy with neoliberalism
Self-coup
1992 launched a coup with military to prevent congress and judges from entering buildings
When they did come back he packed court and congress with his allies
Hugo Chavez: 1999 - 2013 Quasi-communsit, Bolivarian Revolution, packed judiciary with allies, poverty rates fell
What he did:
Nationalised health care
Healthcare
Education
Problem:
Couldn't pay for this, and didn’t invest in anything but oil
Nicolas Maduro
Assumed office after Chavz died
After oil prices fell in 2014 the economy went into trouble since relied on it too much
Ever since they have done poorly
Inflation or shortages
Hyperinflation because money became valueless
2019 inflation was 1 million percent
Chronic shortages for basic goods due to price controls
Bread, milk, toilet paper, detergent all short
Bureaucratic authoritarianism during 1964-1985
Bureaucratic authoritarianism: mode of authoritarianism, happened in Uruguay and Argentina
Non personalistic
This means no centred on one person
Legalistic
Used law to respress you, like using unfair trials for charges if don’t like you
Military didn't shut down congress and had elections
Not overly corrupted
Technocratic
Rule by experts (risen through ranks of treasury)
Emphasis on concrete policy goals
Do not come to power to steal money but have goals
Brazil: concrete goals goal was economic development and opposing communism, some repression but was legally as could have judges
Hochschild “King Leopold's Ghost”
King Leopold II:
1865 - 1909
Liked palaces and gardens
Didn't like how small Belgium was
Wants to colonise for ivory and rubber so Africa sent explorers
Claim did for philanthropy, building roads, commerce and outlawed slavery
Stanley
Explorer he recruited to explore
Thought would be easy since no government, got land from chiefs with bribes
Tyrant = he beat people with whips and used slaves
Colonised with repeating rifles, malaria medication (quinine) and machine guns
Rubber extraction
Needed for cars, establish monopoly quickly
Took hostages to ensure met quotas and underreported amount
Cause of death - smallpox, murder, starvation and plummeting birth rate
E.D Morel
Elder Dempster shipping clerk, undercover Congo wealth and exploitation
Leopold II sent lots of guns to Congo
Wrote articles about horrors of Congo to rally church and public
Did it work:
Yes, only because people hated Leopold, having having with minor
Needed to make self look good sent rigged committee of friends to Congo in commission to say not bad, said opposite
Belgian state
Took over after death in 1909
Claimed ended of forced labour but did not
Mobutu
Dictator got power after Lomumba went against Western interests, was backed by West
Why Congo poor:
Few doctors or engineers and most civil servants were European
Van der Wall = neopatrimonialism (corruption)
Low state capacity (absenteeism, bad tax collection)
Foreign aid
Pros:
Can help make healthcare, basic education
Cons:
Can cause overreliance on it and squanders money
Stanford Prison Experiment
1971 wanted to see if normal peoples environment that made violent
Some people were guards, and pretended to arrest, some were criminals and guards had absolute power over them
Guards abused them and led to physical violence
It if environment that people are in that cause them to be abusive
Low population density and state capacity
Fukuyama State capacity vs size
If can governed territory then strong state
Herbst - one of big factors that stopped from making good states in Africa was low population density
As population density goes up cost to control people decreases since people more far apart
British East India Company 1700 - 1858
Privately owned cooperation to establish trade
Monopoly on exotic goods by Queen Elizabeth I into Britain
British East India Company started to use standing army to get new territory
1858 Sepoy Rebellion:
Caused British to resume direct control, Queen Victoria was then the ruler of India
Pros:
British left a state, army, civil service, limited democracy
Many Indians learned about democracy from Britain
Mahatma Gandhi and nonviolent resistance
Gandhi Congress Party started resistance against, used nonviolent civil disobedience
Salt march, since they couldn't collect salt, illegally made salt from seawater
1947 got independence
Nehru
1947 - 1964 Congress party and Nehru was in power
Marked by nationalism fused with socialism
What he did:
Neglected agriculture in favour of heavy industry
Land reform failed
Neglected primary education in favour of university led to illiteracy
Indira Gandhi
1966 - 1984 Congress party
Nehru's daughter, chosen because name recognition and thought woman was weak
Was a populist and socialist
Garibi Hatao
Related to poverty alleviation, popular among poor
Used this to get absolute power
1975 emergency declaration
She felt threatened politically so issued one and curtailed civil liberties but then restored democracy
People didn't like this so lost elections
She got back power in 1980
After this was capitalist but was assassinated in 1984
Rajiv Gandhi
Indira Gandhi's son
Open up economy to business
Also assassinated
Congress Party and Bharatiya Janata Party
Congress party: old party with regions in colonial period
Bharatiya Janata Party: 1980s a rightwing party with Hindu nationalism
Immense poverty still an issue, malnutrition, and literacy low
Modi (BJP)
US history: July 4th 1776 was a British colony, sick of taxes, and got independence with revolutionary war with George Washington who became first president
US constitution 1789
Constitution: 1789 controversial due to autonomy of states interference
Bill of rights: 1791 James Madison, created to restrict power of federal government to convince colonies to join
Inspired other nations like Canada's charter
First amendment: freedom of speech, assembly, and religion
Limits are defamation, obscenities, blackmail
Second amendment: right to bear arms
Can increase homicides, but can defend people, defend from invaders
Exceptions are automatic firearms
Third amendment: prohibits quartering soldiers in peoples homes
Fourth amendment: search warrant needed that is specific (what you are allowed to search)
Doesn’t apply at the border
Fifth amendment: no double jeopardy, speedy trial, no self incrimination
Sixth amendment: right to a trial by jury if accused of a crime
Harder to be biassed with people, issue is usually plea deals
Seventh amendment: right to jury in civil matters
Eighth amendment: protect against cruel and unusual punishment
Ninth amendment: gives rights not in constitution if not specifically outlined, so can have more rights not in there
Right to privacy
Tenth amendment: creates federalism in US, which divided power in national and state government, and if constitution did not give specifically feds right then thats goes to state
Federalism: federalist papers made to create constitution and why they put what they did in it
Governors and state legislatures:
The president: elected for 4 years, elected by electoral college
How the electoral college works: each state has number of electors based on pop, 538 in total and needs to have 270, in each state candidate with most vote gets electors
Created to give all adequate say
Battleground states: state where people switch between who they vote for
Pennsylvania and Nevada
Presidential powers in the US: Americans presidents are very weak
Executive order and the veto:
Effective orders are decrees, limited to less important policies
Power to nominate judges that is approved by senate
Pardon power or reduce years in prison (committing sentence)
Foreign policy
Can veto policies from Congress
FDR and his importance: Great Depression to World War 2
Got rid of prohibition
Security Exchange Commission and FDIC to prevent bank runs
Social security for pensions and unemployment
Helped win World War Two
New Deal with public works program
House of reps: current speaker Mike Johnson, 435 reps reelected 2 years and need 218 votes to pass legislation and is by population
Propose the budget
Minority party no protection
Senate: 100 senators, all states 2 seats, elected for 6 years
Can approve judges picks
Filibuster, senate 60 votes to block laws from senate, budget reconciliation can’t be or judges
Minority party protected
Congressional budget office: allows to assess impact on policies or budget without may rely on analysis from president which is biassed
Judicial branch:
Federal and state courts
Run parallel to each other and do own thing independently
Federal courts enforce federal law and state courts enforce state laws
State crimes:
Stealing
Federal crimes:
Treason and terrorism
Federal law precedence: federal courts are more powerful than state laws and can overturn
Supreme court:
Most important courts in the US with 9 judges and appointed for life
Precedence made by supreme court
Can shape law to some extent due to unclarity of some laws
Federal reserves: the bank of the US responsible for money supply and nominated by President and approved by senate
Lowered supply leads to recession but less inflation
Increase supply leads to boom but inflation
Social security:
FDR made it, pension program and diabetes
Pays as you go, part of salaries are taken for it
Problems with it:
Population issues as can not support due to ageing pop, declining birth rate and retirements
Declining trust in US government:
Only 24% of Americans trust the government and bipartisan
Was higher in 60s and 70s like 60+
Issues:
Creates toxic environment such as during pandemic
Increasing political polarisation in the US:
Three prints = New York TImes and Washington Post and Wall Street journal
Fox News and CNN
Two Americans with Democrats and Republicans
These are two different world in own country
Disasters
Pandemic such as vaccines with democrats or republican
Foreign policy
Before it was unaffected by party in power, people knew what was in interests
Ukraine for example
Hiroshima and Nagasaki:
Manhattan project under FDR and then Truman
To end war quickly use bomb to make surrender
August 6th 1945 plane dropped the bomb on Hiroshima and many died
Did not surrendered so dropped another on Nagasaki
Then surrendered
Economic growth after WW2:
Japan had large economic growth after WW2
Devastated but rebounded quickly
1961 to 1969 the GDP growth = 10% a year
1970s slowed, but still good
1987 higher GDP per capita than USA
Japanese asset bubble:
Asset bubble: when the prices of an asset astronomically overvalued
One consequence of growth, made asset bubble
Japan had a housing bubble and stock market tripled
Value of all land was 4x as much as all US land
Bubble burst when realized not worth it
1990s there was stagnation and has never recovered
Douglas MacArthur:
General placed in charge of country after WW2 and emperor subjected to his authority
Made reforms that people liked
Constitution in 1947:
Made democracy with rights and women's rights
Emperor almost no power
Article 9:
Can not have war or army
1951 security treaty that says US has to aid Japan if attacked but not other way around
Lets the US keep a check on China
Mao Zedong:
Found of PRC 1949
1949 Mao declared founding of PRC
Before
Two main political from Kuomintang (Chan kai-shek) and the Communists (Mao)
Communists won
Good at revolution but reckless when having to make government policies
Good, gender equality, abolished foot binding, made people more literate
Great Leap Forward:
Caused by Mao, incompetence of his policies, little dissident
Mao knew nothing about economics
1958 - 1961
Mao wanted to double steel production in year
Prove that communists could achieve great targets
Led to famine
Causes:
Diverted resources from agriculture to manufacturing
Ordered all sparrows to die, led to no natural predators
Deng Xiaoping
Mao's death created conditions for change
Less repression, economic freedom
Didn't like democracy so shot at Tiananmen Square 1989 protests
Led to more authoritarian hardliners in party
Xi Jinping:
Concentrating power in past years and most powerful leader since Mao
What he did:
No term limits, anti-corruption drive, predecessor was forced out of room and more repression
Uses surveillance to control population like Xighurs
Legitimacy kept by economic growth but if recession then people will hate
Situation with Taiwan:
Taiwan was where nationalists went after war and was backed by the US
Eisenhower vowed to protect them, until 1979 where recognize the CCP
One China policy:
China claims Taiwan is part of them
US could not recognize Taiwan then and most do not recognize
Works like country with passports and government and US had relations with them through and external organisation
Us gives military aid to Taiwan