Definition: Males and females differ in various traits across many species.
Traits include size, coloration, shape, and body ornamentation.
Commonality: Sexual dimorphism is widespread in many species.
The reasons behind the prevalence of sexual dimorphism can be linked to adaptive traits through natural selection.
Example: Purple-throated caribs (Eulampis jugularis)
Observation: Females possess longer and more curved beaks than males.
Adaptation Question: This leads to investigation if these traits are adaptations for feeding strategies.
Caribs show preference for nectar from Heliconia caribea.
Males: Larger and dominant, limit female access to feeding.
Females: Feed on Heliconia bihai, which has longer flowers suited for their beaks.
Natural Selection:
Favors males with shorter, straighter beaks for H. caribea and females with longer, curved beaks for H. bihai.
Darwin's Recognition: Natural selection is not the only force; sexual selection significantly influences reproductive success.
Sexual Selection: Enhances an individual's ability to attract mates, leading to sexual dimorphism.
Male and female selection pressures may differ based on reproductive strategies.
For sexual selection to occur, there must be heritable traits that affect mate acquisition.
Over time, variants that improve mating success will become more prevalent.
Sexual Selection Drives:
Females have a fixed maximum fecundity, while males can increase success by increasing the number of mates.
Males typically have greater variance in reproductive success compared to females.
Parental Investment: Differences in the energy and time investment in offspring lead to distinct reproductive strategies.
Orangutans: Females care for the fetus and infants, while males provide no care in 90% of species.
Illustrates differences in energy expenditure per egg versus sperm; eggs require more energy to produce.
Setup: Mating trials with virgin males and females to assess reproductive success.
Findings: Males' reproductive success positively correlates with the number of mates, while females do not see increased success past a single mating.
Access to mates is often limiting for males, prompting stronger sexual selection pressure.
Intrasexual Selection: Males compete for access to females (direct control).
Intersexual Selection: Females choose mates based on traits or displays advertised by males.
In species with fighting males, traits like large body size or weaponry evolve.
Example: Galápagos marine iguanas exhibit larger males due to selection pressures.
Natural Selection Impact: Found stabilizing selection on body size.
Medium-sized iguanas show higher fitness than larger or smaller counterparts.
Male lions often kill cubs of other males to expedite mating opportunities with the pride.
Average coalition time for males in the pride is typically 1-2 years.
Females tend to be choosy for several reasons: to gain good genes, resources, or due to aesthetic preferences.
Barn Swallows: Illustrates a model of intersexual selection where male tail variability influences female choice.
Males with elongated tail feathers attract mates faster and gain greater reproductive success.
Distinct calling traits in species like gray tree frogs influence female preferences.
Hangingflies: The size of prey during copulation can enhance sperm transfer efficiency.
Suggests that female preferences can reinforce the male trait selection over generations, even if traits are arbitrary.
Small males in species like marine iguanas compensate through strategies such as sneaky copulation.
Coho Salmon: Exhibit variations in mating strategies where smaller males are sneaker males that try to fertilize eggs discretely.
Studies suggest that human dimorphism may not solely arise from sexual selection, due to cultural complexities.
Examples: Observations of aggressive behaviors affecting reproductive success in males.
Sexual selection is a driving force in the evolution of various traits, often acting in opposition to natural selection but still enhancing reproductive fitness in individuals.