The best results are usually achieved with a combination of different techniques
The Kano Model
Categories:
Delighters
Satisfiers
Dissatisfiers
Note:
Change over time
The Kano Model Explained
Delighters:
Excitement factors, unconscious requirements.
Satisfiers:
Performance factors, conscious requirements.
Dissatisfiers:
Basic factors, subconscious requirements.
Camera Function on Cell Phones Example
Evolution:
Initial introduction as a delighter.
Transition to a satisfier based on picture quality.
Became a dissatisfier as camera function became standard.
Gathering Techniques: Questioning
Methods:
Interview
Questionnaire
Interviewing Users & Other Stakeholders
Process:
Prepare detailed questions.
Meet with individuals or groups of users.
Obtain and discuss answers to the questions.
Document the answers.
Follow up as needed in future meetings or interviews.
Interview - Question Theme
Questions to users:
What do you do?
How do you do it?
What steps do you follow?
How could they be done differently?
What information do you use?
What inputs do you use?
What outputs do you produce?
Theme:
What are the business operations and processes?
How should those operations be performed?
What information is needed to perform those operations?
Interview – Question Types
Open-ended questions:
Encourages discussion and explanation.
Example: How do you do this function?
Close-ended questions:
To get specific facts.
Example: How many forms a day do you process?
Interview - Checklist
Before:
Establish the objective for the interview.
Determine correct user(s) to be involved.
Determine project team members to participate.
Build a list of questions and issues to be discussed.
Review related documents and materials.
Set the time and location.
Inform all participants of objective, time, and locations.
During:
Arrive on time.
Look for exception and error conditions.
Probe for details.
Take thorough notes.
Identify and document unanswered items or open questions.
After:
Review notes for accuracy, completeness, and understanding.
Transfer information to appropriate models and documents.
Identify areas needing further clarification.
Thank the participants.
Follow up on open and unanswered questions.
Interview Session Agenda Example
Objective of Interview:
Determine processing rules for sales commission rates
Date, Time, and Location:
April 21, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. in William McDougal's office
User Participants:
William McDougal, vice president of marketing and sales, and several of his staff
Project Team Participants:
Mary Ellen Green and Jim Williams
Interview/Discussion:
Example questions:
Who is eligible for sales commissions?
What is the basis for commissions? What rates are paid?
How is commission for returns handled?
Are there special incentives? Contests? Programs based on time?
Is there a variable scale for commissions? Are there quotas?
What are the exceptions?
Follow-Up:
Important decisions or answers to questions: See attached write-up on commission policies
Open items not resolved with assignments for solution: See Item numbers 2 and 3 on open items list
Date and time of next meeting or follow-up session: April 28, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.
Interview - Sample Open Item List
Includes example issues like partial shipments, returns and commissions, and extra commissions with details such as date identified, target end date, responsible project person, user contact, and comments.
Distributing and collecting questionnaires
Collect information from large number of stakeholders
Not suitable for understanding business processes, workflows or techniques
Gathering Techniques: Collaboration
Workshops:
A structured meeting in which a carefully selected group of stakeholders and content experts work together to define, create, refine and reach a closure on deliverables
Crowd-based RE
Gathering Techniques: Observation
Methods:
Field observation
Apprenticing
Artifact-Based Gathering Techniques
Methods:
System archaeology
Feedback analysis
Reuse of requirements
Ridgeline Mountain Outfitters - Customer Order Form
An example of reviewing inputs, outputs, and procedures
Observing and Documenting Business Procedures
Watch and learn business processes.
Understand the business processes and see how to improve them (system archaeology)
Document with Activity diagram (Topic 3)
Design & Idea-Generating: Creativity
Brainstorming:
Classical – Moderator initiates ideas and leads discussion to assess the ideas.
Variations – Participants initiate ideas and gathered by the moderator. Moderator provides criteria for appraisal, later appraised by the participants on group level.
Analogy Technique:
Two ways:
Hidden – Participants know only the analogy
Open – Analogy and real problem are known
Design & Idea-Generating: Design
Methods:
Prototyping
Scenarios & storyboards
Correlation of Elicitation Techniques with Kano Model
Technique
Dissatisfier
Satisfier
Delighters
Interview
+
++
+
Questionnaire
-
+
-
Design & idea-generating
-
++
++
Observation
++
+
+
Artifact-based
++
+
-
Kano Model and Requirements Types
Delighters:
Excitement factors, unconscious requirements
System properties that the stakeholder does not know or expect and discovers only while using the system (unconscious knowledge).
If some demanded properties are missing, the stakeholders probably will not accept the product.
Dissatisfiers:
Basic factors, subconscious requirements, properties of the system that are self-evident and taken for granted (subconscious knowledge).
Must be fulfilled by the system, otherwise, stakeholders will be disappointed/dissatisfied.
The Kano model looks at requirements from the perspective of the customer. It focuses on differentiating features, as opposed to expressed needs
Gathering Techniques such as questionnaire, Artifact based Design andIdea-Generating Technique Gathering Technique, Observation, Artifact based
Prioritize Requirements
Determining crucial requirements
Desirable vs essential requirements
Why prioritize?
Limited resources, thus need to justify system scope
To avoid scope creep
Help determine number of project iterations
High priority requirements are often included in early iterations to allow ample opportunity for refinements
Develop User-Interface Dialogs
Old system replaced by new systems
Automating functions that were previously manual – users are not certain of requirements
Users are not able to interpret and validate models such as use cases, activity diagrams, and interaction diagrams
User interface validation is simpler and more reliable
Use storyboard or user interface prototype
Evaluate Requirements with Users
Ideally – evaluation and documenting requirements are integrated
Practice - System users have other responsibilities besides developing systems, evaluation and documentation is an iterative process
Elicit → build models & prototypes → evaluate
Challenges of Requirements Analysis
Stakeholders don’t know what they really want.
Stakeholders express requirements in their own terms.
Different stakeholders may have conflicting requirements.
Organisational and political factors may influence the system requirements.
The requirements change during the analysis process. New stakeholders may emerge and the business environment change.
Results of Incorrect Requirements
The system may cost more than projected.
The system may be delivered later than promised.
The system may not meet the users’ expectations and that dissatisfaction may cause them not to use it.
Once in production, the costs of maintaining and enhancing the system may be excessively high.
The system may be unreliable and prone to errors and downtime.
The reputation of the IT staff on the team is tarnished because any failure, regardless of who is at fault, will be perceived as a mistake by the team.