BK

Civil Justice System: Costs and Time

Costs and Time in Civil Disputes

Introduction

  • The civil justice system's ability to achieve fairness, equality, and access is significantly impacted by costs and time.

  • Kapua and Jessie's dispute highlights the challenges in achieving fairness when cases are heard in courts.

Costs

Factors Contributing to Costs

  • Legal Representation: The court system relies on legal representation to maximize the chances of a just outcome.

  • Disbursements: Expenses include expert witness fees, filing and hearing fees, and jury fees.

  • Nature of the Dispute: Court cases generally incur higher costs compared to VCAT cases.

Impact of Costs

  • Many people cannot afford legal representation, deterring them from initiating claims.

  • Self-represented litigants may struggle due to a lack of objectivity and legal knowledge.

  • Legal aid is difficult to obtain for civil matters, with most funding directed to criminal and family law.

  • A judge's responsibility to assist self-represented parties can help ensure fairness, but understanding legal issues remains challenging.

Measures to Address Costs

  • Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods like mediation and conciliation.

  • Use of CAV (Consumer Affairs Victoria) and VCAT (Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal).

  • Case management powers in court.

  • Pro bono assistance from various bodies and organizations.

Time

Factors Impacting Time

  • Complexity of the case.

  • Type of claim.

  • VCAT and court backlogs.

  • Pre-trial procedures.

  • Evidence gathering and preparation.

  • Where the claim was issued.

Impact of Time

  • Delays can affect the reliability of evidence, jeopardizing a fair outcome.

  • Significant delays can impact procedural fairness.

  • Delays can seriously impact vulnerable parties (e.g., injured persons, those with limited funds).

  • Parties unfamiliar with litigation may experience stress due to court processes.

  • Delays may force parties to settle or withdraw claims, reducing genuine access to the civil justice system.

  • Significant backlogs in VCAT have been identified as a major challenge.

Measures to Reduce Delays

  • Case management powers.

  • VCAT programs to address backlogs.

  • Dealing with matters 'on the papers' to avoid hearings.

  • Increased use of online methods to resolve disputes.

Evaluating the Civil Justice System’s Ability

Fairness
Strengths

  • Tiered court and VCAT fees based on categories (corporate, standard, concession).

  • Adverse cost orders can encourage fair outcomes.

Limitations

  • High costs may force defendants to settle rather than challenge claims.

  • High costs may encourage plaintiffs to accept unfair settlements.

  • Self-representation can lead to unfair outcomes due to lack of legal expertise.

Equality
Strengths

  • Legal representation via VLA (Victoria Legal Aid) reduces inequality.

  • Less costly dispute resolution bodies (e.g., VCAT) may not require legal representation.

  • Three-tiered system in courts and VCAT promotes equality by accommodating those with fewer financial resources.

Limitations

  • Unequal opportunity to resolve disputes due to associated costs.

  • Varying quality of legal representation.

  • Self-represented parties may be at a disadvantage against skilled lawyers.

Access
Strengths

  • Judicial case management powers (e.g., ordering mediation) can reduce legal costs.

  • Alternative dispute resolution methods (e.g., mediation) promote access due to low costs and informality.

Limitations

  • High costs can discourage individuals from initiating civil cases.

  • High costs associated with defending claims may force defendants to settle.

  • High costs may force plaintiffs to accept unfair settlements.

  • Access to a jury may be limited by high costs.

  • High costs of filing appeals may discourage dissatisfied parties.

Evaluating the Civil Justice System in Relation to Time

Fairness
Strengths

  • Lower waiting times in dispute resolution bodies like VCAT can facilitate timely and fair resolutions.

  • Case management powers can reduce resolution time and encourage procedural fairness.

Limitations

  • Delays can compromise procedural fairness and increase stress.

  • Delays can negatively impact the credibility of evidence.

Equality
Strengths

  • Orders and directions to reduce delays apply equally to both parties.

Limitations

  • Inconsistent use of case management powers among judges can create unequal treatment.

  • Delays disproportionately affect parties unfamiliar with court proceedings and those in vulnerable circumstances.

Access
Strengths

  • The range of dispute resolution bodies ensures accessible and efficient justice.

  • Judicial case management powers can encourage early case determination.

  • Alternative dispute resolution methods can result in prompt resolutions.

Limitations

  • Delays may discourage prospective plaintiffs from initiating legal action.

  • Parties may be forced to withdraw or settle cases due to limited financial resources.