Colonialism and Imperialism
Strategies, Reasons, Effects, Antagonists, Solutions, limitations to the solutions? Industrialization strategies pros and cons
Challenges of Post Imperalism
How to create a modern state, society, and economy?
They did not industrialize during the industrial revolution due to their imperial empires not allowing them to
Challenge: Building State Institutions
Challenge of creating effective political institutions
Weak capacity
Weak bureacratic structures after imperialism
State politicized by new leaders
Rent-seeking - parts of state “rented out” to supporters
Lack of pol. Infrastructure
Solution 1. Forging States
Borrow cash to build institutions – IRS, military, rule of law (police and courts)
Strengthen legal system, redirect state to provide public goods, not just regulate
“Shared sovereignty” a possible middle road – IOs overseeing taxation and revenue expense
Challenge: Forging Social Indentities
Making a single nation where none existed before
Group divisions with economic implications (one ethnic gorup controls eocnomy)
Group div. With pol. Implications (battles for pol. Power fall along ethnic, regilious lines ex: Iraq (Sunnis 35%)
Ethnic divisions in NIgeria (350 groups)
Ethnic ineuqlaity can hiner development
Solution: 2. Building Society
Borrow cash to develop an educational system and empower citizen
Diff matters less when 1. Common destiny
Challenge: Generating Economic Growth
Trapped in a system of “neocolonialism”
Solution 3: Industrialization
Borrow cash to develop industrial capacity – infrastructure (roads and factories)
Two paths to attempted to break pattern of dependency:
Import substitution
Export-oriented industrialization (comparative advantage)
To build industrial capacity and wealth
Industrialization strategies pros and cons
Import Substitution
Definition: develop local industries – a developmental strat in which industrialization occurs by encouraging the domestic production of industrial goods fro cosmetic consumption instead of depending on imports (insulation)
How: need investment for growth: increase investment → increase GDP, we cna only grow if we save, but savings are limited by consumption (starve consumption), we can borrow froom the rest of the world
Problems: 1. lack of competitiveness, little innovation, 2. Corruption – misallocation of resources – greater state subsidies and a cut for the politicians giving them, 3. ISI does not lead to exports, but does increase reliance on imports – leads to need to borrow foreign currency
Export-oriented Industrialization
Definition: state led, pushes resources to industries where comparative advantage already exists and export, then upgrade, goal is to export – not limited to domestic needs, shifts to emphasis on tech
Asia – fastest growing region
Summary:
State capacity …
Regime Type and Growth
Relationships and Nuances between political regime types and economic growth
EX: China and Singapore – growth sustained for years
Most rich countries in the world are democracies
Argument for non-democracy promoting growth:
Dem. prone to influ. By interest groups wgo promote private interests — thus, less money available for public interest projects that can promote growth such as argi. Subsidies, military-industrial complex ect.
More tax money spent on private needs crowds out investment in both the private sector (as the govt borrow from banks) and public sector (as it distributes to key constituencies)
Insulation from organized interest can prevent these pressures
Criticisms of non-democracies
1. But non dem rulers are not public-minded benevolent dictators
Insulation from the public gives them more leeway to engage in corruption
2. They are also not afraid of the political consequences of getting casught since there are no elections
3. Insecure property rights in non dem = people have no incentive to invest and try to improve their businesses. They can be taken from them at any point
= democratic institutions: separation of powers, judiciual review, and fear of not being reelected
No evidence that neither dem or non dem causes growth
However, the opposite relationship – that growth causes democracy seems to exist? How so?
Modernization Theory
Endogenous and Exogenous Explanation
Endogenous: empirics and logic
Exogenous: empirics and logic
The Inverted U Curve: Relationship between income distribution and democracy
Modernization theory: as societies become more rich they inevitably become more democratic??
Modernization associated with:
More education
Weakening of older, traditional inst, upward mobility
Greater gender equality
Rise of middle class
Close correlation between levels of economic development levels of economic development and the incidence of democratic regimes
Explanations:
Endogenous: democracies may be more likely to emerge as countries develop economically
Boix and Stokes
Testing the endogenous explanation:
Transitions are indeed increasingly likely as per capita income increases, but only until it reaches a level of about $6,000. Support endo!
Above that level dictatorships consolidate their power and become more stable
Probability that a regime is democratic predicted by its level of development breaches 50% at 4,155. But few countries in their sample (5/19) actually democratized – REJECT ENDO
Exogenous: democracies may be established independently off economic development but may be more likely to survive in economically advanced countries
Adam Prezeworski & Fernando Limongi
Testing the exogenous explanation:
Level of development, GPA per cpaita, does not have a strong impact on the survival of democracies
If high GPA, probability that a democracy will stay alive is high
Once a level of $6,055 in income is reached the dem is expected to last forever PROOF OF EXO
The Inverted U Curve
Acemoglu and Robinson: income matters but distribution matters more
Democratization depends on the extent to which autocratic elites fear the cost of redistribution under any future democratic system
Inverted U Curve
What does the Inverted U Curve really mean???
In equal autrocracies, there is little demand for economic redistribution, so elites have no incentive to liberalize
In highly unequal autocracies, on theother hand, lites fear redictrubution more, so they tend to repress rather than democratize
The probability of democratization is highest at middle levels of inequality
Olsen's Institutions
Causal Mechanisms and Conceptual Thinking
Evidence: Empirical studies on institutional impact
Policies: Policies that work and those that don't, and why?
READ THE OLSEN ARTICLES
Slides 55 to 63 I think
How can states promote or hinder development? Olsen’s analysis
Olsen: growing inequality in the world. Why?
1. National border mark differences in the scarcity of production resources
2. Mark differences in public policies and institutions
Thesis: econ performance is not a consequence of endowments
Criticisms and Elaborations
Alternative theories
Examples of institutional success or failure
African Politics of Permanent Crisis
Nuts and Bolts, definition, Effects, possible Solutions:
Nuts and Bolts: refers to the systems of governance, political institutions, leadrship styles, policy-making, and power dynamics that defiine poltical life across Africa
Effects
Political Effects
Weak dem institutions
Corruption
Election rigging
Military coups
Economic effects
Resource curse
Inequality and poverty
Infrastructure deficits
Solutions
Strengthen judicial independence
Transparent elections
Empower local governments
More anti-corruption measures
Reduce reliance on natural resources
Corruption and Its Effects
Causal Mechanisms: How corruption leads to specific negative outcomes in social, economic, and political spheres
Corruption Discourages investment
1. Corr = tax evasion decreases govt revenue and capacity to invest in infrastructure and education
2. Corr = unpredictable tax on profits
3. Corr = unstable environment (feeble property rights and enforcement)
Corruption increases inequality
1. Benefits from corr accrue to the better-connected in society, mostly to high-income groups – tax systems, credit, siphon off poverty-reducation programs
2. Corruption increases poverty by reducing the level of social services available to the poor and slowing growth
Corruption impedes development
1. Corr diverts funds unfairly or inefficiently
Ex: Uganda: no 50% salary boost for 30k school teachers and 46k policemen; no 18 million doses of anti-malaria medicine
2. Hijacked aid to – massive losses for the needy
Corruption leads to less competition
Corruption increases distrust of the state, decreases state capacity, endangers stability and peace
Less revenue to protect the populace
Lack of social cohesion, increase of feelings of estrangement between groups – possibility of ethnic ocnflict
When citizens do not trust the police, they do not report crimes – emboldens criminals and leads to higher crime rate
Human trafficking (Nigeria)
Armsa trafficking – terrorism
Drug trafficking (Mexico and Colombia)
The Mauritian Miracle (slide 58)
Reasons for Mauritius's economic success, institutions, policies?
Strong Institutions
Stable democracy with free elections
Peaceful power transitions
Low corruption – Idependent Comission Against Corruption
Economic Policies
Dependent on sugar exports, but expanded into textiles, tourism and finance – prevented the “resource curse”
Uses export-oriented industrialization – encouraged manufacturing industries
Resource Curse
Why are resources good and bad?
When are they good and bad?
Political and Economic Causality
Natural resources: why are they good?
1. You can sell them, 2. You can use them to produce value added goods. Coal in Britain (industrial Rev)
BUT: Poverty, inequality, lack of growth and stability in resource rich countries?
23 countries at least 60% of whose exports are oil = non-democracies
Other resources such as gold, diamonds, and gems – similar
Have had a lot of Civil Wars
Many non-oil countries are also dictatorships
Resource curse = lack of democratization and development?
Stability:
1. Domestic political instability and war
Vast wealth, higher incentives to not resdistribute that wealth. Higher determination to stay in power even if the price is repression
Creates incentives to rebel or secede – greed hypothesis
Wealth can finance rebel groups, terrorists too – facilitation hypothesis
Can result in corruption that can motivate factions to rebel – justice hypothesis
Geopolitics
2. Powerful actors want guaranteed supply to oil and prefer (freindly) non-democracies as they are more predictable. (Shah in Iran, US installed dictators in Lat Am, Chile/Pinochet-copper
Altervativesly, they may invade (MENA) – Russia, UK, US, Italy, Nazi Germany
No or lower taxation
3. Depriving people from the possibility to have a claim or voice
Leads to low accountability and representativeness
Subpar outcomes in law and order as well as rights
Economic inefficiency / Economic Causality
4. As taxation is low, civil services are low which impedes development/growth – no good roads, education
5. Nigerian disease – vast revenue – no investment in infrastructure and welfare, incentive to enhance corrupt politics – patronage, entrench and enrich elites
6. Dutch disease – natural resources - higher exports leads to (demand for local cash) more expensive currency, making other exports more expensive and thus less competitive
A resource boom increases foreign exchange earnings, raising the value of a country’s currency.
This makes non-resource exports (manufacturing, agriculture) less competitive in global markets.
The Story of Asian Success
Internal Factors, External Factors, Sustainability: Can Asian success stories maintain their growth?
Wade reading
Is Asia a success?
S. Korea – exaggerated – GDP per capita in 1988 was only 20% of that of the Northwest. Life expectancy of 69
Why extraordinary?
His numbers are wrong … today it is 70%
Structural explanations for success
1. High interest rates
Cheap credit. State in charge (mercantilism). Allocate it to the best performers
2. Subsidies. Manufacture a comparative advantage
More subsidies for wthose ho do well, cut those who underperform
3. Uncompetitive domestic environment – no problem, wean off subsidies. Companies export, subject to international companies like Sony, Panasonic, LG, Samsung – fight with Phillips, Siemens, Braun
4. A lot of education and schooling
Were they lucky?
At the time of their reforms,
1. Unskilled labor in the West was becoming scarce and more expensive
2. Falling transport costs
Blessed by geopolitics after the Cold War – US gave them aid
More schooling – test scores have a correlation with the economy overall