1 │ Title
EXSS3070 Week 9/10 — “CAD & PAD – Safe & Effective Delivery of Exercise”.
Lecturer: Dr Timothy English, Discipline of Exercise & Sport Science. XSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
2 │ ESSA Criteria — Exercise Science
Exercise Prescription & Delivery (4.2.12): deliver an exercise-based intervention already prescribed by a qualified health professional.
Professional Practice (1.2.x)
1.2.2 Follow privacy, confidentiality, consent & record-keeping laws.
1.2.3 Use appropriate verbal & non-verbal communication.
1.2.4 Create concise, respectful, informative clinical documents.
1.2.7 Self-reflect, seek feedback, pursue CPD. XSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
3 │ ESSA Criteria — Foundational Knowledge
2.2.1 Integrate anatomy-to-pathophysiology knowledge to build safe exercise.
2.2.3 Evaluate acute & chronic physiological responses across the health spectrum.
2.2.6 Apply clinical, ethical, evidence-based reasoning when prescribing. XSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
4 │ ESSA Criteria — Prescription & Outcome Evaluation
4.2.2 Design & monitor interventions for complex presentations with multiple comorbidities.
4.2.3 Continuously manage risk & adapt programs with measured outcomes.
4.2.7 Report progress to clients & other professionals.
4.2.8 Critically evaluate intervention effectiveness to guide future practice. XSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
5 │ Learning Outcomes
Unit LO (2, 4, 5, 6, 7) emphasise:
Evidence-based planning, safe conduct, monitoring, referral, professional conduct, chronic-disease interaction, prevention roles.
Lecture LO:
Use ESSA & ACSM ExRx for CAD & PAD.
List safety precautions/contra-indications.
Memorise monitoring cut-offs.
Respond appropriately to adverse events.
Relate acute & chronic exercise effects to pathophysiology.
Produce gold-standard clinical documentation. XSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
6 │ Section Banner – Guidelines
Announces that Slides 7-12 summarise the primary ESSA & ACSM guidelines for HT, CAD, PAD. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
GUIDELINES (Slides 7 → 12)
7 │ ESSA HT Position Stand (2019 Sharman et al.)
Emphasises exercise as core non-pharmacologic therapy for hypertension.
≥ 5 days/week moderate aerobic activity.
Notes emerging evidence for isometric hand-grip in BP control. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
8 │ ACSM HT Guidelines (2004 Pescatello)
FITT | Detailed prescription | Notes |
Freq. | 7/7 days (daily) | Maximise post-exercise hypotension |
Int. | 40-59 % HRR (RPE 12-13) | “Moderate” |
Time | 30-60 min per session | Continuous or intermittent bouts |
Type | Large-muscle aerobic (walk/jog/run/cycle). Resistance as adjunct. | Resistance lowers BP too, but to a lesser magnitude than endurance work. |
9 │ ACC/AHA HT Guideline Table (2017)
Mode | Core Prescription | Expected Δ SBP | Expected Δ DBP |
Aerobic | ≥ 150 min·wk⁻¹ @ 60-80 % HRR | −5 mmHg | −2 → −3 mmHg |
Resistance | 60-80 % 1RM, > 8 ex, ≥ 3 d·wk⁻¹ | −3 → −6 | −3 → −5 |
Isometric | 4 × 2 min @ 30-40 % MVC, unilateral arms + legs | −4 → −9 | −4 |
10 │ ACSM CAD Guidelines (1994 Van Camp et al.)
Frequency: ≥ 3 supervised sessions / week.
Intensity: 40-85 % HRR but below ischaemic/arrhythmic threshold.
Time: 10 min warm-up → 20-40 min training → 10 min cool-down.
Type: Aerobic (LB focus); arm ergometer if LE contra-indicated.
Resistance: Circuit ≤ 10-12 ex, 10-12 reps, comfortable loads; introduce ≥ 4-5 wk post-event. XSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
11 │ Guidelines vs Evidence (Hollings 2017 SR)
Progressive resistance training (PRT) improves VO₂peak equivalently to aerobic training in CHD.
PRT + AT combination = larger gains in fitness & strength.
High-intensity PRT may outperform the low-moderate loads usually recommended. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
12 │ ESSA PAD Position Stand (2014 Askew et al.)
Supervised treadmill/track walking to near-max claudication pain is gold standard for collateral formation.
Provides ankle-brachial index (ABI) categories, claudication scales & medication considerations. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
SAFETY & MONITORING (Slides 14 → 28)
13 │ Section Divider – “Safety Precautions & Monitoring”
Introduces 5 pre-exercise slides, 6 in-exercise slides & 4 post-exercise/medication slides. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
PRE-EXERCISE CONTRA-INDICATIONS (Slides 14-18)
14 │ Contra-indications (1 / 5)
Absolute: uncontrolled HT > 180/110 mmHg, unstable heart disease, aortic aneurysm, symptomatic hernia, proliferative retinopathy (or laser < 6 wk), rapidly progressive/terminal illness.
Education: patient must recognise own angina pattern & carry nitrolingual spray. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
15 │ Contra-indications (2 / 5)
Unstable angina (unpredictable, may occur at rest) = do not exercise; precursor to MI.
Both EP & client should understand personal HR or RPP ceilings.
Post-MI clients frequently have concurrent PAD ± DM; likely on β-blockers & ACEi that blunt HR/BP. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
16 │ Contra-indications (3 / 5)
Always confirm medication compliance before sessions.
Screen for new neuropathy, ulcers, retinal bleeds, dizziness, dyspnoea, oedema. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
17 │ Contra-indications (4 / 5)
Reinforce home BP/HR logs; check for out-of-clinic instability.
Update emergency contacts each review. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
18 │ Contra-indications (5 / 5 – Thompson 2007 JPS)
Use Joint Position Statement algorithm: any new or worsening cardiovascular symptom → defer & refer. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
INTRA-EXERCISE STOP CRITERIA (Slides 19-23)
19 │ Termination Thresholds
Hypertensive
SBP > 250 mmHg or DBP > 115 mmHg.
SBP rise ≥ 40 mmHg to small workload jump.
SBP drop or flat response → suspect LV dysfunction / severe aortic stenosis / ischaemia.
Ischaemic / Arrhythmic
≥ 1 mm ST-depression (vs baseline).
Angina ≥ 2 on 0-4 scale.
Any ventricular arrhythmia.
Claudication
≥ 3 on claudication scale. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
20 │ Warm-Up & Cool-Down Protocol
10 min each at HR ≈ training HR − 20 bpm (same modality).
Adequate warm-up reduces exercise-induced ischaemia & arrhythmia; inadequate prep is a common cause of cardiac events. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
Study: PCI/CABG pts (n = 15) performed 3 × 15RM vs 3 × 4RM. Despite heavier load, HR/SBP/DBP equal at rep 4; at rep 15 haemodynamics far higher → volume, not intensity drives BP/HR rise → high-load low-rep is safer early-phase. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
21 │ Angina Scale (0-4)
0 No pain → 4 Worst imaginable.
Action: at 1: reduce intensity; at ≥ 2: stop, administer nitrates (see Slide 31).
Warn of silent ischaemia in diabetes → rely on HR/BP & RPP, not just symptoms. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
22 │ Claudication Scale
0 no pain · 1 onset · 2 moderate · 3 severe · 4 maximal pain.
Protocol: walk to ≥ 3, rest to full relief, repeat. Proven to extend pain-free & total walk distance. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
23 │ Resistance Training Timing (Post-MI & CABG)
Stent/PCI: Light-moderate loads 3-5 wk post-procedure.
CABG:
20-40 % RM at 4 wk.
40-60 % RM at 8 wk.
Avoid UB > 50 % MVC for 8-12 wk (sternal healing).
Technique checklist: slow controlled tempo (2 s exhale, 4 s inhale), full ROM, avoid Valsalva, alternate UB/LB.
PAD nuance: prioritise PRT if claudication severe, ulcers present, high fall risk; avoid leg press to limit intramuscular pressure. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
24 │ Special Notes — Previous MI
Expect VO₂peak 30-50 % below age-norms and blunted SBP rise.
Monitor graft patency; ECG helpful.
Sternum not fully healed ≤ 12 wk; limit UB loading & public-pool swimming (infection). EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
MEDICATIONS (Slides 25-26)
25 │ Long-term Cardiovascular Medications
Class | Exercise impact | Key side-effects |
β-blockers | ↓ HR → ↑ diastolic time (good); HR plateau ≈ 110 bpm | Worsen asthma if non-selective |
Ca-channel blockers | Variable HR; ↓ BP | Hypotension, headache, constipation |
Diuretics | ↓ BP | Dehydration, postural hypotension |
ACEi / ARB | ↓ BP + reflex ↑ HR | Cough (ACEi), hypotension |
Anticoagulants | No haemodynamic change | Bruising / bleeding risk |
26 │ Adapting for Meds
Use RPE in place of HR for β-blocked clients.
Prolong cool-down for ACEi/ARB users to offset exaggerated post-exercise hypotension. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
POST-EXERCISE MONITORING (Slides 27-28)
27 │ Post-Exercise Hypotension
Normally beneficial, but can be exaggerated with meds.
Ensure SBP returns to resting or below; persistent elevation may indicate LV dysfunction.
In high-risk CAD, keep ECG/HR visible until ST segments & RPP normalise. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
28 │ Monitoring Matrix & “Signs!”
Aerobic:
Continuous HR.
BP/RPE/angina every 3-5 min early, then every 15-20 min once predictable.
Calculate RPP each stage and stay below IT.
PRT:
HR throughout.
BP & RPP pre/post each set.
Early weeks: RPE ≤ 13; later progress ≤ 16.
Golden rule: Watch the client, not just the numbers—colour, facial expression, gait, speech. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
ADVERSE EVENTS (Slides 30-32)
29 │ Section Divider – “Adverse Events & Response”
30 │ Adverse-Event Table & Responses
Event | Mandatory response |
MI, unstable angina, VT/VF, stroke signs, poor perfusion | STOP, DRSABCD, document case note + incident report |
Swollen limbs / pitting oedema | Do not start exercise → refer GP |
Worsening claudication at lower workload | Stop & refer GP |
BP/HR not normalising post-exercise | DRSABCD, document |
Non-healing wounds / gangrene | Refer GP; ambulance if systemic |
31 │ Acute Angina Treatment —
Nitrates
Anginine tabs: must fizz; repeat every 3 min; max 3 → call ambulance.
Nitrolingual spray: 1 spray every 5 min; max 3.
Side-effects: hypotension, syncope, headache → seat patient. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
32 │ Section Banner – “Acute & Chronic Responses”
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY & ACUTE RESPONSE (Slides 33-42)
33 │ Parallel Concepts
CAD: cardiac work (MVO₂) vs coronary flow.
PAD: skeletal muscle work (VO₂) vs limb blood flow. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
34 │ MVO₂ Determinants
Formula: MVO₂ = coronary flow × (a-v)O₂ diff.
Coronary flow ∝ Diastolic BP × Diastolic time / Resistance.
Exercise ↑ HR → ↓ diastolic time → potential ischaemia in CAD. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
35 │ Coronary Flow vs Cardiac Cycle
Most flow in diastole; faster HR compresses diastole → emphasise HR ceilings during exercise. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
36 │ Rate-Pressure Product
RPP = HR × SBP → convenient field surrogate for MVO₂ & individual angina threshold. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
37 │ PAD Oxygen Equation
VO₂ = (CO × aO₂) – (CO × vO₂).
Manifestations: claudication, atypical leg pain, gangrene/ulcers when demand > supply. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
38 │ Ischaemia Cascade
Supply < Demand → O₂ deprivation → metabolite accumulation → cellular acidosis →
↓ force generation → ECG/ST changes & angina (CAD) or claudication / ulcers (PAD). ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
39 │ Acute Exercise Interactions
HT patients: HR/SBP ↑; normal hearts tolerate; post-exercise BP ↓ via vasodilation.
CAD/PAD: same rise may breach thresholds → angina/claudication. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
40 │ Graph – Angina Threshold by RPP
Shows linear RPP vs workload; angina occurs at individual fixed RPP. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
41 │ β-Blocker Effect
β-blockade lowers HR → same RPP reached at higher external workload → functional gain, but underlying threshold unchanged. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
42 │ (Continuation Graph)
Illustrates shift in workload-RPP curve with β-blockers (Amsterdam 1977). EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
CHRONIC ADAPTATIONS & MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE (Slides 43-53)
43 │ Secondary Prevention Targets (AHA/ACCF 2011)
Smoking cessation.
BP < 140/90 mmHg.
LDL < 2.6 mmol·L⁻¹ (statin).
≥ 30 min PA daily.
Waist < 89 cm (♀) / 102 cm (♂); BMI 18.5-24.9 kg·m⁻².
HbA1c < 7 %.
Antiplatelet/anticoagulant, ACEi/ARB, β-blockers.
Influenza vaccination, depression screening, cardiac rehab. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
44 │ Clinical & Functional Status Toolkit
BP: Holter or electronic cuff.
Lipids & HbA1c: lab tests; BG pre/post-exercise if diabetic.
Self-report PA: e.g., IPAQ.
Anthropometry: waist, body mass.
Psychometric: DASS, GDS.
Performance: VO₂peak, workload, strength, function (6MWT). Re-assess every 6-12 mo. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
45 │ Chronic Adaptations – Fundamentals
HT: aim to chronically reduce resting BP → ↓ CVD mortality.
CAD/PAD: lower sub-max MVO₂/VO₂, enlarge collateral vessels, improve mitochondrial density. EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
46 │ Graph – Anti-Ischaemic Training Effect
After training, for the same external workload: RPP lower, mitochondrial/fatigue resistance higher.
Important: angina RPP itself doesn’t change, but daily tasks fall further below the threshold. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
47 │ Endothelial Function (FMD)
Figure shows % increase in brachial artery flow-mediated dilation after training → systemic endothelial health improves. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
48 │ Arterial Compliance (Pulse-Wave Velocity)
Trzos 2007: post-MI rehab ↓ PWV, indicating ↑ arterial elasticity & ↓ afterload. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
49 │ PAD: Walking vs PRT
Walking to claudication pain improves pain-free & total 6MWD and VO₂peak.
High-intensity PRT trial showed +62 m in 6MWD — larger than average aerobic trials (+35 m).
Choose PRT when claudication, ulcers, neuropathy or fall risk limit walking. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
50 │ Outcomes of PRT (All CVD)
↓ sub-max RPP.
Large ↑ muscle strength & endurance.
↑ Treadmill capacity & endurance time.
↓ RPE, HR, BP at given load.
Favourable metabolic changes: ↑ HDL, ↓ LDL/TG, ↑ insulin sensitivity, ↑ BMD, ↓ depressive symptoms. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
51 │ RCT — Aerobic vs Aerobic + PRT
10 wk, 2 d·wk⁻¹ PRT (start 40-50 % 1RM → 80 % 1RM, 3 sets).
Same aerobic prescription both groups.
At 6 mo post-CR, combo group superior in strength, lifting endurance & VO₂peak. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
52 │ Graph – Combo Benefits
Bars illustrate > strength, > lifting endurance, > aerobic endurance for Aer + R group. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
53 │ Typical Comorbidities Map
CAD & PAD rarely isolated; frequent overlap with AMI, CVA, valve disease, HT, CHF, MetS, T2D, CKD, COPD.
Exercise counters physical deterioration → preserves capacity & function. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
RECORD-KEEPING & RESOURCES (Slides 54-58)
54 │ Section Divider – Record Keeping
55 │ Clinical Documentation Essentials
Why document?
Accountability — prove appropriate service.
Legal — case notes admissible in court.
History — ensure continuity & appropriate future care.
Referral — provide concise info to other agencies.
Standard contents: client details, presenting complaint, contact type, issues, action plan, next meeting, date, signature/position, line through blank space (hardcopy). EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
56 │ Section Banner – Resources
57 │ Key Guideline & Review Papers (1 / 2)
2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guideline (Whelton et al.).
Worldwide CVD prevalence review (Laslett et al.).
PRT + AT systematic review in CHD (Hollings et al.).
AHA scientific statements on functional capacity & PA promotion (Forman 2017; Lobelo 2018).
AHA risk statement on exercise & acute CV events (Thompson 2007). EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
58 │ Key Guideline & Review Papers (2 / 2)
ESSA PAD position stand (Askew 2014).
Meta-analyses on exercise for PAD: Parmenter 2013, 2014, 2015; Haas 2012; Kruidenier 2012. ‡EXSS3070+Wk+10+lecture+CAD+PAD+Ex+Delivery+2024.pdf](file-service://file-QAYveeU8p6TF2zZAZXbEQi)
How to Use These Notes
The wording mirrors the slides; tables & figures are expanded so you see all data points (e.g., FITT numbers, thresholds, medication doses).
Citations beside every bullet trace back to the exact slide for fast cross-checks.
When revising, focus on:
Termination & cut-off numbers (Slides 19-23).
FITT prescriptions & differences between CAD, PAD, HT (Slides 7-12).
RPP calculation & angina threshold concept (Slides 33-41).
Chronic adaptation graphs (Slides 46-48).
Slide 22 explanation - A “true” 1 RM test is often safer than using a predicted 1 RM because:
Reason | Why it matters for safety |
Lower cardiovascular load | A direct 1 RM is one brief lift; a prediction test asks for 5–15 near-max reps to fatigue (e.g., 5 RM-to-failure or 10 RM). The cumulative time-under-tension and repeated Valsalva manoeuvres drive heart-rate, systolic BP and rate-pressure-product higher than a single lift. In CAD studies, HR rose more after the final set of 40 %1 RM × 16 reps than after 80 %1 RM × 8 reps |
Less technique breakdown | Fatigue over multiple reps degrades form, increasing shear and compressive joint forces and the chance of soft-tissue injury. A single concentrically controlled rep, with spotters, lets the lifter maintain optimal posture throughout. |
More accurate loading | Prediction equations (Epley, Brzycki, etc.) carry ±10–15 % error; if they over-estimate, subsequent training loads can be set too heavy—posing a bigger risk than the single test itself. Testing the actual 1 RM removes this guess-work. |
Shorter exposure to strain | Total mechanical work (load × reps) and metabolic cost are several-fold higher in a predictive set, so musculoskeletal and cardiometabolic stress accumulate more. |
In short: one properly supervised maximal repetition produces a brief, easily contained spike in intrathoracic pressure and blood pressure, while multi-rep “prediction” sets pile up cardiovascular, metabolic and technique-related risks and may mis-lead programming. Hence your lecturer prefers a tested 1 RM for both accuracy and safety.