(1732) The ROLES and POWERS of the President [AP Gov Review Unit 2 Topic 4 (2.4)]
Overview of the roles and powers of the President of the United States (P.O.T.U.S).
Aim of the video: to explain how the president can implement a policy agenda.
Definition: The set of policies a candidate promises to enact if elected.
An informal contract between the president and voters regarding expected actions and laws.
The president cannot pass laws directly; this power belongs to Congress.
The president can still influence law-making through formal and informal powers.
Definition: The president can reject bills from Congress.
Origin of the term: "veto" comes from Latin meaning "I forbid."
Process: After receiving a bill, the president has 10 days to sign it into law or veto it. A vetoed bill can be overridden by Congress with a two-thirds vote.
Strategy: Presidents often communicate their willingness to veto legislation to guide Congress in crafting bills they will support.
Definition: An indirect veto that occurs if the president does not sign a bill and Congress adjourns within the 10-day period.
Implication: The bill does not become law if the president does not act.
Definition: The president's role as the head of the U.S. Armed Forces.
Run through foreign policy initiatives based on an agenda.
Example: Joe Biden's decision to withdraw troops from Afghanistan as part of his campaign promise.
Definition: The ability of the president to influence Congress and the public to pass legislation.
Impact of approval ratings: Higher ratings enable more leverage in Congress.
Example: Lyndon Johnson's successful Great Society legislation due to high approval; Clinton's healthcare reform struggles at lower approval ratings.
Definition: Directives issued by the president with the force of law.
Scope of authority: Used to direct federal agencies or allocate funds for the implementation of policies.
Example: Trump's diversion of funds for building a border wall via an executive order, and Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation as a military strategy.
Definition: A statement issued by the president when signing a bill into law that outlines how he interprets the law.
Common use: Presidents might disagree with aspects of the law while still signing it, influencing how it is executed.
Example: Franklin Roosevelt's signing statement regarding a World War II law he believed contained unconstitutional sections.
Definition: International agreements made by the president without Senate approval; not formal treaties.
Politically binding but not legally binding: Valid only while the president is in office.
Example: Obama's Paris Accord agreement on climate change, and how Trump and Biden’s differing approaches impacted U.S. involvement.
Summary of how the president uses both formal and informal powers to enact policy agendas.
Encouragement to subscribe and engage with further educational materials.
Presidential power exists within a framework of checks and balances, which includes significant limitations imposed by Congress.
The president's agenda can cause tensions and confrontations with Congress, particularly the Senate.
Advice and Consent: The Senate has the constitutional power to approve treaties and various presidential appointments.
The president appoints ambassadors to represent the U.S. in foreign countries.
Senate Approval: This appointment typically receives swift and straightforward approval from the Senate (rubber-stamped).
Appointments to the White House staff do not require Senate approval.
Staffers often include campaign allies and longtime friends of the president.
The president appoints members of the cabinet, who are heads of major executive departments.
Senate Approval: Cabinet appointments require Senate approval, which is usually met without significant contention.
Historical Note: High-profile cabinet appointments can lead to tension, such as Betsy DeVos in 2017, where her confirmation resulted in a tie in the Senate.
The tie was broken by Vice President Mike Pence in favor of DeVos.
Appointments to federal courts, especially the Supreme Court, are the most contentious.
The stakes are high as justices serve for life, influencing the judiciary long term.
Contentious Examples:
Robert Bork (1987): Nominated by Ronald Reagan but rejected due to concerns over his judicial philosophy and views.
His rejection was public and contentious, leading to the term "borking" for character assassination hearings against judicial nominees.
Brett Kavanaugh (2018): Nominated by Donald Trump and faced intense scrutiny regarding past behavior and allegations, ultimately confirmed but still underwent a "borking" process.
Understanding these dynamics helps grasp the complexities of presidential power and the importance of Senate cooperation in appointments, especially in the high-stakes environment surrounding judicial nominations.
Expansion of FEDERAL POWER [AP Gov Review Unit 2 Topic 6 (2.6)]
The power of the presidency has significantly increased since Franklin Roosevelt, with estimates suggesting an increase of 13 to 14 metric butt loads.
The video aims to explain how presidents interpret and justify their formal and informal powers.
Formal Powers: Explicitly granted to the president in Article 2 of the Constitution.
Examples include:
Vetoing legislation
Appointing federal judges
Informal Powers: Not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but exercised by presidents.
Examples include:
Bargaining
Persuasion
Executive agreements
Executive orders
The trend shows that presidents have increasingly utilized both formal and informal powers, leading to a more powerful executive branch compared to the early republic.
Anti-federalists expressed concerns during the Constitution ratification debates about the potential for presidential power to expand uncontrollably.
Federalist 70 (Hamilton): Argues for a strong single executive as a safeguard.
A single executive can act decisively, and the clear identification of one person holding power ensures accountability.
In contrast, anti-federalists feared a monarchy.
Teddy Roosevelt: Advocated for a broad interpretation of executive power.
Believed the president should act as a steward of the people, unless restricted by the Constitution.
William Howard Taft: Favored a restricted interpretation.
Argued that the president can only exercise powers explicitly granted or reasonably implied by the Constitution.
George Washington: Limited executive power, often deferring to Congress.
Andrew Jackson: Shifted the view, acting more as a populist and increasing his use of vetoes (12 compared to Washington's 2).
Abraham Lincoln: Expanded powers during the Civil War, including suspending habeas corpus and taking significant executive actions to save the Union.
Franklin Roosevelt: Major expansion of executive powers.
Implemented New Deal policies in response to the Great Depression.
Increased government spending and created numerous agencies.
Was elected four times, challenging the two-term tradition and attempted judicial appointments in favor of his policies.
Post-FDR, presidential power has generally remained stronger than at the republic's inception.
Debates today among Republicans and Democrats hinge on the size of government rather than reversing executive power expansion.
Despite increased power, there remain checks and balances:
Impeachment: Donald Trump was impeached twice, becoming part of history alongside Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson. Although he was not removed from office, it emphasized that presidential power is not unassailable.
22nd Amendment: Ratified after FDR's presidency, limiting presidents to two terms, establishing a formal check on executive power.
Federalist 70, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Documents]
Topic: Federalist 70 by Alexander Hamilton
Purpose: Justification for a single executive during the Constitution ratification debates.
Anti-Federalists feared investing power in one executive due to its resemblance to monarchy.
Proposed a council of executives to prevent any one individual from becoming tyrannical.
Hamilton rejects the idea of multiple executives, asserting:
A single executive is essential for a responsive government.
Energy in the executive is a fundamental trait for effective governance.
Definition: Energy implies the capacity to act quickly and decisively.
Contrast with Legislative Branch:
Legislative deliberation slows down decision-making due to the need for debate and compromise.
Unity
Hamilton argues that one executive ensures more energy where decision-making, activity, secrecy, and dispatch are prevalent.
Quote: "Decision, activity, secrecy, and dispatch will generally characterize the proceedings of one man..."
Consequence: A multitude of executives leads to diminished energy and effectiveness, especially in crises.
Responsibility
Multiple executives can obscure accountability; it may be unclear who is responsible for failures.
Hamilton states that if mismanagement occurs among several individuals, it becomes impractical to identify the culpable party.
Simplified accountability: A single executive allows citizens to know who to hold accountable for failures or corruption.
Summary: While concerns about monarchical power exist, a single executive is crucial for energy and accountability in government.
Hamilton's stance promotes a government that can effectively respond to crises with clarity in leadership responsibilities.
Focus on how communication technology has shaped the president's relationship with the national constituency and other branches of government.
The president has a unique advantage over other politicians due to widespread recognition.
/
Public Recognition of the President:
People widely know the president; many may not know their congressional representatives.
The president embodies the executive branch’s visibility and influence.
Informal Powers of the President:
Persuasion is a critical informal power used to enact policies through Congress.
Communication is key in persuading legislators to align with the presidential agenda.
Definition:
Coined by President Teddy Roosevelt; describes the president's ability to influence public opinion and policy through communication.
"Bully" historically means excellent or great, emphasizing the potential of the presidency as a platform to drive change.
Effective Communication:
When the president speaks, the nation pays attention, creating opportunities for legislative advocacy.
State of the Union Address:
Only constitutionally required presidential communication.
Historically, Washington delivered it in person; modern presidents adapted it into televised formats starting with Woodrow Wilson.
Annual event; serves to outline policy recommendations to Congress and the public.
Historical Context:
Earlier presidents relied on newspapers; filtering by journalists limited direct interaction with the public.
Franklin D. Roosevelt's Innovations:
Introduced "fireside chats" via radio during the Great Depression to explain policies directly to Americans.
Successfully garnered public support for his New Deal legislation through accessible communication.
Television:
Transformed presidential communication further by adding visual elements to messaging.
Notable debates (Nixon vs. Kennedy) showed significant differences in public perception based on how candidates appeared visually on-screen.
Rise of Social Media:
Platforms like Twitter and Facebook allowed presidents to communicate directly without media filtering.
Enhanced speed and frequency of communication, reshaping public engagement.
Barack Obama’s Strategy:
Effectively used social media during his campaign and presidency to keep constituents informed.
Donald Trump’s Tenure:
Maximized Twitter, averaging 35 tweets per day in his last year, using it for public engagement and political commentary.
However, faced restrictions as Twitter banned his account following the Capitol insurrection incitement.
Communication technology has continually evolved, fundamentally altering the dynamics of presidential outreach and influence over time.
Understanding these changes is crucial for studying the interpersonal relationship between the presidency and the public in AP Government.
The Federal BUREAUCRACY [AP Gov Review Unit 2 Topic 12 (2.12)]
The federal bureaucracy is comprised of millions of employees responsible for executing the duties of the federal government, falling under the executive branch's authority.
The primary role of the executive branch is to enforce laws passed by Congress, necessitating a large workforce.
There are 15 cabinet departments, each led by department heads who form the president's cabinet.
Notable examples include:
Department of Defense
Department of Education
Each department is divided into agencies working together toward departmental goals.
Example: The Department of the Treasury aims to maintain a strong economy, involving several agencies such as:
Internal Revenue Service (IRS): Collects taxes and regulates tax policy.
United States Mint: Produces coinage and currency.
These commissions operate independently of presidential authority yet still fall under the executive branch.
Their main function is to regulate specific societal aspects.
Example: Federal Communications Commission (FCC) oversees broadcast standards and censorship.
Hybrid entities combining government functions with private business characteristics.
Created to offer public services typically serviced better by the free market.
Example: U.S. Postal Service provides mail services.
Bureaucracies write and enforce regulations to uphold legislative intent.
Example: The FCC mandated closed captioning for the hearing impaired in the mid-90s.
Enforcement mechanisms include fines for not adhering to regulations, which can include:
IRS: Penalizes late tax filings.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Fines industries that violate environmental laws like the Clean Air Act.
Bureaucratic heads, who are experts in their fields, often testify in congressional committees regarding agency operations.
Collaboration between bureaucracies, congressional committees, and interest groups forms an iron triangle, where:
Bureaucrats provide expertise to committees.
Committees control funding and engage with interest groups that can influence policy.
This cooperation often influences congressional policy-making.
Initially, the bureaucracy operated under the spoils system, where jobs were granted based on political support rather than qualifications.
Example: The assassination of President James Garfield in 1881, triggered by rejecting an applicant related to the spoils system.
The aftermath of Garfield's assassination led to the Pendleton Civil Service Act of 1883, introducing a merit-based system for hiring in the bureaucracy to increase qualifications and effectiveness.
This reform continued into the 20th century, making the bureaucracy more professional and specialized.
Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 furthered these efforts by promoting opportunities for women and enhancing departmental efficiency.
Understanding the federal bureaucracy's functions, structure, and evolution is crucial for grasping how the executive branch operates in enforcing laws and regulations.
Discretionary & Rule Making Authority [AP Gov Review Unit 2 Topic 13 (2.13)]
The federal bureaucracy consists of the millions of individuals working in various government agencies under the executive branch.
Its primary role is to execute the laws enacted by Congress and interpreted by the Supreme Court.
The president, as the figurehead of the executive branch, is responsible for enforcing the law but cannot do so alone, hence the role of bureaucracy.
Definition: The power granted to bureaucratic agencies to make specific rules and regulations under the broader laws passed by Congress.
Bureaucracies possess rule-making authority, enabling them to create detailed guidelines on how laws are to be implemented.
An analogy: When parents delegate authority to a child to manage a sibling's chores, the child decides the specifics of how those chores are done based on the parent's general directive.
Department of Homeland Security
Protects against terrorism and manages border control.
Has discretion over immigration admission and asylum seeker regulations.
Department of Transportation
Oversees all modes of transportation, affecting travel regulations.
Makes rules for flight attendant work hours and required rest periods.
Department of Veteran Affairs
Responsible for the welfare of veterans, including healthcare and benefits.
Creates rules for veterans' hospitals and education/home loan requirements.
Department of Education
Manages the implementation of federal educational standards by states.
Develops rules for federal grant allocations and school qualification criteria.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Aims to protect the environment and public health through regulations.
Establishes rules preventing pollution, such as regulations on nuclear waste disposal.
Federal Elections Commission (FEC)
Administers and enforces laws related to campaign finance.
Sets rules for candidate qualifications, fundraising limits, and spending regulations.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Regulates the stock market and protects against fraud.
Enforces rules against insider trading and ensures transparency in stock transactions.
Understanding these examples helps clarify how bureaucratic discretion aids in practical law enforcement and public administration.
(2093) Holding the BUREAUCRACY Accountable [AP Gov Review Unit 2 Topics 14-15 (2.14-15)]
The federal bureaucracy plays a significant role in implementing laws, using delegated discretionary authority and rule-making procedures.
Oversight from Congress, the President, and sometimes the Supreme Court is essential for ensuring that the bureaucracy functions as intended.
Congress wants the bureaucratic agencies to implement laws as intended.
Two primary methods for Congress to check the bureaucracy:
Congress can hold hearings where agency directors testify on their progress in carrying out laws.
Example: Judiciary Committee hearing regarding the FBI's failure to act on Olympic gymnasts' abuse reports.
Congress controls funding for bureaucratic agencies via authorization of spending measures.
Agencies must receive approval before spending taxpayer money.
The Budget and Empowerment Control Act of 1974 gave Congress enhanced power over budgetary decisions.
The President has formal and informal powers to ensure bureaucracy aligns with the presidential agenda.
Appointment Power
The President can appoint heads of agencies who align with their policy goals.
Example: President Trump fired James Comey as FBI director due to disagreement over the handling of a Russia investigation.
Executive Orders
The President can use executive orders to direct agencies towards specific agendas.
Example: Executive Order 11246 by President Lyndon B. Johnson promoted affirmative action in federal contracting to enforce civil rights.
Bureaucratic inefficiencies can occur due to the time-consuming process of compliance monitoring.
Agencies must follow up to ensure rules are followed but this can slow down policy implementation.
The judicial branch can check the bureaucracy through judicial review.
If bureaucratic rules or regulations are challenged as unconstitutional, individuals have the right to appeal to the courts.
Generally, courts favor agencies unless there's a clear constitutional violation.