A

The Wisdom of Repugnance: Why We Should Ban the Cloning of Humans Study Notes

Introduction to Human Cloning

  • Discussed in the Valparaiso University Law Review, Volume 32, No. 2, Spring 1998, pages 679-705.

  • Focus on ethical implications and the arguments against human cloning.

The Context of Human Cloning

  • Commission Report (June 1997):

    • Concluded human cloning is "morally unacceptable" at this time.

    • Recommended continuance of the President’s moratorium on federal funding for cloning.

    • Called for federal legislation to prohibit attempts to create a child via cloning for the next 3-5 years.

  • Congressional Action:

    • Bills were introduced in both the House and Senate to prohibit federal funds for cloning research.

    • A specific House bill aimed to make it illegal for anyone to use a human somatic cell to produce a human clone.

Cloning's Public Recognition

  • History of Cloning Awareness:

    • Cloning entered public discourse approximately 30 years ago with successful asexual reproduction techniques.

    • Joshua Lederberg, Nobel Laureate, popularized the discussion on human cloning in the 1960s via publications.

    • He emphasized eugenic advantages of cloning and genetic engineering.

Moral and Ethical Concerns

  • Deterioration of Moral Discourse:

    • Post-Dolly discussions reveal irony and moral fatigue in public sentiment about cloning.

    • Significant voices advocating against cloning have faded, leading to a cynical acceptance of the technology.

    • Cloning serves as a representation of contemporary societal views on reproduction.

Philosophical Shifts

  • Cultural Change:

    • Societal views on procreation, sexuality, and family structure have shifts influenced by various movements (sexual revolution, feminism).

    • Postmodern view undermines the natural connection between sexuality and procreation.

Cloning: The Technological and Ethical Struggle

  • Arguments for Cloning:

    • Some bioethicists advocate for cloning as a form of personal empowerment and reproductive freedom.

    • Cloning viewed as a way to exercise individual rights in reproduction, to create desired offspring.

  • Counter-arguments:

    • Cloning depersonalizes conceptions of identity and individuality, raising concerns about progeny created from planned genetic constructs.

    • Represents a potential threat to traditional family structures, complicating relationships and definitions tied to kinship.

  • Distinction from Traditional Procreation:

    • Traditional procreation involves both sexes contributing to the genesis of a child, ensuring an inherent uncertainty and individuality.

    • Cloning negates this by designed manipulation of genetics, leading to ethical concerns about control and identity.

The Nature of Human Experience

  • Identity Issues:

    • Cloned individuals may face unique identity crises, carrying the weight of their genetic predecessor's life experiences.

  • Concerns arise regarding the emotional, social, and psychological burdens these unique relationships entail.

    • Explores the repugnant nature of cloning from societal, psychological, and moral aspects, creating a discourse on the loss of individuality.

Ethical Perspectives on Cloning

  • Liberal Perspective: Defends the freedom to reproduce and opposes limits based on subjective desires of parents.

  • Meliorist Perspective: Advocates for improving the human condition through genetic control and enhancement technology.

  • Critique of These Approaches: Asserts that these perspectives oversimplify the profound implications of human reproduction and experience.

The Call to Action

  • Proposed Legislative Action:

    • Suggests the need for a federal ban on human cloning through legislative means.

    • Acknowledges the potential ineffectiveness of such bans but argues for an ethical responsibility to protect humanity from manufacturing practices akin to cloning.

  • Research Implications: Calls for cautious consideration of cloning research, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between human and animal cloning.

  • Rejection of cloning practices in all forms raises questions regarding the future of scientific ethics.

    • Encourages a commitment to moral and ethical principles as biotechnology advances.

Conclusion

  • Emphasizes the need to maintain human dignity in the face of rapidly evolving genetic technologies.

  • The author concludes that a serious, clear-eyed commitment is necessary to secure the ethical integrity of human reproduction against cloning.