Autism
Chronological Age (CA)
Cognitive Development
Collectivist Societies
Competence
Conceptual Shift
Cross-Cultural Study
Deceptive Box Task
Down’s Syndrome
Egocentric
False Belief
Hindsight Bias
Hunter–Gatherer Tribe
Individualistic Societies
Instinct
Intuitive Psychology
Intelligence Quotient (IQ)
Mental Age (MA)
Metacognition
Modularity
Performance Limitations
Representational Ability
Unexpected Transfer Test
Violation of Expectation (VoE)
Wing’s Triad of Impairments
Early attunement to others’ minds
Focusing on false beliefs: The unexpected transfer test
The deceptive box test
The case for gradual change
Do children suddenly begin giving correct judgments of false belief?
Understanding the question asked
Adults’ difficulty with false beliefs
Nature versus nurture
Are we equipped with a dedicated module in the brain for understanding other minds?
The role of the family: Siblings
The role of the family: Adults
The characteristics of the child
Lack of imagination
Socialisation and communication
Causes of autism
Failure to understand the mind
Theory of Mind (ToM) describes the understanding that others hold beliefs, which can be incorrect (false beliefs).
Important tests of ToM include:
Unexpected Transfer Test
Deceptive Box Task
Children under about 4 years often fail these tasks.
Some theorists suggest a conceptual shift occurs around age 4, while others believe children experience gradual change.
Evidence shows infants may understand some aspects of false beliefs; adults also struggle with these concepts under certain conditions.
Developmentally, humans can connect with other minds early on. Parents notice unique traits in newborns.
Infants showcase social skills, engaging in joint play and cooperation, indicating an awareness of others' needs and beliefs.
Focus on ignorance and false beliefs allows researchers to test ToM.
True beliefs do not differentiate those who understand minds from those who do not.
Example: Maxi scenario demonstrates how children can infer based on others' mistaken beliefs.
Piaget describes children under 7 as egocentric, lacking perspective taking.
Wimmer & Perner (1983) found children around ages 4-5 start to grasp false beliefs.
Developmental milestone observed; however, not all children pass consistently.
Emergent abilities to recognize false beliefs potentially masked by testing methods.
Studies show infants as young as 15 months may show understanding of false belief via looking time experiments.
Interaction of nature and nurture is critical.
Varied rates of ToM development across cultures, demonstrated by cross-cultural studies.
Family dynamics impact ToM, particularly the presence of siblings and parental interaction styles.
Autism characterized by impairments in social behavior, communication, and imagination (Wing’s triad).
Children with autism struggle with understanding false beliefs, impacting their social skills.
Researchers note a genetic component and possible brain abnormalities leading to challenges in ToM.
Developing ToM has practical implications, allowing for empathetic interactions and broader understanding of social dynamics.
Effective interpretation of others' feelings enables appropriate social responses.
Children develop an understanding of mind through testing false beliefs; methodology and social context heavily influence outcomes.
Findings suggest both innate and environmental factors shape the ability to comprehend others' beliefs.