MN

20250214_BIOC212_Model organisms & Dev 1

Page 1

  • Model Organisms & Development

    • Course Code: ANAT212/BIOC212

    • Date: February 14, 2025

    • Instructor: Katie Cockburn, PhD, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Biochemistry

Page 2

  • Outline of Model Organisms & Development Part I

    • Brief overview of model organisms and their uses

    • Study of S. cerevisiae and identification of vesicular trafficking machinery

Page 3

  • Importance of Using Model Organisms

    • A model organism is a non-human species used to study biological phenomena or diseases.

    • Justification for use:

      1. Mimic specific aspects of human biology

      2. Generally easier to work with compared to human subjects

    • Common applications include forward and reverse genetics

      • Phenotype: observable characteristics

      • Genotype: genetic makeup

      • Forward Genetics: studying traits to identify the genes responsible.

      • Reverse Genetics: manipulating a gene to observe phenotypic effects.

Page 4

  • Eukaryotic Model Organisms

    • S. cerevisiae (budding yeast): Used in baking and brewing

    • C. elegans (nematode): A simple roundworm for genetic studies

    • D. melanogaster (fruit fly): Crucial for genetic studies

    • Danio rerio (zebrafish): A vertebrate model organism

    • Mus musculus (house mouse): Mammalian model for advanced studies

    • General characteristics: easier to grow, relevant biological insights for humans

Page 5

  • Divergence of Humans & Common Model Organisms

    • Timeline of divergence from the last common ancestor (in millions of years)

    • Reference: Zaidel-Bar et al, JCB (2009)

Page 6

  • S. cerevisiae:

    • Eukaryotic unicellular fungus

    • Generation Time: 2 to 3 hours

    • Can exist as haploid or diploid forms; reproduces both sexually and asexually

    • Capable of being frozen and revived

    • Reference: Bernstein & Bernstein (2020)

Page 7

  • Life Cycle of S. cerevisiae:

    • Diagram showing haploid and diploid phases

    • Mating: between haploid types a and α

    • Processes include sporulation and budding

    • Reference: Wang et al, PLoS Computational Biology (2017)

Page 8

  • C. elegans:

    • Invertebrate multicellular organism

    • Generation Time: 3 days (produces 300 progeny)

    • Features: simple and translucent body structure; can trace the fate of each of its 1090 cells

    • Reproduction: male and hermaphrodite; self-fertilization possible

    • Capable of freezing and reviving

Page 9

  • Life Cycle of C. elegans:

    • Development involves specific durations for stages (14h, 12h, 8h, etc.) under varying conditions (crowding, starvation, temperature)

    • Reference: Images from Worm Atlas

Page 10

  • D. melanogaster:

    • Invertebrate multicellular organism

    • Generation Time: 10 days (producing around 100 progeny)

    • Features: shares approximately 75% of genes linked to human diseases; extensively studied with many available genetic tools

    • Reference: Images from Droso4schools

Page 11

  • Danio rerio:

    • A vertebrate, multicellular organism

    • Generation Time: 2-3 months (producing 200 eggs)

    • Benefits: embryos and larvae are optically translucent; simple and inexpensive maintenance; suitable for drug and toxicity screening

    • Reference: White et al. Nature Reviews Cancer (2013)

Page 12

  • Mus musculus:

    • Vertebrate mammal model

    • Generation Time: 3 months (producing 2-12 pups)

    • Advantages: small, easy to house; key in studying human biology and preclinical testing

    • Caveats: not always an accurate model for human conditions

    • Reference: Delage et al. Pharmaceutics (2021)

Page 13

  • Emerging Model Organisms:

    • Planaria (A. mexicanum): Known for limb regeneration

    • Planaria (S. meditteranea & others): Capable of regenerating entire bodies

    • Reference: Wells et al. eLife (2021); Beanelab.org

Page 14

  • Outline Continuation: Model Organisms & Development Part I

    • Brief overview of model organisms and their uses

    • Focused study on S. cerevisiae and identification of vesicular trafficking machinery

    • Nobel Prize Recipients (2013):

      • Randy Schekman: COPII vesicle formation

      • Thomas Sudhof: Synaptic vesicle fusion

      • James Rothman: COPI & SNAREs

Page 15

  • Discovery of the Secretory Pathway:

    • Conducted by George Palade in the 1960s

    • Pulse-chase experiment:

      1. Radioactive leucine incubation followed by non-radioactive solution

      2. Electron microscopy used to visualize where proteins are located within organelles

      3. Model established for the movement of proteins through ER → Golgi → secretory vesicles

    • Queries regarding the proteins that facilitate cargo movement between organelles.

Page 16

  • Basics of Forward Genetic Screens:

    1. Perturb multiple genes (randomly/systemically), e.g., using chemical mutagens

    2. Search for specific phenotypes that emerge:

      • Organism shows death or distinct changes

    3. Identify the mutated gene responsible

    • Connection between phenotype and genotype

Page 17

  • Temperature Sensitive Mutations:

    • Essential genes for secretory pathways; mutations often lead to cell death or growth defects

    • Mutations may involve single amino acid substitutions affecting protein function

    • Description of permissive and restrictive temperatures (23°C vs 37°C)

Page 18

  • Identification of Temperature Sensitive Sec Mutants:

    • Screening led to identification of 1600 colonies, yielding 87 temperature sensitive (Ts) mutants

    • Tested phosphatase activities, revealing normal secretion in 86 mutants, but 1 mutant (sec1) showed defective secretion.

Page 19

  • Mapping Sec Mutations:

    • Additional screens identified ~50 sec mutants, each with defects at specific points in the secretory pathway, classified via electron microscopy

    • Comparisons made between wildtype and sec4 mutants at different temperatures.

Page 20

  • Complementation Tests in Yeast:

    • Used to determine if two mutant strains share mutations in the same gene

    • Resulted in narrowing down 50 sec mutants to 23 individual genes using complementation analysis.

Page 21

  • Yeast Double-Stranded DNA Techniques:

    • Creation of yeast genomic DNA libraries through restriction enzyme cleavage

    • Introduction of plasmids into yeast to observe phenotypic rescue in mutant strains and sequence to identify responsible genes.

Page 22

  • Determining Functions of Sec Gene Products:

    • Focus on SEC gene product purification and in vitro systems to demonstrate vesicle formation

    • Products like Sar1, Sec23, and others involved in COPII vesicle formation.

Page 23

  • Identifying Human Homologs of Yeast Genes:

    • Introduction of human cDNAs into yeast models to rescue specific mutant phenotypes

    • Sequencing successful plasmids to identify corresponding human genes.

Page 24

  • Identifying Human Versions of Sec Genes:

    • Characterization of sec23ts mutant's interaction with a cDNA library to find corresponding human homologs (Sec23A & Sec23B).

Page 25

  • Implications of Secretion Machinery in Human Disease:

    • Specific mutation (phenylalanine to leucine) in Sec23A linked to cranio-lenticulo-sutural dysplasia

    • Disease characterized by improper collagen secretion, affecting skeletal development.

    • Mutant Sec23A shows compromised interaction with critical coat proteins (Sec13/31), leading to impaired secretion.