Ethcis 3/11

Midterm Preparation

Overview of upcoming midterm exam discussions. Reminder to review returned quizzes and logistics related to midterm preparation. First in-class worksheet to begin thinking about the exam prompt and claims.

Categorical Imperative

Discussion on Kant's formula of the categorical imperative. Connection between the last discussed 'humanity formula' and the new formula being introduced today. Aim for the new formula is to have it make intuitive human sense. Participants encouraged to reflect on their understanding of the 'categorical imperative' and its implications.

Key Elements of Categorical Imperative

• Categorical imperative serves as a foundational framework for determining moral actions.

  • Focus on intention-based ethics versus result-based ethics:

    • Intention: Must align with universal duties and moral law.

    • Results: Not the primary concern in Kant’s ethical framework.

  • Rational beings must derive moral duties that apply universally regardless of individual desires or specific circumstances.

Humanity Formula of Categorical Imperative

• Important Quote: "We should never act in such a way that we treat humanity, whether in ourselves or others, as a means only, but always as an end in itself."

• Core Idea: Intrinsic worth of every individual must be respected in ethical considerations. This formula emphasizes that all humans possess inherent dignity and should not be viewed merely as instruments to achieve personal goals. Instead, it calls for recognition of each individual as possessing their own goals and rights.

• Details:

  • The humanity formula challenges individuals to evaluate their actions based on whether they respect the intrinsic value of others.

  • It asserts that ethical actions must contribute to the flourishing of all individuals involved.

  • For example, forming relationships that prioritize mutual respect and understanding, rather than using individuals for self-serving ends.

  • Kant warns against practices that dehumanize or exploit individuals, such as deceit or manipulation, arguing that they violate moral law.

  • Reflecting on this formula encourages discussions about consent, authenticity in relationships, and the moral obligation to treat others with dignity and respect.

Discussing Ethical Implications

• Ethical duties should not treat individuals as mere tools or means to an end.

• Examples to demonstrate this concept discussed:

  • Using someone for networking versus mutual genuine relationships.

  • Deceptive practices like making false promises undermine consent and mutual respect.

Art Institute Field Trip Announcement

Exciting opportunity for students to visit the Art Institute in Chicago on April 24 with Professor Seaford. Aim to provide accessible cultural experiences; planning to leave DSU early prior to class. Details and confirmations to come in subsequent classes.

Midterm Paper Guidelines

• Paper is due on April 1 at 11:59 PM, four pages minimum, discussing philosophical texts covered in class.

• The importance of a thesis statement to outline students' argument and guide their essay.

• Emphasis on argumentative clarity and utilizing class readings in forming claims.

Sample Prompt Discussion

• Sample prompt: Evaluate Hadova’s claims regarding spiritual exercises and their relevance for contemporary ethical issues.

• Importance of moving beyond restating the prompt to developing arguments with supporting reasons.

Next Steps

Class discussion will continue to delve into philosophical concepts and engage with worksheets to refine understanding in preparation for the midterm.