Savvas Learning Co - United States History-Savvas Learning Co (2016) (1)-531-556

Two Presidents Respond to the Great Depression

Hoover’s Response to the Crisis

Hoover’s Background:Herbert Hoover, the 31st President of the United States, did not cause the onset of the Great Depression. However, his response to the crisis led to widespread public disappointment and disillusionment. He was an intelligent leader with a strong background in business, having worked as a mining engineer and businessman. During his presidency, he relied on the advice of numerous experts, believing that their insights could help navigate the nation through economic turmoil.

Initial Response Strategies:Initially, Hoover adopted a hands-off approach towards the economy, grounded in the belief that economic cycles were natural and would resolve themselves over time. He perceived government interference as unnecessary, comparing it to attempting to prevent natural storms, which could lead to further disruption.

Shift in Policy:As the Great Depression deepened with soaring unemployment and widespread financial failure, Hoover began to reevaluate his approach. He implemented several strategies to combat the economic downturn, which included:

  • Volunteerism: Hoover encouraged businesses to voluntarily maintain wages and employment levels without federal mandates, urging the private sector to rise to the occasion through self-regulation.

  • Public Works Programs: He suggested tax reductions to stimulate spending, while also proposing public works projects as a means to provide jobs and revitalize the economy. Notable projects included infrastructure improvements and flood control initiatives.

  • Relying on Localism: Hoover believed that local and state governments were best equipped to manage relief efforts. He requested that they handle welfare programs, relying on the principle that communities understand their needs best.

Challenges with Hoover’s Approach:Despite his intentions, Hoover's policies faced numerous obstacles:

  • Volunteerism: This approach largely failed as many businesses resorted to wage cuts and layoffs to survive the economic pressures they faced, demonstrating that voluntary measures were insufficient in a time of crisis.

  • Local Governments: Many local governments lacked adequate resources to provide meaningful relief efforts, often overwhelmed by the scale of unemployment and poverty.

  • Resistance to Federal Relief: Hoover’s staunch belief in “rugged individualism”—the idea that individuals should be self-reliant—caused him to resist direct federal assistance. He feared that providing too much government intervention would lead to an expansion of federal control and interfere with personal freedoms.

Failed Perception:Public sentiment increasingly turned against Hoover as he became synonymous with the failures of the Great Depression. The terms ‘Hoovervilles’ (shantytowns of displaced persons) and ‘Hoover wagons’ (cars that had been converted into homes) emerged as symbols of hardship and despair during his presidency.

Hoover’s Policy Revisions

Reversal of Course:Facing mounting criticism, Hoover initiated the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC) in 1932. This marked a considerable shift, as it provided financial support in the form of loans to banks, railroads, and large businesses in the hope of spurring a trickle-down effect that would benefit the wider economy.

Challenges of RFC:Despite the RFC's efforts to inject funds into the economy, the results were mixed. Loans often did not reach the intended grassroots level; many businesses that received funds chose not to hire additional workers or increase spending, failing to generate significant economic activity. However, projects like the Hoover Dam served as a rare success story, providing thousands of jobs and stimulating economic growth in the Southwest.

Democratic Response: Franklin D. Roosevelt

Roosevelt’s Emergence:In stark contrast to Hoover, Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) campaigned on a platform of increased government intervention to tackle the economic crisis. His privileged upbringing and experience as New York’s governor prepared him for the challenges of the presidency.

Roosevelt’s Strategy:FDR emphasized an experimental approach to government intervention, which he believed was essential to stimulate economic recovery. This approach was particularly evident during his first 100 days in office when he proposed 15 major bills focusing on relief, recovery, and reform to navigate the dire economic conditions.

Fireside Chats and Public Engagement:Utilizing radio broadcasts famously known as 'Fireside Chats,' Roosevelt effectively communicated with the American public, aiming to restore confidence in the banking system and providing comfort amidst bank failures. His first chat reassured depositors during a time of widespread banking panic.

Key New Deal Programs

Federal Reforms:FDR implemented several key reforms through the New Deal, including:

  • Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC): Established to insure bank deposits, which helped protect citizens’ savings and protect the banking industry from further collapses.

  • Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Created to regulate the stock market and prevent the kind of speculative abuses that contributed to the Great Depression.

Agricultural Assistance:To support struggling farmers, Roosevelt enacted:

  • Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA): Aimed at regulating crop production and pricing to raise farm income through subsidization.

  • Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA): Focused on improving agricultural conditions and providing electricity to rural areas, thereby boosting both local economies and quality of life.

Job Creation Initiatives:Among the New Deal programs designed to combat unemployment were:

  • Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC): Provided temporary jobs for young men to work on environmental projects like reforestation and infrastructure improvement.

  • Works Progress Administration (WPA): Created millions of jobs focusing on public works projects, including infrastructure development and artistic programs spanning literature and the arts.

Opposition to the New Deal

Criticism From Various Sectors:The New Deal faced criticism from multiple factions:

  • Conservatives: Argued that Roosevelt's policies expanded federal power excessively and interfered with free-market principles.

  • Progressives: Believed FDR’s actions did not go far enough in reforming capitalism, maintaining that many programs benefitted wealthy interests disproportionately.

Public Figures Opposing FDR:

  • Huey Long: A prominent critic, he proposed wealth redistribution through heavy taxation on the wealthy via his ‘Share Our Wealth’ program.

  • Father Charles Coughlin: A radio priest who criticized Roosevelt for not adequately addressing the economic suffering of the lower classes.

  • Frances Townsend: Advocated for a pension system for the elderly, arguing that FDR’s plans failed to provide sufficient relief for vulnerable populations.

Conclusion

Legacy of the New Deal:While the New Deal programs did not fully resolve the Great Depression, they profoundly reshaped the role of the federal government in American life, marking a pivotal moment in the evolution of governance and social policy that would influence future political and economic strategies.

Two Presidents Respond to the Great Depression

Hoover’s Response to the Crisis

Hoover’s Background:Herbert Hoover, the 31st President of the United States, came into office in March 1929, just months before the stock market crash that precipitated the Great Depression. He was not responsible for the economic downturn, but many viewed his responses as inadequate. Hoover had a strong background in business and engineering, serving as a successful mining engineer and businessman before becoming involved in public service. His belief in the power of individual initiative and voluntary action influenced his policies during the economic crisis, leading to widespread public disappointment and disillusionment as the crisis unfolded.

Initial Response Strategies:

  • Hands-off Approach: Initially, Hoover adopted a laissez-faire approach towards the economy, grounded in classical economic theories that suggested that markets would self-correct over time without government intervention. He believed that the government should not interfere in personal and business affairs, comparing interventionist policies to attempting to prevent natural storms, which could lead to worse outcomes.

  • Ministerial Guidance: Hoover sought advice from economic experts and utilized the insights of leading businessmen, believing their expertise would help guide the nation through the crisis. However, his reliance on expert opinions over direct action ultimately left many feeling that he was disconnected from the realities faced by average Americans.

Shift in Policy:

  • Evolving Strategies: As the severity of the Great Depression became evident, marked by skyrocketing unemployment and financial instability, Hoover began reevaluating his earlier policies. He recognized the need for government intervention, albeit reluctantly, and started to implement several strategies in hopes of addressing the economic crisis more effectively.

  • Volunteerism: He encouraged businesses and banks to voluntarily maintain wages and employment levels, promoting the idea that the private sector could self-regulate. This involved urging employers to avoid layoffs and wage cuts despite the financial pressures they faced, aiming to foster a sense of shared responsibility among businesses.

  • Public Works Programs: Hoover proposed public works initiatives and advocated for tax reductions to spur consumer spending. He believed that federal investment in infrastructure and utilities could help stimulate job growth and economic activity. Notable projects under this initiative included extensive road construction and flood control measures, with the goal of creating immediate employment opportunities for the unemployed.

  • Relying on Localism: Upholding the principle of local governance, Hoover pushed for state and local governments to spearhead relief efforts rather than the federal government. He assumed that local communities understood their needs best and should manage welfare programs, believing that localized efforts would be more efficient and effective in alleviating suffering.

Challenges with Hoover’s Approach:

  • Failure of Volunteerism: Despite Hoover's intentions, his push for volunteerism largely failed as many businesses could not withstand the economic pressures, leading instead to widespread wage cuts, layoffs, and bankruptcies. This demonstrated that voluntary actions were often insufficient during such a large-scale economic crisis, and many Americans saw this approach as inadequate.

  • Local Governments Overwhelmed: Local governments frequently found themselves ill-equipped to manage relief programs due to insufficient resources, unrealistic expectations, and the overwhelming scale of unemployment and poverty in their communities. Many local agencies became overwhelmed by the sheer number of people needing assistance.

  • Resistance to Federal Relief: Hoover’s commitment to “rugged individualism,” which espoused the principles of self-reliance and minimal government intervention, led him to resist calls for direct federal assistance. He feared that extensive federal support would lead to dependency on government aid, expand federal control, and undermine traditional American values of personal freedom and responsibility.

Failed Perception:

  • Public Sentiment Against Hoover: As the effects of the Great Depression deepened, public opinion shifted dramatically against Hoover, who became a scapegoat for the economic woes facing the nation. The emergence of derogatory terms such as ‘Hoovervilles’ (makeshift shantytowns inhabited by displaced individuals and families) and ‘Hoover wagons’ (cars repurposed as homes for families who lost their houses) illustrated the despair of many citizens during his presidency.

Hoover’s Policy Revisions

Reversal of Course:

  • Initiating the RFC: In the face of growing criticism, Hoover established the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC) in early 1932, which represented a significant shift in approach. The RFC was created to provide financial assistance in the form of loans to banks, railroads, and large corporations with the aim of stabilizing the economy and instigating a trickle-down effect that would ultimately benefit the wider population by revitalizing industries and, in turn, creating jobs.

Challenges of RFC:

  • Mixed Results: Although the RFC injected much-needed funds into the economy, its overall effectiveness was mixed. A considerable portion of the loans did not trickle down to smaller businesses or contribute significantly to job creation; many recipients used the funds to improve their balance sheets rather than to hire more workers or invest in expansion. However, some projects, such as the construction of the Hoover Dam, emerged as rare success stories, providing thousands of jobs and facilitating regional economic development.

Democratic Response: Franklin D. Roosevelt

Roosevelt’s Emergence:

  • Contrast with Hoover: Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) entered the presidency with a commitment to a more active governmental role in managing the economy in stark contrast to Hoover. Coming from a privileged background, having served as a state senator and Assistant Secretary of the Navy, and later as the governor of New York, FDR's political experience and understanding of effective governance equipped him for the challenges presented by the Great Depression.

Roosevelt’s Strategy:

  • Experimental Approach: FDR emphasized an experimental approach to governance, believing that innovative and sometimes untested actions were vital in addressing the economic crisis. This perspective manifested dramatically during his first 100 days in office, characterized by the rapid introduction of numerous significant bills aimed at providing relief, promoting economic recovery, and instituting structural reforms to prevent future economic crises.

Fireside Chats and Public Engagement:

  • Effective Communication: FDR utilized radio broadcasts known as 'Fireside Chats' to communicate directly with the American public. These chats became a hallmark of his presidency as he sought to restore public confidence in the banking system and provide reassurance to citizens amidst widespread uncertainty. His first Fireside Chat focused on the banking crisis, encouraging individuals to trust the banking system again and highlighting steps taken to ensure their deposits were safe.

Key New Deal Programs

Federal Reforms:

  • Establishment of FDIC: Under the New Deal, FDR established the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to protect bank deposits, helping to restore public trust in financial institutions and prevent bank runs that had led to the closure of numerous banks during the Depression.

  • Creation of SEC: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was created to regulate the stock market and curb fraudulent trading practices. By doing so, the SEC aimed to restore investor confidence and promote a fair and transparent trading environment.

Agricultural Assistance:

  • Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA): FDR enacted the AAA, which sought to stabilize agricultural prices by regulating crop production and providing subsidies to farmers to reduce oversupply and enhance their income.

  • Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA): The TVA was established to improve regional living standards through infrastructure development, including dams and electricity generation. By focusing on rural electrification and agricultural assistance, the TVA played a crucial role in revitalizing the economies of the Tennessee Valley area, fostering improvements in education, health, and quality of life.

Job Creation Initiatives:

  • Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC): FDR initiated the CCC, providing temporary employment for young men to engage in environmental and conservation projects. These projects included planting trees, building flood barriers, and establishing national parks, serving both environmental and job creation goals.

  • Works Progress Administration (WPA): The WPA was created to generate millions of jobs by engaging unemployed individuals in public works projects. This involved a diverse range of initiatives, from building roads and bridges to making significant contributions to arts, literature, and community projects, helping to stimulate local economies and foster a spirit of national pride.

Opposition to the New Deal

Criticism From Various Sectors:

  • Conservative Critique: Critics from conservative circles argued that FDR's policies represented an overreach of federal power and undermined free-market principles by imposing excessive regulations on businesses and altering the balance between government and the economy.

  • Progressive Concerns: Some progressive leaders felt that the New Deal did not go far enough in reforming the capitalist system, arguing that many programs disproportionately benefited wealthy interests rather than addressing the root causes of poverty and economic inequality.

Public Figures Opposing FDR:

  • Huey Long: A prominent critic, he recommended radical wealth redistribution through heavy taxation on the wealthy via his ‘Share Our Wealth’ program, which proposed guaranteeing a minimum income for all Americans.

  • Father Charles Coughlin: A radio priest and influential figure, he criticized FDR for not adequately addressing the economic suffering of lower classes, promoting nationalist and populist rhetoric to shape public discontent.

  • Frances Townsend: He advocated for a pension system for the elderly, arguing that FDR’s New Deal failed to adequately support vulnerable populations, especially seniors who were suffering due to the economic crisis.

Conclusion

Legacy of the New Deal:While the New Deal programs did not fully resolve the Great Depression, they left a profound mark on the role of the federal government in American life. By expanding the scope of government involvement in the economy and social welfare, the New Deal marked a pivotal shift in federal policy, influencing future governance and social strategies that continue to reverberate in contemporary American society and politics.

robot