Ethics Test 1
Act-utilitarianism:
Form of consequentialism, what matters is the consequence of the action
The consequences that affect other people
Maximize welfare
Applied ethics:
Applying meta-ethics and normative ethics to concrete quotations in envs, business, medical, etc.
Autonomy:
The ability to act on the basis of self-legistlasted reasons
Categorical imperative:
Genuinely moral duties/actions
Only ceases to apply when you are prevented from keeping through with it at no fault of your own
Consequentialism:
What matters is the consequences of our actions
Contractualism:
What would we reasonably agree to behind a veil of ignorance
Veil = tool to think impartially
We are all equal
Morality is motivating
Deontology:
Looks at the motives of why people do what they do
Duty based
Look at the rules and try to determine which are right v wrong
Descriptive claim:
Tells us something about how the world is, not how it should be
Ethical egoism:
Doing whatever actions fulfil our own needs/desires no matter the effect of such actions on others
Ethical relativism:
There are no universal moral standards
Therefore we should not judge moral practices of other cultures (practice tolerance)
Hypothetical imperative:
A command that binds an agent only contingently
Impermissible:
That class of actions (or omissions) that are morally disallowed, or wrong
Maxim:
Description of the act/obligation and its intention
General principal
Meta-ethics:
Study of abstract questions concerning nature of moral justification or assessment
Good, right, permissible, impermissible
Whether or not we have a reason to be moral
Moral skepticism:
There are no moral truths
Can’t know what’s right v wrong – impossible
Normative claim:
A statement about the way the world should be
Normative ethics:
How meta-ethics is grounded
Original position:
We are not aware of certain features (ones that impede impartial judgement)
Socio-economic, race, gender, etc.
Allows us to
Permissible:
The class of actions (or omissions) that are morally allowed or right
Phronesis:
Practical wisdom
Allows the agent the ability to discern the correct way to achieve the human end
Publicity argument:
If a principle is deemed to be correct, we have a duty to make its principles public.
If we want to justify holding people to account for breaching those principles, they have to know about them
Rule-utilitarianism:
An act is only right if it conforms to a rule that if everyone follows, will produce the best consequences
Social contract theory:
The right action is the one that follows the terms of the agreement amongst self-interested agents
Supererogatory:
Actions that go above and beyond the call of duty
Doing something is not a moral requirement (no punishment for not doing it), but potential for praise if you do do it
Unity of the virtues thesis:
To have any one of the virtues, you must have all of them
You can be courageous, but not for the right reasons bc you lack the other virtues
Universalizability:
The capacity of a maxim to become a law for everyone
Cannot produce a contradiction (or its impermissible)
Utilitarianism:
What we should strive for
what matters is the consequence of the action
The consequences that affect other people
Maximize welfare
Veil of ignorance:
A tool to help us think impartially
We are all equal
“The og position” – we are not aware of certain features
Socio-economic, race, gender, etc.
Virtue ethics:
Located halfway between vices of defect and excess
Actions are made right by being the product of the correct character of the agent performing the actions
Animal welfarism:
The view that the primary bearers of value are individual animals (rather than species or ecosystems)
Anthropocentrism:
Only humans have moral standing (genuine, morally relevant interests)
Extrinsic value:
Value based on the service it can provide
Intrinsic value:
Value based on its mere existence
Moral standing:
For an entity’s existence and interests to have positive moral weight
Pos. moral weight = means others have to constrain themselves when dealing with such entities
Negative right:
A right not to be interfered with in certain ways
Right to free speech (when not posing danger to others)
Positive right:
A right to be provided with certain conditions for flourishing
Health care, duty for gov to provide
Speciesism:
All animals are equal
Bioaccumulation:
Build-up of chemical substances in organisms in even greater quantities are they are passes up the food chain (biomagnification)
Bioaccumulation is buildup in an individual animal
Biocentric egalitarianism:
The view that the interests of all living things have equal positive moral weight
Biocentrism:
Living things – from the mere fact that they have life – possess intrinsic value
Biosphere:
The totality of interlocking ecosystems on Earth
Conservationism:
Protecting natural spaces is compatible with some form of human activity within those spaces
Deep ecology:
Focusses on a radical emotional and cognitive “reorientation” of our lives and very selves in relation to nature
Dynamic equilibrium:
Characteristic of a system that is neither purely chaotic nor in full stasis (equilibrium)
Ecocentrism:
The view that the objects of primary moral concern are ecosystems
Ecosystem:
A geographically specific collection of plants and animals interacting among themselves and with the non-living (abiotic) things – rock, soil, climate – of that area
Ecosystem-based management (EBM):
Gaia theory:
The view that the Earth is a self-regulating super-organism
Propounded by James Lovelock
Individualism:
The primary object of moral concern are individual plants or animals
Inertia:
Resistance to change within a system. Ecosystems can display varying degrees of inertia
Land ethic:
The view that an action is right to the extent that it protects or promotes the stability, integrity, and beauty of the “land”
Preservationism:
Protection of natural spaces should have as its goal the maintenance of the pristine condition
Thought to be mostly incompatible with human activity within those spaces
Psychocentrism:
What matters morally is the ability to have psychological experiences, such as pleasure and pain
Resilience:
An ecosystem’s ability, following a disturbance, to regain the pre-disturbance state
People and their Stance
Immanuel Kant:
Categorical imperative
Animals have only extrinsic value
People’s property
cruelty to animals is wrong not for the animal's sake, but because it might lead people to act cruelly toward fellow humans
Hobbe:
Social contract theory,
People are motivated by self-interest
Agreement legitimizes government
Morality exists where there is agreement to live under the rule of a sovereign or organized government
(morality doesn’t exist in the state of nature)
Rawl:
Contractualism, the veil of ignorance,
Act from a sense of fairness
We would all want the broadest possible catalogue of individual basic rights and liberties
a. Everyone would have equal access to positions of power within society
b. If economic inequality is to be tolerated, it must be to the benefit of the worst-off in society
Aristotle:
Virtue ethics
Peter Singer:
against speciesism
Argues that we should extend to other species the basic principle of equality that most of us recognize should be extended to all members of our own species
Claire Jean Kim:
Abolition
Criticises racism/speciesism comparison to the ‘abolitionist’ movement that opposes the mistreatment of animals
Bentham:
Right to equal consideration based on capacity to suffer
Sentience is an entity’s most morally importance attribute
Sentience proved by feeling pleasure/pain (which can be quantified)
Tom Regan:
Intrinsic value & rights to nonhuman entities
Rights should not be violated no matter what
Donaldson & Kymlicka:
Animal citizenship
Wilderness animals – sovereignty
Liminal animals
Christopher D. Stone:
Legal rights for natural objects
Paul Taylor:
Biocentric outlook on nature
Humans are members of earth’s community on the same terms as other living members
Ecosystems are complex web of interconnected elements
Each ind organism pursues its own good in its own way
Reject that humans are superior
Aldo Leopold:
The land ethic
The land pyramid
Arne Naess:
Identification as a source of deep ecological attitude
James Lovelock:
The gaia hypothesis