C1.2.4 Attribution Theory (HL)
State causes for success or failure often fall on one end of the spectrum
“I won because I trained hard”
“I lost because they got lucky”
Learned helpfulness can result from blaming losses on stable and internal factors, but out of one’s control. People feel as though nothing can be done
Stable and internal factors, within control, can be linked to expectations of success. Can motivate an athlete to continue with a training regimen that appears to be working
There are three categories for this theory:
Locus of stability
Stable or unstable
Locus of causality
Internal or external
Locus of control
In one’s control or out of one’s control
Internal factors related to a person, and controllable, mean they can do something about them
External factors are not related to a person, and uncontrollable is out of their control
High Ego Orientation
High ego orientation means that a person is mostly focused on winning or being better than other people
Low task orientation is a lack of motivation toward self-improvement
These two traits acting together are often detrimental to motivation and persistence due to an eventual lack of progress, which can lead to low satisfaction (and less winning)
Examples
In team sports, individuals may focus more on themselves, which results in lower team performance and may eventually lead to team losses
In individual sports, self-improvement may stop when competition increases, and then individuals will no longer continue to succeed
High orientation and perceived ability
High ego orientation will lead to confidence when the perceived ability is high; however can lead to anxiety and frustration if perceived ability is low
When ego is challenged, it can feel as though an individual’s self-worth is being criticised. This can lead to defensive attitudes. In individual sports (such as swimming) ego is often tied to self-worth and identity because performance and ability is the biggest indicators of success.