19. Assistive Devices
Course Context & Lecture Objectives
PT 7312 – Patient Care Skills I (Lecture date: July 18, 2025)
Instructor: Steve Spivey, PT, DPT
Session focus: Ambulatory Assistive Devices
Learning goals
Describe multiple devices used for ADLs, transfers, and gait
Compare strengths / weaknesses of every gait device
List & demonstrate gait patterns applicable to each device
Safely guard patients while teaching correct device use
Recognize patient & environmental safety issues
Correctly perform patient-specific device fitting
Indications for Selecting an Assistive Device (AD)
\text{1) Weight-bearing limitations}
• E.g., surgical precautions, fractures, post-injury protocols\text{2) Weakness} (global or focal; UE/LE/trunk)
\text{3) Decreased balance} (sensory, vestibular, neuro)
\text{4) Pain} (acute or chronic; limits loading & quality of gait)
Patient- & Context-Specific Factors Affecting Device Choice
Physical endurance / fatigue tolerance
Attention span & ability to dual-task
Cognitive status & safety awareness
Pain level & medication side-effects
Prescribed weight-bearing status (see below)
Muscular strength (UE, LE, core)
Environment: home set-up, community terrain, stairs, tight spaces
Social & lifestyle demands (work, hobbies, caregiver support)
Co-morbidities (cardiac, pulmonary, neuro, vision, etc.)
Review of Weight-Bearing (WB) Categories
FWB – Full Weight Bearing (no restrictions)
WBAT – Weight Bearing As Tolerated
• Patient self-limits based on comfort; clinician imposes no %, no pound limitPWB – Partial Weight Bearing
• Typically prescribed as % body weight (commonly 50\%) or specific poundsTTWB – Toe-Touch / Touch-Down Weight Bearing
• Toes may rest for balance only; no axial load through extremityNWB – Non-Weight Bearing
• Foot does not contact ground at any time
Hierarchies to Memorize
Relative STABILITY (greatest → least)
Parallel bars
Walker
Axillary crutches
Forearm (Lofstrand) crutches
Two canes
One cane
Coordination DEMAND (least → most)
Parallel bars
Walker
One cane
Two canes
Axillary crutches
Forearm crutches
Parallel Bars
Highest external stability; best initial teaching station
Permits therapist to assist LE placement & manually correct gait pattern
Not functional for community mobility → transition promptly to portable device
Strengths
\uparrow stability & patient security
Adjustable height/width (electric units ≈ fastest)
Therapist can physically guide hips/knees/feet
Weaknesses
Foster "hanging" or "pull-through" compensations
Risk of dependency; non-portable; limited availability in HH / sub-acute
Walkers
Main Categories
Conventional / Standard Walker (SW) – pick-up style
Front-Wheeled Walker (FWW) or Rolling Walker (RW)
Four-Wheeled Walker (often w/ seat & brakes) – "Rollator" / tripod variant
Platform Walker (UE weight-bearing through forearm platform)
Pediatric posterior or reverse walkers
General Strengths
High BOS & \uparrow stability versus canes/crutches
Simple motor learning: \"move walker – bad leg – good leg\"
Can incorporate accessories (trays, baskets, oxygen tank holders, seats)
Better ability to unload involved LE for PWB prescriptions
General Weaknesses
Bulky & heavy; transport/storage issues (cars, small closets)
Wider than bathroom doors / narrow hallways; limited on stairs
Rolling versions hazardous on inclines if brakes failed or absent
Sizing & Adjustment
Stock sizes: Tall, Adult, Youth, Child
Key landmarks
Handgrip inline with greater trochanter (GT) or level of ulnar styloid ("wristwatch trick")
UE elbow flexion 20^{\circ} - 30^{\circ} when patient stands inside walker
Ensure all four tips/wheels contact floor simultaneously
Accessories (clinical judgment!)
Folding mechanisms, wheels, glide tips, brakes, seats, handgrip foam, storage pouches
Note: Added devices ≈ added weight & cost; only use if it serves a clear functional need
Patient Safety & Guarding
Discourage pulling on walker to stand; teach push from armrests then grasp walker
In sit→stand, cue patient to reach back for the chair before sitting
Gait belt on; clinician typically posterior-lateral to involved side
Scan for environmental hazards (water spills, rugs, pets, toys)
Stress upright trunk posture & proper step length (don’t shuffle into frame)
Basic Walker Gait Sequence
Advance walker one step-length forward; ensure all feet/wheels stable
Advance involved LE into frame (WB per orders)
Shift BW onto UE & involved LE (if allowed)
Advance uninvolved LE to / beyond walker
Shift weight to uninvolved LE; repeat
Crutches
Two Major Forms
Axillary crutches – underarm support; most common for short-term ortho use
Forearm (Lofstrand) crutches – cuffed; common for neuro, long-term users
Axillary Crutches
Strengths
Moderate stability ( > cane, < walker)
Effective for young athletic pts needing NWB/PWB
Indirect trunk support via axilla (benefit for mild trunk weakness)
Weaknesses
Incorrect axilla weight-bearing → brachial plexus injury risk
High coordination requirement; tricky on slick surfaces
Occupies both UEs → hampers object carrying, door opening
Fitting parameters
Distal tips: 6" ant & 6" lat to 5th toe (45°)
Handgrip at GT height; elbow flexion 20^{\circ}-30^{\circ}
Axillary pad clearance: ≈ 2" (or two fingers) below armpit when shoulders relaxed
"Spivey Shortcut"
Seated, shoulders flexed 90^{\circ} → measure from flexed elbow to opposing hand 3rd phalanx ≈ crutch length
Forearm (Lofstrand) Crutches
Strengths
Lighter, less bulky than axillary
Hands can release grip without dropping crutch (cuff retention) → functional for ADLs
Weaknesses
Highest coordination demand among major devices
Social stigma & learning curve
Same fall risk on wet surfaces
Fitting
Handgrip & distal tip positions same as axillary
Cuff: as high as possible without limiting elbow flexion; snug enough to stay when UE lifted
Global Safety Tips (Crutches)
No pulling on crutches to stand; practice push-up from chair then grasp
Emphasize small step lengths & looking forward, not at feet
Rule of thumb: crunch = crutch; avoid surfaces that could cause crutch slip
Core Crutch / Two-Device Gait Patterns
Two-Point
• Device (R) + LE (L) → Device (L) + LE (R)
• Mimics reciprocal gait, ↓ energy than four-pointFour-Point (Deliberate Two-Point)
• Sequence: Device 1 → Opp. LE → Device 2 → Opp. LE
• Always three points on ground; maximal stability among crutch patternsThree-Point (NWB)
• Both crutches → shift weight to UEs → swing uninvolved LE to/through → repeat
• Involved LE maintained NWB throughoutSwing-Through (fast ambulators, e.g., young trauma pts)
• Crutches → swing both LE past crutches; higher energy & balance needSwing-To
• Same as swing-through but LE land even with crutches; often seen with paraplegia + KAFOs or walker usersPWB Crutch Pattern
• Crutches → involved LE (share load per PWB %) → shift weight → uninvolved LE steps through
Canes
Device Spectrum (in descending stability)
Hemiwalker (HW) / Walk-Cane – essentially half walker for unilateral use
Large-Based Quad Cane (LBQC)
Small-Based Quad Cane (SBQC)
Straight / Standard Cane (SC) – wood or adjustable aluminum
Hemiwalker
Strengths: highest unilateral stability; stands upright when released
Weaknesses: bulky; poor stair negotiation; cannot support PWB orders
Quad Canes
Strengths: adjustable BOS size; remains upright; transitional option
Weaknesses: awkward gait rhythm in some pts; still less stable than walker; SBQC often tips if placed incorrectly
Straight Cane
Strengths: lightest, most normative appearance, customizable styles
Weaknesses: provides only balance (not load-reducing); cannot accommodate WB restrictions; easy to drop
Fitting Principles (All Canes & Hemiwalkers)
Handgrip at GT / ulnar styloid; elbow flexion 20^{\circ}-30^{\circ}
Safety & Guarding
Same sit↔stand precautions: push from armrest, don’t use cane to pull
Use cane in opposite hand from affected LE
• Biomechanics: ↑ BOS, ↓ hip abductor demand on involved side, recreates normal arm swing, ↓ contralateral joint compression
Single-Cane Gait Sequence
Simultaneously advance cane + involved LE (alt: cane then LE if coordination limited)
Shift weight onto cane & involved LE
Step through with uninvolved LE
Re-weight to uninvolved LE; repeat
Clinical Decision Algorithm (Big Picture)
Clarify WB status (FWB → NWB)
Match to minimum device providing necessary stability & safety
• Example: NWB → crutches or walker; FWB + slight balance deficit → straight caneEvaluate patient’s cognitive & physical capacity for coordination
Consider environment & long-term goals (stair use, car transfers, community ambulation)
Continually reassess & downgrade device as balance, strength, & confidence improve
Universal Patient & Environmental Safety Themes
ALWAYS apply gait belt, stand slightly behind & to involved side
Discourage footwear without heel counter / grip (slippers, flip-flops)
Surfaces to anticipate: wet tile, gravel, throw rugs, ice, uneven sidewalks
Clear clutter, supervise pets & toddlers during early training
Check device integrity each session (tips, screws, brake cables)
Document fitting values & patient demonstration for legal safety record
Ethical & Practical Considerations
"Least-restrictive device" aligns with patient autonomy & fosters independence
Avoid unnecessary accessories that increase cost/weight unless justified (insurance scrutiny)
Teach patient & family proper maintenance to prevent accidents (e.g., replacing worn rubber tips)
Quick Reference Numbers & Angles
Elbow flexion for all hand-held devices: 20^{\circ} - 30^{\circ}
Axillary clearance: ~2\text{ in}
Distal tip on crutches/canes: 6\text{ in}\; \text{anterior} & 6\text{ in}\; \text{lateral} to 5th toe (≈45° angle)
Typical PWB prescription: 50\% \text{ body weight} (always verify physician order)
Practice Lab Expectations
Students will guard peers during:
Standard walker → basic pattern & turning
RW with brakes & glides on multiple surfaces
Axillary crutch three-point (NWB) & two-point (FWB) patterns
Forearm crutch swing-through for speed analysis
Hemiwalker & cane gait focusing on step symmetry & hip kinetics
Assessment rubrics: proper fitting, verbal cueing, safety spotting, posture correction, documentation accuracy
End-of-Lecture Prompt
"Questions?" – Reflect on device pros/cons, pattern selection, and how you will integrate weight-bearing orders into every therapeutic decision.