Rational behavior refers to making the best possible decisions based on available information.
Individuals often strive for optimal choices but may deviate from rationality in predictable manners, as highlighted by behavioral economics.
People with less experience, such as using credit cards, may incur avoidable fees due to lack of knowledge.
Overconfidence and underestimating risks can lead to poor decision-making.
The phenomenon called availability bias causes people to overestimate the likelihood of events that come readily to mind.
Example: Fear of flying vs. driving; more fatalities occur in car accidents than plane crashes, yet plane crashes garner more media attention.
Reference points influence emotional responses and decision-making.
Individuals tend to gauge satisfaction based on expectations compared to outcomes.
Example: Earning $15/hr when expecting $18/hr leads to greater dissatisfaction compared to just being told a flat $15/hr.
The concept of loss aversion suggests that losses impact feelings more than equivalent gains.
Example: A drop from $18/hr to $15/hr feels worse than a rise from $15/hr to $18/hr, even if the end values are the same.
Loss aversion can hinder investment decisions; investors may hold onto underperforming stocks to avoid realizing losses.
Anchoring occurs when individuals rely too heavily on the first piece of information they encounter, which serves as a mental reference point.
Example: Retail pricing strategies where original prices are shown next to sale prices, influencing buyer perception of value.
Sunk costs represent expenses that have already been incurred and cannot be recovered.
Individuals often fall into the trap of honoring sunk costs in decision-making, leading to suboptimal outcomes.
Example: Continuing to watch a boring movie simply because a ticket was purchased wastes time and doesn’t retrieve the sunk cost.
Traditional economic models often assume intentions align with actions, which doesn't account for self-control issues.
Concepts like present bias or myopia illustrate how individuals may struggle with short-term temptations over long-term goals.
Example: Students may choose partying over studying even though they desire good grades.
This behavior can contribute to insufficient retirement savings or lack of exercise despite clear personal goals.
Limiting options may help individuals achieve their goals, such as maintaining a healthy diet.
Governments may intervene, like banning unhealthy foods, aiming to assist people in making better choices, although this remains a debated issue.
Some government agencies use behavioral economics principles to “nudge” people towards better decision-making.
Example: Organ donation rates differ significantly based on whether individuals must opt-out or opt-in, demonstrating default settings' impact on choice.
While traditional economic models remain robust, behavioral economics provides additional insights into human behavior and decision-making.
Rational choices do not equate to perfect decisions; they reflect individuals utilizing available resources and information to the best of their ability.