Technology and Art
Richard Serra articulates that technology embodies a mix of hope and hoax, significantly impacting marginalized groups under the pretext of progress. James Turrell’s insights from 1970 suggest that the "Art and Technology" exhibition represented broader societal shifts that overshadowed its own importance.
Historical Context
The social, economic, and political climate of the 1960s and 70s played a crucial role in shaping the collaborations between art, science, and technology. The Vietnam War notably weakened support for art projects that utilized technology, highlighting the tensions between artistic innovations and national interests.
Technophilia in 1960s Art
The Cold War's influence was palpable, especially after the launch of Sputnik in 1957, which inspired American artists to engage with technology. Educational frameworks that emphasized science encouraged theorists to advocate for stronger connections between art and technology. Billy Klüver, in 1967, observed a new interface emerging between artists and engineers as contemporary art trends evolved, which was echoed in the perspectives of various artists in 1966. Dan Flavin anticipated the rise of artist-engineers, while Robert Morris emphasized the need for experimental centers to foster artistic innovation. Allan Kaprow proposed that significant artistic energies were found in the crossovers between disciplines.
Exhibitions Reflecting Technophilia
Prominent exhibitions that encapsulated this technophilia included "The Machine as Seen at the End of the Machine Age" (1968), "Cybernetic Serendipity" (1969), "Software Information Technology" (1970), and "Explorations" (1970) at the Smithsonian. Initiatives like E.A.T. (Experiments in Art and Technology) and CAVS (Center for Advanced Visual Studies) were established to encourage collaboration between artists and technologists.
"Art and Technology" Exhibition Overview
Maurice Tuchman's curatorial vision aimed to connect the futuristic aura of Los Angeles with artistic innovation, seeking to establish meaningful partnerships between artists and technology firms, rather than limiting the effort to a single exhibition. Despite these ambitions, many partnerships faced challenges due to the limited success of collaborations, leading to skepticism regarding their viability.
Issues within Art-Tech Partnerships
Partnership failures were not uncommon; many collaborations fell short due to misunderstandings, although some notable successes were achieved among celebrated artists. Artists started to express concern over the nature of their relationships with industrial technology, especially in the context of the Vietnam War, which spurred a shift towards technophobia.
Shift to Technophobia
The decline in collaborations stemmed from political and social changes, notably the Vietnam War, which shifted public sentiment towards distrust of industrial partnerships. Growing skepticism surrounding corporate involvement in the art world emerged, with strong critiques emphasizing ethical implications. Tuchman reflected on how the changing climate would have likely deterred artists from participating had the project commenced during the war's escalation.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the aftermath of the Vietnam War significantly altered perceptions of technology within the realm of art, associating it with damaging military applications. Artistic collaborations that once flourished in the 1960s encountered a critical backlash, as artists endeavored to distance themselves from industry sponsorships closely linked to the war.
Knowt
Note
Studied by 517 people
