The State, The Nation, and Nationalism
The State vs the nation
State: Has complete authority within boundaries
Sovereignty: Supreme authority within the territory
Limitations: When there are border disputes, territorial integrity is a gray space
Nation-state: Citizens have a similar national identity
Japan, China, Somalia
Most states are multinational
Nationalism
Cuba: Castrow overthrew US-backed corrupt dictator. Nationalization of sugar plantations, telephone, cars
Mexico: Inclusive nationalism since 1910. Belonging to the patria (fatherland), everyone has a right to education, working rights, public control of resources
Conflicts and war
Causes: Human nature, internal structure of states, structure of the international system
Types:
Hegemonic: Shifting the distribution of power
Total war: Any sacrifice necessary
Limited war: No interest in taking another state
Civil war
Guerilla warfare: Hit and run
Preventative war: One state learns by spies that another state is trying to attack them. Strike first, eliminate threat
Preemptive war: Like preventative but attack a certain location where threat is believed to be
The Just War Doctrine:
War is a last resort and can only be waged to correct a wrong, restore justice, or defend political stability
Civilians can never be targets
There must be a reasonable chance of success
The Fourteen Points: Woodrow Wilson’s response to Lenin
The first five points focus on an “open world”
The next eight points focus on self-determination for Europe’s national minorities
The last point focuses on a “general association of nations” so all states have equal vote in an international assembly
Led to The Treaty of Versailles (which heavily punished Germany)
The Cold War
ICP- International Communist Party- World Communism
Russia was not invited to The Treaty of Versailles
Then post WW2, there was disagreement on how to unify Germany
1949: Mao has victory in China, it is now the largest communist state
Sputnik: (1957) Russia launches Sputnik 1 + 2. The first artificial Earth satellites
Explorer 1 + 2: (1958) The US’s responses to Sputnik
Cuban Missile Crisis: (1962) US imposes arms blockade in Cuba after finding offensive missile sites.
This was the closest point to nuclear warfare. SU and US begin negotiations of reducing strategic arms
SALT 1: (1969) Lead to the Anti-ballistic missile
START: (2011) Reduced offensive weapons
Impact
The Cold War led to a bipolar international structure
3rd world countries could play off superpowers because superpowers needed support
Non-aligned movement: Improving developing countries, decolonization
Superpower proxy wars in Asia, Africa
The Soviet Union collapsed leading to a unipolar world
National Security
Definition and Scope
In recent times, security has broadened from focusing on military to health, economics, environmental, food, and cybersecurity
It is deepening from the state to the individual
Theorizing national security
Realism: External threats
The fundamental interest of states is security
Statism: States are central actors
Survival: The central policy goal
Self-help: Take necessary steps to ensure survivial
Security dilemma: Building defense in one state is threatening to another
Liberalism: A collective and common security. You need to work with the enemy
Develop international rules and cooperative institutions
R2P
Constructivism: Security and threats are social constructs
Norms (what’s deemed appropriate for policy) control international politics
Security communities: Transnational values and collective security interests (ex: EU, NATO)
Feminist theory: Security is emancipation from dominaiton
Create a more just and less violent society
Also looks at unequal reprecussions of environmental, poverty, and structural violence issues
Fundamental elements of national security
Socio-political stability: Achieving peace among all citizens regardless of race, ethnicity, social status, etc.
Common values allow for common identity and nationalism
Without socio-political stability, national security is threatened
Territorial integrity: Ensuring a national territory has effective control by a government and state
Needs a strong and well-equipped military
Economic solidarity and strength: Ensures a strong livelihood for all individuals
International Terrorism
Terrorism: Premeditated violence (or threat of violence) against a government or their citizens to achieve political ends
Typically considered a method of last resort
Collective responsibility: Terrorists argue civilians who die are paying the price for being on the side causing injustice
The first case of modern terrorism was the assassination of Tsar Alexander II in 1881
Look below
Suicide terrorism: Began with Hezbollah in 1983
Major psychological impact on enemy
Easy and inexpensive
Destructive in terms of numbers killed and property is destroyed
Self-sacrifice has a legitimating effect on a cause
Eternal life
Strategies for countering terrorism
Realists: Define terrorism as non-state actors engage in intimidation, pose assymetrical threats (weak entity attempting gains over a stronger one)
Realists will monitor and prevent terrorism with preemptive strategies. They will use punishment, confiscation, and pressure
Liberalists: State we must understand terrorism and its roots. We need to distinguish terrorism from legitimate struggles for freedom
Liberalists will monitor by condemnation, policy change, improving social/economic conditions, and educational campaigns
Constructivists: State terrorism is based on perception and counterterrorism is a construct. They seek to understand motivations, identities, and ideas
Constructivists believe we can shape ideas of the terrorists
Diplomacy and foreign policy
Foreign policy is strategies a state utilizes when interacting with others (focusing on defense, security, economics, etc.) while diplomacy means being diplomatic while working on the foreign policy
The greatest priority of the state is to exist
Bilateral diplomacy: Conduct of interactions between two states
Old diplomacy- before WW2
Multilateral diplomacy: Interactions between 3+ parties with intergovernmental organizations
IGOs (EU, UN, NATO)
INGOs (Doctors w/out borders, Green Peace, WHO)
Factors influencing foreign policy making
Global-level factors: How interdependent we are with other countries
State-level factors: Geographic location, natural resources, military, etc.
Individual-level factors: Role of political/governmental leaders (personalities, beliefs)
Explaining foreign policy
Rational actor model: Each country is a unitary actor
There is a head of state responsible for foreign policy
Foreign policy decisions are based on the head of state’s capacity to execute them
Organizational Perspective/Process Model: Organizations view foreign policy issues as opportunities or threats to their mission
Political perspective/bureaucratic policy model: All decisions by leaders are political in nature
All decisions spur from bargaining, arguing, compromising
Individual perspective: Decision makers differ in their style and perspective
Active presidents are energetic and ready to take responsibility
Passive presidents are cautious and avoid controversy
Nationalists
Militarists
Bunker mentality: Being affected by paranoia (Nixon wiretapped opponents- Watergate)
Conclusions
There is no rationality in FP decision-making
Bounded rationality: We assume we have all the advice needed to make the best decisions possible
Satisficing behavior: Satisfactory and sufficient. Doing the bare minimum to succeed
International law
International law: Rules and principles dictating the relationship between international actors and individuals/groups during peace and conflict
Major branches:
Human rights law
Criminal law
Dipomatic law
Environmental law
The Law of Treaties
The Law of the Sea
International Trade Law
International Space Law
The 5 subjects
States
Individuals
Public international organizations (UN, EU, NATO)
Transnational corporations (McDonalds, Toyota)
Entities (Palestine, Vatican City)
Sources of international law
Treaties: Legally binding contracts signed bewteen states. Can be particiular, general, bilateral, multilateral
Customary rules: International customs accepted as law. Binding on states
General principle of law: Logical responses by subjects that come from judicial reasoning, based on what has already been decided in international law
Judicial decision: Decisions of international courts and tribunals (tribunals work on specific areas of law and are temporary)
Peremptory norms: Principles that are accepted and recognized by states as norms
Resolutions of international organizations: A source of international law with respect to matters in question
Non-binding standards: (Soft law). Expression of intent by international communities
Why states obey international law
Most states follow international law even though there is no central enforcement
Self-interest: States benefit from living in a world with order
Punishment: Other members of the internal system may punish them
Reputation: Every state wants to be seen as legitimate and trustworthy
International Relations
IGOs: International Organizations
PIOs: Public International Organizations (World Bank, UNiCEF)
INGOs: International Nongovernmental Organizations (Doctors w/out Borders)
MNCs: Multinational Corporations (McDonald’s, Toyota)
Preamble to UN Charter
The people of the UN will
Save future generations from war
Reaffirm prioritization of human rights and social progress
Respect obligations of treaties
Purposes of the United Nations
The League of Nations failed to prevent WW2 so it is picking up from there- maintain peace and security
Organs of the United Nations
General assembly
Meets once per year to deliberate on the UN’s budget
Elects non-permanent members of the Security Council and Secretary General
Makes recommendations on principles of cooperation
Considers reports from the Security Council
Security Council
5 permanent members (US, UK, France, China, Russia) and 10 rotating members
Maintain international peace and security, investigate disputes
Determine the weight of a threat
Call on members to use economics to settle disputes and not force
Recommend appointment of Secretary General
Economic and Social Council
54 members, elected by the General Assembly
Discusses economics and social rights
Promotes nation development
Trusteeship council (no longer exists)
Ensured that trust territories (territories of Germany, Italy, Japan) were regulated in the best interest of their people
International Court of Justice
15 justices appointed by the General Assembly and Security Council
Makes binding decisions on international law, hears disputes brought up by states
Secretariat
The executive arm of the UN
The main source of economic and political development
Appoints heads of peacekeeping functions
Headed by the Secretary General
Notable UN Achievements
Has protected the world from another hegemonic war
Has saved the pyramids and other World Heritage Sites
Has destroyed smallpox with WHO
Works to protect the ozone
UN Major Failures
Rwanda genocide (1994): The UN knew about an impending genocide but failed to stop it
Srebrenica (1995): A massacre of 8000+ Bosnian Muslim men by the Serbs
Iraq oil for food program: If Iraq gave oil, the UN was supposed to channel money to them for food and medicine but a lot of it went through private pockets
Rape and child sex abuse in Congo (2005): Peacekeepers did not protect women and young girls. They even contributed to the issue
Spreading cholera in Haiti (2010): Nepali peacekeepers caused 700,000 to be infected and 8000 to die
The North vs. South → Poverty, Inequality, Development
Global North vs Global South
Term is inaccurate because it homologizes all northern countries as developed and all southern ones as underdeveloped
Modernization theory: All societies go through a process of development from traditional to modernity
Enhancement of GNP (Gross National Product) is the best method for development
Dependency theory: Under-development does not come from a continuing “traditional society’ but the expansion of capitalism and exploitation
Capitalism makes peripheral countires look feudal (outdated)
Within the periphery there’s a core and within the core there’s a periphery
Washington Consensus
Washington Consensus: A macro-level economic and political restructuring for economic growth. Sovereign debt repayment, addressing poverty
SAPs (Structural Adjustment Policy).
Privitization
Liberalization
Deregulation
Cutback on social spending
Post-Washington Consensus: A shift from macro-level processes of development to addressing specific lived experiences of the poor
MDGs (Millenium Development Goals): [2000-2015]. 8 goals to reduce poverty but there was uneven progress between countries
SDGs (Sustainable Developmental Goals): [2016-2030]. 16 goals to reduce poverty, emphasizing same-pace development
Advocation for MDGs/SDGs
Development by modernization
Private rights and free market
Capitalism is the engine of economic development
Criticism of MDGs/SDGs
Entrench global poverty and inequality
Developing a country means those living there need to be relocated
Even if a country develops, only the wealthy will be benefited
Globalization
What is globalization?
Three main factors:
Religion: Globalization of christianity began with conversion of Emperor Constantine (313 AD)
Economy and empire: Voyages of exploration, industrialization, colonialism
Technology: Explosion of the information superhighway
Three perspectives of globalization:
Hyperglobalists: Globalization is real, current, and the result of technology
Positive outlook
Skepticals: Globalization doesn’t exist, this is capitalism per usual
Transformationalists: Globalization is real but is not current. It is a long-term development of human activities and ideas
Global Economic Institutions are the World Bank and GATT. They bring globalization
Global university: United Nations University in Tokyo
It is a global thinktank
Trajectories, impacts, and perils of globalization
Political trajectory: Democratization, good governance, protection of human rights
Impact:
Legitamizing voices of political dissent
Elevating society’s role in politics
Limited mandate (term limits) means the beginning of the end of dictatorship
Economic trajectory: (The Washington Consensus)- liberalizing pricing and market systems
Impact:
Expansion of the private sector
Heightened cost of living
Decrease in employment
Cuts in education
Cultural trajectory: Transmit values and ideas around the world
Impact:
Hybridization: Cultural mixing across continents
Homogenization: Reconfiguring world culture into one blend
Hegemonization: One dominating culture around the world
Humanitarianism
What is humanitarian intervention?
Protect and assist individuals in war/conflict zones by relief, rescue, and reconstruction
It exists in two forms:
Armed: (Controversial). Justified when a state abuses sovereignty for brutal and cruel treatment of citizens
Paternalism in intervention undermines claims of justified interventioin
By international organizations: More benign
Self-interested intervention is considered realist while R2P is considered idealist
Therefore, the governent uses R2P as an excuse to act in self interest
Henry Dunant: A swiss businessman who was horrified by WW2 made Red Cross (an NGO)
NGOs include: Red Cross, InterAction, International Council for Voluntary Action
There are 37,000 NGOs for humanitarian work
Cosmopolitanism: Equal human worth
Why the proliferation of humanitarian organizations?
There is a growing willingness and ability to help others at risk
Technology gives us more resources
More relief organizations
Dangers are getting worse, so we need more relief workers in war zones where
Access is difficult
Relief workers are seen by enemies as a threat or people who be captured
The R2P
Setup by the Security Council
Kofi Annan- UN Secretary General (2000). Detailed how to intervene
Comes from the international community’s failure to respond to tragedies like the 1994 Rwandan genocide
The Canadian Government set up the International Comission on Intervention and State Sovereignty in September 2000
Criteria for protection
Just cause
Right intention
Final resort
Legitimate mandate (must be a UN mandate)
Three pillars suggested to turn the concept of implementing the R2P into reality:
A state has the R2P citizens from genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity
The international community has the responsibility to assist the state in fulfilling primary responsibility (listed above)
The international community must intervene within a state by economic sanctions (military as last resort) if the state purposefully fails to fulfill primary responsibility
Human Rights
The concept of human rights
Equal and inalienable rights for all
Human rights norms create a relationship between individuals and states
Rights come from religion, the nature of the human being, and the nature of society
Philosophical roots of human rights (universalist)
Human rights derive from our essence as human beings
They can be applied in any geographical location
Every individual can use nature, God, and their own reason to prove these rights are part of our essence
Human rights surpass the legal system
Humans are the only animals endowed with rationality
Realist/positivist perception of human rights
Human rights are necessasry but may vary from culture to culture
Human rights reflct the value system of a particular society in a particular moment in history
There is no emphasis on indivudalism
Rights of a community come before rights of the individual
Human rights will improve as a country develops
A state has a responsibility to protect its population from genocide, war
crimes, crimes against humanity, and ethnic cleansing.
2. The international community has a responsibility to assist the state to fulfill its
primary responsibility.
3. If the state manifestly fails to protect its citizens from the four above mass
atrocities and peaceful measures have failed, the international community has
the responsibility to intervene through coercive measures such as economic
sanctions with military intervention as a last resort.